top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Help fight racism and protect free speech at UCSC

by UC Activist Defense Committee
Fellow UC Alumni -

We are writing to ask you to join us in supporting the UC Activist Defense Committee's campaign in defense of Alette Kendrick. Alette was targeted as a Black woman and a central organizer of the student speak-out that took place on Oct. 18, 2006, resulting in her arrest. The Office of Doug Zuidema, Student Judicial Affairs, has now announced its intention to suspend Alette for a period of 3 years—essentially a sentence of expulsion for the third year student. For more information on her case, please visit our website http://www.ucactivistdefense.org and read her personal narrative.

Alette is now being denied her constitutional right to a lawyer and a trial before a jury before her peers. Her hearing will be closed to the public, and judged by a panel of three faculty and two students. Student Judicial Affairs stalled for six months, and then notified Alette that her hearing would take place on June 6th, right in the middle of finals and just before undergraduate students will be leaving for the summer and so unable to rally in her defense. A three-year suspension would be the worst penalty ever given by the UCSC administration for political activism, and a precedent that would seriously endanger student free speech in the years to come.
alumni_letter.pdf_600_.jpg
***PLEASE FORWARD FAR AND WIDE!***

Fellow UC Alumni -

We are writing to ask you to join us in supporting the UC Activist Defense Committee's campaign in defense of Alette Kendrick. Alette was targeted as a Black woman and a central organizer of the student speak-out that took place on Oct. 18, 2006, resulting in her arrest. The Office of Doug Zuidema, Student Judicial Affairs, has now announced its intention to suspend Alette for a period of 3 years—essentially a sentence of expulsion for the third year student. For more information on her case, please scroll down to read her Personal Narrative, and visit our website http://www.ucactivistdefense.org.

Alette is now being denied her constitutional right to a lawyer and a trial before a jury before her peers. Her hearing will be closed to the public, and judged by a panel of three faculty and two students. Student Judicial Affairs stalled for six months, and then notified Alette that her hearing would take place on June 6th, right in the middle of finals and just before undergraduate students will be leaving for the summer and so unable to rally in her defense. A three-year suspension would be the worst penalty ever given by the UCSC administration for political activism, and a precedent that would seriously endanger student free speech in the years to come.

PLEASE TAKE ACTION TO DEFEND ALETTE! Alumni can support can support the campaign in the following ways:

1. Tell the Chancellor and Student Judicial Affairs what you think of racist repression.
PHONE:

You can call the chancellor at 831-459-2058, Doug Zuidema in Student Judicial Affairs at 831-459-4447

Here's a sample script you may want to use:

"Hello, my name is __________ and I graduated from __________ college in _____. I'm calling to demand that all academic charges against Alette Kendrick be dropped immediately to prevent the university from harming her any more than it already has. The police attack on Alette was racist and completely unjustified, and we will not tolerate this attack on free speech at our university."

SNAIL MAIL:

Attached as a pdf document, you will find a sample Alumni letter to the chancellor. Please print it out, sign it, and send it to Chancellor Blumenthal with CC to Doug Zuidema at these addresses:

George Blumenthal
Office of the Chancellor
200 Clark Kerr Hall
University of California
1156 High St
Santa Cruz, CA 95064

Doug Zuidema
Office of Student Judicial Affairs
245 Hahn Student Services
University of California
1156 High St
Santa Cruz, CA 95064

EMAIL:
You can also email chancellor [at] ucsc.edu, dzuidema [at] ucsc.edu, and Jean Marie Scott, Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs: jmscott [at] ucsc.edu

2. Spread the word.
Please forward this message to your alumni friends and faculty contacts before you leave the computer today. facebook, myspace, or friendster may also be useful tools.

3. Use your influence
If you are a member of an alumni association, explore passing a resolution in solidarity with Alette. The UCSC undergraduate and graduate student governments have already done so. If you have ideas about mobilizing alumni, please contact the defense committee: ucadsolidarity [at] gmail.com

4. Stay Informed
You can sign up to receive periodic campaign updates, read more, and download petitions, letters, and posters etc. at http://www.ucactivistdefense.org


In solidarity and deep thanks,
-ryan wadsworth
ryanrain [at] gmail.com 510.712.6422

UC Activist Defense Committee
http://www.ucactivistdefense.org ucadsolidarity [at] gmail.com

***********************************
A Personal Narrative By Alette Kendrick
http://www.ucactivistdefense.org/background
***********************************

*****************************
Sample letter from alumni
*****************************

George Blumenthal
Office of the Chancellor
200 Clark Kerr Hall
University of California
1156 High St
Santa Cruz, CA 95064


Acting Chancellor Blumenthal:

We are writing to express our outrage over and opposition to the unjust intention to suspend Alette Kendrick for a period of 3 years, in essence a sentence of expulsion, for participating in the October 18th protest. As Alumni, we will not tolerate racist repression at our Alma Mater.

We understand the use of police force and repression against student activists, especially female student activists of color, as representative of the hostility, antagonism, and violence that underrepresented student populations often face at UCSC and in the community. We understand the harsh ‘punishment’ specifically being sought against Alette Kendrick as endorsing the climate and expression of anti-Black aggression and intimidation. We oppose the University’s intent to punish any of our fellow students and activists, especially female activists of color, for exercising their political rights, for expressing dissent, and for practicing their right to assemble (rights the University would now seek to abridge as well). Chancellor Blumenthal, we urge you to stop any University process that would result in the suspension of Alette Kendrick.

In the wake of the October 18th protest, a memorandum issuing from your office circulated throughout the campus and expressed approval for the police response to the student protest. Such an endorsement hurt Black students at UCSC not only because it justified the dehumanizing treatment of Alette, but because it corresponded with long legacies of police brutality toward Black people, it expropriated a Black woman’s body to demonstrate the power of the state/University, and it rationalized the racial profiling and harassment so many Black UCSC students have experienced from the police.

Support of the police response through academic suspension is akin to the racist messages recently written on the bathroom walls of Baskin Engineering. It indicates the University’s participation in rendering underrepresented students, especially Black students, susceptible to the state-sanctioned or extralegal production and exploitation of group-differentiated vulnerability to premature death. By this we mean that the University has participated in the use of racial profiling to make Alette the target of the police response, has leveled severe charges and punitive measures, has subjected her to the racist and sexist criminal court system, and has created a climate of racial terror/intimidation. All of these University responses have produced conditions that isolate, exploit, and harm Alette, other Black students and students of color at UCSC.

After all, UCSC’s continued refusal to address student concerns about the lack of infrastructure for students of color (lack of faculty of color, curricula, funding for student initiated outreach/retention, etc) is an indication that UCSC’s expressed principles of community and commitment to diversity are purely rhetorical. UCSC’s continued endorsement of the police’s actions as well as UCSC’s intent to essentially suspend Alette Kendrick fundamentally proclaims UCSC’s active commitment to racial profiling, police brutality, the increase in the number of prisons, the growth of the prison population, state-sanctioned intimidation and repression, and the justification of violence.

If UCSC would truly like to abide by its stated principles of community and commitment to diversity, it must eliminate any intent to suspend Alette academically. Failure to do so would leave us with no choice but to withhold all future financial support for UCSC.


Sincerely,


Cc: Doug Zuidema
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Becky Johnson
FROM ABOVE: "Alette is now being denied her constitutional right to a lawyer and a trial before a jury before her peers."

False. Allette was charged with felony assault on a police officer (for biting the officer--something the other students charged did not do)--and had the option of a jury trial with a public defender. Her attorneys (she has two of them!) advised her during this process. Allette plead NO CONTEST (treated as a a guilty plea) to two misdemeanors in order to avoid the felony charges.

In this process, she waived her right to a jury trial before her peers. She WAS, however represented by legal counsel and I believe, she will also have legal counsel at the upcoming CIVIL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING.

Readers should know that a felony conviction would have prevented Allette from ever becoming a teacher---and it was this fact that prosecutors allege was the reason for offering the reduced misdemeanor charges.

Protesters should know that any type of physical action against an officer, no matter how slight, can result in felony assault charges. While each person makes choices about what they will or will not do during a protest, failing to understand the gravity of fighting with a police officer, or in this case biting a police officer, can be a mistake with consequences that last a lifetime.


by not becky
"Allette was charged with felony assault on a police officer (for biting the officer--something the other students charged did not do)"

Allete was CHARGED BY THE STATE for biting an officer. This does not mean that she actually did it. The other students were not charged with biting an officer.

"Allette plead NO CONTEST (treated as a a guilty plea) to two misdemeanors in order to avoid the felony charges."

Yes, but she DID NOT plead guilty to biting an officer. She went with a plea bargain.

From the Sentinel, "In a deal with the District Attorney's Office, the student, Alette Kendrick, 20, apologized for her behavior and pleaded no contest Tuesday to two misdemeanor charges for resisting arrest and disturbing a lawful public assembly. Prosecutors dropped charges of assault against a police officer in exchange for the apology, which Kendrick read before the court."
by Becky Johnson
NOT STUPID WRITES: "Allete was CHARGED BY THE STATE for biting an officer. This does not mean that she actually did it. The other students were not charged with biting an officer."

BECKY: Fact one: the prosecution initially charged her with a felony for biting an officer
Fact two: Her own account fails to either confirm nor to deny the biting incident. If fails to mention it completely ---and it's the most serious charge.

Fact three: She had excellent attorneys working for her. If she had a good case at beating the felony charges, they would have happily represented her in a jury trial.

You call me "stupid" for pointing out that Allette was not denied a jury trial. She opted to waive a jury trial and take a deal which involved dropping the felony charges. The SF Chron article also says that one reason the deal came about was that the officer was not seriously injured.

So many comments and threads here have been devoted to the differential treatment Allette is getting vs the two other students who were arrested.
I am pointing out that in no case, either from the prosecution, the University, or eye-witnesses sympathetic towards Allette's cause have they grappled with the fact that only Allette was accused by the prosecution of biting a police officer.

If she, and only she, committed this offense, then its reasonable for her charges to be more severe than those of the other students based on differing behaviors having nothing to do with Skin color or prior activism on campus.

Unless and until Allette's defense committee address the differing set of charges for the three defendants, they will have failed to make their case---that this is a racially motivated punishment. Angela Davis or not.
by BorderRaven
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. MLK, Jr.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$330.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network