$1572.00 donated in past month
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
U.S. v Wolf Huge First Amendment Victory in America
As Wolf's heroic contribution to the cause of a free press may be about to come to an end, the debate is sure to continue and one expects that Wolf has been handed a voice that he will use to share a personal victory with all who value freedom of the press throughout the world. With it comes another lesson to leaders who too often forget that the heart of a free people beats not in a document, or in a seat of power, but in those who stand up for liberty against oppression.
U.S. v WOLF HUGE FIRST AMENDMENT VICTORY IN AMERICA
RALLY & PRESS CONFERENCE TODAY AT 5 PM ON STEPS OF SF CITY HALL
by Howard Vicini
San Francisco - The release of 24 year old journalist, Josh Wolf, is imminant according to his press representative, Lisa Cohen. Lawyer's for imprisoned vBlogger, Josh Wolf, and the federal prosecutor filed separate motions to release Wolf from coercive custody during mediation before U.S. Magistrate Joseph Spero, on Monday.
A press conference and rally for Wolf will be held today at 5 pm on the steps of San Francisco City Hall.
A hint of a resolution in the case came when Wolf released his unedited video of a 2005 protest on his blog site this morning that was the target of the federal grand jury subpoena that caused him to be held at the federal holding facility, in Dublin CA, now at 226 days, a record amount of time for any coercive action against a journalist in the United States history.
At the beginning of public controversy surrounding the case, Wolf successfully invoked the California shield law causing prosecutors to move the case to federal jurisdiction under a controversial homeland security claim and debate erupted over whether or not the 24 year old Wolf held a fair claim to being a journalist. Still a student at the time he shot the video in 2005, he was at the very least an aspiring journalist by any standard with sales of some video to local broadcasters under his belt.
Therefore, what seemed to be driving the debate was Wolf's own admission that he is a member of the group, Anarchist Action, that he was covering as the principal organizers of the protest against a G-8 meeting being held in Scotland, raising the specter that the case was a federal attempt to censure a journalist because of his beliefs. Though the debate over the status of bloggers as journalists was raised to the lofty heights of the New York Times and the Washington Post by journalists on both sides of the issue, professional journalism organizations weighed in heavily in support of Wolf with awards and monetary support to his defense fund that dwarfed his experience.
As Wolf's heroic stand for the cause of a free press is about to come to an end, the debate is sure to continue and one expects that Wolf has been handed a voice that he will use to share a personal victory with all who value freedom of the press throughout the world. With it comes another lesson to leaders who too often forget that the heart of a free people beats not in a document, or in a seat of power, but in those who stand up for liberty against oppression.