From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
San Francisco Supervisors Should Take Control of Housing Authority
The scene has been happening for decades: low-income tenants complaining at City Hall hearings about the lack of repairs, inadequate staffing, and other problems in housing projects operated by the SF Housing Authority. As Supervisors earn cheers by vowing to make the Housing Authority perform its job, ignored is the question of why they and their colleagues have not stepped in to take responsibility for the failed agency. Progressives regularly bemoan the decline in San Francisco’s African-American population---yet they have not safeguarded the housing stock where many of the city’s black residents live. The Board of Supervisors can vote to abolish the Housing Authority Commission and replace it with itself---and if it does not act quickly, the city’s largest supply of low-cost family housing will be sharply eroded.
After former Mayor Art Agnos wrote an editorial about the San Francisco Housing Authority in the March 11 San Francisco Chronicle, I asked longtime Agnos critic Barbara Meskunas, a former chair of the San Francisco Housing Authority Commission and currently an aide to Supervisor Ed Jew, what she thought of his analysis. “ It was great,” she said, “he got everything right except I thought six kids rather than five died in the 1997 Housing Authority fire.”
When Agnos and Meskunas are on the same page, there is clearly a broad consensus over the need for systemic change at the SFHA.
Agnos was the last Mayor who really made improving conditions for Housing Authority tenants a priority---and it did him little good politically, as voters defeated him for re-election. Other mayors have seen little upside in getting into political fights with entrenched and politically powerful interests on behalf of a constituency that does not give campaign contributions and whose voting is infrequent at best.
When Terrence Hallinan was on the Board of Supervisors in the early 1990’s, he held hearings on the issue of the Board taking control over public housing. Opposition was strong, and the idea went nowhere.
In 2001, Supervisor Matt Gonzalez floated the idea of a Supervisors takeover and held a hearing to get input. The Housing Authority organized a march opposing any discussion of the idea, and speakers accused Gonzalez of racism for raising the issue even though a proposed takeover was not even on the meeting agenda.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=4292#more
When Agnos and Meskunas are on the same page, there is clearly a broad consensus over the need for systemic change at the SFHA.
Agnos was the last Mayor who really made improving conditions for Housing Authority tenants a priority---and it did him little good politically, as voters defeated him for re-election. Other mayors have seen little upside in getting into political fights with entrenched and politically powerful interests on behalf of a constituency that does not give campaign contributions and whose voting is infrequent at best.
When Terrence Hallinan was on the Board of Supervisors in the early 1990’s, he held hearings on the issue of the Board taking control over public housing. Opposition was strong, and the idea went nowhere.
In 2001, Supervisor Matt Gonzalez floated the idea of a Supervisors takeover and held a hearing to get input. The Housing Authority organized a march opposing any discussion of the idea, and speakers accused Gonzalez of racism for raising the issue even though a proposed takeover was not even on the meeting agenda.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=4292#more
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network