From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Democrats Coalesce – FINALLY! – Around Plans to Withdraw
The House and Senate resolutions on Iraq that the party leadership introduced on March 8th are historic for two reasons: (a) Congress would finally use its power of the purse to bring our troops home – after the President has made it clear that he won’t listen to a “non-binding” resolution, and (b) it sets an actual deadline to get out of Iraq. While it doesn’t call for an immediate withdrawal, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid deserve credit for finally getting the message that Congress must pass binding legislation that will put an end to this madness. While it’s still an open question if they have the votes to get it approved – not to mention signed into law – Pelosi urged her colleagues not to constrain their efforts like that, because it’s “too limiting a factor."
This is not the first time that Congress has voted on legislation to get us out of Iraq, but it’s the first time that Democratic leaders (who now run both houses) have endorsed such efforts. Progressives like Barbara Lee, Dennis Kucinich and Lynn Woolsey have been pushing this for years, but Pelosi did not support it – and their measures went down to defeat. In the Senate last year, Russ Feingold and John Kerry introduced a binding resolution to get us out by July 2007 – but only 13 Senators voted for it. What the Democrats in Congress are finally doing is incredibly important, and concerned citizens should lobby their legislators to get it passed.
Here’s what it does. The Senate version directs the President to transition the mission for U.S. forces in Iraq and begin a phased redeployment in 120 days – with a goal of complete withdrawal by the end of March 2008. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will bring this to a vote on the Senate floor tomorrow.
The House version conditions funding for the War on having our troops fully prepared, and requires the Iraqi government to set benchmarks on getting the country in order. It calls for a complete withdrawal to begin no later than March 2008, and earlier if the Iraqi government fails to make progress beforehand. Because it’s an Appropriation bill, it has to first go to the House Appropriations Committee – who will vote on it this week.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=4288#more
Here’s what it does. The Senate version directs the President to transition the mission for U.S. forces in Iraq and begin a phased redeployment in 120 days – with a goal of complete withdrawal by the end of March 2008. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will bring this to a vote on the Senate floor tomorrow.
The House version conditions funding for the War on having our troops fully prepared, and requires the Iraqi government to set benchmarks on getting the country in order. It calls for a complete withdrawal to begin no later than March 2008, and earlier if the Iraqi government fails to make progress beforehand. Because it’s an Appropriation bill, it has to first go to the House Appropriations Committee – who will vote on it this week.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=4288#more
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
this is BS
Mon, Mar 12, 2007 11:18AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network