A message from Leonard Peltier

Forwarded from LPDC:

From: info at leonardpeltier.net
Subject: A message from Leonard Peltier, from the Leonard
Peltier Defense Committee
Date: January 7, 2007 5:51:50 PM PST


To: Leonard Peltier Supporters
From: Leonard Peltier Defense Committee
Subject: A message from Leonard Peltier


"Much of the government's behavior at the Pine Ridge Reservation and
in its
prosecution of Mr. Peltier is to be condemned. The government withheld
evidence. It intimidated witnesses. These facts are not disputed."



BACKGROUND

For over 30 years I have sought justice from the United States Courts
which
have failed to provide me with any relief despite acknowledging numerous
acts of Government misconduct. For example, after my trial, my lawyers
issued Freedom of Information Act Requests ("FOIA") and discovered
that the
Government fabricated the ballistics evidence which it used at trial to
argue that I shot the agents in cold blood. Once we revealed this
egregious
misconduct, the Government has had to admit on several occasions in open
Court and before the Parole Commission that it could not prove I shot
the
agents and that it could not prove who shot the agents.

Despite the Government misconduct recognized by the Courts, I remain in
prison. When we exposed the Government misconduct, the Government
stopped
arguing that I "shot the agents," and began arguing that my conviction
should be upheld on aiding and abetting grounds, even though the only
two
people I could have aided and abetted, Robert Robideau and Dino
Butler, were
acquitted on self-defense grounds. In the Robideau and Butler trials,
the
Court allowed them to present evidence to show that they where
shooting in
self defense at unknown assailants who were shooting at houses
occupied by
women and children. In contrast, my case was moved to another Judge,
Judge
Benson, who prevented me from introducing evidence of self-defense and
evidence of the war-like climate that existed on the Pine Ridge Indian
Reservation because of marauding groups of vigilantes hired by a corrupt
tribal government, supported by the United States government.

Just as significant, no Court has ever explained how my conviction
could be
upheld on aiding and abetting grounds since I could not aid and abet
myself,
and I could not aid and abet my co-defendants since they were
acquitted. So,
just who did I aid and abet to warrant two consecutive life
sentences? The
Courts and the Government cannot answer that question. Yet, I remain in
prison.

My case demonstrates the illegal means which our Government will
utilize to
ensure that I, a native American, am punished for the death of two FBI
agents, without regard to whether I did it, which I did not, and without
regard to the deprivation of my rights. All the Government cared
about was
that someone was punished for an incident provoked by the FBI, the
corrupt
tribal government, and its private police, known as the GOON squad.
And yet,
I remain in prison.

The United States Government keeps me imprisoned to justify the
continuing
abuses against, not only Native American people, but anyone who seeks to
fight criminal abuses such as those committed and/or aided by the FBI
on the
Pine Ridge Indian Reservation between 1973-1976. This Country has
waged, and
continues to wage, war not just against native Americans but against any
form of domestic political dissent. Secret domestic intelligence
programs,
such as the well documented Cointelpro program and the Patriot Act, have
eroded and destroy the constitutional rights and liberties of all
peoples of
this Nation. But, most people would rather ignore injustice, then take a
stand against injustice and face the wrath of our Government. What I
was not
allowed to introduce into evidence was the indisputable evidence that
United
States Government and a corrupt tribal government committed war crimes
against the Oglala people during the so-called "Reign of Terror," from
1973-1976. Yet, these crimes have never been uninvestigated, and, if
anything, they have been ignored and certain propagandists have revised
history to say they never occurred, similar to those who espouse that
the
genocide of Native American people never occurred in the Americas.
The one
exception is the murder of Anna Mae Aquash which the United States
Government began pursuing earnestly nearly 30 years after her death, in
order to smear me to harm my chances at parole through the use of
hearsay
testimony and unsubstantiated innuendo. I unequivocally deny that I had
anything to do with the murder of Anna Mae, and I condemn those who
murdered
her and those who seek to smear me and make me a patsy for the crime
they
committed.

The indisputable Government misconduct which led to my wrongful
conviction
represents a threat to the liberties of each and every one of us.
Perhaps
this is what ultimately struck the conscience of Judge Heaney (a
judge of
the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit who despite
the
glaring evidence of Government misconduct, wrote a strained and legally
embarrassing decision to deny my first habeas petition), and
compelled him
to write a letter supporting my request for presidential clemency.

As recently as the fall of 2003, the United States Court of
Appeals for
the Tenth Circuit stated:

Much of the government's behavior at the Pine Ridge Reservation and
in its
prosecution of Mr. Peltier is to be condemned. The government withheld
evidence. It intimidated witnesses. These facts are not disputed.

As my lawyers wrote in a recent brief, the United States Court of
Appeals
for the Eighth Circuit has repeatedly recognized specific instances
of FBI
misconduct in my case: The Eighth Circuit found that the FBI withheld
critical ballistics evidence which raised questions "regarding the
truth and
accuracy of [FBI agent Evan] Hodge's testimony." The Eighth Circuit
acknowledged that the FBI withheld critical evidence which was "newly
discovered evidence indicating [that the government's ballistic's
expert]
may not have been telling the truth," and that the evidence withheld
by the
FBI created "inconsistencies casting strong doubts upon the government's
case."

The Eighth Circuit also addressed the government's coercing of
witnesses and
extracting perjurious affidavits including the three fabricated
affidavits
of Myrtle Poor Bear which were used to extradite me from Canada. The FBI
knew that Ms. Poor Bear was mentally incompetent. Yet, they had her sign
three fabricated affidavits which falsely stated that she was my
girlfriend
and that she saw me kill Agents Coler and Williams. Poor Bear never
knew me,
and she was never at the Jumping Bull Compound on June 26, 1975, or any
other date that I am aware of. The Eighth Circuit described the
Myrtle Poor
Bear episode as follows:

In February and March, 1976, Myrtle Poor Bear signed three affidavits
which
related her eyewitness account of the murders of the two agents on
June 26,
1975. Two of these affidavits were considered by Canadian officials
in the
extradition proceedings. In testimony given outside of the presence
of the
jury at the trial, Poor Bear disclaimed virtually every allegation
contained
in the affidavits. She testified that she had been forced to sign the
affidavits, which were prepared by FBI agents Price and Wood, under
threats
of physical harm.

The Eighth Circuit court recognized that "[t]he Poor
Bear....testimony was
certainly consistent with [my] theory [that the FBI framed me by
manufacturing evidence and inducing witnesses to testify in
accordance with
its theory of the murders.]" Even in the face of this fraud, one of the
prosecutors, Lynn Crooks, belligerently stated on television in 1990
that,
even if he knew the affidavits were false, he still would not have
hesitated
to provide them to the Canadian prosecutor.

THE FBI'S ILLEGALL TACTICS IN ITS WAR ON THE AMERICAN INDIAN MOVEMENT
AND ME

I was a member of the American Indian Movement who, like many others,
was
subjected to a number of Counterintelligence (COINTELPRO) type
activities by
the FBI. "COINTELPRO" is the FBI acronym for a series of covert action
programs directed against political domestic groups. This program was
investigated and condemned by a Congressional hearing in the 1970s. With
this unauthorized program, the FBI engaged in covert actions designed to
'disrupt' and 'neutralize' target groups and individuals," engaged in
political dissent. One of the COINTELPRO type tactics used by the FBI
and,
in particular against AIM, was the infiltration of the legal defense
by paid
informants, violating attorney-client privilege. We have recently
discovered
evidence that the FBI did this in my case.

RECENTLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE

In the face of Court expressions acknowledging and condemning the
Government
misconduct, the Courts continue to allow the FBI to engage in wrongful
behavior by allowing them to withhold more than 140,000 documents
which are
located in FBI Field Offices throughout the country. Despite the
passage of
over 30 years, the Courts have justified the FBI's behavior by ruling
that
the Informant Files in my case must be protected because the release
of such
documents could impact the war on "international terrorism." Such a
ludicrous and unfathomable reason can only undermine any remaining
confidence we could possibly have that our system is based on justice
and
fairness.

With respect to AIM, and me in particular, we now know that the FBI used
confidential informant sources to compromise attorney/client
communications
they illegally used to develop strategies for conviction. We recently
discovered FOIA documents establishing that the FBI utilized Douglas
Durham,
a paid FBI confidential source who infiltrated the highest levels of
AIM and
was exposed on March 7, 1975, in my extradition proceedings from
Canada. As
one Court recognized, "Mr. Douglass Durham, infiltrated the American
Indian
Movement under instructions of the FBI, won the confidence of Dennis
Banks
and other leaders of the movement, occupied a series of high level
positions
in the organization."

These FOIA documents show that the FBI utilized Durham not only to
provide
information to William Halprin, the Chief Prosecutor from Canada,
against me
in connection with the extradition proceedings, but also as an "expert
adviser on AIM." Halprin requested Durham's involvement "to enable
him to
utilize the source [Durham] to refute statements made by Peltier's
defense."
To purportedly avoid legal liability, Durham was told by the FBI not to
execute any affidavits or to travel to Canada. "Durham has been
instructed
to provide information requested by Crown Attorney [and] .. If
recontacted
by Halprin, he would cooperate fully and would keep Omaha [FBI]
advised of
developments."

As my attorneys recently wrote, the Courts have indicated that this
type of
conduct crosses the line:

The informant, Douglass Durham, had worked in various undercover
capacities
prior to the Wounded Knee incident. His relationship with the FBI
began in
March 1973 when he supplied the FBI office in Des Moines, Iowa, with
copies
of photographs he had taken in a one-day visit to Wounded Knee. He later
served in various leadership positions within AIM, including national
security director and national administrator. He became a close
companion of
AIM leader Dennis Banks during the period including the Banks-Means
trial in
St. Paul. Throughout this period of intimate affiliation with AIM and
its
leaders, he was supplying information to the FBI.

In analyzing this issue, the Eighth Circuit described the troubling
conduct
by the FBI:

Were we concerned on this appeal with the question of whether the
convictions of Dennis Banks and Russell Means, tried in St. Paul,
could be
upheld, we would have another case. There is evidence in the record
and FBI
files to indicate that Durham was privy to numerous conversations
between
Banks and his lawyers, that he was present in St. Paul during the
course of
the trial, and that he was in constant communication not only with
Banks and
the other defendants during the trial, but with the FBI. As the
record here
is devoid of that type of close proximity to the defense of these
appellants
and as no prejudice has been shown, we refuse to set aside the
convictions
of the appellants because of the activities of the informants.

The FBI permitted informants to attend both my trial and that of my
co-defendants. In an FBI internal memo, the FBI discussed the
circumstances
under which informant sources could be approved to go to our trials: "If
approved by FBIHQ, sources should be specifically instructed to
refrain from
being parties to Defense Litigation strategies. Furthermore, they
should be
instructed that in the event they are unexpectedly placed in the
position of
being parties to such discussions, they should, where their informant
status
will not be compromised, leave such discussions immediately."

Durham himself acknowledged that this caution was little more than a
wink
and a smile. In the Wounded Knee Trials, Douglas Durham was similarly
advised by the FBI not to engage in any activity that would violate
confidences of the defense, nor to engage in any activities or relate
to the
FBI any information that had to do with defense tactics, or any legal
aspect
of the operations of AIM or the defense at that point. In spite of the
advice he allegedly received from the FBI, Mr. Durham testified in the
United States Senate about the 1974 trial of AIM leader Dennis Banks:
"If
Dennis and I were sitting in a room and an attorney would walk in and
start
talking, I couldn't jump up and say, 'I can't be here, the FBI won't
allow
it.'"

In a Teletype dated July 7, 1975 from the Special Agent in Charge of the
Buffalo Field Office of the FBI to the FBI Director and Mr. Richard
Held,
Special Agent in Charge, Pine Ridge, South Dakota, The FBI indicated
that a
confidential source, much like Durham was allegedly advised by the
FBI not
to engage in any activity that would violate any confidences of my
defense.
The FBI however refuses to produce the name(s) of their informants
and has
been given unfettered discretion by the courts to keep this
information from
my legal team.

Despite our discovering this information, the Courts have let the
Government
be the arbiter of what documents to produce and what they can
withhold. As
such, the FBI has unfettered discretion to withhold documents from
which it
can be determined whether it engaged in misconduct, because it will not
acknowledge it. As it is, the FBI deliberately failed to produce any
documents from the time period of my trial in the exemplar of documents
which it recently produced to the Court to allow it to determine
whether the
informant documents should be produced to me in an unredacted form.
It is
clear that it did so to prevent me from finding information they have
hid
that could affect my due process rights.

Indeed, a document recently produced by the FBI and recently
introduced by
my lawyers to a Magistrate Judge established that the FBI
intentionally took
actions to try to avoid producing documents in discovery in my case. But
again, this seems to have had no impact on the Court. The United States
Federal Courts have recognized overwhelming evidence of FBI
misconduct in my
case which has already been revealed, yet it has continued to allow
the FBI
to use exemptions under FOIA to shield its illegal tactics in this case,
depriving me of my rights to a fair trail. I urge all of you who
believe in
justice to join my fight and cry out for the production of all documents
related to my case. Why is the FBI still withholding documents? Why
won't
they produce all documents to me? To me the answer is obvious. I
believe the
answer is obvious to you also.





Leonard Peltier
# 89637-132
U.S.P. Lewisburg,
P.O. Box 1000,
Lewisburg, PA USA 17837

Leonard Peltier Defense Committee Website:
http://www.leonardpeltier.net <http://www.leonardpeltier.net/>
E-mail: info [at] leonardpeltier.net