top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Calendar
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Lt. Watada hearing tackles free speech for soldiers, relevancy of truth

by Jeff Paterson, Courage to Resist (jeff [at] paterson.net)
Lt. Ehren Watada sat before military judge Lieutenant Colonel John Head for a pre-trial hearing yesterday that will go a long way to defining what will, and will not, be allowed by the defense during the full court martial when it begins on February 5.
1-watada.jpg

Watada hearing tackles free speech for soldiers, relevancy of truth

Jeff Paterson, Courage to Resist. January 5, 2007

FORT LEWIS, WA – More than a hundred people rallied yesterday morning at the gates of Fort Lewis, Washington in support of Army First Lieutenant Ehren Watada, the first officer to publicly refuse to fight in Iraq.

About a mile away, Lt. Watada sat before military judge Lieutenant Colonel John Head for a pre-trial hearing that will go a long way to defining what will, and will not, be allowed by the defense during the full court martial when it begins on February 5.

Lt. Watada faces two years in a military prison for “missing movement” as result from his refusal to board a plane to Iraq with the First Stryker Brigade last June. Additionally, he faces four additional years, one year per count of “conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman,” resulting from statements he made to the press.

Journalists and anti-war activists subpoenaed for Army prosecution

During the proceedings, lead prosecutor Captain Daniel Kuecker repeatedly defended his subpoenas of civilian reporters Sarah Olson and Gregg Kakesako, and Seattle-area anti-war activists Phan Nguyen and Gerri Haynes, as “relevant” and “admissible” for the prosecution.

Lt. Col. Head dismissed the subpoenas for reporters and activists to appear at yesterday’s pre-trial hearing less than two days prior. Although Lt. Col. Head expressed some skepticism regarding this possible subpoenaed testimony, these reporters and activists remain under order to take the stand on February 5. They are being ordered to help send Lt. Watada to prison for his public explanations as to why he did not deploy to Iraq – or face six months in prison and a $500 fine for contempt of a military court.

In a lengthy feature in today’s San Francisco Chronicle, independent journalist Sarah Olson declared, "Journalists should not be asked to participate in the prosecution of political speech. Dragging a journalist into court like this really damages the barrier between press and government. When speech is the crime, the journalist really can be the investigative arm, the eyes and ears of the government." She has received public support from the national association of Military Reporters and Editors, along with the PEN-USA. See www.FreePressWG.org for more information.

Where does the First Amendment end for military servicepersons?

The morning session of yesterday’s hearing turned on the vague question of what exactly are the limits of free speech for members of the military. Military case law regarding outspoken anti-war Vietnam-era GI’s was addressed, along with that of white racists in the military.

Lt. Watada’s civilian defense attorney Eric Seitz of Honolulu, Hawaii opened by declaring that, “First, there is nothing wrong with the statements Lt. Watada made. There is simply no offense. Second, attempting to prosecute these types of statements raise significant constitutional problems. Finally, this is a selective prosecution of speech in retaliation for Lt. Watada not deploying to Iraq.”

Judge Lt. Col. Head challenged all parties to answer what test he should apply to political speech. This led Capt. Kuecker, the military prosecutor, to grudgingly acknowledge that the First Amendment does indeed apply to members of the military. Seitz added that even “forceful” political speech is allowed, as long as it’s not “contemptuous.”

Kuecker acknowledged that the government is actually charging Lt. Watada with “contempt of government officials” under the nebulas “conduct unbecoming of an officer and gentleman” article of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

“Lt. Watada’s speech was offensive to the military,” and as such was illegal, claimed Kuecker. Head rhetorically asked if all statements “offensive to the military” are punishable by court martial?”

Larry Mosqueda, a local supporter of Lt. Watada who viewed the proceedings from a spectator overflow room near the courtroom remarked, “The prosecutions case is extraordinarily weak, and incompetently presented.”

For authentication, the Army noted that a crime lab has analyzed the video recording of Lt. Watada presenting a speech to hundreds of military veterans at the Veterans for Peace National Convention held last August in Seattle.

Is the legality of the Iraq War an irrelevant political question?

At the core of Lt. Watada public refusal to deploy to Iraq is his understanding that the Iraq occupation war is not only morally wrong, but illegal based on both international and U.S. law. To that end, defense attorney Eric Seitz promised to “present overwhelming evidence that the war is illegal, beyond any doubt.” Kuecker later retorted, “We don’t believe EVERY legal scholar will find the war illegal.”

The prosecution, and likely the judge as well, would like to see the legality of the war as purely a political question. If so, “This court is not authorized to hear that. It’s a non-judicial question,” asserted Kuecker.

“But hasn’t the prosecution made these questions relevant by the way you have charged this case? Aren’t you trying to block these issues for coming in the front door, but opening up the back door?” asked Judge Head. “You have charged motive as an offense.”

Seitz asserted that “The legality of the Iraq War is not merely a political question. Lt. Watada’s specific intent was to avoid unlawful actions in Iraq… For the sake of due process, we need the opportunity to raise this issue.”

“Conduct charges might help Watada's defense” read yesterday’s headline of The Olympian newspaper in summing up the prosecutions significant contradictions and problems.

During a break in the pre-trial hearing, Lt. Watada briefly greeted reporters out side the military courtroom. Later that evening at a nearby press conference for Lt. Watada’s family and attorneys, Lt. Watada again chose to not make any public statements.

Seitz explained that Lt. Watada was literally facing additional years of imprisonment for simply speaking. During the hearing, Seitz pointed out that when Lt. Watada takes the stand in his own defense and explains his objections to the war, these statements alone could well be the basis for additional charges of conduct unbecoming and officer and gentleman.

At the end of the day, Lt. Watada’s father Robert offered “My son is resolute, and I’m so proud of him. While I was on Fort Lewis another Lieutenant came up to me and said, “It’s such a load of crap what they are trying to do to your son.””

Support Lt. Watada – Refuse Illegal War

Supporters are asked to write Lt. General James Dubik, Commanding General Fort Lewis, 1 Corps Building 2025 Stop 1, Fort Lewis WA 98433. Please request that General Dubik “Dismiss all charges and honor Lt. Watada's long-standing resignation from the U.S. Army.”

A Citizens' Hearings is being convened January 20-22 at Evergreen State College, Tacoma campus in order to fully evaluate Lt. Watada’s claims regarding the legality and morality of the Iraq War. Confirmed witness include: Daniel Ellsberg, military analyst who released the Pentagon Papers in the Vietnam War; Denis Halliday, former UN Assistant Secretary General; Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University. For more information: www.WarTribunal.org

Finally, help spread the word about the regional mobilization at Fort Lewis on day Lt. Watada’s court martial is scheduled to begin on February 5, or organize your own local protest in solidarity on that day. For more information: www.ThankYouLt.org or www.CourageToResist.org

Related Categories: U.S. | Anti-War
§Mother Caroyln Ho, step mother Rosa, father Bob Watada, and Lt. Ehren Watada
by Jeff Paterson, Courage to Resist
2-family.jpg
§Father Bob Watada and Lt. Ehren Watada
by Jeff Paterson, Courage to Resist
3-father-son.jpg
§Mother Carolyn Ho and Lt. Ehren Watada
by Jeff Paterson, Courage to Resist
4-ho-watada.jpg
§Lt. Ehren Watada outside Fort Lewis, Washington military court room
by Jeff Paterson, Courage to Resist
5-watada-cannon.jpg
§Lt. Ehren Watada and family walking outside of Fort Lewis, Washington military court room
by Jeff Paterson, Courage to Resist
6-watada-walking.jpg
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by thankful reader
this information is very crucial to our peace and anti-empire movement. keep on writing!
by Davis Mirza
Lt. General James Dubik Commanding General Fort Lewis 1 Corps Building 2025 Stop 1 Fort Lewis WA 98433. Re. Court Martial of U.S. Army Lt. Ehren Watada Dear Lt. General James Dubik It has come to my attention that the U.S. military plans to continue the court martial of Lt. Ehren Watada and is currently seeking subpoenas of U.S. anti-war campaigners and reporters in order to prosecute its case against Lt. Watada. I am requesting that you desist from using journalists to prosecute military personnel and immediately dismiss all charges against Lt. Watada's. In a recent PBS Frontline expose (“The Dark Force”) concerning the scripting of official documents to support the rush to war with Iraq, defense analysts from the CIA and the State Department confirmed that information on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were intentionally falsified in order to bolster the Bush administration’s pre-invasion plan. (The overwhelming evidence against weapons of mass destruction caused the sudden resignation of CIA head George Tenet and the purging of dozens of Pentagon officials.) Such public evidence about the nature of the Bush administration’s attempt to manipulate Congress to hastily convene an invasion of Iraq should not be overlooked and nor should our responsibility to protect those civilians and soldiers who are in harms way from such political deceit. As a soldier in the U.S. military, Lt. Watada stated, "[T]he reason I spoke out (against the Iraq war)…I saw that what was being done in terms of this war was so illegal and so immoral, and not being checked. It was a danger to our troops and a danger to our country. So, I think what needs to be done is some kind of accountability in Washington (D.C.) and also investigations into how this war was started in the first place." With no WMD’s found in Iraq, with US military higher-ups admitting to lying to justify a rush to war and with no link found between Iraq and 9-11, the question begs to be asked – Why is America occupying Iraq? If it is to bring democracy to the region, your own former Defense Chief Donald Rumsfeld candidly admitted to the contrary in congressional testimony in March 2003 – “I don’t believe that the United States had the responsibility for reconstruction.” In Peter Laufer’s new book Mission Rejected: U.S. Soldiers Who Say No To Iraq – an AWOL Oklahoma private describes US soldiers kicking around the heads of decapitated Iraqi’s like soccer balls during a search and destroy mission in the city of Ramadi. Will such crimes ever be prosecuted or can we expect the U.S. military’s continued silencing of dissenting voices by attacking the very cornerstones your country was founded upon – the right to freedom of speech and freedom of association? What Lt. Watada may be excercising is what he learned in basic training- if given an illegal or immoral order, it is the duty of that soldier to disobey it…the invasion and occupation of Iraq is such an illegal and immoral order. And maybe what Lt. Watada is asking of himself and the country that he serves is – Who is responsible for such criminal behaviour?…for the torture deaths of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison; of the illegality of detaining prisoners without due process in Guantanamo Bay or the rendering of prisoners (Canada’s own Mahar Arar) to be tortured in secret jails in Syria and Egypt and inevitably, of the relevance of a mounting body of scholarly work surrounding the events of 9-11, specifically the manufactured notion that foreign terrorists attacked US soil. It is with resilience and fortitude that Lt. Watada faces the challenges ahead of him and I believe the recent U.S. elections show more and more Americans are opening their eyes to the questions posed by Lt, Watada and various other servicemen and women who refuse to carry out such illegal orders. As Lt. Watada himself explains, “I hope that actions such as mine will continue to help expose the truth behind the fundamental illegality and immorality of the war," As Commanding General at Fort Lewis, you have the final decision on whether to proceed with the court martial of Lt. Ehren Watada on any or all charges. Along with tens of thousands of Canadians and Americans, I support Lt. Ehren Watada’s right to refuse duty in Iraq and I urge you not to bring court martial proceedings against him. With already 3000 of your own troops dead by year’s end, there is no time like the present to support your own military personnel by refusing to put them in harm’s way…supporting Lt. Ehren Watada’s cause to refuse active duty in Iraq may not only save thousands of more lives but bring American troops back home to finally end the illegal invasion of Iraq. Sincerely, Davis Mirza Toronto, Ontario dmirza@sympatico.ca
by karmila
"i've heard a lot about lt. ehren watada, through the tv and internet, hope u'll always be bless by God, keep ur spirit fight 4 the right coz maybe this is a chance 2 prove that humanity is amongs of all, nobody has right 2 hurt other people if they have no reason, generally i agree that iraq war againts the international law, coz i was studying on it when i was study in law faculty, now i graduated majoring international law, i hope lt. watada free from any sue and he can free 2 decide what he wants in his life"
ganbatte ne watada kun!!
ja matta!!!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$ 140.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network