top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Why we show up: the value of visibility

by BACORR
This is an op-ed that ran in last week's SF Bay Guardian
Why we show up: the value of visibility

Three years ago, the 1st annual anti-choice “Walk for Life—West Coast,” march, which is organized by the San Francisco and Oakland Archdiocese, “Feminists for Life,” and others, walked the length of the Embarcadero, near the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, armed with what they claim is the absolute “truth” about abortion: it “hurts women,” and that’s all it does. They announced their intention of coming back year after year until abortion (and contraception and queer partnerships, according to some of the signage) was a thing of the past. Speakers at the anti-choice rally decried what they saw as the ultimate sell out—abortion—which “turns women against their babies”, and is a manifestation of “sexual lawlessness.”

It’s a rich irony that the Catholic Church, with its tradition of protecting sexually lawless priests, feels entitled to anoint itself as the protectors of children. But more to the point, what you get when you prohibit abortions are illegal abortions. You do nothing to solve the problems of women who were forced to get an abortion, or who were forcibly sterilized, or who were forced to give birth, or forced in any way to act against their deepest needs. Coercion is a real problem. Simple prohibition is no solution.

The question for those committed to reproductive rights is this: how can we broaden the debate beyond abortion in the four hours that the anti-choice marchers hit the streets? How can we effectively address the fundamental right for a woman to control her body, the need for healthcare, childcare, the need for safe and accessible contraception, the discriminatory treatment of immigrant, young, queer and women of color, and the continuing onslaught of restrictions on family planning clinics nationwide?

The answer is to encourage visibility and attendance by local and national reproductive rights organizations and individuals that have done the work to provide women with healthcare options, emotional, and economic support and non-biased information about their bodies and their rights. The Bay Area Coalition for Our Reproductive Rights has put out a national call to action, that will transform January 20th from a one-sided debate, dominated by triumphalist marches and rhetoric by the anti-choice community, into a day of impassioned displays of cultural solidarity between the reproductive rights, queer and social justice organizations. It’s cultural events like these that lead to solid gains for reproductive rights—at the polls, in legislative offices and at the community level. We cannot solely depend on elected officials to secure and expand our rights. What’s needed is a inclusive movement with diverse allies like the the San Francisco Labor Council; the Green Party; Code Pink; Dr. Ahimsa Sumchai, Sister Bernie Galvin, Choice USA; San Francisco NOW; National Radical Women; California State Assemblyman Mark Leno; [Amnesty] Freedom Socialist Party; the Ruckus Society; Women's Choice Clinic; GABNet; United Auto Workers, Local 2103; San Francisco Atheists; the Coalition for a General and Unconditional Amnesty for All Now; the National Network of Abortion Funds, and others, all of whom acknowledge an existing nexus in their programs with reproductive rights work. These groups, together, illustrate the wide range of rights and options that constitute real choice.

And make no mistake, what we need are more rights, not less. We need a display of community that collectively spells out the as-yet unwritten bill of reproductive rights: the right to reproduce, or not, in safety, within responsive, accessible health care systems and under the guidance and urgings of our souls, reason and faith.

Saturday, January 20th is the opportunity to demonstrate the breadth and depth of our work and to join together in celebration of the rights we do have- as well as show our intent to secure more.

Gather with BACORR at 10:30am at Pier 5. For more information, e-mail BACORR at bacorrinfo [at] riseup.net or call 415-864-1278.

Elizabeth Creely is an organizer with the Bay Area Coalition for Our Reproductive Rights


Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Pro human rights
Wrong. Abortion is violent. It does nothing to address injustice. Being pro life is not right wing. Indeed it is about justice. Being pro life is about being consistent in protecting life - opposing abortion, war, capital punishment, the arms trade, WMD. It is no use decrying the war in Iraq and then championing killing the unborn. Defend life - consistently! P.S. I am not conservative and am a union rep.
by Pro-Union and prochoice
Glad you're not in my union, that's all I can say. When you fail to understand the impact that reproductive rights and the lack of the same has on women in the workplace and women with less money and access to not only abortion, but even contraceptives and sex education, you prove you are conservative- you're conservative about giving rights to others who do not share your beliefs. You would protect a fetus before you would protect a woman or girl from back alley butchers and desparate solutions.

Your antichoice friends would even keep the lid on a vaccine that would prevent women and girls from getting cervical cancer. Because the antichoice religious right assumes that taking a vaccine is a license to be promiscuous. Just like access to condoms. Just like sex education. Just like abortion.
by Me
Being a unionist has nothing to do with being for or against abortion. There are people for and against abortion on the left and right, for and against unions. I myself think abortion is not a solution. It promotes a culture of death and takes away liberals credibilty when they complain about capital punishment. If one oposses taking life, one should oppose abortion and capital punishment. Some capitalists are very pro abortion. Some progressives find it incongruous with non violence. The tirade of stereotypical tripe written by the above pro choice unionist shows that many in the pro choice movement fear that people in progressive circles will question the sort of pro choice extremism that allws killing a well developed unborn child in the womb. We need some creative pro life solutions, not the tired old pro abortion propaganda.
by i agree
In this respect, I agree that people's rights shouldn't be taken away. In other words, yes it is fine to conduct a counter-protest, but when you actually attempt to stop people who don't think like you from exercising their right to peacefully demonstrate, that is wrong. Yes, "taking away people's rights is violent."

-Thoughts from a free-speech-and-liberty-for-all choice advocate
by SUKI
Both of you are making the all-too-common mistake of mistaking free speech with unchallenged speech. Free speech simply means you have to right to communicate- through the written word, spoken word, or any other way- what it is you want to say. But free specch doesnt mean you have the right to remain unchallenged. You might think that theres should be some sort of time lapse before the other perspective/side responds...but no. Debating or challenging is not a block to free speech. Legal harrassment/govt. interference is...
The idea that the anti-choice community can have a day to speak uninterupted about this issue is ludicrous...the groups that are asseembling to counter respoind COULD be accused of fucking with their free speech rightif they had tried to get their permit yanked, but...that isnt what's happening.
Free speech comes in all directions and is practised simulteneously.
by yes!
I agree with Suki- it isn't a lone voice speaking- free speech in a democracy looks more like several people yelling- that may not want to be the way you want to use your energy, but don't be confused as to what it is youre witnessing...free speech is messy and rambunctious!
by prochoice
Nope, nobody's permits got yanked, the antichoicers can say whatever they like, but- they should not and will not go unanswered.

They do not define the day however- we do. By our creativity, our empowerment, and our refusal to be labeled screaming feminazis by the other side. Extremists are so good with labels. Time to take back a few words that belong to all of us, not just the religious right!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network