top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

FDA Expected to OK Food from Cloned Animals

by Center for Food Safety
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is expected later this week to release a preliminary safety assessment that clears the way for marketing of meat and dairy products from cloned animals for human consumption
DESPITE LACK OF SCIENCE AND STRONG PUBLIC CONCERN,
FDA EXPECTED TO OK FOOD FROM CLONED ANIMALS
Inadequate Safety Review Threatens U.S. Food Supply and Animal Welfare

(December 26, 2006) The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is expected later this week to release a preliminary safety assessment that clears the way for marketing of meat and dairy products from cloned animals for human consumption. The assessment and the agency’s expected endorsement of cloned food comes despite widespread concern among scientists and food safety advocates over the safety of such products. The move to market cloned milk and meat also flies in the face of dairy and food industry concern and recent consumer opinion polls showing that most Americans do not want these experimental foods.

"Instead of doing its job, the Bush FDA has ignored the science and fast-tracked this decision for the benefit of a few cloning companies," said Joseph Mendelson, Legal Director for the Center for Food Safety (CFS). "This is a lose-lose situation for consumers and the dairy industry."

The FDA action follows the recent news that the agency has refused to investigate health problems in animal clones on a U.S. dairy farm. Greg Wiles, whose Williamsport Maryland "Futuraland 2020" dairy was the first farm in the nation to have cloned cows, told FDA that one of his two cow clones was suffering from unexplained health problems. Wiles told Food Chemical News that the clone "just stopped growing...she just looks terrible," but says that when he reported the problems to FDA and other federal officials, he was "paddled around like a tennis ball from agency to agency." CFS has asked the Agriculture Department to intervene in the case to stop any sale and prohibit the slaughter of clones and their progeny for food.

In October, CFS, joined by a coalition of consumer, environmental and animal welfare organizations, filed a legal petition with the FDA seeking a moratorium on foods produced from cloned animals and establishment of mandatory rules for pre-market food safety and environmental review of cloned foods (see the petition at http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/ ). The petition also requested that the Department of Health and Human Services establish a federal review committee to advise FDA on the ethical issues raised by animal cloning.

Recent opinion polls also show that Americans are overwhelmingly concerned about animal cloning for food production. A November 2006 food industry poll conducted by the International Food Information Council showed that 58% of Americans’ surveyed would be unlikely to buy meat or milk from animal clones even if FDA found such products to be safe. In the same poll, only 16% of Americans had a favorable opinion of animal cloning. A December 2006 poll by the Pew Initiative found that 64% of those polled were uncomfortable with animal cloning, with 43% saying that cloned food is unsafe, while another 36% felt unsure about cloned food safety.

The FDA’s action also follows growing opposition to the use of clones and their progeny for food products on Capitol Hill. In November, Senator Barbara Mikulski sent a letter to the FDA requesting a complete overview of how the agency came to its decision of using clones in food. In early December, a bi-partisan group of seven senators led by Senator Patrick Leahy asked FDA to reconsider its assessment of cloned animals. The International Dairy Foods Association, representing major dairies and food makers including Kraft, Nestle and others, also has opposed allowing products from cloned animals into the food supply at this time.

Cloning scientists have acknowledged that genetic abnormalities are common in clones, yet FDA failed to address how food safety and animal welfare concerns could be managed if cloning is widely adopted by the livestock industry. Some of the health and safety problems in animal cloning include:

Surrogate mothers are treated with high doses of hormones; clones are often born with severely compromised immune systems and frequently receive massive doses of antibiotics. This opens an avenue for large amounts of veterinary pharmaceuticals to enter the human food supply;

Imbalances in clones' hormone, protein, and/or fat levels could compromise the quality and safety of meat and milk;

The National Academy of Sciences warned that commercialization of cloned livestock for food production could increase the incidence of food-borne illnesses, such as E. coli infections;

Cloning commonly results in high failure rates and defects such as intestinal blockages; diabetes; shortened tendons; deformed feet; weakened immune systems; dysfunctional hearts, brains, livers, and kidneys; respiratory distress; and circulatory problems.
"There is widespread concern among Americans, and scientific concern that cloned food may not be safe and that cloning will increase animal cruelty," said Mendelson. "We intend to pursue our legal action to compel FDA to address the many unanswered questions around cloned food."

What can you do?
Though FDA has not made their official announcement (it is expected later this week), the story has already hit the press. Keep an eye out in your local papers for stories on FDA's approval. We will send you another email with an opportunity to send letters to the editors of your local media outlets. It is also expected that a public comment period will be opened once FDA makes a formal announcement, if so, we will have an opportunity to make our voices heard then as well.

For more background information, see http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by goneVegan
Recently I have gone vegan and soon "greenhousing" my own veggies. After reading this ALERT, and thank you for it, I am UPSET and HORRIFIED by the so called scientific communities allowing such (money, it is truly at the heart of all evil, like the "good book" says). I want to seriously weep for the various routes this admin has taken. We cannot win unwinnables (and you know what I am talking about), we do not use SURPLUS FOODS and feed the POOR, we set our eyes on the skies (moon missions and bases - puleeez) and then come up with CLONING as some "solution" to future food needs. The fact that clones have many health issues, even if just ONE! but a multitude!? ... that fact alone should have STOPPED any FDA approvals. But! Like war, this means money into some greedy persons bank accounts. I hope someone posts / writes an article on ALL THE NAMES of those who profit from this horrific endeavor, in order for boycotts and choices to NOT buy said merchandise. Planet Earth, when will your saviour return?
by Citizen
Who needs enemies as long as we have the government and "the Decider" making goofy decisions such as this? If the government has its way on this matter, the solution for us is to avoid all dairy and meat products.
by Paul Yost
Some species of fish can reproduce asexually. If you eat fish, it is possible you may have already eaten a "naturally" cloned animal, although parthenogenesis does not always result in a genetic clone--genetic variability is sometimes introduced during normal meiosis.

The danger that widespread use of cloning might reduce variability in species is extremely small. In fact, the opposite is true--cloning may well preserve genetic variety subject to loss through interbreeding. Just because something CAN be done does not mean it WILL be done TO EXCESS. There are about 100,000 people walking around today who were conceived in a petri dish. The other six billion humans were conceived the old fashioned way.

Would I eat cloned meat? Of course. Far too many people reached erroneous conclusions based on Dolly the sheep. She was cloned using one particular technique involving non reproductive cells. We cannot conclude even from the basis of this one example that there is necessarily anything wrong with this particular cloning technique--and there are numerous techniques, some of which are clearly superior. Cloning is like anything else--the more you do it, the better you get at it. If I sat down at a piano and played some music, and it did not sound perfect, I'd be stupid to give up piano playing on the basis of that one poor performance.

I favor cloning animals and humans. The sooner we embrace this technology, the sooner we will move on to even greater things, such as bioengineering. The only hangup people have about cloning is purely psychological. And a huge amount of information being bandied about concerning cloning is simply false or misleadling.
by Right to choose
I have no problem with people who want to eat cloned animals. For myself I do have a problem with it and I believe I have the right the choose. One of our basic rights in this country is our right to choose, wheather that choice is to have children or not and to feed our selves and our children cloned animals. We have a right and a responsiblility to be informed. I think it is highly irresponsible that the FDA is even considering marketing cloned food without it being labled.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$200.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network