top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

SF: Prop H Opposed by Realtors & Democrat Mayor Newsom

by (
Two weeks before election day, November 7, the voters of San Francisco, tenants and homeowners, received a vicious lying multicolor slick mailer against the pro-tenant Prop H, endorsed by the real estate industry, the Republican Party and Democrats "Mayor" Gavin Newsom and Democrats Supervisors Elsbernd, Ma and Alioto-Pier.
Two weeks before election day, November 7, the voters of San Francisco, tenants and homeowners, received a vicious lying multicolor slick mailer against the pro-tenant Prop H, endorsed by the real estate industry, the Republican Party and Democrats "Mayor" Gavin Newsom and Democrats Supervisors Elsbernd, Ma and Alioto-Pier.

As the website of the San Francisco Tenant Union explains at http://www.sftu.org/YesonH.htm:
"Tenants who are evicted for no fault of their own receive very short notice and have little time to save money and move. Far too many end up moving out of San Francisco or even into shelters. These no-fault evictions are done by landlords looking to sell the property, fix up the property, convert it to more profitable uses or to demolish the rental units. In San Francisco's heated real estate market, landlords profit greatly via these evictions, while tenants end up with nowhere to go. YES on Prop H requires landlords to pay tenants relocation expenses for all no fault evictions. Tenants getting eviction notices for owner move in, capital improvements, demolition, or substantial rehabilitation will get $4,500 per tenant in relocation expenses. Tenants who are senior or disabled and households with children under 18 will get an additional $3,000. Prop H is retroactive to August 10, 2006, meaning landlords will not be able to rush to get evictions done before Prop H passes and meaning many tenants now facing eviction will be entitled to these relocation benefits."

This very modest relocation benefit is opposed by all of the above-named Democrats, including "mayor" Newsom who sits in office with election fraud committed against pro-tenant Green member Matt Gonzalez in 2003. This thug endorsed all kinds of lies on the slick mailer claiming that somehow this relocation benefit will be harmful to tenants!

On the same day, Oct 23, this thug "mayor" exhibits his contempt to everyone with his unbelievable defense of the Oracle computer company's closure of a major street, Howard Street at 4th, for their party-convention, in a letter format on page B6 of the local pro-landlord rag, the San Francisco Chronicle. He states that he is just thrilled that 40,000 people will attend this convention and give $50 million in revenue to the City's economy (mostly to private profit businesses, not the City's budget). This money, and much more, could be easily be obtained by taxing the rich, those who make over $200,000 a year, with the progressive income tax, and raising taxes on that crowd, instead of cutting them as the Democrat-Republicans have been doing in Sacramento and Washington, DC. San Francisco alone has enough billionaires to take care of all our budget shortfalls. He actually unapologetically refers the reader to the street closure information on the Oracle website at:
http://www.oracle.com/openworld/howardstreet/index.html

We then turn to the Technology section of the same reactionary rag on 10/23/06, and find a promotional in the form of news for Oracle where they state on page E3 that they just cannot help but serve food on Howard Street, while traffic and buses are re-routed!

The obvious solution is to TELL ORACLE'S CONVENTION TO LEAVE TOWN AND TO TAKE ANTI-TENANT, ELECTION FRAUD MAYOR NEWSOM WITH THEM, ALONG WITH ANTI-TENANT SUPERVISORS ELSBERND, MA AND ALIOTO-PIER. We can and must tax the rich to pay for all our city's needs. All these conventions do is make the rich richer. The homeless crisis will continue to exist; nothing will improve.

This all demosntrates that the only pro-tenant parties on the ballot are the socialist Peace & Freedom Party and the Green Party, which support Prop H, as do all their candidates. In addition to voting for these parties candidates, vote Yes on D through K in San Francisco, and Yes on 86, 87 and 89; No on 85 and 90 on the state ballot. And on the US Senate race, you have a choice of Marcia Feinland from P&F or Todd Chretien of the Green Party. For Congress in San Francisco, the Greens are running Krissy Keefer. Please remember to vote November 7.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Wayne Schaffnit
I also DID NOT like the Realtors' mailer, but you are confusing a gross exaggeration with a lie.

AND your comments were even more biased and exaggerated!


Prop H will be a disincentive to property owners that need to relocate tenants to make improvements on their building.

I am totally against Prop H, and yet I was also not pleased when I received the mail from the Board of Realtors


HOWEVER, their exaggeration is no more egregious than the San Francisco Tenants Union, which states:
“Tenants who are evicted for no fault of their own receive very short notice and have little time to save money and move.”

This is not true. State law requires a minimum of 60 days notice, and the permit process in SF is months.

And, on the same page of their web site: http://www.sftu.org/YesonH.htm, they also exaggerate:

“Far too many end up moving out of San Francisco or even into shelters.”

Talk about a scare tactic. This statement is based upon NO FACTS. Last year there were 417 of these no-fault evictions in 215,000 rental units.

The fact is that 4 SF Supervisors shoved this measure on the ballot on the last possible day, with NO public debate.

Two years ago this relocation compensation was discussed in the Board of Supervisors, but it did not get out of committee.

They have had two years to have a debate and create a reasonable (well thought out and well discussed) proposal.

This last minute ballot initiative allows 4 SF Supervisors to place themselves in a no lose position:

- If Prop H is voted down, they can tell the Tenants Union, “Hey we were on your side, and we pushed for it.”

- If Prop H is passed, they can say, “Well, the voters have spoken.”

This is just sloppy legislation and we should send it back to the Board of Supervisors to do their job.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network