conspiracy to educate

UPON MY ARREST, I WILL SEND THIS TO 80+ THOUSAND RECIPIANTS SPECIALLY GATHERED TO BRING JUSTICE IN THE SWIFTEST MEANS POSSIBLE TO AND FOR THE PEOPLE. Round #2 will have YOU named.
http://www.freewebs.com/freenorthdakota/
A CITIZEN COMPLAINT
FARGO POLICE AND SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Name of Persons filing Complaint ; Ed, Dan, Shane and Justin Curtis
Address; 924 5th st. S. Fargo, North Dakota
Home Phone 701-298-0623 Location of Incident
NORTH DAKOTA AND COUNTRY
ATTENTION: North Dakota, Police, Sheriffs and enforcement personal
Details of Complaint; THEFT OF PUBLIC MONEY. The police, Sheriffs, and ALL Government people HAVE BEEN TRICKED. YOU are costing the people of North Dakota countless Billions of dollars with your BLINDLY FOLLOWING FORIGN AGENTS. That has led to misuse of Public funds, YOU have left behind YOUR duties as protectors of the people and have become part of a criminal gang , hunting us, fining us, Jailing us AT OUR FREEDOMS AND EXPENSE for their departments, Promoted by the lawyers, judges and politicians, for “THE STATE” profit. Watch this show.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4851745402754817816&q=the+irs+and+federal+reserve
What does a person do when he discovers Crimes against the people, so immense as almost to be beyond comprehension? Crimes that involves every agency in the state and country being infiltrated by an agent who uses YOU for their dirty work?
Crimes that involve Theft by deception, forgery and fraud. This is theft of public money on a scale that truly makes it the biggest crime in human history. IT IS TIME TO DEMAND OUR LIVES BACK
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY FROM ALL OUR OFFICIALS for their actions. Law is WHAT IS GOOD of the people, NOT PROFIT FOR THE FICTION OF “THE STATE”.
It is time to SEND THIS TO ALL! TO Your neighbors, friends and business, To your local Police, Sheriffs and media. Who have been USED BY OUR BLINDED, POLITICANS, LAWYERS, JUDGES. Together, WE CAN AND WILL STOP THEIR BUSINESS OF CRIME!
How many people have been killed? How many families torn apart for the laws profit? How many homes destroyed? How many livelihoods gone? How many imprisoned in these lies? How many lives ruined? How many people sacrificed to and for the fiction of "THE STATE"? We ALL bear responsibility, NOW IS THE TIME
to end this war on us all, insist on just reparations for suffering caused, and promote legal scrutiny of the crimes committed on the people at the peoples expense, A crime against one is a crime against ALL. A crime against THE STATE is a crime against us all. That is what law was meant to be. We have been tricked and forced to pay for our own enslavement by a few agents. EITHER YOU ARE WITH US OR YOU ARE WITH THEM, THE TERRORESTS
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

1. Arrest is presumed to be false;
officer has the burden of proof

The only thing the plaintiff needs to plead and to prove is either (1) that the defendant made an arrest or imprisonment, or (2) that the defendant affirmatively instigated, encouraged, incited, or caused the arrest or imprisonment. Burlington v. Josephson, 153 Fed.2d 372,276 (1946).

When the plaintiff has shown that he was arrested, imprisoned or restrained of his liberty by the defendant, "the law presumes it to be unlawful." People v. McGrew, 20 Pac. 92 (1888); Knight v. Baker, 133 P. 544(1926). "The burden is upon the defendant to show that the arrest was by authority of law." McAleer v. Good, 65 Atl. 934, 935 (1907); Mackie v. Ambassador, 11 P.2d 6 (1932).

"Any arrest made without a warrant, if challenged by the defendant, is presumptively invalid...the burden is upon the state" to justify it as authorized by statute, and as not violative of constitutional provisions. State v. Mastrian, 171 N.W.2d 695 (1969); Butler v. State, 212 So.2d 577 (Miss 1968)

"As in the case of illegal arrests, the officer ... must keep within the law at his peril." Thiede v. Scandia, 217 Minn. 231, 14 N.W.2d 400 (1944).

2. Must show warrant upon request

"He must show it to the accused, if requested to do so." Smith v. State, 208 S.2d 747 (Miss., 1968).

"If demanded, he must produce the warrant and read it to the accused, that he may know by what authority and for what cause he is deprived of his liberty." State v. Shaw, 89 S.E. 322 (1916).

"An accused person, if he demands it, is entitled to have the warrant for his arrest shown to him at the time of arrest." 42 L.R.A. 682, 51 L.R.A. 211, Crosswhite v. Barnes, 124 S.E. 242, 245 (1924).

"A special deputy is bound to show his warrant if requested to do so, and if he omit, the party against whom the warrant is may resist an arrest, and the warrant under such circumstances is no protection against an action for an assault, battery and false imprisonment." Frost v. Thomas, 24 Wendell's Rep. (N.Y.) 418, 419 (1840).

“It is doubtless the duty of an officer who executes a warrant of arrest to state the nature and substance of the process which gives him the authority he professes to exercise, and, if it is demanded, to exhibit his warrant, that the party arrested may have no excuse for resistance.” Shovlon v. Com., 106 Pa. 369, 5 Am. Crim. Rep. 41 (1884)

“It was the duty of an officer who attempts to make an arrest to exhibit the warrant if he has one.” Jones v. State, 114 Ga. 79, 39 S.E. 861 (1901)

3. Warrant must be valid

A constable justifying an imprisonment under a warrant must show that the warrant on its face is legal, and that the magistrate had jurisdiction of the subject-matter. 51 L.R.A. 197, Poulk v. Slocum, 3 Blackfords (Ind). 421.

A warrant is regarded as insufficient and thus void if, on its face, it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. Wharton’s Crim. Proc., 12th Ed., vol. 1, p. 152 (1974).

4. No rubber-stamp “signature”

“The United States Supreme Court ... stressed the need for ‘individualized review’ to avoid the issuance of ‘rubber stamp’ warrants.” State v. Paulick, 277 Minn. 140, 151 N.W.2d 596 (1967).

5. False arrest is assault and battery

"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right, and only the same right, to use force in defending himself as he would have in repelling any other assault and battery.” State v. Robinson, 72 Atl.2d 262 (1950).

"An arrest without warrant is a trespass, an unlawful assault upon the person ... where one is about to be unlawfully deprived of his liberty he may resist the aggressions of the offender, whether of a private citizen or a public officer, to the extent of taking the life of the assailant, if that be necessary to preserve his own life, or prevent infliction upon him of some great bodily harm.” State v. Gum, 69 S.E. 464 (1910).

Every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest ... and, in preventing such illegal restraint of his liberty, he may use such force as may be necessary.” Columbus v. Holmes, 152 N.E.2d 306 (1958).

6. No handcuff

“But a constable cannot justify handcuffing a prisoner unless he has attempted to escape, or unless it be necessary in order to prevent his doing so.” 51 L.R.A. 216.

“The handcuffing was utterly unlawful.” Osborn v. Veitch 1 Foster & Fin Eng Rep 317.

7. Go immediately to magistrate (no photographs, no fingerprinting)

The one arresting has “a duty to immediately seek a magistrate,” and failure to do so “makes a case of false imprisonment.” Heath v. Boyd, 175 S.W.2d. 217 (1943); Brock v. Stimson, 108 Mass. 520 (1871).

"To detain the person arrested in custody for any purpose other than that of taking him before a magistrate is illegal.” Kominsky v. Durand, 12 Atl.2d. 654 (1940).

"Any undue delay is unlawful and wongful, and renders the officer himself and all persons aiding and abetting therein wrongdoers from the beginning.” Ulvestad v. Dolphin, 278 Pac. 684 (1929).

"The taking of the plaintiff’s picture before conviction was an illegal act.” Hawkins v. Kuhne, 137 NY Supp 1090, 153 App Div 216 (1912).

"The power to arrest does not confer upon the arresting officer the power to detain a prisoner for other purposes.” Geldon v. Finnegan, 252 N.W. 372 (1934).

"Compulsory fingerprinting before conviction is an unlawful encroachment...[and] involves prohibited compulsory self-incrimination.” People v. Helvern, 215 N.Y. Supp. 417 (1926)

Summary

A warrant must be issued and signed (no rubber stamp) by a judge who has jurisdiction.
It must state the facts showing jurisdiction.
It must be based upon probable cause.
It must name the offense committed.
It must contain an affidavit (under oath) by the accuser, stating facts constituting a crime.
It must name the person to be arrested, or describe him sufficiently to identify him.
You must show me the warrant and the affidavit upon request.
No handcuffs.
You must take me immediately before a magistrate, and hold me for no other purpose (no photographs, no fingerprinting).
You are responsible for everything that happens to me even if you relinquish custody.
Unlawful arrest is assault, battery & trespass.
There is no immunity in a false arrest case.
Good faith is not a defense.