MEDIA SEX DISCRIMINATION FRAUDULENTLY AFFECTS OUTCOME OF 2006 U.S. SENATE RACE?

Will media sex discrimination against women candidates
fraudulently affect the outcome of the
2006 federal election for United States Senate
seats in the United States Congress?

Is Ms. Cris Ericson,
Republican candidate for United States Senate
in the Vermont Primary Election September 12, 2006,
a victim of media sex discrimination,
media fraud affecting the outcome of federal elections,
and media organizations violating federal laws by acting as PAC's, unregistered political action committees?

WPTZ, http://wptz.com on August 9, 2006
posted 11:14 am EDT
Homepage > Commitment 2006
published an article,
"Willie Nelson Stumps for Sanders".
In the article it states,
"Sanders will face the winner of next month's Republican primary between pilot Greg Parke and businessman Richard Tarrant."

Is WPTZ committing internet fraudulent omission of material facts by stating that the Republican primary election is between Greg Parke and Richard Tarrant, when in reality,
it is between Cris Ericson, Greg Parke and Richard Tarrant?

Isn't it an internet crime of fraudulent omission of material facts to omit Cris Ericson's
name in the list of Republican candidates and to assert that there is no way she will win,
that she has no chance of winning,
by stating that
"the Republican primary election is between Greg Parke and Richard Tarrant" ?

It simply is not true that "the Republican primary election is between Greg Parke and Richard Tarrant".

The truth is that the Republican primary election is between
Ms. Cris Ericson, (female, a woman)
and Greg Parke and Richard Tarrant.

Is this type of fraudulent omission of material facts one of the causes of the fact that there are so few women in the United States Senate?

Must we be eternally vigilant to point out fraudulent omissions of material fact in the media in order to get more women elected to the United States Senate?

Women do not have equal representation under the law.
Half the country is made up of a population of women.
There has never been a woman President.
There is only a tiny handful of women who hold seats in the United States Senate.

We must speak out and be heard!
We must demand recognition when we achieve ballot access!

Thursday, August 10, 2006,
http://www.caledonianrecord.com
Top News
Rural Development Hands Out Money to NEK Organizations
By James Jardine, Staff Writer
paragraph 8:
"U. S. Rep. Bernard Sanders is hoping to win the seat being vacated by Jeffords.
He is being challenged by Republicans Richard Tarrant and Greg Parke, one of whom will face off against Sanders in November after the Republican primary race in September."

Isn't the above news statement criminal internet fraud, a fraudulent omission of the material fact that Sanders is being challenged by Republican candidate Ms. Cris Ericson, and that the phrase, "one of whom will face off against Sanders" is pure fraud because there is no way that the writer, James Jardin, can predict which Republican candidate will win the September primary election unless he is in a criminal conspiracy to fraudulently control the ballot box counting ?

Isn't it pure fraud to assert that only Richard Tarrant and Greg Parke have any chance of winning the Republican primary election unless there is a criminal conspiracy to change the outcome of the votes because you can't determine the outcome of an election a month ahead of the election ?

Isn't the phrase, "one of whom", when it applies only to Richard Tarrant and Greg Parke, a phrase meant to fraudulently assert that there is no third Republican candidate?

Is this clearly sex discrimination against Ms. Cris Ericson, Republican candidate for U.S. Senate, who is not mentioned in the article?

Is the author using the Caledonian Record online edition as an unregistered and illegal political action committee by promoting two Republican U.S. Senate candidates (Richard Tarrant and Greg Parke) while fraudulently omitting the existence of the third, Ms. Cris Ericson ?

Women must speak up!

More women need to be elected to the United States Senate!

http://crisericson.com
http://makemarijuanalegal.com

Is this a plot by the conservative media to deceive voters to the fact that the 2004 Marijuana candidate, Cris Ericson, got on the official primary election ballot in Vermont as a Republican?

Is this a plot by the conservative media to conceal the developing Republican trend towards leaglizing and taxing marijuana?