top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Berkeley Shows San Francisco How to Address Inclusionary Housing

by Randy Shaw, Beyond Chron (reposted)
On Wednesday July 12, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use Committee will consider long delayed reforms to the city’s inclusionary housing ordinance. The most recent hearing on May 10 was continued pending the completion of a Planning Department/Mayor’s Office of Housing study of the current law, a report whose production has delayed the passage of a stronger affordable housing law for several months. Two weeks ago, the city of Berkeley revised its inclusionary law---long more stringent than San Francisco’s ---in a way that is so smart that one wonders why San Francisco does not follow its lead. The Berkeley reform won unanimous support in a city whose commissioners rarely agree on anything, and if applied in San Francisco would greatly increase new affordable housing units without increased cost to developers.
Berkeley’s inclusionary housing law has always been stronger than San Francisco’s, with the East Bay city requiring developers to provide 20% on-site affordable units compared to its neighbor’s paltry12%. The law also applies to projects of five units of more, which is one of San Francisco’s proposed reforms. But Berkeley Housing Director Steve Barton has come up with an even better idea to increase affordable units---a reform of the law that also decreases developers’ costs.

Barton’s plan works as follows. Assume a developer could sell a condo for $700,000 but under the inclusionary law is limited to a sales price of $200,000. This means that the developer is spending $500,000 so that Berkeley gains a single affordable unit.

That’s quite an inefficient use of scarce housing funds.

To remedy this, Barton proposed that the developer would pay 62.5% of the inclusionary cost (62.5% of $500,000 is $312,500) into the city’s affordable housing fund. This $312,500 would be used by a nonprofit to create three or four new or substantially rehabilitated affordable units.

In other words, Barton’s approach will at least triple the number of affordable housing units produced by the city’s inclusionary law.

More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3469#more
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
cp
Tue, Jul 11, 2006 7:25PM
20939
Tue, Jul 11, 2006 8:58AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network