From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Will Change Finally Come to San Francisco Planning Commission?
A majority of San Francisco’s Planning Commission will soon be up for reappointment. Although the Commission includes four mayoral and three Board of Supervisor appointees, Commissioner Christina Olague (whose term is not expiring) is the only member whose votes consistently reflect the Board’s progressive majority. Although voters approved the split appointment process in 2002, two of the three appointees by then Board President Tom Ammiano---Sue Lee and Kevin Hughes---have voted identically with their four Brown-appointed colleagues. Board President Aaron Peskin now has a chance to appoint two new commissioners who reflect his and the Board majority’s progressive land use views. Will he and his Board colleagues change the current business as usual attitude at Planning, or simply maintain the status quo?
A major difference between the Brown and Newsom Administrations has been the sharp reduction in public criticism of the San Francisco Planning Department and Commission by progressives and neighborhood activists. All is quiet despite the fact that the Planning Department backlog is the same, the new Planning Director, Dean Macris, was activists’ chief target during the Feinstein years, and the Commission has not voted down or even significantly modified a single major development project.
While Macris, Mayor Newsom, and the Commissioners professional demeanor have insulated the Planning Commission from public criticism, it almost exclusively represents the Newsom-Dufty-Alioto-Pier-Ma- Elsbernd political bloc. Only two Planning Commissioners prioritize tenant interests, and Shelley Bradford-Bell is a Mayor Brown appointee who will soon be replaced.
The Commission’s lack of motivation toward protecting tenants is not simply reflected by public votes. Rather, it is also seen in the freedom it has given to the city’s zoning administrator to issue anti-tenant rulings.
When the Board of Appeals rules 5-0 on tenants’ behalf because the Zoning Administrator refuses to intervene, something at the Planning Department is clearly amiss
Other than Commissioner Olague, the current Planning Commission has little connection with the city’s progressive community.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3326#more
While Macris, Mayor Newsom, and the Commissioners professional demeanor have insulated the Planning Commission from public criticism, it almost exclusively represents the Newsom-Dufty-Alioto-Pier-Ma- Elsbernd political bloc. Only two Planning Commissioners prioritize tenant interests, and Shelley Bradford-Bell is a Mayor Brown appointee who will soon be replaced.
The Commission’s lack of motivation toward protecting tenants is not simply reflected by public votes. Rather, it is also seen in the freedom it has given to the city’s zoning administrator to issue anti-tenant rulings.
When the Board of Appeals rules 5-0 on tenants’ behalf because the Zoning Administrator refuses to intervene, something at the Planning Department is clearly amiss
Other than Commissioner Olague, the current Planning Commission has little connection with the city’s progressive community.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3326#more
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
This City has NO Master Plan that makes sense
Tue, May 30, 2006 6:31PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network