Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
After Eviction Victory, Tenants Seek Further Protections
After winning passage of tough new restrictions on condo conversions, tenant activists are now moving to eliminate other incentives for speculator evictions. On Wednesday, the Board of Supervisors Land Use Committee will consider legislation sponsored by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi to prevent landlords from eliminating tenants parking spots, decks, and even bedrooms without just cause. Supervisor Sandoval will soon have a hearing on his measure to require rental units that convert to ownership to meet modern building codes. Both of these measures could wind up on the November ballot if vetoed by the Mayor, as could a more controversial measure that would prevent the Sheriff’s Office from spending public funds on carrying out the eviction of senior or disabled tenants.
Following the passage of legislation that prevents units where protected tenants have been evicted from becoming condominiums, some might assume that tenant activists would take it easy for a while before promoting new measures. But as critical as the Peskin legislation was to deterring evictions, it does not address all of the threats that San Francisco tenants still face.
Consider the situation where a landlord issues a 30-day notice to a tenant stating that they are removing one of their bedrooms so that they can combine the space with another unit. Despite the fact that the loss of a bedroom completely changes the terms of tenancy, under current law a tenant receiving this notice has little recourse.
Similarly, it is an all too common practice for landlords to issue 30-day notices eliminating tenant’s access to decks or on-site parking. These services may well have led the tenant to rent the unit in the first place, but current law allows parking and decks to be eliminated so long as rents are reduced.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3308#more
Consider the situation where a landlord issues a 30-day notice to a tenant stating that they are removing one of their bedrooms so that they can combine the space with another unit. Despite the fact that the loss of a bedroom completely changes the terms of tenancy, under current law a tenant receiving this notice has little recourse.
Similarly, it is an all too common practice for landlords to issue 30-day notices eliminating tenant’s access to decks or on-site parking. These services may well have led the tenant to rent the unit in the first place, but current law allows parking and decks to be eliminated so long as rents are reduced.
More
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3308#more
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
And you wonder why there are over 20,000 vacant apartments in SF. Who wants to put up with this shit? +
This would be unusual, as you usually run when asked to support your pathetic arguments--but since this one may actually be true, please provide citations. Or is all that you can do is regurgitate rhetoric?
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$135.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network