From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
English-Only Laws Don't Work, and Bush Knows It
The president, who enthusiastically backed bilingual education as governor of Texas, should resist English-only moves by Congress. Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an associate editor at New America Media and the author of "The Crisis in Black and Black" (Middle Passage Press). TheHutchinsonReport blog is now at http://www.earlofarihutchinson.com.
LOS ANGELES--In September 1999, then-Texas Gov. George Bush told an audience during the New Hampshire presidential primary, "English-only would mean to people, 'Me, not you.'" The few times during his White House tenure Bush has seen moves to restrict the use of non-English languages by government agencies, the president didn't budge from that position.
However, when House and Senate Republicans pounded Bush recently for championing a non-punitive immigration reform measure he slightly backpedaled, supporting the Senate's tough English-only amendment and a competing amendment that simply touts English. The Senate's English-only amendments are at best empty symbolism, and at worst, a xenophobic, race-tinged tact that could imperil programs that genuinely help non-English students and adults attain English proficiency.
Bush knows that. As Texas governor, he enthusiastically backed bilingual education, and for a good reason. It is the quickest path for non-English speaking immigrants to assimilate and ultimately attain citizenship.
If Congress's English-only amendment stands it would undermine that effort. But it wouldn't be the first time that a shortsighted Congress shot itself in the foot on the issue. In 1996, the House passed an English-only bill. The following year, Arizona Sen. John McCain proposed a "non-binding" Senate resolution endorsing English plus. The House has proposed amendments and even legislation over the years to dump or severely curtail funding for bilingual education.
The English-only drive got a rocket boost in 1998 when businessman Ron Unz dumped millions into the campaign to pass Proposition 227 in California. The initiative's premise was simple: bilingual education was costly, wasteful and ineffectual, and non-English speaking students, mainly Hispanics, didn't learn a lick of English in bilingual classes. Some charged that the programs were a sneaky way to promote multiculturalism.
More
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=b838a8ea9605f90d18d15365a0a370ef
However, when House and Senate Republicans pounded Bush recently for championing a non-punitive immigration reform measure he slightly backpedaled, supporting the Senate's tough English-only amendment and a competing amendment that simply touts English. The Senate's English-only amendments are at best empty symbolism, and at worst, a xenophobic, race-tinged tact that could imperil programs that genuinely help non-English students and adults attain English proficiency.
Bush knows that. As Texas governor, he enthusiastically backed bilingual education, and for a good reason. It is the quickest path for non-English speaking immigrants to assimilate and ultimately attain citizenship.
If Congress's English-only amendment stands it would undermine that effort. But it wouldn't be the first time that a shortsighted Congress shot itself in the foot on the issue. In 1996, the House passed an English-only bill. The following year, Arizona Sen. John McCain proposed a "non-binding" Senate resolution endorsing English plus. The House has proposed amendments and even legislation over the years to dump or severely curtail funding for bilingual education.
The English-only drive got a rocket boost in 1998 when businessman Ron Unz dumped millions into the campaign to pass Proposition 227 in California. The initiative's premise was simple: bilingual education was costly, wasteful and ineffectual, and non-English speaking students, mainly Hispanics, didn't learn a lick of English in bilingual classes. Some charged that the programs were a sneaky way to promote multiculturalism.
More
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=b838a8ea9605f90d18d15365a0a370ef
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network