top
Central Valley
Central Valley
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Commercial Salmon Fishermen Rally At PFMC Meeting in Sacramento Today

by Dan Bacher
Commercial salmon fishermen will rally in Sacramento today against Bush regime plans to outlaw salmon fishing along the California and Oregon coast. The White House plan appears to be (1) take the most vocal supporters of river restoration off the water and (2) pave the way for corporate offshore aquaculture.
P R E S S   R E L E A S E
 
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA)
and the
Small Boat Commercial Salmon Fishermen’s Association (SBCSFA)
 
For Immediate Release: April 5, 2006
 
For more information:
Mike Hudson, President SBCSFA, (510) 528-6575 (h), (510) 407-0046, Email: mike [at] sbcsfa.com
Zeke Grader, Executive Director PCFFA (415) 561-5080 x224; Cell: (415) 606-5140
 
What:
Commercial FISHERMEN Rally and speak at final PFMC public input meeting about the 2006 Salmon Season
      Fishermen stage rally at Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC) Meeting, ask Council to adopt emergency regulations that would provide for a meaningful salmon season while minimizing fishery impacts on Klamath salmon stocks
 
     Where:
               Doubletree Hotel
                  2001 Point West Way
                  Sacramento, CA
     When:
               Thursday, April 6, 12 noon
 
Sacramento, CA - Despite large over-all numbers of fall chinook salmon, particularly the very large runs coming back to the Sacramento River, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC), meeting in Sacramento this week, is considering a total ban on ocean commercial salmon fishing for 2006 from south to Point Sur to Oregon’s Cape Falcon, nearly 700 miles of coastline, including what were once the most important salmon ports outside of Alaska.
 
Yet many fishermen’s groups say such a draconian step of banning all fishing is unwarranted, and would cause enormous economic damage while providing very little conservation benefit.
 
“We are asking the Council to adopt an emergency rule that would enable the fleet to go fishing in places were Klamath salmon are very rare, places where some fishing could legitimately be done without having any real impact on the survival of Klamath Salmon stocks” said Zeke Grader, Executive Director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA) 
 
Dave Goldenberg of the California Salmon Council stated “The current management system mandates that 35,000 wild Salmon return to spawn in the Klamath River every year. However, this is a goal not to prevent extinction, but to ensure maximum productivity of the stock. The Klamath fall chinook are not listed as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act.”  Thus there may be some flexibility in applying this standard.
 
“The Klamath River has proven times and times again that record numbers of offspring result from years with low returns of adult spawners”, said longtime fisherman Sunny Maahs, “In 1992 only 12,000 adult Salmon came back to the river. The offspring of these 12,000 Salmon produced a near-record run of Salmon in 1995.” 
 
Dave Bitts, another longtime salmon fisherman, a member of the Klamath Fisheries Management Council and PCFFA’s expert on the Klamath, agrees with Maahs’ testimony and adds, “Through the emergency rule, we would tap into 10% of the available biomass of this year’s salmon run with very little Klamath impact. The easy question to ask is: Is saving an extra 3,000 Klamath salmon worth putting the whole coast out of business? – The answer is NO.” 
 
Most fisheries experts agree that over-fishing is simply not the problem in the Klamath. Ocean and in-river salmon harvests have long been tightly regulated. The problems, they say, are all within the Klamath River.  Years of artificially low flows and the effects of warm water reservoirs behind several fish-blocking dams have encouraged fish parasites to spread throughout the middle part of the river, killing off the juvenile salmon in spring 2003 right after low flows had already killed off 79,000 adult spawners in fall 2002 in a massive fish kill.  The salmon thus suffered a “double whammy” from these two back-to-back losses that have greatly reduced this year’s returning adults – which are primarily the few remaining survivors from the fish kills of fall 2002 and spring 2004.  Neither problem was caused by fishing.
 
After the fish kill in fall 2002, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC) itself predicted that, as a result of this lost reproductive potential, the numbers of returning fish would be way down during 2005, 2006 and 2007. This prediction is now coming true.
 
Last year these Klamath declines triggered severe fishing restrictions closing half the season that cost the California and Oregon economies over $50 million in economic losses. If the season is cancelled altogether this year, the additional losses could exceed $150 million.
 
“Mother Nature has provided plenty of rain this year to flush pollutants and parasites out of the river,” said Mike Hudson, President of the Small Boat Commercial Salmon Fishermen’s Association. “A federal Judge has recently decided that the Bush Administration’s plan for Salmon recovery was severely flawed, and ordered immediate water releases to the Klamath.  All this will help Klamath salmon survive in future years.  Furthermore, the federal agencies are now mandating fish passage at all Klamath dams, which will make hundreds of miles of lost spawning grounds available to the salmon once again. We are finally on the right track.  For that they should cut us at least a little slack.”
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Zenar
stateoftheplanet-foodpanelstatement-revised3-25-04.pdf_600_.jpg
Why are you publishing a commercial fishing group's press release? I understand that indymedia people love protests and demonstrations, but fish havesting regulation is absolutely a good idea. Have you read through their practices to ensure that they're sustainable?

We're in the midst of a massive degradation of all ecosystems on the planet, and major changes will have to be made -- including wild fish harvesting practices -- if we are to avoid environmental catastrophy.

I attached a PDF from the Earth Institute at Columbia University that includes information on this. Pay special attention to "SECTION V. STATUS AND TRENDS IN WORLD FISHERIES PRODUCTION"

The original location is : http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/sop2004/documents/StateOfThePlanet-FoodPanelStatement-Revised3-25-04.pdf
The ocean sport and commercial fishermen deserve a season S. of Cape mednocino but it should not start until after August 1 in order to allow the remaining Klamath Spring Chinook to get into the river first. There were only a few hundred wild Springers counted on the Klamath last year and this is the stock we need to restore to the Upper Basin (once the dams come down!).
More important to the survival of Klamath salmon is what the California Fish & Game Commision will do next week about in river sport fishing. There should not be an in river sport season this year so that every possible spawner which makes it back to the river has the opportunity to spawn. It is especially important that the Commission end the practice of allowing in-river sport fishing in the Spring because those sport boats are taking some of the last wild Springers. I love to fish for them too but we must conserve now.
Each year millions of baby salmon die on the Klamath and two major agricultural tributaries - the Scott and Shasta Rivers due to disease made epidemic because of poor water qulaity, high water temperature and low flows. Taking out the dams is not a majoc bullet. It will help and may be the single most important action we can take to save Klamath salmon but we must also clean-up all the pollution coming off the ag lands and all reduce the sediment coming off the industrial forest land. We need real regulation of ag and timber; the state water baords and the DFG have allowed these two industries to drive Klamath salmon to the brink of extinction. Meanwhile tribal folks, fishermen, river and coatal communities suffer. this is a gross injustice that should end!
by green sturgeon
Look, there's enough evidence out there that with rivers restored to their previous condition (remove dams, reduce fertilizer runoff, stop clear cut logging, soil erosion, sedimentaion, etc..) that the numbers of salmon and other anadromous fish available would increase, thus reducing the need for any sort of fishing ban suggested by the bush regime. What the Yurok, Karuk, Hoopa and other indigenous peoples want is enough salmon for everyone, including dolphins
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$40.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network