top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Hippies Make the Best Bureaucrats: The Realities of Recruiting at UCSC

by Kate Flanagan (projectcollective [at] ucsc.edu)
The Project
March 2006
page 8

Counter-Recruitment is one of the best tools of the anti-war movement. Around the country, activists are engaging in providing alternative information to potential recruits, and engaging in protests and civil disobedience to stop recruitment.

At UCSC, military recruiters only come around during the schools’ two annual career fairs. At the past two, students have prevented recruitment: last spring by surrounding the fair en masse and demanding that the recruiters leave and this fall by forming a wall of queer kissing to block access to recruiters. Recruiters will be back on campus on April 11 and students are planning an action to oppose them. Look to the right to read the letter that SAW delivered to the administration about the April 11th career fair.
Counter-Recruitment is one of the best tools of the anti-war movement. Around the country, activists are engaging in providing alternative information to potential recruits, and engaging in protests and civil disobedience to stop recruitment.

At UCSC, military recruiters only come around during the schools’ two annual career fairs. At the past two, students have prevented recruitment: last spring by surrounding the fair en masse and demanding that the recruiters leave and this fall by forming a wall of queer kissing to block access to recruiters. Recruiters will be back on campus on April 11 and students are planning an action to oppose them. Look to the right to read the letter that SAW delivered to the administration about the April 11th career fair.

The 1996 Solomon Amendment forces schools to allow military recruiters the same opportunities that they allow other employers, under penalty of withdrawal of federal funds. Recently, the Amendment was reviewed by the Supreme Court. A group of law schools argued that the military is discriminatory because of their anti-queer policy and that being forced to publicize for recruiters violated their free speech. Campus anti-war activists had been holding their breaths and playing nice with administration in hopes that the Solomon Amendment would be overturned and that recruiters could be barred from campus. But in the decision that was released March 6th, the judges voted unanimously to reject the law schools’ case.

For the past two actions opposing ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ has been the focus. Activists were enforcing the school’s anti-discrimination policy by not allowing recruiters who discriminated against homosexuals to recruit. Many student were unconvinced by this argument. Nondiscrimination was a strategic argument, in part to fall in line with the case against the Solomon Amendment. Nondiscrimination was mainstream debate but it didn’t really express why we were opposed to military recruitment on campus.

Now that there is no legal way to ban military recruiters from campus, the movement needs to find a more complete and powerful way to frame the anti-recruitment debate. We need to connect recruitment to war, and point out the contradictions of war, which reveal its implicit racism, sexism, heterosexism, classism, and imperialism.

Many high school students are forced into the military because there are no other economic options for them (the economic draft). A powerful argument against recruitment at the high school level is that schools have a responsibility to protect their students from the lies of recruiters and the dangers of the military. But at UCSC no one is being forced or coerced into the military. College graduates have the tools to get alternative jobs with adequate salaries. People with a degree who join the armed forces are hired to be administrators, doctors, lawyers, officers, and public relations people. These are jobs with little to no risk and much higher salaries and benefits than soldiers. They are the professional bureaucrats who order the soldiers onto the front lines. They are not just cogs in the machine. Because they have the privilege to choose to work for military, they are responsible for the wars they help create.

Because recruitment is different at UCSC than at high school campuses, the military recruitment debate needs to be different. We need to acknowledge the realities of recruitment at UCSC and look critically at the University system itself. An honest anti-recruitment movement must include a critique of the University’s role in our society, of creating and reproducing privilege. Saying no to military recruiting at UCSC is rejecting the idea that a person with a college degree is somehow worth more than a person without one. It is rejecting the unjust economic system which war relies on, which forces many poor high school students into the military while middle-class college graduates control their lives.

The military recruiters will be back on campus on April 11th at the Last Chance Job and Internship Fair. I’ll be there to prevent them from recruiting UCSC students to be their bureaucrats. Because choosing to create war shouldn’t be an option.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
Why do supposedly educated people continue to aim their protests towards the soldiers instead of the policymakers? In the case of the “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy and in concerns for our actions in Iraq they are protesting to wrong people. In both of these cases the policies put in to law or action by the duly elected leaders of our government. Soldiers have little say in this. They swear to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and obey the leaders appointed above them”. These are civilian politicians and political appointees not generals' or privates definitely not recruiters. It is the soldiers to protect your right under the Constitution and Bill of Rights not the least of which is the First Amendment right to free speech. What do you hope to achieve by preventing recruiters from doing their job? Most members of the military when pressed about it prefer to have a volunteer force. They are better motivated and tend to be better educated. But by denying volunteers to the armed forces could force the Congress, which is constitutionally responsible for raising and supporting an army, to reinstate the draft. Once again this is something that the military’s leaders have said that they do not want. In fact the only time the word draft ever comes up is when it’s mentioned politician. Maybe the protesters are hoping to change the mind of the military and have them rise up against the political leadership and refused to go to war. Let us think about that little bit. The bottom line is that if you truly want to make a change you have to affect the people that make the decisions in this case it is the Congress and the president not the soldiers.
by student
"The bottom line is that if you truly want to make a change you have to affect the people that make the decisions in this case it is the Congress and the president not the soldiers."

Actually, history have shown us that this statement is frequently false. Many nonviolent revolutions that have toppled oppressive dictatorships have been based not on 'changing the mind' of the dictator, but rather, eroding the support that is vital to their holding power. If the soldiers refuse to fight for the dictator, then the dictator's war can't happen.

As the majority of the American public is opposed the the war, and the majority of soldiers want out of Iraq, the most democratic thing to do would be to pullout right now. Since the anti-democratic government won't do it, we can do it ourselves. If there are no soldiers, there are no wars.

There won't be a draft, because if there were, the whole country would riseup even more than it already has. But if a draft is instituted, we'll be entering a whole new era of social unrest.
by Ralph
The Imperial U.S.A will do whatever it wants to do, empires do not ask for the opinions of the masses. Also, Dictators will never listen to the ranting of the powerless and people with less than say 250mil. dollars. What would be needed to stop a juggernaut like the Imperial USA would be something like everyone refusing to pay taxes at the same time or 250 million people marching on the White House. All of these little ittybitty protests do nothing but keep the lower class fighting itself while the top 1-5% sits pretty.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network