top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

March 18 Global Day of Action — San Francisco

by A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition (answer [at] actionsf.org)
As the war and occupation of Iraq becomes an increasing human disaster now is the time to say no to the U.S. war drive. On March 18, 2006, the 3rd anniversary of shock and awe, we will be gathering at 11am at the Civic Center for an opening rally followed by a march through downtown and then returning to the Civic Center for a closing rally.
jan._18__2003x.jpgqkk6nd.jpg

From Iraq to New Orleans

Fund People's Needs - Not War and Occupation

 

As the war and occupation of Iraq becomes an increasing human disaster, now is the time to say no to the U.S. war drive.  On the 3rd anniversary of shock and awe, we will be gathering at 11am at the Civic Center for an opening rally followed by a march through downtown and then returning to the Civic Center for a closing rally.

The March 18 weekend is the 3rd anniversary of the criminal U.S. "shock and awe" invasion of Iraq, in which more than 100,000 Iraqis and 2,200 U.S. troops have died. The U.S. continues to occupy Iraq at great cost to Iraqis and people in the U.S. Much of Iraq—devastated by the U.S.-led occupation and, before that, more than a decade of genocidal sanctions—lacks running water and electricity. Despite being bogged down in Iraq, the warmakers in Washington are pushing ahead with their agenda of regime change in Syria, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and elsewhere. The situation is difficult for many working and poor people in the U.S. as well. More than $200 million is spent to wage war on Iraq each day. That money should be directed to fund people's needs, like health care, housing, education, job creation, relief for hurricane victims and more. Only a fraction of the war budget for one day could solve the current Medicare prescription drug crisis.

Despite growing opposition, the Bush administration is also trying to widen its assaults on labor, immigrants' rights, and civil liberties. In an attempt to silence anti-war activists and create a general climate of fear, the Pentagon and NSA have been spying on innocent people. We can't let the warmongers in the White House and Congress and their corporate backers silence our voices of conscience.

Now is the time to speak out loudly against imperialist war and repressive, racist policies at home. We have the momentum. The political climate and popular opinion in the U.S. has turned dramatically against the war. The Bush administration is on the defensive. A new poll shows that more than 52% of Americans believe that Bush should be impeached. Let's channel the popular outrage against Bush and the war into a powerful people's movement for peace and social justice.

 

 Volunteers needed! Call 821-6545

come to the ANSWER organizing meetings Tuesdays, 7pm

2489 Mission, San Francisco, CA (near 24th St. BART)

 photo credit: Peter Maiden

 

 

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by protest is not enough
It had no effect whatsoever. It's time to try something new.
by Pissed
Amen. Marching around in circles hasn't accomplished anything. This war has been going on since 1991 and the anti-war movement clings to comfortable tactics.
by ...
"This war has been going on since 1991 and the anti-war movement clings to comfortable tactics."

Just because "comfortable tactics" have not stopped the war does not mean that "uncomfortable tactics" will.

There is nothing fundamentally wrong with the use of violence against property or violence as a form of self defense to try to bring about change in face of horrors such as those going on in Iraq... but that doesnt mean that random acts of sabotage will really have much of an effect either. Street protests and Ploughshare type destrucion of military machinary are ultimately both symbolic with the real effect being on public opinion and not in the actual act itself. What brought an end to the Vietnam war was the actions of the Vietnamese, the effects of the war on the US economy, the draft (and how that effected public opinion and how that efected military morale), and Nixon. The ultra-radical guerrilla wanabe groups in the US may have helped effect morale but its hard to say in which direction, since polarization may have actually resulted in more support for the war than if the war were just going badly and siding against the war hadnt meant taking a side in the domestic culture wars.

A giant protest is something that helps build connections which can help people get out ideas out that can increase opposition that as the next election approachs may force the hand of some in Congress. It probably wont be much more effective than a single person like Cindy Sheehan was getting national news coverage or the effect of Abu Ghraib type images was... but it's something. More radical actions may feel like doing more but even if putting one's self at risk feels good (like your doing something) the action itself should be judged by its effect and in a country the size of the US no amount of property damage one can do to the military machine is anything more than symbolic (unless we were the in the middle of a mass uprising which we are not since public opinions just isnt there)
by RWF (restes60 [at] earthlink.net)
. . . . ANSWER might want to elevate the emphasis upon the prospect of an attack on Iran during the event

there is something eerie about seeing groups protesting the war and occupation and not highlighting the need to protest the launching of a war against Iran

--Richard
by Let's just stop and....
...and we can all wait for nessie to figure it out.

We haven't tried that. Maybe that will work!
by close, but no cigar
What you have tried is waiting for *someone* to figure it out. It's not working. You're going to have to figure it out for yourselves.
by for telling us that
we might not have figured that out without your instruction.
by Buy some books!!
Anarchist books! Buy some books from some anarchists. Not to be confused with socialist newspapers...

We haven't tried THAT before...
by close, but no cigar
Some of you might have. Others might not have. Either way, all of you could have done it, even if you didn't actually do it. It's well within your capabilities to figure stuff like this out on your own. If you haven't figured it out on your own yet, it's probably from lack of trying.

I advise trying. If you don't at least try to figure stuff out for yourself, you're never going to be free, ever. How very sad that would be, how very, very sad.
by cp
Yes, I agree with the person above. Just because traditional nonviolent marching tactics have proven ineffective in many cases, it doesn't follow that you will automatically be effective by adopting a sabotage/nonnonviolent/edgier tactic. Really, it's just far more complicated to determine what action you could take that will work.

For instance, look at the recent SHAC convictions. I have to say that in this case, taking the unmoderated approach (for an issue that probably has high public support for some aspects of it!) really was counterproductive. The last place I would been seen this month is at an animal rights group meeting which is probably filled with FBI agents, and the general public just learned that animal rights protesters want to kidnap your children. However, the Solomon islanders somewhat violently kicking out Australian mining companies clearly did the effective and right thing. Leica camera company moving out hundreds of at-risk employees from Germany in 1939 using direct action and no open petitioning of government was doing the right thing.
by or lack of reading maybe.
If only I knew where to get, oh I dunno.... some good books on the topic. Or something. Where oh where...
The public library is a great place to get books because they are free and most will let you get rare books from other libraries if you are willing to wait.

If you want to buy books your best bet for rare books is online but in-person Anarchist books are easiest to find fom the booksellers stores themselves (AK and Bound Together). Socialist and Communist bookstores also exist in the Bay Area and have pretty good selections too. The book fair does have more zines and stuff like that but there is a strong lifestylist aspect to everything that can even be seen in whats being sold. In terms of total number of political oriented books you are about as likely to find what you want if you go to tables at the main anti-war march as your are at the bookfair. But both places mainly sell books which is a waste of paper if you just want to get the ideas and dont feel an absolute need ofr ownership; reading books online or using a library is a better way to go.
by but no.
i want to support someone else's cult, and to define myself by what i believe, based on my consumer purchases. i want friends based on our common commodity acquisition patterns.

in particular, i'd like to meet people who like the same bumper stickers, tshirts, printed matter and, hey why not? i want to meet people who like the same STAR PERSONALITIES that i do.

i'm not gonna get that at the library. i need a semi-privatized marketplace of (some) ideas. preferrably, that might include an anti-statist event at a municipal government facility, one willing to kick out anyone bold enough to attempt to disrupt my anarcho-shopping dream.
by it's about time
>one willing to kick out anyone bold enough to attempt to disrupt my anarcho-shopping dream.

If you want kicked out, be disruptive. It's as simple as that.
by for the New Society.
"If you want kicked out, be disruptive. It's as simple as that."


and that's different than totalitarianism how, exactly?
Based off ones view of public and private property, controlling things within a private Book Fair isnt totalitarian since its not government control and just control of a private space.

In a future libertaian socialist world one would expect there still be to private spaces where people can meet with friends and control entry to others since even if one doesnt believe in private property free association isnt authoritarian if everyone has the resources to organize their own events of this sort.

Of course there will never be a future libertarian socialist world since the private nature of most Anarchist events acts as a barrier to entry into the community and by treating a political movemnt as a private social event Anarchist tend to undermine themselves. The book fair is actually better in this respect than the 8 Days of Anarchy thing ( http://enpleinforme.com/ ) where half of the days are invitation only (and I would bet most Bay Area Anarchists are not even invited) Its easier and safer to organize radical actions and sabotage in private spaces but with the world in its current state most such radical acts are ineffectiev and probably counterproductive. How many nonAnarchists even know of recent acts of sabotage carried out by Anarchists? If nobody notices and the acts are essentially symbolic (since the scale of modern capitalism is such that small insurance payouts are not going to change policy) the general public not knowing about an action means it may as well have never taken place. My personal take is that secretive cell type groups that see themselves as uberradical are essentially the same as Ren Fair events and other events where people act out fantasies because it feels better to play an exciting role in something thats not really real, than engage in more boring forms or real political action that may have a real effect but dont allow those taking part to feel like they are engaged in some epic struggle that one may read about in books or see in movies. There is nothing bad about trying to make political action exciting but when secrecy is required and denunciation of everyone not willing to buy into the fantasy is a constant them,e the end effect seems to undermine the stated political goals.
by The Rockefellers and the Morgans agree.
"controlling things within a private Book Fair isnt totalitarian since its not government control and just control of a private space."


So, you're okay with private control of the marketplace-- so long as it's your marketplace.

Right down to kicking out opposing points of view. Just like any (other) shopping mall owner in the USA.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$160.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network