From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Moderates propose .XXX domain
-- which fascists and pornographers oppose.
To the San Francisco CHRONICLE:
Filtering*, whether manual or programmed, would work better
if adults-only sites could voluntarily choose appropriate top-level domains,
such as ".xxx" or ".adult".
Such adult domain names would virtually say "Juveniles, keep out!"
But the fascist Bush regime has, so far, prevented ICANN from allowing ".xxx".**
Will Congress intervene?
Tortuga Bi LIBERTY,
San Francisco
12 February 2006
.......
*
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/02/12/FILTERING.TMP
....
**
[ August 2005:]
http://news.com.com/Bush+administration+objects+to+.xxx+domains/2100-1028_3-5833764.html
........
[ February 2006:]
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/story.asp?ID=115170
" Bill would create .xxx domain for porn
Mary Clare Jalonick
Associated Press
February 6, 2006
©2006Associated Press
WASHINGTON – It's rare that Christian conservatives and the pornography industry agree on anything. But a congressional proposal to create a new Internet domain has made odd bedfellows of the two groups.
Some moderate Democrats in Congress are pushing for an Internet red-light district where pornography would be isolated on a ".xxx" domain. Conservatives and the adult entertainment industry are fighting the idea – but for dramatically different reasons.
Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., is crafting the legislative package that would require the Department of Commerce to create the new domain name. Pornographic Web sites would be required to abandon their ".com" addresses, ideally consolidating them all in one Internet neighborhood. [....] "
..........
[ Note by TBL:
Alliance between fascists and pornographers?
This reminds me of when Oklahoma was a "dry" state.
Whenever there was a referendum on the issue, bootleggers and fundis united to continue Prohibition of alcoholic beverages.]
....
....
Filtering*, whether manual or programmed, would work better
if adults-only sites could voluntarily choose appropriate top-level domains,
such as ".xxx" or ".adult".
Such adult domain names would virtually say "Juveniles, keep out!"
But the fascist Bush regime has, so far, prevented ICANN from allowing ".xxx".**
Will Congress intervene?
Tortuga Bi LIBERTY,
San Francisco
12 February 2006
.......
*
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/02/12/FILTERING.TMP
....
**
[ August 2005:]
http://news.com.com/Bush+administration+objects+to+.xxx+domains/2100-1028_3-5833764.html
........
[ February 2006:]
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/story.asp?ID=115170
" Bill would create .xxx domain for porn
Mary Clare Jalonick
Associated Press
February 6, 2006
©2006Associated Press
WASHINGTON – It's rare that Christian conservatives and the pornography industry agree on anything. But a congressional proposal to create a new Internet domain has made odd bedfellows of the two groups.
Some moderate Democrats in Congress are pushing for an Internet red-light district where pornography would be isolated on a ".xxx" domain. Conservatives and the adult entertainment industry are fighting the idea – but for dramatically different reasons.
Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., is crafting the legislative package that would require the Department of Commerce to create the new domain name. Pornographic Web sites would be required to abandon their ".com" addresses, ideally consolidating them all in one Internet neighborhood. [....] "
..........
[ Note by TBL:
Alliance between fascists and pornographers?
This reminds me of when Oklahoma was a "dry" state.
Whenever there was a referendum on the issue, bootleggers and fundis united to continue Prohibition of alcoholic beverages.]
....
....
For more information:
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/story...
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/indexn?blogid=13
Have you ever
accidentally
stumbled on a
porn site?
Have you ever
accidentally
stumbled on a
porn site?
For more information:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate...
No .xxx for VietNam...
http://www.localnewsleader.com/olberlin/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=140723
..............
http://www.localnewsleader.com/olberlin/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=140723
..............
"CensorNet(s)" to rival free Internet?
Weak Warped Web, helping dictatorships limit information?
.........
China, Arab-League Build New Internets
http://news.tmcnet.com/news/2006/01/20/1301898.htm
TMCnet - Jan 20, 2006
... For example, China, the Arab League and a Dutch company ... [...]
.......
Should World Make Room For Another Wide Web?
http://www.courant.com/business/hc-wsjinternet.artjan22,0,4344057.story?coll=hc-headlines-business
Hartford Courant, United States - Jan 22, 2006
... The 22-nation Arab League has begun a similar system ... [...]
.......
........
PS: Please also see
".xxx" domain controversy:
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1801829.php
.....
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network