top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Oakland Settles Police Attacks in Port

by via list
a vote was finally taken on the proposed settlement stemming from the police attack on anti-war demonstrators and longshore workers in the port on April 7, 2003
Oakland Settles Police Attacks in Port

Dear Friends,

After a loooong City Council meeting last night with much pomp and ceremony and even some serious stuff like the Oakland teachers (OEA) appealing to the Council to intervene with the recalcitrant (School) District over their contract lest they strike, a vote was finally taken on the proposed settlement stemming from the police attack on anti-war demonstrators and longshore workers in the port on April 7, 2003. Those familiar with Oakland politics opined that the reason a settlement is finally getting voted on is because elections are coming up in November and the election campaigns will be getting into full swing shortly. City Council President Ignacio de la Fuente is running for Oakland mayor, with the support of most of the City Counci members, and his mentor Mayor Jerry Brown is after the State Attorney General job. Both supported the cops throughout this lengthy ordeal and neither lent any support to the rights of anti-war protesters or longshore workers who were shot and beaten. The only name listed on the agenda was Sri Louise as was her settlement, none of the others were except ILWU Local 10, but no settlement was listed for the union.

After one newspaper reporter pointed out that the agenda was confusing and had mentioned a "closed" (i.e. secret) meeting and that the business conducted in that meeting had to be made public, it was announced that a total of 59 plaintiffs had originally sued the City of Oakland. 47 cases had been settled before the "closed" meeting. They proposed a settlement of the remaining 12 for $393,750. The total settlement cost, according to reliable legal sources, is pegged at $2,000,000. After the City politicians pay their legal expenses, including their high-priced attorney, the total cost to we, who live and work in Oakland, will likely be over $3,000,000. This does not include the money spent to mobilize the police to attack anti-war demonstrators (partially subsidized by Bush's Homeland Security!). Do you think the City Council in its wisdom ever considered using that money instead to keep Oakland schools and classes open and pay teachers what they deserve?! Will this monetary settlement stop police brutality? Will Jerry Brown and Ignacio de la Fuente begin defending civil liberties and vehemently opposing this bloody war now that election time is approaching? If you think so, I've got a bridge across the bay to sell you............ if it ever gets built.

Thanks to all those who showed up to the City Council meeting to show support, teachers, ILWU members, and especially the striking Northwest aircraft mechanics.

La lutta continua,
Jack
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by no
Why do you sue the man when it is THE PEOPLE who will have to pay? You are only hurting the people, not punishing the elite or those in power. You are helping them to divide and conquer us.
by Oaklander
Some of the people attacked by OPD at the Port sustained injuries that are not going away. The settlement will serve to compensate them for medical bills and lost wages. Frankly, the settlement amount is not all that large in light of the injuries. A punitive award would have been much more.

I don't agree that such legal action is counterproductive. Activists in Oakland, SF, DC, and elsewhere must raise the costs to local and federal authorities of repression and excessive force.
by ntuit
Yes, lawsuits are necessary to get help for the people injured. But the comments about this in Why? are important. In the end the people of Oakland, the city, are paying for all of this. Instead of money going to schools or other vital services it is going to pay for the injuries to the people who were hurt. That is necessary and desirable. What is problematic is the politicians and police don't seem to have to pay anything. But I guess if we keep electing them...people like Ignacio De La Fuente....we will always end up paying for their misdeeds and the misdeeds of those government employees they defend. Oakland needs a governmental house cleaning....and the people need to be put back into power.....Maybe changes like electing Dellums and Aimee Allison could help move this along.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$40.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network