Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Fact File on Reaction to Danish Caricatures
It is being alleged in some quarters that the controversy over the Danish caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad is somehow artificial or whipped up months later by the Saudis. This is not true. The controversy began in Denmark itself among the 180,000 Danish Muslims. It was taken up by the ambassadors of Muslim states in Copenhagen. Then the Egyptian foreign minister began making a big deal of it, as did Islamist parties in Turkey and Pakistan. The crisis has unfolded along precisely the sort of networks one would have expected, and become intertwined with all the post-colonial crises of the region, from the foreign military occupation of Iraq to the new instability in Syria and Lebanon.
Below is a press record on the controversy, drawn from the Foreign Broadcast Information Service, a translation service of the CIA that is later released under various commercial auspices, including BBC World Monitoring and World News Connection.
Below is a press record on the controversy, drawn from the Foreign Broadcast Information Service, a translation service of the CIA that is later released under various commercial auspices, including BBC World Monitoring and World News Connection.
The Caricatures were published on 30 September in Copenhagen.
They provoked a protest of 5,000 Muslims there soon thereafter.
----------------
"FBIS Analysis Oct 05: Danish Media Back Publication of Cartoons of Mohammad
For assistance with multimedia elements, contact FBIS at 1-800-205-8615 Correction: correcting formatting
Denmark -- FBIS Analysis
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
. . . The media reported on 16 September that a Danish author was unable to find an illustrator for her book on the Prophet Muhammad, since Islam forbids pictorial representations of the prophet and illustrators were afraid of a Muslim backlash.
The conservative daily then asked 40 cartoonists to provide such pictures and it subsequently published all 12 cartoons received in response, some of which depicted the prophet in an unflattering manner. Various Muslim organizations and clerics condemned the daily for this and on 20 October several embassies of Arab and other Muslim states protested to Prime Minister Fogh Rasmussen. Meanwhile, an Islamic group called "Holy Brigades in Northern Europe" threatened both and Denmark in general with terrorist retaliation. Both the editor and cultural editor of the newspaper explained their reasons for publishing the cartoons and refused to accept that they had done anything inappropriate.
-- cited editor Carsten Juste saying the publication was a "journalistic project" about self-censorship. Expressing surprise at the Muslim reaction, he denied intending to offend anyone's religious beliefs. The English-language independent daily cited Juste as saying satire and caricature were accepted in Denmark and there should be no "barriers" against such expression. Danish Radio's website quoted him as saying he "could never dream of retracting the pictures" (15, 12, 10 October).
-- cited Jyllands-Posten cultural editor as describing the publication as a reaction to artists and writers censoring their work out of fear of "radical Islamists." She said religious beliefs could not demand special treatment in a secular society (6 October). Other Danish newspapers backed right to publish, but some suggested the cartoons were provocative. One editorial pointed to the possible danger created and urged calm on all sides.
-- Backing the publication of the cartoons, an editorial in the center-right daily described the fear of criticizing Islam as "really destructive" to society, warning "freedom of speech dies from self-censorship." Another editorial called freedom of speech the "fundamental core of Danish democracy" (4, 22 October). . .
--------
Danish Prime Minister Backs Press's Right To Caricature Prophet Muhammad
"Danish PM Touts Freedom of Expression in Muhammad Cartoons Row" -- AFP headline
AFP (North European Service)
Friday, October 21, 2005 T18:26:26Z
COPENHAGEN, Oct 21 (AFP) -- Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Friday ( 21 October) told Muslim diplomats in the country he would not intervene in a row over newspaper caricatures of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, citing freedom of expression.
Ambassadors from Arab countries and Pakistan, Iran, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Indonesia wrote a letter to Rasmussen earlier this week, saying they were offended by the 12 cartoons published in Denmark's largest circulation daily on September 30 and demanding an apology from the paper.
Images of the prophet are considered blasphemous under Islam.
Rasmussen said in a written reply, a copy of which was obtained by AFP, that he would not intervene in the affairs but said the diplomats were free to undertake legal proceedings.
"The freedom of expression is the very foundation of the Danish democracy . . . (and) the Danish government has no means of influencing the press," he said.
"However, Danish legislation prohibits acts or expressions of a blasphemous or discriminatory nature. The offended party may bring such acts or expressions to court, and it is for the courts to decide in individual cases," he wrote.
Last week, as many as 5,000 Muslims demonstrated in Copenhagen against the newspaper and the drawings, which depicted Muhammad in different settings. In one of the drawings, he appeared with a turban shaped like a bomb strapped to his head.
The editors of have stood by their cartoons and rejected the demand for an apology.
"We live in a democracy where satire and caricature are generally accepted, and religion should not set limits on that," chief editor Carsten Juste said on Thursday.
Islam is the second religion in Denmark after the Evangelical-Lutheran state church, with some 180,000 members or three percent of the population.
-----------------------
The issue became quickly internationalized, with the embassies of Muslim countries demanding a retraction. by mid-October. PM Fogh-Rasmussen continues to refuse to entertain the complaints. Indeed, he went on the offensive, threatening Danish Muslims with heightened penalites for harassing persons who wrote on religion.
-----------------------------
Danish Prime Minister To Seek Harsher Penalties for Threats to Freedom of Speech
Excerpt from report by Line Prasz: "Harsher Penalties Will Protect Freedom of Speech"
Politiken (Internet Version-WWW)
Tuesday, October 25, 2005 T18:36:27Z
There should be harsher penalties for those who threaten and harass people who exercise their legal rights to make statements about topics such as religion. That is what Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen (Liberal Party) said in the wake of the trouble over the drawings of the prophet Muhammad.
The government wants to institute harsher penalties for crimes and threats against people who exercise their legal rights to make statements about topics such as religion.
That is what Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said at a press conference.
"We want to protect freedom of speech in Denmark. We have seen examples of how people have been assaulted and threatened if they expressed themselves, and that is unacceptable," said Fogh Rasmussen.
The specific details of the bill are still uncertain.
Newspaper illustrators threatened with their lives
The bill comes in the wake of the case involving a group of newspaper illustrators who were threatened with their lives after they drew pictures of the prophet Muhammad in.
"It is unacceptable that legal statements can lead to violence and threats," said the prime minister.
Since the drawings were made public on 30 September, 's name has appeared on at least two web sites that glorify violence, which also have pictures of terrorist targets in Denmark with a message stating that "you will soon regret all of this." . . .
(Description of Source: Copenhagen Politiken (Internet Version-WWW) in Danish -- nationwide centrist daily)
----------------------
Then the Danish Muslims tried to invoke Danish law, as Rasmussen initially suggested they do if they thought they had a case.
---------
Danish Muslim Groups Make Complaint to Police Over Mohamed Cartoons
Ritzau Bureau report: "Jyllands-Posten Reported for Racial Discrimination"
Politiken (Internet Version-WWW)
Tuesday, November 1, 2005 T00:57:57Z
Journal Code: 771 Language: ENGLISH Record Type: FULLTEXT
Document Type: FBIS Translated Text
Word Count: 159
Eleven Muslim organizations in Denmark have reported [Jyllands-Posten] to the police for blasphemy and racial discrimination.
The complaint was made to the police in Odense on Thursday ( 27 October) after the paper published 12 cartoons of the prophet Mohamed on 30 September. According to Islam, pictorial representations of Mohamed are not permitted.
Asmaa Abdol-Hamid, the 23-year-old spokesperson for the organizations that made the complaint, told Ritzau Bureau that the complaint to the police is based on the context in which the drawings were published.
"We have based our action on the article that the drawings were published alongside, and the intention of the article. We believe that it was the newspaper's intention to mock and ridicule," Asmaa Abdol-Hamid says.
She refers to the fact that the newspaper's arts editor wrote that Muslims in Denmark must be prepared for insult, mockery, and ridicule.
(Description of Source: Copenhagen Politiken (Internet Version-WWW) in Danish -- nationwide centrist daily)
------------
We have this from Turkey on Nov. 5:
"In a 650-word article entitled "Everything Fine so far But ..." on page 17, Zaman columnist Ahmet Turan Alkan comments on Denmark's reaction to criticisms from some 11 countries including Turkey of a Danish daily's publication of "inappropriate" cartoons depicting Prophet Mohammad. Alkan argues that while Danish Prime Minister Rasmussen is right "on paper" in citing freedom of the press as justification for Jyllands-Posten's publication of the said cartoons because the freedom of religious conviction as described in the EU acquis includes the liberty to practice "sarcasm" as well as the liberty to exercise religious faith, "the problem is not how Rasmussen and those who are of the same opinion as Rasmussen are acting but how we should act in the face of this situation. Such disagreements, which appear to be negligible now, will bring Turkey to a dramatic crossroads at one point in a negotiation process that is projected to last 10-12 years." (Istanbul Zaman (Ankara Edition) in Turkish -- moderate pro-Islamic daily supportive of Nurcu Sect leader Fethullah Gulen -- Root URL: http://www.zaman.com/ http://www.zaman.com)"
-----------
Then other nations besides Pakistan, Iran, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Indonesia got involved, including Egypt. Egypt's government was cracking down on the Muslim Brotherhood in the lead-up to the Egyptian elections, so this was a freebie for the secular Mubarak regime. They could pose as defenders of Islam abroad with no domestic cost.
-----------
Egyptian Foreign Minister Says Danish Paper's Cartoons of Prophet 'Disgraceful'
MENA
Monday, November 14, 2005 T18:39:38Z
Journal Code: 659 Language: ENGLISH Record Type: FULLTEXT
Document Type: FBIS Transcribed Text
Word Count: 203
CAIRO, Nov 14 (MENA) - Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul-Gheit rejected anti-Islam approaches in Denmark, branding them as a scandal.
The foreign minister said that Egypt had confronted this disgraceful act and will continue to confront such insults.
Abul-Gheit said he was keen, during the Future Forum foreign ministerial conference in Bahrain Sunday, on stressing the importance of dialogue among civilisations to avoid what had taken place in Denmark.
Twelve cartoons depicting Prophet Muhammad in different settings appeared in Denmark's largest circulation daily Jyllands-Posten on September 30.
The images have drawn criticism across the Muslim minority in Denmark, with religious leaders insisting they are an insult to the prophet and calling for an official apology.
On October 20, Muslim diplomats in Denmark protested against the newspaper caricatures in a letter to Danish Premier Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
Egypt is leading a diplomatic movement to prevent repeating such a scandal, said Abul-Gheit, reiterating the importance of dialogue.
Egypt ambassador to Denmark Mona Omar, as well as Arab and Muslim ambassadors, had protested over the drawings, but the Danish government rejected the protest and considered them as part of freedom of expression.
(Description of Source: Cairo MENA in English -- government news agency)
----------
By mid-November it hit Iraq. Al-Najaf al-Balagh, a Shiite newspaper, demanded that the Danish newspaper apologize.
"A 270-word front-page report says that Islamic organizations in Denmark have condemned a Danish newspaper for vilifying the Prophet Muhammad and urged the newspaper to apologize."
----------
Egypt's foreign minister kept the story going in November. This is important because Egypt is a big press center and very influential.
Then it was alleged that a member of the fundamentalist Jama'at-i Islami in Pakistan got into the action, offering a reward to whoever assassinated one of the cartoonists. The Jama'at, which is generally not this radical, denied the report, saying that it believed in a democratic society and so would never do such a thing.
----------
AFP: Denmark Envoy Warns of Pakistani Threat Over Mohammed Cartoons
" Denmark Warns of Pakistani Threat Over Mohammed Cartoons" - AFP headline
AFP
Friday, December 2, 2005 T14:01:45Z
Journal Code: 1001 Language: ENGLISH Record Type: FULLTEXT
Document Type: FBIS Transcribed Text
Word Count: 396
ISLAMABAD, Dec 2 (AFP) - Denmark said Friday it had issued a warning to travellers to Pakistan after fundamentalists reportedly offered a reward for the deaths of cartoonists who drew the prophet Mohammed in a Danish newspaper.
Copenhagen altered its travel advisory for the Muslim country after an official from Pakistan's Jamaat-e-Islami religious party allegedly offered the 500,000-rupee (8,333-dollar) bounty, said Denmark's ambassador to Islamabad, Bent Wigotski.
"We changed our travel advisory on November 17. It mentions the fact that cartoons were printed by a Danish newspaper in September and many Muslims consider them blasphemous and against Islam," Wigotski told AFP.
"We mentioned that the cartoons have been mentioned in Pakistani papers and they have generated death threats against the cartoonists," the envoy added. . . .
The Danish ambassador said the change in the travel advisory was based on a report published in Pakistan's influential Urdu language newspaper Nawa-i-waqt on November 15.
The report said that a member of Jamaat-e-Islami's youth wing named Shahid Pervez Gilani told a rally in Islamabad on November 14 that "anyone who kills the cartoonists will be given a reward of 500,000 rupees (8,333 dollars)."
The party's secretary general Syed Munawar Hassan also addressed the rally, urging Pakistan to "lodge a protest with Denmark and expel its ambassador from the country over the publication of the insulting cartoon".
A spokesman for Jamaat-e-Islami denied offering any reward for the deaths of the cartoonists.
"This is absolutely foolish and baseless news. We do not believe in violence and we never had any such policy because we are a democratic party," spokesman Shahid Shamsi told AFP.
"However, we are strongly against drawing sketches of our Holy Prophet," Shamsi said.
Images of the prophet Mohammed are considered blasphemous under Islam.
Ambassadors of Muslim countries to Denmark protested against the cartoons in October in a letter to the Danish prime minister.
A previously unknown Islamic group called Glory Brigades in Northern Europe also threatened to carry out attacks in the Scandinavian country over the affair, media reported at the time.
(Description of Source: Hong Kong AFP in English -- Hong Kong service of the independent French press agency Agence France-Presse)
------------
Anyway, the allegation that this thing was fanned by Saudi Arabia does not seem to be substantiated by the FBIS record, which shows Egypt's secular foreign minister to have been among the main fanners of the flame. Minor members of youth wings of Islamist parties in places like Pakistan then got into the action. Nor is it true that things were quiet after the immediate publication of the cartoons. Nor is it true that the Danish prime minister or the Jyllands-Posten expressed any sympathy for the hurt feelings of Muslims early on. Indeed, they lectured them on being uncivilized for objecting.
http://www.juancole.com/2006/02/fact-file-on-reaction-to-danish.html
They provoked a protest of 5,000 Muslims there soon thereafter.
----------------
"FBIS Analysis Oct 05: Danish Media Back Publication of Cartoons of Mohammad
For assistance with multimedia elements, contact FBIS at 1-800-205-8615 Correction: correcting formatting
Denmark -- FBIS Analysis
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
. . . The media reported on 16 September that a Danish author was unable to find an illustrator for her book on the Prophet Muhammad, since Islam forbids pictorial representations of the prophet and illustrators were afraid of a Muslim backlash.
The conservative daily then asked 40 cartoonists to provide such pictures and it subsequently published all 12 cartoons received in response, some of which depicted the prophet in an unflattering manner. Various Muslim organizations and clerics condemned the daily for this and on 20 October several embassies of Arab and other Muslim states protested to Prime Minister Fogh Rasmussen. Meanwhile, an Islamic group called "Holy Brigades in Northern Europe" threatened both and Denmark in general with terrorist retaliation. Both the editor and cultural editor of the newspaper explained their reasons for publishing the cartoons and refused to accept that they had done anything inappropriate.
-- cited editor Carsten Juste saying the publication was a "journalistic project" about self-censorship. Expressing surprise at the Muslim reaction, he denied intending to offend anyone's religious beliefs. The English-language independent daily cited Juste as saying satire and caricature were accepted in Denmark and there should be no "barriers" against such expression. Danish Radio's website quoted him as saying he "could never dream of retracting the pictures" (15, 12, 10 October).
-- cited Jyllands-Posten cultural editor as describing the publication as a reaction to artists and writers censoring their work out of fear of "radical Islamists." She said religious beliefs could not demand special treatment in a secular society (6 October). Other Danish newspapers backed right to publish, but some suggested the cartoons were provocative. One editorial pointed to the possible danger created and urged calm on all sides.
-- Backing the publication of the cartoons, an editorial in the center-right daily described the fear of criticizing Islam as "really destructive" to society, warning "freedom of speech dies from self-censorship." Another editorial called freedom of speech the "fundamental core of Danish democracy" (4, 22 October). . .
--------
Danish Prime Minister Backs Press's Right To Caricature Prophet Muhammad
"Danish PM Touts Freedom of Expression in Muhammad Cartoons Row" -- AFP headline
AFP (North European Service)
Friday, October 21, 2005 T18:26:26Z
COPENHAGEN, Oct 21 (AFP) -- Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Friday ( 21 October) told Muslim diplomats in the country he would not intervene in a row over newspaper caricatures of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, citing freedom of expression.
Ambassadors from Arab countries and Pakistan, Iran, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Indonesia wrote a letter to Rasmussen earlier this week, saying they were offended by the 12 cartoons published in Denmark's largest circulation daily on September 30 and demanding an apology from the paper.
Images of the prophet are considered blasphemous under Islam.
Rasmussen said in a written reply, a copy of which was obtained by AFP, that he would not intervene in the affairs but said the diplomats were free to undertake legal proceedings.
"The freedom of expression is the very foundation of the Danish democracy . . . (and) the Danish government has no means of influencing the press," he said.
"However, Danish legislation prohibits acts or expressions of a blasphemous or discriminatory nature. The offended party may bring such acts or expressions to court, and it is for the courts to decide in individual cases," he wrote.
Last week, as many as 5,000 Muslims demonstrated in Copenhagen against the newspaper and the drawings, which depicted Muhammad in different settings. In one of the drawings, he appeared with a turban shaped like a bomb strapped to his head.
The editors of have stood by their cartoons and rejected the demand for an apology.
"We live in a democracy where satire and caricature are generally accepted, and religion should not set limits on that," chief editor Carsten Juste said on Thursday.
Islam is the second religion in Denmark after the Evangelical-Lutheran state church, with some 180,000 members or three percent of the population.
-----------------------
The issue became quickly internationalized, with the embassies of Muslim countries demanding a retraction. by mid-October. PM Fogh-Rasmussen continues to refuse to entertain the complaints. Indeed, he went on the offensive, threatening Danish Muslims with heightened penalites for harassing persons who wrote on religion.
-----------------------------
Danish Prime Minister To Seek Harsher Penalties for Threats to Freedom of Speech
Excerpt from report by Line Prasz: "Harsher Penalties Will Protect Freedom of Speech"
Politiken (Internet Version-WWW)
Tuesday, October 25, 2005 T18:36:27Z
There should be harsher penalties for those who threaten and harass people who exercise their legal rights to make statements about topics such as religion. That is what Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen (Liberal Party) said in the wake of the trouble over the drawings of the prophet Muhammad.
The government wants to institute harsher penalties for crimes and threats against people who exercise their legal rights to make statements about topics such as religion.
That is what Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said at a press conference.
"We want to protect freedom of speech in Denmark. We have seen examples of how people have been assaulted and threatened if they expressed themselves, and that is unacceptable," said Fogh Rasmussen.
The specific details of the bill are still uncertain.
Newspaper illustrators threatened with their lives
The bill comes in the wake of the case involving a group of newspaper illustrators who were threatened with their lives after they drew pictures of the prophet Muhammad in.
"It is unacceptable that legal statements can lead to violence and threats," said the prime minister.
Since the drawings were made public on 30 September, 's name has appeared on at least two web sites that glorify violence, which also have pictures of terrorist targets in Denmark with a message stating that "you will soon regret all of this." . . .
(Description of Source: Copenhagen Politiken (Internet Version-WWW) in Danish -- nationwide centrist daily)
----------------------
Then the Danish Muslims tried to invoke Danish law, as Rasmussen initially suggested they do if they thought they had a case.
---------
Danish Muslim Groups Make Complaint to Police Over Mohamed Cartoons
Ritzau Bureau report: "Jyllands-Posten Reported for Racial Discrimination"
Politiken (Internet Version-WWW)
Tuesday, November 1, 2005 T00:57:57Z
Journal Code: 771 Language: ENGLISH Record Type: FULLTEXT
Document Type: FBIS Translated Text
Word Count: 159
Eleven Muslim organizations in Denmark have reported [Jyllands-Posten] to the police for blasphemy and racial discrimination.
The complaint was made to the police in Odense on Thursday ( 27 October) after the paper published 12 cartoons of the prophet Mohamed on 30 September. According to Islam, pictorial representations of Mohamed are not permitted.
Asmaa Abdol-Hamid, the 23-year-old spokesperson for the organizations that made the complaint, told Ritzau Bureau that the complaint to the police is based on the context in which the drawings were published.
"We have based our action on the article that the drawings were published alongside, and the intention of the article. We believe that it was the newspaper's intention to mock and ridicule," Asmaa Abdol-Hamid says.
She refers to the fact that the newspaper's arts editor wrote that Muslims in Denmark must be prepared for insult, mockery, and ridicule.
(Description of Source: Copenhagen Politiken (Internet Version-WWW) in Danish -- nationwide centrist daily)
------------
We have this from Turkey on Nov. 5:
"In a 650-word article entitled "Everything Fine so far But ..." on page 17, Zaman columnist Ahmet Turan Alkan comments on Denmark's reaction to criticisms from some 11 countries including Turkey of a Danish daily's publication of "inappropriate" cartoons depicting Prophet Mohammad. Alkan argues that while Danish Prime Minister Rasmussen is right "on paper" in citing freedom of the press as justification for Jyllands-Posten's publication of the said cartoons because the freedom of religious conviction as described in the EU acquis includes the liberty to practice "sarcasm" as well as the liberty to exercise religious faith, "the problem is not how Rasmussen and those who are of the same opinion as Rasmussen are acting but how we should act in the face of this situation. Such disagreements, which appear to be negligible now, will bring Turkey to a dramatic crossroads at one point in a negotiation process that is projected to last 10-12 years." (Istanbul Zaman (Ankara Edition) in Turkish -- moderate pro-Islamic daily supportive of Nurcu Sect leader Fethullah Gulen -- Root URL: http://www.zaman.com/ http://www.zaman.com)"
-----------
Then other nations besides Pakistan, Iran, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Indonesia got involved, including Egypt. Egypt's government was cracking down on the Muslim Brotherhood in the lead-up to the Egyptian elections, so this was a freebie for the secular Mubarak regime. They could pose as defenders of Islam abroad with no domestic cost.
-----------
Egyptian Foreign Minister Says Danish Paper's Cartoons of Prophet 'Disgraceful'
MENA
Monday, November 14, 2005 T18:39:38Z
Journal Code: 659 Language: ENGLISH Record Type: FULLTEXT
Document Type: FBIS Transcribed Text
Word Count: 203
CAIRO, Nov 14 (MENA) - Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul-Gheit rejected anti-Islam approaches in Denmark, branding them as a scandal.
The foreign minister said that Egypt had confronted this disgraceful act and will continue to confront such insults.
Abul-Gheit said he was keen, during the Future Forum foreign ministerial conference in Bahrain Sunday, on stressing the importance of dialogue among civilisations to avoid what had taken place in Denmark.
Twelve cartoons depicting Prophet Muhammad in different settings appeared in Denmark's largest circulation daily Jyllands-Posten on September 30.
The images have drawn criticism across the Muslim minority in Denmark, with religious leaders insisting they are an insult to the prophet and calling for an official apology.
On October 20, Muslim diplomats in Denmark protested against the newspaper caricatures in a letter to Danish Premier Anders Fogh Rasmussen.
Egypt is leading a diplomatic movement to prevent repeating such a scandal, said Abul-Gheit, reiterating the importance of dialogue.
Egypt ambassador to Denmark Mona Omar, as well as Arab and Muslim ambassadors, had protested over the drawings, but the Danish government rejected the protest and considered them as part of freedom of expression.
(Description of Source: Cairo MENA in English -- government news agency)
----------
By mid-November it hit Iraq. Al-Najaf al-Balagh, a Shiite newspaper, demanded that the Danish newspaper apologize.
"A 270-word front-page report says that Islamic organizations in Denmark have condemned a Danish newspaper for vilifying the Prophet Muhammad and urged the newspaper to apologize."
----------
Egypt's foreign minister kept the story going in November. This is important because Egypt is a big press center and very influential.
Then it was alleged that a member of the fundamentalist Jama'at-i Islami in Pakistan got into the action, offering a reward to whoever assassinated one of the cartoonists. The Jama'at, which is generally not this radical, denied the report, saying that it believed in a democratic society and so would never do such a thing.
----------
AFP: Denmark Envoy Warns of Pakistani Threat Over Mohammed Cartoons
" Denmark Warns of Pakistani Threat Over Mohammed Cartoons" - AFP headline
AFP
Friday, December 2, 2005 T14:01:45Z
Journal Code: 1001 Language: ENGLISH Record Type: FULLTEXT
Document Type: FBIS Transcribed Text
Word Count: 396
ISLAMABAD, Dec 2 (AFP) - Denmark said Friday it had issued a warning to travellers to Pakistan after fundamentalists reportedly offered a reward for the deaths of cartoonists who drew the prophet Mohammed in a Danish newspaper.
Copenhagen altered its travel advisory for the Muslim country after an official from Pakistan's Jamaat-e-Islami religious party allegedly offered the 500,000-rupee (8,333-dollar) bounty, said Denmark's ambassador to Islamabad, Bent Wigotski.
"We changed our travel advisory on November 17. It mentions the fact that cartoons were printed by a Danish newspaper in September and many Muslims consider them blasphemous and against Islam," Wigotski told AFP.
"We mentioned that the cartoons have been mentioned in Pakistani papers and they have generated death threats against the cartoonists," the envoy added. . . .
The Danish ambassador said the change in the travel advisory was based on a report published in Pakistan's influential Urdu language newspaper Nawa-i-waqt on November 15.
The report said that a member of Jamaat-e-Islami's youth wing named Shahid Pervez Gilani told a rally in Islamabad on November 14 that "anyone who kills the cartoonists will be given a reward of 500,000 rupees (8,333 dollars)."
The party's secretary general Syed Munawar Hassan also addressed the rally, urging Pakistan to "lodge a protest with Denmark and expel its ambassador from the country over the publication of the insulting cartoon".
A spokesman for Jamaat-e-Islami denied offering any reward for the deaths of the cartoonists.
"This is absolutely foolish and baseless news. We do not believe in violence and we never had any such policy because we are a democratic party," spokesman Shahid Shamsi told AFP.
"However, we are strongly against drawing sketches of our Holy Prophet," Shamsi said.
Images of the prophet Mohammed are considered blasphemous under Islam.
Ambassadors of Muslim countries to Denmark protested against the cartoons in October in a letter to the Danish prime minister.
A previously unknown Islamic group called Glory Brigades in Northern Europe also threatened to carry out attacks in the Scandinavian country over the affair, media reported at the time.
(Description of Source: Hong Kong AFP in English -- Hong Kong service of the independent French press agency Agence France-Presse)
------------
Anyway, the allegation that this thing was fanned by Saudi Arabia does not seem to be substantiated by the FBIS record, which shows Egypt's secular foreign minister to have been among the main fanners of the flame. Minor members of youth wings of Islamist parties in places like Pakistan then got into the action. Nor is it true that things were quiet after the immediate publication of the cartoons. Nor is it true that the Danish prime minister or the Jyllands-Posten expressed any sympathy for the hurt feelings of Muslims early on. Indeed, they lectured them on being uncivilized for objecting.
http://www.juancole.com/2006/02/fact-file-on-reaction-to-danish.html
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
We Are All Danes Now - Jeff Jacoby
The current uproar over cartoons of Mohammad illustrates yet again the fascist intolerance that is at the heart of radical Islam. That anything so mild could trigger a reaction so crazed - riots, death threats, kidnappings, flag-burnings - speaks volumes about the chasm that separates the values of the civilized world from those in too much of the Islamic world. Freedom of the press, the marketplace of ideas, the right to skewer sacred cows: militant Islam knows none of this. And if the jihadis get their way, it will be swept aside everywhere by the censorship and intolerance of sharia. The freedom of speech we take for granted is under attack, and it will vanish if it is not bravely defended. Today the censors may be coming for some unfunny cartoons, but tomorrow it is your words and ideas they will silence.
The current uproar over cartoons of Mohammad illustrates yet again the fascist intolerance that is at the heart of radical Islam. That anything so mild could trigger a reaction so crazed - riots, death threats, kidnappings, flag-burnings - speaks volumes about the chasm that separates the values of the civilized world from those in too much of the Islamic world. Freedom of the press, the marketplace of ideas, the right to skewer sacred cows: militant Islam knows none of this. And if the jihadis get their way, it will be swept aside everywhere by the censorship and intolerance of sharia. The freedom of speech we take for granted is under attack, and it will vanish if it is not bravely defended. Today the censors may be coming for some unfunny cartoons, but tomorrow it is your words and ideas they will silence.
Offensive Cartoons
HonestReporting
"The publication of cartoons that incite religious or ethnic hatreds is unacceptable."
--U.S. Department of State
The decision of several European newspapers to publish cartoons portraying the Islamic Prophet Mohamed has led to death threats and rioting around the world. While many in Europe are standing firm, the cartoons' publication has also produced strong apologies by international leaders and some of the media. The managing director of France Soir (one of the papers that published the cartoons) was even fired "as a powerful sign of respect for the intimate beliefs and convictions of every individual for allowing them to be published."
Jyllands-Posten, the original Dutch paper that published the cartoons, had this to say: "They (The cartoons) were not intended to be offensive, nor were they at variance with Danish law, but they have indisputably offended many Muslims for which we apologize."
We wonder why no similar outcry and apologies have come after viciously anti-Semitic and anti-Israel cartoons are published on an almost daily basis throughout the Arab world. The following cartoon (as reported by Palestinian Media Watch) was published in Al-Hayat, the official newspaper of the Palestinian Authority, last month. Perhaps the reason that it did not provoke an outrage is that by the standards of the Arab press, it is hardly exceptional.
"Offensive" Cartoons in the Arab World
As documented by Palestinian Media Watch, the Arab Press exercises almost no self-censorship in the publications of cartoons which involve gross stereotypes of Jews.
Not a week goes by in the Arab world without a "political" cartoon portraying Jews as either blood-suckers, Nazis, or the indiscriminate killers of Palestinian children.
The Anti-Defamation League points out that: The U.N. designation of January 27 as a Holocaust memorial day was an occasion for many newspapers to run cartoons and columns that denied or downplayed the horrors of the Holocaust. Additionally, many newspaper articles accused Jews of using the Holocaust to justify the persecution of others
The Nazi Swastika superimposed on the Star of David. From Al-Yawm (Saudi Arabia).
In an interview with the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, analyst Joe Kotek, writes that "The main recurrent motif in Arab cartoons concerning Israel is 'the devilish Jew.' This image conveys the idea that Jews behave like Nazis, kill children and love blood."
"A major theme in Arab cartoons is the blood-loving or blood-thirsty Jew. This originates in Christian anti-Semitism. The Christian anti-Semitic libel alleged the Jews needed Christian blood for their Passover service. Its claim is that the Jew is evil, as his religion forces him to drink blood. In today's Arab world this image of unbridled hatred has mutated into the alleged quest for Palestinian blood.
Blood-drinking Jews are frequently shown by Al Ahram, one of Egypt's leading dailies. On 21 April 2001, it printed a cartoon showing an Arab being put into a flatting mill by two soldiers wearing helmets with Stars of David. The Arab's blood pours out and two Jews with kippot and Stars of David on their shirts drink the blood laughingly."
Yet, we find very little condemnation and apologies from the international community when these cartoons are published. In response to the offending cartoons of Muhammad, many like The Vatican said that "the drawings amounted to an "unacceptable provocation" and the right to freedom of expression "cannot entail the right to offend the sentiment of believers." One wonders why the same standards have not been used in reacting to the above cartoons.
On the other hand, Die Welt, one of the German papers to print the cartoons, got it right when they noted (as quoted in CNSNews.com):
"The protests from Muslims would be taken more seriously if they came across as less hypocritical," the Hamburg-based daily said, noting that no protests greeted the depiction by Syrian television of rabbis as cannibals."
Not Just in the Arab World
Unfortunately it is not just the Arab world that seems comfortable publishing blatantly anti-Semitic slurs in the guise of "political" cartoons. As previously documented by Honest Reporting, media in Europe and the United States have published cartoons that go beyond offensive.
A political cartoon published in The Independent in 2003 depicted Ariel Sharon biting into the flesh of a Palestinian baby. The background shows Apache attack helicopters firing missiles, and blaring the message "Vote Likud." Sharon is saying, 'What's wrong, you never seen a politician kissing babies before?"
The government of Israel lodged an official protest to the cartoon by Dave Brown. Yet no apology similar to the many we are hearing from around the world today was forthcoming.
Not only were no apologies forthcoming, but the UK's Political Cartoon Society awarded it first prize in its 2003 "Cartoon of the Year" competition, choosing it over 34 other entries. When Honest Reporting wrote to protest the award, the reply we received was:
"You have all taken this award completely out of perspective and context. Shame on you! We do so much good."
For an eye-opening selection of more cartoons of this nature, go to Tom Gross Media.com. With the lack of remorse that we hear from publications of these cartoons one has to conclude that the threat of violence is the only reason that most of the media are so concerned with offending Muslim sensibilities.
HonestReporting
"The publication of cartoons that incite religious or ethnic hatreds is unacceptable."
--U.S. Department of State
The decision of several European newspapers to publish cartoons portraying the Islamic Prophet Mohamed has led to death threats and rioting around the world. While many in Europe are standing firm, the cartoons' publication has also produced strong apologies by international leaders and some of the media. The managing director of France Soir (one of the papers that published the cartoons) was even fired "as a powerful sign of respect for the intimate beliefs and convictions of every individual for allowing them to be published."
Jyllands-Posten, the original Dutch paper that published the cartoons, had this to say: "They (The cartoons) were not intended to be offensive, nor were they at variance with Danish law, but they have indisputably offended many Muslims for which we apologize."
We wonder why no similar outcry and apologies have come after viciously anti-Semitic and anti-Israel cartoons are published on an almost daily basis throughout the Arab world. The following cartoon (as reported by Palestinian Media Watch) was published in Al-Hayat, the official newspaper of the Palestinian Authority, last month. Perhaps the reason that it did not provoke an outrage is that by the standards of the Arab press, it is hardly exceptional.
"Offensive" Cartoons in the Arab World
As documented by Palestinian Media Watch, the Arab Press exercises almost no self-censorship in the publications of cartoons which involve gross stereotypes of Jews.
Not a week goes by in the Arab world without a "political" cartoon portraying Jews as either blood-suckers, Nazis, or the indiscriminate killers of Palestinian children.
The Anti-Defamation League points out that: The U.N. designation of January 27 as a Holocaust memorial day was an occasion for many newspapers to run cartoons and columns that denied or downplayed the horrors of the Holocaust. Additionally, many newspaper articles accused Jews of using the Holocaust to justify the persecution of others
The Nazi Swastika superimposed on the Star of David. From Al-Yawm (Saudi Arabia).
In an interview with the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, analyst Joe Kotek, writes that "The main recurrent motif in Arab cartoons concerning Israel is 'the devilish Jew.' This image conveys the idea that Jews behave like Nazis, kill children and love blood."
"A major theme in Arab cartoons is the blood-loving or blood-thirsty Jew. This originates in Christian anti-Semitism. The Christian anti-Semitic libel alleged the Jews needed Christian blood for their Passover service. Its claim is that the Jew is evil, as his religion forces him to drink blood. In today's Arab world this image of unbridled hatred has mutated into the alleged quest for Palestinian blood.
Blood-drinking Jews are frequently shown by Al Ahram, one of Egypt's leading dailies. On 21 April 2001, it printed a cartoon showing an Arab being put into a flatting mill by two soldiers wearing helmets with Stars of David. The Arab's blood pours out and two Jews with kippot and Stars of David on their shirts drink the blood laughingly."
Yet, we find very little condemnation and apologies from the international community when these cartoons are published. In response to the offending cartoons of Muhammad, many like The Vatican said that "the drawings amounted to an "unacceptable provocation" and the right to freedom of expression "cannot entail the right to offend the sentiment of believers." One wonders why the same standards have not been used in reacting to the above cartoons.
On the other hand, Die Welt, one of the German papers to print the cartoons, got it right when they noted (as quoted in CNSNews.com):
"The protests from Muslims would be taken more seriously if they came across as less hypocritical," the Hamburg-based daily said, noting that no protests greeted the depiction by Syrian television of rabbis as cannibals."
Not Just in the Arab World
Unfortunately it is not just the Arab world that seems comfortable publishing blatantly anti-Semitic slurs in the guise of "political" cartoons. As previously documented by Honest Reporting, media in Europe and the United States have published cartoons that go beyond offensive.
A political cartoon published in The Independent in 2003 depicted Ariel Sharon biting into the flesh of a Palestinian baby. The background shows Apache attack helicopters firing missiles, and blaring the message "Vote Likud." Sharon is saying, 'What's wrong, you never seen a politician kissing babies before?"
The government of Israel lodged an official protest to the cartoon by Dave Brown. Yet no apology similar to the many we are hearing from around the world today was forthcoming.
Not only were no apologies forthcoming, but the UK's Political Cartoon Society awarded it first prize in its 2003 "Cartoon of the Year" competition, choosing it over 34 other entries. When Honest Reporting wrote to protest the award, the reply we received was:
"You have all taken this award completely out of perspective and context. Shame on you! We do so much good."
For an eye-opening selection of more cartoons of this nature, go to Tom Gross Media.com. With the lack of remorse that we hear from publications of these cartoons one has to conclude that the threat of violence is the only reason that most of the media are so concerned with offending Muslim sensibilities.
indybay published the blasphemous cartoons
BEHEAD THoSE WHO INSULT tHE PROFET!!!
You won't be able to escape your fate, no matter if the posts get removed.
YOUR DAYS ARE nUMBERED
BEHEAD THoSE WHO INSULT tHE PROFET!!!
You won't be able to escape your fate, no matter if the posts get removed.
YOUR DAYS ARE nUMBERED
You have made many enemies in Islam and around the world, pretty soon your fancy words will not get you out of the hole your digging for yourself.
This goes beyond ideas and internet talk. Your identitiy is known and where you live. One of the scums running this site is known as David P. Grace. I know others. He better watch his back, for the police won't manage to guarantee his safety.
Stop this web site.
This is the last email you will recieve from me.
May your enemies do what they wish with the information they are about to recieve.
On behalf of Islam's tenets, we spit at you.
Watch out.
- God's Hand
This goes beyond ideas and internet talk. Your identitiy is known and where you live. One of the scums running this site is known as David P. Grace. I know others. He better watch his back, for the police won't manage to guarantee his safety.
Stop this web site.
This is the last email you will recieve from me.
May your enemies do what they wish with the information they are about to recieve.
On behalf of Islam's tenets, we spit at you.
Watch out.
- God's Hand
Don't you mean God's ass&%#$???? That name better suits peple like you.
muslim fanatics get back own medicin
Jews portrayes as s bloodthirsty vampires with hooknoses in arab media every day. but no one arab country get any dead-threat or flag-burning or violent demonstration...
jesus has been portayed :
1 fucking with maria magdalena in one italian film by Scorsese,
2. as a marxist-leninist-anarchist in another italian film be P.P.Pasolini
3. as a gay on many artist exhibition
BUT no one christian has burned italian flags neither dead-threated or beat film-makers or italian embassy..for that 'blasphemy'
Long live Free Speech !
Long Live YullandsPosten.
Jews portrayes as s bloodthirsty vampires with hooknoses in arab media every day. but no one arab country get any dead-threat or flag-burning or violent demonstration...
jesus has been portayed :
1 fucking with maria magdalena in one italian film by Scorsese,
2. as a marxist-leninist-anarchist in another italian film be P.P.Pasolini
3. as a gay on many artist exhibition
BUT no one christian has burned italian flags neither dead-threated or beat film-makers or italian embassy..for that 'blasphemy'
Long live Free Speech !
Long Live YullandsPosten.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$135.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network