top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Homegrown fuel: a waste of energy?

by Seattle Times repost
a provocative article that examines the biodiesel phenomenon

Homegrown fuel: a waste of energy?

By Warren Cornwall
Seattle Times staff reporter

REARDAN, Lincoln County — On a blazing day last July at his farm west of Spokane, Fred Fleming placed a machine that looks like a meat grinder the size of a truck engine on a concrete slab and started dumping tiny canola seeds into the top.

The machine kept clogging as it squashed the seeds into oil, and Fleming was reduced to slowly pouring in the seeds.

After three straight days under the searing Eastern Washington sun, he shut down the crusher. After all that, he had managed to produce about 400 gallons of vegetable oil, which eventually was sold to become some of the first homegrown biodiesel ever made in Washington. The biodiesel was a paltry trickle.

"That was one of the dumber things I did," Fleming said, recalling the heat and "wondering if I should really be committed and be in counseling."

Such is the state of Washington's biodiesel industry — more farmyard experiment than full-sized factory.

The fuel — a mix of vegetable oil and methanol used in place of diesel to fuel engines — has been pushed as a way to help both struggling farmers and the environment, with talk of Washington farm fields producing 100 million gallons of clean-burning fuel a year and pumping millions of dollars into the state's faltering farm economy.

Biodiesel basics


What is it?

Biodiesel is clean-burning fuel that is a mix of vegetable oil and methanol used in engines in place of diesel.

How is it used?

Biodiesel can be mixed with regular petroleum diesel and can be burned in most diesel engines. Sometimes it can be used without blending with regular diesel. Biodiesel is also blended with home heating oil.

Are people using it?

According to the National Biodiesel Board, about 25 million gallons of biodiesel were sold in the U.S. in 2004. But Washington state alone burns about 1 billion gallons of regular diesel fuel a year.

How much does it cost?

Tuesday, Laurelhurst Oil in Seattle sold biodiesel for $3.18 a gallon, compared with $2.60 for regular diesel. The price varies, and biodiesel sold for less than regular diesel for a brief time after Hurricane Katrina, according to Laurelhurst Oil.

Where can I buy it?

There are dozens of biodiesel retailers in Washington. For a list, look online at http://www.biodiesel.org.

Source: National Biodiesel Board

Gov. Christine Gregoire recently proposed low-interest loans for biodiesel factories, and a requirement that diesel sold in the state contain at least some biodiesel. State lawmakers from both parties are vowing to promote similar plans when the Legislature convenes next month. And Congress last summer included a tax credit for biodiesel in its energy bill.

At least four companies plan to build biodiesel plants, and a refinery is already operating in South Seattle. But even the enthusiasts say there are daunting obstacles to actually making money. Skeptics point out that recent history has seen plenty of hype around crops like sugar beets that were supposed to be the salvation of Washington farmers but flopped.

"It's like an old carcass out there and everyone's circling to see if it's going to make us sick when we eat it," said Fleming, a fourth-generation farmer.

Making it worth planting

Though getting fuel from plants isn't new, the industry has been mostly confined to the Midwest, where corn is turned into ethanol and soybean oil is made into biodiesel. Biodiesel can be mixed with regular diesel or, in some engines, used alone.

But recent high gas prices and global warming, joined with farmers' hunger for a new lucrative crop, have people in Washington talking seriously about homegrown fuel.

While most of the biodiesel today comes from soybeans, the oil can also come from canola and mustard seeds that grow well in Washington.

Seattle Biodiesel, the state's largest refiner, made about 1 million gallons this year, and has the capacity to produce 5 million gallons as the market grows. But that's a fraction of the 1 billion gallons of diesel fuel sold in the state. And for now, the company imports its soybean oil from the Midwest.

So would-be biodiesel companies are trying to figure out how to pay Washington farmers enough for their crops to make them worth planting, and where to get the millions of dollars to build a factory to turn the crop into biodiesel.

"Everybody will tell you they can sell all the biodiesel they can produce. Nobody wants to take on the risk that's involved in the crushing or the production," said Chad Kruger of Washington State University's Climate Friendly Farming Project.

Projects "don't pan out"

Mike Roecks would like to grow canola again, if he could just make money at it.

The past few years, he has grown tall, leafy canola plants on his farm just south of Spokane. But he stopped this year, when the price of the seeds plummeted.

At most recent count, in 2002, about 20,000 acres of canola and mustard were grown in Washington. But that's only enough to make 1 million or 2 million gallons of biodiesel.

On a recent November day, Roecks, 51, stood in his brightly lit machine shop and listened impassively as David Ostheller, a farmer who serves on the board of Cooperative Agricultural Producers, talked about the co-op's plans to build a biodiesel plant to be fed with local crops.

"There's been projects for a long time that don't pan out," Roecks replied. "So I'll believe 'em when I see 'em."

Even if farmers planted the crops, so far no one has risked the $8 million to $12 million it could cost to build a plant capable of crushing the seeds into oil. The closest large-scale crushers are in central Montana and in southern Alberta, Canada.

"We need the capital for a crusher and a refinery, that's what it boils down to," said Mike Conklin, president of Palouse Biodiesel, an alliance of four Eastern Washington farm cooperatives, including Cooperative Agricultural Producers.

Companies optimistic

Palouse Biodiesel is one of at least four companies in Washington claiming to have plans that will actually make money.

Fleming has already successfully tapped into the eco-friendly agricultural market with a company that makes sustainably grown wheat flour. Now he has formed an alliance with Seattle Biodiesel and another farm cooperative to build a high-capacity crusher. Two groups of Eastern Washington investors are also pursuing plants, one in Columbia County near the Oregon border and another near Othello, Adams County.

All of them are trying to win financial help from the state, and talk of breaking ground next year.

The Palouse Biodiesel venture, which represents about 1,200 farmers, wants to start a complete biodiesel operation, from field to fuel tank, so that the farmers will profit from the finished product, not just the seed. But Conklin said the company doesn't have the capital to build a plant.

"I can guarantee you it's going to get done. Whether it's my company or another company, the momentum in Eastern Washington for this is huge," Conklin said.

Several of the other companies say they can make money, partly by selling the crushed seed pulp as livestock feed.

Building a market

Politicians, farm groups and environmentalists are trying to help make the companies profitable.

Gregoire recently endorsed legislation that would mandate that every gallon of diesel sold in the state contain 2 percent biodiesel.

Gregoire and others say that could translate to 20 million gallons of biodiesel a year — based on the 1 billion gallons of diesel fuel consumed a year in the state — and create an instant demand.

"It allows the farming community and us, as producers, the safety to know there will be a market for the fuel," said John Plaza, president and founder of Seattle Biodiesel.

Others, however, warn a mandate might only benefit huge Midwest biofuel producers, such as Archer Daniels Midland (ADM).

"If we go with a mandate and a big-time program and we don't think of the producer at the farm level or the refinery level, we've done ADM a great favor but we really haven't helped the state's economy," said state Sen. Mark Schoesler, a Republican whose district includes much of the farm country south of Spokane.

To address that, Gregoire has proposed $17.5 million in low-interest loans to help build crushing plants.

But with so many companies rushing to get into the market, some may not survive. To keep all those new crushers fed with local seeds, hundreds of thousands more acres of land would have to be planted with canola.

"We've got massive facilities under consideration for what we don't grow," cautions Kruger, of WSU's Climate Friendly Farming Project.

Snake oil?

Hanging over all this is another specter: the legacies of strawboard and sugar beets.

In the 1990s, boards made from straw were hyped as an environmentally friendly substitute for wooden particle board, and also touted as a boon for Washington farmers. By the end of the decade, factories started churning out the boards.

But quality was uneven. Horses sometimes ate the grassy panels. And the boards often cost more than the wooden ones. The main plant went out of business.

Around the same time, a group of farmers in Moses Lake built a $100 million sugarbeet refinery. But equipment failures left beets rotting on the ground. Farmers lost big. Banks quit loaning on the crop. Four years after opening, the refinery shut down.

"You have seen a lot of snake-oil salesmen come through with the next best thing," acknowledged Conklin, the Palouse Biodiesel president.

Unpleasant reminder

On the outskirts of Creston, a farming town west of Spokane, a metal-sided building at the end of a dirt road stands as a monument to the pitfalls of biodiesel investment.

The Northwest Lincoln County Regional Public Development Authority built it in 2003 with money from the state to house American Premix Technologies, a company that was supposed to hire locals to make animal feed.

The development authority was also going to borrow $980,000 to erect a building next door for Columbia Oilseeds, a related company that was going to crush canola oil for biodiesel.

Instead, the development authority has been fighting with John Graff, a founder of the companies, alleging unpaid bills and broken promises.

Lately, development authority officials have been trying to evict American Premix from their building.

Graff, whose meeting room in the Creston building is furnished with a folding table, a chair, a dry-erase board and a jar of golden biodiesel, says it's the development authority that broke a promise by failing to build a railroad spur to the building.

The issue has gone to court.

Now Graff is the chief operating officer for Technical Holdings, a company of investors who want to build a biodiesel plant near Othello.

Gary Trautman, who runs a Moses Lake-based insurance company, has invested a lot of his own money in the project. He said he knows about Graff's disagreement with the folks in Lincoln County. But this new business shouldn't be judged by the history of one member, he said.

"We really think that some of our competitors have taken this thing, John's problems with the [public development authority], and tried to use it to their competitive advantage," he said.

Another try

And back at his farm outside Spokane, Fleming said his first summertime frustrations with biodiesel haven't extinguished his enthusiasm. He sees huge promise in biodiesel if private enterprise and government work together.

He likes to think of it as something akin to President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, when the federal government helped build industries and create jobs during the Great Depression.

So Fleming planted canola again last fall.

But he planted only five acres.

"This is sort of an experiment," he said. "Just to see what we could do."

Warren Cornwall: 206-464-2311 or wcornwall [at] seattletimes.com

"I can guarantee you it's going to get done ... the momentum in Eastern Washington for this is huge."

Mike Conklin, president, Palouse Biodiesel

Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company
by repost
http://www.countercurrents.org/monbiot081205.htm

By George Monbiot

08 December, 2005 The Guardian

Over the past two years I have made an uncomfortable discovery. Like most environmentalists, I have been as blind to the constraints affecting our energy supply as my opponents have been to climate change. I now realise that I have entertained a belief in magic.

In 2003, the biologist Jeffrey Dukes calculated that the fossil fuels we burn in one year were made from organic matter "containing 44 x 10 to the 18 grams of carbon, which is more than 400 times the net primary productivity of the planet's current biota."(1) In plain English, this means that every year we use four centuries' worth of plants and animals.

The idea that we can simply replace this fossil legacy - and the extraordinary power densities it gives us - with ambient energy is the stuff of science fiction. There is simply no substitute for cutting back. But substitutes are being sought everywhere. They are being promoted today at the climate talks in Montreal, by states - such as ours - which seek to avoid the hard decisions climate change demands. And at least one of them is worse than the fossil fuel burning it replaces.


The last time I drew attention to the hazards of making diesel fuel from vegetable oils, I received as much abuse as I have ever been sent by the supporters of the Iraq war. The biodiesel missionaries, I discovered, are as vociferous in their denial as the executives of Exxon. I am now prepared to admit that my previous column was wrong. But they're not going to like it. I was wrong because I underestimated the fuel's destructive impact.

Before I go any further, I should make it clear that turning used chip fat into motor fuel is a good thing. The people slithering around all day in vats of filth are perfoming a service to society. But there is enough waste cooking oil in the UK to meet one 380th of our demand for road transport fuel(2). Beyond that, the trouble begins.

When I wrote about it last year, I thought that the biggest problem caused by biodiesel was that it set up a competition for land(3). Arable land that would otherwise have been used to grow food would instead be used to grow fuel. But now I find that something even worse is happening. The biodiesel industry has accidentally invented the world's most carbon-intensive fuel.

In promoting biodiesel - as the European Union, the British and US governments and thousands of environmental campaigners do - you might imagine that you are creating a market for old chip fat, or rapeseed oil, or oil from algae grown in desert ponds. In reality you are creating a market for the most destructive crop on earth.

Last week, the chairman of Malaysia's Federal Land Development Authority announced that he was about to build a new biodiesel plant(4). His was the ninth such decision in four months. Four new refineries are being built in Peninsula Malaysia, one in Sarawak and two in Rotterdam(5). Two foreign consortia - one German, one American - are setting up rival plants in Singapore(6). All of them will be making biodiesel from the same source: oil from palm trees.

"The demand for biodiesel," the Malaysian Star reports, "will come from the European Community ... This fresh demand ... would, at the very least, take up most of Malaysia's crude palm oil inventories"(7). Why? Because it's cheaper than biodiesel made from any other crop.

In September, Friends of the Earth published a report about the impacts of palm oil production. "Between 1985 and 2000," it found, "the development of oil-palm plantations was responsible for an estimated 87 per cent of deforestation in Malaysia"(8). In Sumatra and Borneo, some 4 million hectares of forest has been converted to palm farms. Now a further 6 million hectares is scheduled for clearance in Malaysia, and 16.5m in Indonesia.

Almost all the remaining forest is at risk. Even the famous Tanjung Puting National Park in Kalimantan is being ripped apart by oil planters. The orang-utan is likely to become extinct in the wild. Sumatran rhinos, tigers, gibbons, tapirs, proboscis monkeys and thousands of other species could go the same way. Thousands of indigenous people have been evicted from their lands, and some 500 Indonesians have been tortured when they tried to resist(9). The forest fires which every so often smother the region in smog are mostly started by the palm growers. The entire region is being turned into a gigantic vegetable oil field.

Before oil palms, which are small and scrubby, are planted, vast forest trees, containing a much greater store of carbon, must be felled and burnt. Having used up the drier lands, the plantations are now moving into the swamp forests, which grow on peat. When they've cut the trees, the planters drain the ground. As the peat dries it oxidises, releasing even more carbon dioxide than the trees. In terms of its impact on both the local and global environments, palm biodiesel is more destructive than crude oil from Nigeria.

The British government understands this. In the report it published last month, when it announced that it will obey the European Union and ensure that 5.75% of our transport fuel comes from plants by 2010, it admitted that "the main environmental risks are likely to be those concerning any large expansion in biofuel feedstock production, and particularly in Brazil (for sugar cane) and South East Asia (for palm oil plantations)."(10) It suggested that the best means of dealing with the problem was to prevent environmentally destructive fuels from being imported. The government asked its consultants whether a ban would infringe world trade rules. The answer was yes: "mandatory environmental criteria ... would greatly increase the risk of international legal challenge to the policy as a whole"(11). So it dropped the idea of banning imports, and called for "some form of voluntary scheme" instead(12). Knowing that the creation of this market will lead to a massive surge in imports of palm oil, knowing that there is nothing meaningful it can do to prevent them, and knowing that they will accelarate rather than ameliorate climate change, the government has decided to go ahead anyway.

At other times it happily defies the European Union. But what the EU wants and what the government wants are the same. "It is essential that we balance the increasing demand for travel," the government's report says, "with our goals for protecting the environment"(13). Until recently, we had a policy of reducing the demand for travel. Now, though no announcement has been made, that policy has gone. Like the Tories in the early 1990s, the Labour administration seeks to accommodate demand, however high it rises. Figures obtained last week by the campaigning group Road Block show that for the widening of the M1 alone the government will pay £3.6 billion - more than it is spending on its entire climate change programme(14). Instead of attempting to reduce demand, it is trying to alter supply. It is prepared to sacrifice the South East Asian rainforests in order to be seen to do something, and to allow motorists to feel better about themselves.

All this illustrates the futility of the technofixes now being pursued in Montreal. Trying to meet a rising demand for fuel is madness, wherever the fuel might come from. The hard decisions have been avoided, and another portion of the biosphere is going up in smoke.

http://www.monbiot.com

References:

1. Jeffrey S. Dukes, 2003. Burning Buried Sunshine: Human Consumption Of

Ancient Solar Energy. Climatic Change 61: 31-44.

2. The British Association for Biofuels and Oils estimates the volume at 100,000 tonnes a year. BABFO, no date. Memorandum to the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. http://www.biodiesel.co.uk/press_release/
royal_commission_on_environmenta.htm

3. http://www.monbiot.com/archives
/2004/11/23/feeding-cars-not-people/

4. Tamimi Omar, 1st December 2005. Felda to set up largest biodiesel plant. The Edge Daily.

http://www.theedgedaily.com/cms/content.jsp?id=com.tms.
cms.article.Article_e5d7c0d9-cb73c03a-df4bfc00-d453633e

5. See e.g. Zaidi Isham Ismail, 7th November 2005. IOI to go it alone on first biodiesel plant.

http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BT/
Monday/Frontpage/20051107000223/Article/; No author, 25th November 2005. GHope nine-
month profit hits RM841mil. http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?
file=/2005/11/25/business/12693859&sec=business; No author, 26th November 2005. GHope to invest RM40mil for biodiesel plant in Netherlands. http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=
/2005/11/26/business/12704187&sec=business; No author, 23rd November 2005. Malaysia IOI Eyes Green Energy Expansion in Europe. http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/33622/story.htm

6. Loh Kim Chin, 26th October 2005. Singapore to host two biodiesel plants, investments total over S$80m. Channel NewsAsia.

7. C.S. Tan, 6th October 2005. All Plantation Stocks Rally. http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=
/2005/10/6/business/12243819&sec=business

8. Friends of the Earth et al, September 2005. The Oil for Ape Scandal: how palm oil is threatening orang-utan survival. Research report. http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/oil_for_ape_full.pdf

9. ibid.

10. Department for Transport, November 2005. Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) feasibility report.

http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_roads/
documents/page/dft_roads_610329-01.hcsp#P18_263

11. E4Tech, ECCM and Imperial College, London, June 2005. Feasibility Study on Certification for a Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation. Final Report.

12. Department for Transport, ibid.

13. ibid.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network