top
Arts + Action
Arts + Action
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Brokeback Mountain: A Vicious Attack on the Queer Community!

by Vincent Fischer (BlackBerryBrambles [at] hotmail.com)
I both enjoyed, and was moved deeply, by the movie Brokeback Mountain. I am sure that I will see it again. Upon reflection, however, there are a few things that bothered me
anglee.jpg
In my opinion, any director worth his or her salt would probably want to include a cigarette or two in any period piece. Indeed, the lack of even one cigarette in the movie Pearl Harbor, which was released in 2001, seemed to be an unpardonable sin. Still, when almost every scene in a movie, as in Brokeback Mountain, involves cigarette smoking by healthy good-looking young people, as well as the prominent placement of one particular brand name cigarette, then it seems clear that our community is being unfairly targeted by manufacturers, the producer and the director.

I am not some reformed smoker type. It is precisely because I have battled a twenty-five year nicotine addiction that I wish to spare others. I have no idea as to whether or not the director of the movie smokes, but he has certainly promoted a specific brand of death in his movie. Cigarettes, it has been said, are crack in a pack. Why then should we accept any particular community being specifically targeted by purveyors of death? We shouldn’t be rude to those who currently smoke, ever, not once, but for fuck’s sake, we shouldn’t wish it on, promote it or market it to future generations.

Nationwide, about 41 to 45 percent of the gay and lesbian population smoke*. That is a statistic we should not be proud of. Smoking is not a way of life, but rather a way of death

I also believe that the glorification of the anachronistic ritual of hunting is out of place. In fact, it appears several animals were harmed during filming, or perhaps the footage of animals being shot was culled from hunt documentaries. I’m not certain, but in any case, hunting is cruel. In addition, I’ve spent a great deal of time opposing the bear hunt here in New Jersey.

There does seem to be a groundswell of support in the North East against hunting our wildlife and for protection of endangered species. Being out on Route 23, in West Milford, NJ, in early December, at a large protest against what was the then the impending bear slaughter, many truckers, SUV drivers and other macho types honked enthusiastically in support of us and in favor sparing the lives of the timid black bears. On the other hand, the movie, which normalizes hunting, undermines the rising tide of opposition. Specifically, I wondered why the film had to include a bear being downed. The effect is to try to legitimize and make acceptable the bygone era of hunting to our modern urban and suburban age. To heck with that!

There are many gay young men and women of conscience who are now vegetarians. They are educating an older generation of queers such as myself. They have helped to raise consciousness in general with regard to animals rights and the absolutely unacceptable practices inherent in factory farming. Again, on that score, the movie seems to promote a skewed image of what is actually involved in the meat industry. Sheep are portrayed in a bucolic setting, happily grazing, and lazily perambulating about a mountain pasture. I’m willing to venture a guess that the reality of sheep herding differs somewhat and is probably considerably less benign.

The subtext of the movie might also be interpreted to imply that it is okay to be gay just so long as you are butch. What about men and boys who are effeminate? This is not just a mere historical footnote either. Sadly, malicious oppression and harassment, physical and verbal, of queer kids, as well as anyone considered to be a sissy, continues unabated in our nation’s schools.

I have a nephew who is an extremely gentle soul. A few years ago, in middle school, in his rural town within a two hour drive of New York City, he was subject to such a high degree of harassment, that he developed a severe skin condition and became paralyzed. Yes, I said paralyzed. Can you imagine? That kid, in this ostensibly enlightened day and age, was so hounded by his classmates, that he literally lost his ability to walk to school and his tormentors, or anywhere else for that matter. A change of school healed both his difficulty walking and his skin condition. In addition, now in high school, a sympathetic and supportive theater arts teacher, as well as dance and music teacher, have had a positive and progressive impact on his life. He has the lead in his public high school play and will be graduating next year with a high academic standing.

It is interesting how easy it is to fall for an idealized silver screen version of a cowboy. The archetype is strong, handsome, laconic and stoic. He embodies the mythic American ideal of rugged individualism. It is true too that it was nice to see on screen in Brokeback Mountain queers who weren’t wealthy, but here too the reality doesn’t exactly match the film portrayal. I came out in 1980, in San Antonio, Texas, where I spent a largely drunken year. I did briefly date a cowhand. Although handsome, Pat, originally from Oklahoma, was poorly educated, lived in a rented room, and did not have a car. After several dates, I moved on, eventually meeting Pete U. who happened to be Mexican-American, cultured, cosmopolitan and worldly. He had an olive complexion and piercing blue eyes, was a social worker and had appeared in GQ Magazine in the summer of 1977. I had hit Texas gold. We spent a magnificent year together.

In conclusion, I never want to be the type of person who can only hear what I already believe reinforced, as if condemned to a perpetual internet or media echo chamber. For that reason I have read critiques of the movie from disparate sources.

In a movie set in the heartland, I want to know how it is received there. Maybe you do too. If you want to know what people are thinking outside our Metropolitan area, I’d recommend this article:

http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/getting_reel/01044_brokeback_mountain_brokedown_ideas.html

For a wonderful and sensitive article on the film, which includes first person interviews with gay men living in Wyoming, check out.


http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Render&c=Article&cid=1135119017244&call_pageid=968332188492


Finally, if you haven’t seen the movie, despite my many reservations and pointed criticisms, I would recommend it. The cinematography is quite breathtaking. I hope that the next gay movie that reaches for a mainstream audience avoids some of the pitfalls of Brokeback Mountain.

Vince


Sites of Interest:

*Smoking rates soar among state's gays:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/1204gaysmokers.html

To learn about the violence and horror of recreational hunting:
http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=53

To learn how sheep are mistreated during factory farming in Australia:

http://www.savethesheep.com/report.asp

To help Save NJ Bears or Learn more see:

http://www.savenjbears.com/

§Hunting is Not Cool!
by Vincent Fischer (BlackBerryBrambles [at] hotmail.com)
huntingone.jpg
§Recreational Hunting is Cruel!
by Vincent Fischer (BlackBerryBrambles [at] hotmail.com)
huntingtwo.jpg
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Cyd Zeigler
Are you kidding? They hunted in the movie because they were hungry. I didn't much like the movie, but the killing of an elk because you're hungry is hardly cruel.
by Patrick Petty (dorian_grey [at] sbcglobal.net)
Dude, do you like totally miss the point. Despite the placing of the camels which I had frankly not noticed, you're so nitpicking what is a fabulous movie based on a short story by amy proulx. You do your own community a disservice by putting out negative publicity of something that is a period piece by being all namby pamby about vegetarian and sheep herding. Wake up, this is wyoming many years ago. Neither the director or the writer is making in any kind of statement about you should hunt or supporting the slaughter of sheep for heaven's sake. You could as easily say they drove a car and therefore it's a movie about emissions in the environment are okay.

Accept this movie as a beautiful tale of a forbidden love that has universal apeal b/c love and longing are universal. It is about societal and social construct and in the time it was so different. Be happy the gay rights movement has allowed us all to nance about with purses and hold hands on sidewalks but back then you got drug off and hit with a tire iron in wyoming.

Amy Proulx writes her stories by going to areas and researching real people, oral histories, town records. This story originally appeared in the New Yorker and is part of a collection of stories about wyoming, as far as I know being the exception because it about gay cowboys.

Shame on you for putting negative publicity on the first movie in ages as well as story which may actually have the appeal to cross boundaries and make more things possible. It shows that sexual identity is not limited to effimenacy and it does so effectively b/c of the time it works in and the honesty of what is going on. We have enough movies about modern queers who are fully realized and not held in check by societal views on masculinity/sexuality ties. This movie is about the human heart alone so see it as that and see its universal appeal and quit nitpicking it to death. You so miss it and the point.
by sam
I don't think when Ang Lee directed this film that he was making it for a certain community or targeting toward a certain community. The point in making this film was that it wasn't for the gay community and that it was aimed toward the mainstream to bring an important issue to center focus and touch the hearts of all people with this delicately intricate love story. So it's entirely unfair to say that the smoking was "targeting" the gay community. Also, I have seen this film three times now, and while there is a lot of smoking, they only display the brand name twice I believe which isn't that bad. I saw the name Coca Cola a few times and I was much more offended by that. I would hope that no one is so easily swayed as to go out and buy any product simply because it was displayed in a movie. As a filmmaker I really hope people wouldn't.
by maphere
Being a straight male I read your article and was impressed that you didn't offer the same slant that all the other me-too articles offered on this movie. Being objective is difficult when you are emotionally involved with an issue and it takes a leader to do just that.

Society is getty savvy on reading through hype and being impressived with 2 minute trailers. We've been bought and sold too many movies that sound and look good both in reviews and trailers only to be left wanting and disappointed that we were duped.

Your point is valid about the movie being "sold" trying to detract from the gayness of the film to avoid scaring away straight men and it is disingenuous to the reality the gay community hopes for which is unadulterated acceptance of the the lifestyle without apology.

Being a tolerant straight man I believe the gay community will not get what they want in regards to a normal acceptance. It's not about tolerance, straight guys are repulsed by men kissing or getting romantic with one another. I don't say that to be disrespectful but some acts naturally are distasteful not unlike watching Fear Factor and someone eating cow brains. You can respect why they're doing it but it doesn't mean it doesn't upset your stomache. Therefore the issue of gay films being widely accepted is less about society tolerance and more about internal wiring.

Thank you for your review and having the balls not to pander to your peers for the mere purpose of panering.
by Joseph Hill
>>>>>
It is about societal and social construct and in the time it was so different. Be happy the gay rights movement has allowed us all to nance about with purses and hold hands on sidewalks but back then you got drug off and hit with a tire iron in wyoming.
>>>>>

Wait a minute....are we living on the same planet? Who gets to 'nance about with purses and hold hands' in Wyoming? Matthew Shepherd would say we've got a hell of a long way to go before that day comes.
by BT - Arizona
Get a clue idiot this isn't just about you, this is a great film.
by Ron (isoron [at] yahoo.com)
Sorry - why not go against the alcohol addicition in the movie? Gays have a higher incidence of this over smoking. Then we have the pot smoking scene---are you going to go on a diatribe over this. The we have GOLBAL WARMING--- what a treasure you are---- a dumb fag who has so many knee jerk responses. Sorry I buried my lover to AIDS.... but I haven't gone on the soapbox about it. How self-indulgent you are.
Thanks very much for the one or two who get it. Right about now, I'm feeling that people are out of their minds. It's a commercial movie that is making a ton of movie and has two straight actors in the lead. In addition, the movie present an odd homo ideal of uber masculinity that doesn’t exactly match many in our community. Talk about a loss of perspective!

At this point, I am beyond seeing any humor in the ignorant and ugly responses and name calling I'm getting both in the comments section and emailed to me directly.

It is interesting the people who tell me to get a life and then proceed to write idiocy such as the following:

From : Larry Kramer ldk44ldk [at] cox.net
Sent : Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:57 AM
To : BlackBerryBrambles [at] hotmail.com
Subject : Brokeback Mountain

You are CLEARLY a simple, foolish and petty person. Only a severely damaged soul with stunted mind and missing should could have worked so hard to find something so useless to write about.

Why don't you stick a cotton tube on your head, wrap yourself in white paper and have a friend (not that you have any) light you up.
by Vincent Fischer (BlackBerryBrambles [at] hotmail.com)
You got me so upset, I'm posting with typos! Truthfully, I'm done wasting my time with responses.

Thanks very much for the one or two who get it. Right about now, I'm feeling that people are out of their minds. It's a commercial movie that is making a ton of money and has two straight actors in the lead. In addition, the movie presents an odd homo ideal of uber masculinity that doesn’t exactly match many in our community. Talk about a loss of perspective!

At this point, I am beyond seeing any humor in the ignorant and ugly responses and name calling I'm getting both in the comments section and emailed to me directly.

It is interesting the people who tell me to get a life and then proceed to write idiocy such as the following:

From : Larry Kramer ldk44ldk [at] cox.net
Sent : Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:57 AM
To : BlackBerryBrambles [at] hotmail.com
Subject : Brokeback Mountain

You are CLEARLY a simple, foolish and petty person. Only a severely damaged soul with stunted mind and missing should could have worked so hard to find something so useless to write about.

Why don't you stick a cotton tube on your head, wrap yourself in white paper and have a friend (not that you have any) light you up.
by Queer hunter
Get used to it.
by Vincent Fischer (BlackBerryBrambles [at] hotmail.com)
Btw, as I mentioned in my article, I did like the movie.


Vin

http://www.no-smoking.org/august03/08-29-03-1.html

By LISA GREENE St. Petersburg Times [08/23/03]

Gays and lesbians are 70 percent more likely than heterosexuals to smoke, a fact that has caught the attention of a health community more attuned to addressing issues like HIV and AIDS, the St. Petersburg Times reported Aug. 23.

"Smoking kills more gays than AIDS, hate crimes, suicide, and breast cancer combined, but it's only recently that we've begun to address this," said Kathleen DeBold, executive director of the lesbian-health group the Mautner Project.
http://www.no-smoking.org/august03/08-29-03-1.html
by Chuck Wagner (rebelmuscle [at] aol.com)
Vincent Fischer's rant against Brokeback Mountain reaches a whole new level of absurdity.
The movie is a western. There's hunting. Get over it.
The guys smoke. Get over it.
And yes, masculine, rugged men are more attractive to the majority of people who are into MEN. It is innate.

This is like watching 24 and complaining that because the monitors used at CTU aren't endorsed with a Greenpeace stamp, the show is awful. Oh right, I'm guessing he doesn't watch 24 because it violates another portion of his leftist laundry list.

Vincent, you take yourself way too seriously.
by Martijn Hostetler (martijn [at] post.harvard.edu)
OK. I understand your criticisms, but understand that they are wildly out of context. You have completely misread the film, however good intentioned.

This is a film about gay men who are not within the gay community. They are closeted their whole lives, and one of the reasons they are so deeply connected is, only the two of them know their secret (except, eventually, Ennis' ex/wife, who surely doesn't tell anyone). Therefore it is not a film that is made to represent the gay community, at all. This film is not about Chelsea, or the Castro, or Weho or Silverlake. It's just not. And there's something revolutionary about that.

Isn't it more revolutionary to show two very masculine, hunting, working class men who fall in love with each other? Or, did you want both of them to talk with an uber lisp ? (Side point: have you considered the possiblity that many gay men act all femmy and lispy just cuz they hang out with each other too often? That sounds homophobic. It's not.) This whole idea of a "gay affect," a "gay" way of talking, even a kind of "gay accent", is just so misplaced. Have you met a gay guy from Wyoming? Do you know what they sound like? I haven't either. But I imagine they sound a little different than your garden variety urban homo.

And the thing about smoking. I'm sorry. I know you mean well. But this is the most ridiculously PC criticism I've read of any film. Ever. These guys are ranch hands living in the 60s. THEY SMOKE. A lot. As they would have. NO ONE is going to see this film and decide hmm, I need to smoke Camels now.

You've got to learn to watch movies and keep your own damn politics out of it. Because I'm sorry, all of your points are just incredibly provincial and sad. You've been living in the gay ghetto a little too long.

Get used to it! Well actually, I think most people are used to it by now, hmm. Now let's move on with our lives and think outside this little shell we call the "gay community."
by Christian Blood
In the story, just as in the movie, there's a good deal of cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking, as well as one joint. In the story, just as in the movie, Jack's wife comments that he drank a lot. Ang Lee was shooting a script that was an adaptation of a story by Annie Proulx, and he was doing it faithfully. He could have excised "bad" things in order to make these two uneducated country boys more acceptable to us, but he decided to stick closely to the author's vision.

Perhaps it is thematically related to the story that Ennis and Jack are heavy smokers and drinkers. These two men, who are consumed with self-loathing, caught living lies, unhappily married to women, etc., etc., spend a great deal of time sublimating, self-destructing and medicating.

I believe that Hollywood has a moral responsibility not to glamorize smoking and alcoholism, and I agree that smoking and alcoholism are massive threats to the well-being of the gay and lesbian community, but I'm not sure that Brokeback Mountain is an endorsement of smoking or drinking, just as it's hardly an endorsement of sham marriages and staying in the closet.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network