From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Horse slaughter: Cruel retirement for racehorses
DawnWatch: Horse slaughter commentary on NPR's "Morning Edition" 11/9/05
I hesitate to flood with postings, but today is simply a wonderfully animal friendly major media day. I thank Susan Clay for making sure we knew about a superb piece on horse slaughter that aired on National Public Radio's "Morning Edition," Wednesday, November 9. It was by Frank Deford as part of the "Sweetness and Light" series.
You can listen to the piece on line at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5005333 and I will paste the transcript below.
The piece refers to the Horse Slaughter Prevention Act. You can find out more about that, and send a letter to your legislators in support of it, at https://community.hsus.org/campaign/2005_horse_slaughter2
"Sweetness and Light" takes comments at http://www.npr.org/templates/contact/index.php?columnId=4499275
Please send a note of thanks.
Here is the piece:
Commentary: Cruel retirement for racehorses
November 9, 2005 from Morning Edition
RENEE MONTAGNE, host: For many racehorses, life after the track is spent lazing in a pasture and producing the next generation of thoroughbreds, but as commentator Frank Deford explains, that's not always the case.
FRANK DEFORD:
Some time ago, I had a thoroughbred colt named after me. Frank Deford was a nice little horse but I'm afraid not very fast, and eventually, my equine namesake was retired from competition. I assumed that he lived out his life gambling in green pastures, maybe being somebody's weekend hunter. Only recently did I learn that instead that there is a very good chance that Frank Deford ended up as somebody's lunch in Europe. There are now, you see, three horse slaughterhouses in the United States--two in Texas, one in Illinois. All three owned by foreign investors. Every year, more American horses are killed and chopped up for export cuisine, 65,000 last year. Thoroughbreds, standardbreds, quarter horses--for animals who've used up their ability to be competitive on the track, to amuse us betters, who are geldings or simply not good enough to breed, off they go to the abattoirs in Texas and Illinois.
They're killed in the same way that cattle are, with a stun gun. But unlike cattle, horses have long necks and are fractious. Too often, the guns miss their target and the poor horses die an agonizing, horrible death. We used to joke about old nags going to the glue factory. Well, at least it was our glue they made. It has never been the custom in this country for humans to dine on horse meat. Indeed, we no longer even put horse meat in pet food. No, it's not our business to tell other people what to eat, but that doesn't mean we have to supply meals for foreigners. In some parts of the world, they eat dogs and cats. Would we permit slaughterhouses for our Fidos and Tabbys so that their meat could be exported to far-away dinner tables? Well, that's what we're doing with our horses.
Despite a growing public revulsion and overwhelming bipartisan political support, a few members of Congress--notably Texas Republican Congressman Henry Bonilla--have managed to stall federal legislation to outlaw horse slaughter. Last month, finally, Bonilla was thwarted and a temporary measure was amended to an agriculture bill to end horse carnage. It won't be implemented for a hundred and twenty days and it will only be in effect for a year, but a permanent horse slaughter prevention act has already been introduced in the Senate by Republican John Ensign of Nevada and a companion bill in the House by Democrat John Sweeney of New York. Hopefully, joint legislation will be passed soon, and the slaughterhouses in Texas and Illinois will be shuttered forever.
Perhaps now the thoroughbred industry will admit that it has some blood on its hands, too. Too many horses race when they're hurting, too often able to get to the starting gate only because of drugs. No wonder so many of our horses break down so young. And even though there are many organizations that adopt and tend to retired racehorses, we need to invest in more care for these animals that we breed so they might entertain us. But first, end the slaughter.
MONTAGNE: The comments of Frank Deford, senior contributing writer at Sports Illustrated. He joins us each Wednesday from member station WSHU in Fairfield, Connecticut.
(END OF COMMENTARY ON MORNING EDITION)
------------------------------------------------------------------
(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.DawnWatch.com. If you forward or reprint DawnWatch alerts, please do so unedited -- leave DawnWatch in the title and include this tag line.)
You can listen to the piece on line at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5005333 and I will paste the transcript below.
The piece refers to the Horse Slaughter Prevention Act. You can find out more about that, and send a letter to your legislators in support of it, at https://community.hsus.org/campaign/2005_horse_slaughter2
"Sweetness and Light" takes comments at http://www.npr.org/templates/contact/index.php?columnId=4499275
Please send a note of thanks.
Here is the piece:
Commentary: Cruel retirement for racehorses
November 9, 2005 from Morning Edition
RENEE MONTAGNE, host: For many racehorses, life after the track is spent lazing in a pasture and producing the next generation of thoroughbreds, but as commentator Frank Deford explains, that's not always the case.
FRANK DEFORD:
Some time ago, I had a thoroughbred colt named after me. Frank Deford was a nice little horse but I'm afraid not very fast, and eventually, my equine namesake was retired from competition. I assumed that he lived out his life gambling in green pastures, maybe being somebody's weekend hunter. Only recently did I learn that instead that there is a very good chance that Frank Deford ended up as somebody's lunch in Europe. There are now, you see, three horse slaughterhouses in the United States--two in Texas, one in Illinois. All three owned by foreign investors. Every year, more American horses are killed and chopped up for export cuisine, 65,000 last year. Thoroughbreds, standardbreds, quarter horses--for animals who've used up their ability to be competitive on the track, to amuse us betters, who are geldings or simply not good enough to breed, off they go to the abattoirs in Texas and Illinois.
They're killed in the same way that cattle are, with a stun gun. But unlike cattle, horses have long necks and are fractious. Too often, the guns miss their target and the poor horses die an agonizing, horrible death. We used to joke about old nags going to the glue factory. Well, at least it was our glue they made. It has never been the custom in this country for humans to dine on horse meat. Indeed, we no longer even put horse meat in pet food. No, it's not our business to tell other people what to eat, but that doesn't mean we have to supply meals for foreigners. In some parts of the world, they eat dogs and cats. Would we permit slaughterhouses for our Fidos and Tabbys so that their meat could be exported to far-away dinner tables? Well, that's what we're doing with our horses.
Despite a growing public revulsion and overwhelming bipartisan political support, a few members of Congress--notably Texas Republican Congressman Henry Bonilla--have managed to stall federal legislation to outlaw horse slaughter. Last month, finally, Bonilla was thwarted and a temporary measure was amended to an agriculture bill to end horse carnage. It won't be implemented for a hundred and twenty days and it will only be in effect for a year, but a permanent horse slaughter prevention act has already been introduced in the Senate by Republican John Ensign of Nevada and a companion bill in the House by Democrat John Sweeney of New York. Hopefully, joint legislation will be passed soon, and the slaughterhouses in Texas and Illinois will be shuttered forever.
Perhaps now the thoroughbred industry will admit that it has some blood on its hands, too. Too many horses race when they're hurting, too often able to get to the starting gate only because of drugs. No wonder so many of our horses break down so young. And even though there are many organizations that adopt and tend to retired racehorses, we need to invest in more care for these animals that we breed so they might entertain us. But first, end the slaughter.
MONTAGNE: The comments of Frank Deford, senior contributing writer at Sports Illustrated. He joins us each Wednesday from member station WSHU in Fairfield, Connecticut.
(END OF COMMENTARY ON MORNING EDITION)
------------------------------------------------------------------
(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.DawnWatch.com. If you forward or reprint DawnWatch alerts, please do so unedited -- leave DawnWatch in the title and include this tag line.)
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network