top
Police State
Police State
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Berkeley: Andrea Pritchett vs Paul Rauber

by Repost berkeley daily planet

Commentary: Crime in South Berkeley is A Difficult Problem to Solve By ANDREA PRICHETT
After reading Paul Rauber’s commentary “South Berkeley’s Crime Enablers,” I feel sure that he misunderstood my opinion piece. Mr. Rauber refers to my “venomous Oct. 25 commentary” accuses me of “tossing around incendiary” charges of racism and then concludes by saying that my opinions “Make a firebomb look kind of benign by comparison.” Mr. Rauber’s choice of language and metaphor suggests that by merely raising the question of racism, I have somehow caused a harm comparable to the destruction of a firebomb. This is a surprising repudiation of the value of free expression coming from a man who makes his living as a writer.
Mr. Rauber, I know that your situation is difficult. It is difficult for many of us. I have been held up at gunpoint in my neighborhood by teenagers. It isn’t pretty. Poverty, crime, lack of education and opportunity all conspire to make life hard for many of us. There is tremendous suffering in South Berkeley that goes unaddressed year after year. This is the reality that much of Berkeley seems determined to ignore.

As naïve as this may sound, I really was hoping that we could work toward solutions if we involve the actual people with whom you have a conflict, identify what help the city is prepared to offer, and let go of the requirement that Ms. Moore sell her home as a prerequisite to the mediation. We need to look at the root causes of the conflict. This is not your responsibility nor is it Ms. Moore’s alone. The City of Berkeley and all of its residents have a responsibility to address poverty issues and the underlying causes of street level crime. We have neglected our young people and ignored the income gap in our city for too long and at our own peril.

Mr. Rauber, please be assured that I had no “venom” in my heart when I wrote my article. My point was to encourage us to see Lenora Moore’s situation in its historical context. Looking at the bigger picture is not meant to minimize your suffering. It is meant to help us correctly diagnose a social problem so that we can create real solutions. Your group seems to be blaming Ms. Moore because it is convenient to do so, not because you really believe that she is the problem.

Mr. Rauber, by bringing up the issue of institutional racism in Berkeley, I didn’t mean to imply that you were practicing racism. However, you can’t deny that gentrification is taking place right before our very eyes. The number of African Americans in Berkeley has declined steadily from a high of 30 percent in the ‘60s to our current level of 13 percent. African Americans in Berkeley live an average of 10 years less than white residents. They are also four times as likely to be stopped by police and profiled than white people in Berkeley. The “achievement gap” in high school education continues to impair the ability of our young people of color to compete for the kinds of jobs that would enable them to remain in Berkeley. Mr. Rauber, can you really believe that the legacy of racism and current economic conditions play no part in this situation and put no pressure on young people to participate in the underground economy ?

By the way, I would like to remind you that I went to court with Ms. Moore in 1992 and am well aware of the problems in your neighborhood. I read the entire case that your group presented to Ms. Moore and tried to help her formulate a response. Be assured that I would love to meet with you and/or your group to discuss the root causes of the drug problem in Berkeley and how we can organize to address it.

However, I find it a bit alarming that simply raising difficult questions about racism and the complexity of justice is enough to get me branded by you as a race-baiter and a crime-enabler. Even worse, my words actually inspired one of the plaintiffs to contact my place of work to complain that I had “encouraged” young people to commit criminal acts. I don’t know how you folks found out where I work, but I would hope that as the lead plaintiff you would encourage the others not to harass me at my job.

Maybe your group will win in court. Maybe the judge will blame Ms. Moore for not being more aggressive in the fight against street crime. However, there are other grandmothers out there. I can point to numerous examples of grandmothers who are struggling to raise their grandchildren and to keep them away from the drug culture. What if we just go ahead and move all those grandmothers right out of Berkeley, too? Maybe we can pressure them to sell their homes, too. Surely we can replace them with some nice, young couples who are looking to get into the housing market through the purchase of an old “fixer upper.” And yes, Mr. Rauber, if we fail to look at the systemic causes of drug addiction, crime and poverty, then when those newcomers apply their fresh coats of paint, they might as well just paint over the history of African Americans in Berkeley, too.


Andrea Prichett is a member of CopWatch and a South Berkeley resident.
§Rauber responds
by repost

Commentary: Civil Suit Filed Only After Defendent Refused to Move By PAUL RAUBER
It’s me again, lead plaintiff for the 14 South Berkeley citizens suing our South Berkeley drug house, responding to the latest distortions of our case in the editorial pages of the Daily Planet. In her Oct. 28 editorial, Executive Editor Becky O’Malley’s paints us ordinary neighborhood folks as vindictive harpies “with blood in their eyes” intent on unconstitutional punishment of Lenora Moore, owner of the drug house at 1610 Oregon Street. “If anyone . . . has broken a criminal law,” O’Malley asks, “shouldn’t they be charged and tried in accordance with the Constitution?”
O’Malley is ignoring the difference between civil and criminal law. We are not charging Moore with a criminal infraction; we are making civil claims for the pain and suffering she has inflicted on our South Berkeley neighborhood by running an open drug house for many years. O’Malley claims that our “stated intent. . . is to force the defendant, a neighboring homeowner, to sell her property, whether she wants to or not.” This is false. Our intent is to collect cash damages from Moore. Before we filed our suit, we told her that if she would sell her house and leave the neighborhood, we would drop the action. She refused. Therefore we’re proceeding with our civil suit. Ms. Moore has allowed her house to be a public nuisance, and she owes her neighbors restitution for the open drug dealing, prostitution, casually discarded drug paraphernalia, and midnight fights her mismanagement of her property has inflicted on us. We all think it would be a fine thing if she would sell her property and move away, but that is not a penalty that small claims court can exact, nor that we can ask of it.

O’Malley magnanimously allows that “No one should have to live in a neighborhood where criminal behavior is tolerated. But stopping criminal behavior should be the responsibility of the police, not of the small claims court, which can do nothing to stop real crimes.” In fact, we have been working closely with the police for many years. We keep our crime logs, call in drug deals we witness, identify violators of restraining orders, etc. But it hasn’t worked, largely because the Alameda County district attorney doesn’t take the matter seriously. Here’s a prime example: Recently, due to the hard work and good policing of the Berkeley Police Department, Lenora Moore’s daughter was arrested for possession of crack. Here was one of the worst actors in the neighborhood, finally in the hands of the criminal justice system. And what did the district attorney do? Gave her five years unsupervised probation. Now she’s back on the street, dealing as before. That’s why we’re pursuing a civil solution: It’s the only avenue left us. If Becky O’Malley is serious in her contention that we stick to purely criminal remedies, I look forward to her editorials in favor of stiff, mandatory sentences for those convicted of drug offenses. Until then, please allow us to deal with the situation as best we can.

Finally, O’Malley calls us “dangerously naïve” for thinking that forcing Moore to move will stop drug dealing in our neighborhood. None of us is so deluded. However, it would stop a whole lot of drug dealing in our neighborhood, and I think we’d all be pretty darn happy with that. Surely O’Malley is not suggesting that since drug dealing is going to go on somewhere, it might as well be next door to us? That’s an easy argument to make for someone whose idea of a neighborhood nuisance is how high the sunflowers in her verge are allowed to grow.


South Berkeley resident Paul Rauber is an editor at Sierra Magazine and a former columnist for East Bay Express.›



§Letters to the editor
by repost

Letters to the Editor
PROGRESSIVES
Editors, Daily Planet:

Supporters of Lenora Moore call themselves “progressive.” They don’t seem to realize that their attitude has caused the declining of progressivism during the last few decades.

If “progressives” support policies that perpetuate crime, drug-dealing, and unsafe neighborhoods, then most Americans will vote for conservatives.

Andrea Prichett says we should look for the root causes or systemic causes of drug dealing in south Berkeley. I suggest that one of those root causes is her own “progressive” belief that people not responsible for their own behavior, that their problems are the fault of the system.

Only in Berkeley! In other cities where people have used small claims court to free their neighborhoods from drug dealer, I have not heard about “progressives” trying to keep the drug dealers in the neighborhood. Let’s hope this news does not get out of Berkeley, because it will just provide more ammunition for conservatives.

Charles Siegel




RAUBER AND CRITICS

Editors, Daily Planet:

It boggles the mind.

Liberal journalist Paul Rauber is lead plaintiff in a civil suit against a neighbor, Lenora Moore, suing her for damages related to the criminal behavior (of her relatives and others) in their neighborhood.

The critics of this lawsuit charge that Rauber and company are trying to force Moore out of her home and that their logic is one of collective punishment. In his most recent letter to the editor, Rauber offers his rebuttal.

Rauber claims that it is false that the stated intent of the lawsuit is to force Moore to sell her property. “Before we filed our suit, we told her that if she would sell her house and leave the neighborhood, we would drop the action,” he explains. Well then.

Likewise, Rauber bristles at the suggestion that Moore is not to blame for crime in the neighborhood. Despite his best efforts to report crimes to the authorities, he says nothing has changed, “largely because the Alameda County district attorney doesn’t take the matter seriously”. Well then.

Am I crazy, or does Rauber actually agree with his critics?

Christopher Cantor




INTOLERANCE

Editors, Daily Planet:

I feel the need to respond to Laura Menard’s letter (“Lies and Intolerance”), in which she advocates the censure of a local teacher, simply for expressing views that differ from her own.

Ms. Menard, I have lived here in the Bay Area for all 23 years. I consider Berkeley my second home. I often think about how lucky I am to live in an urban place spread with a wonderful feast of opinions and views. These range from conservative to liberal to anarchist-radical, and each one adds richness and texture to our home.

If Ms. Prichett is fired or disciplined solely for her political opinions, what does that say about our community as a feast of views that can exist side by side? What will happen to other teachers who hold strong opinions? Will the next generation of young learners have the chance to taste a variety of beliefs including, but not limited to, those on the left? Or will our young people face a sparse, meager political table?

For the sake of our Bay Area, and our world, I hope not.

Alexis Johnson

Oakland




TRUE CORRUPTION

Editors, Daily Planet:

Aren’t Andrea Prichett and Paul Rauber both overlooking the true corruption in this debate? Would moving all the South-Berkeley “criminal-aiding-grandmas” to other neighborhoods be a rational solution? Even incarcerating all the guilty would only waste more scarce millions by providing employment for increased law enforcement.

Pritchett speaks of recognizing “the systemic causes of drug addiction, crime, and poverty.” This is not rocket science; those who are benefiting from our ignorant outdated drug laws are the true criminals. Those who have apparently given up any hope of using our wasted millions for vitally needed education, jobs, housing, etc., are continuing a seemingly endless unproductive debate about the wrong crimes!

Gerta Farber



LOSS OF COMPASSION

Editors, Daily Planet:

The loss of compassion is so saddening. As I read Paul Rauber’s rationalizations for his lawsuit against Ms. Moore, my heart sinks to think that his way of thinking can possibly be popular. I know it is not nice to find paraphernalia of see someone urinating in the neighborhood but compare that level of suffering to some of your neighbor’s problems; not having resources for their family to have a proper home, lack of access to decent jobs, discrimination, mental and physical illnesses and no available treatment. Please, can’t you see the bigger picture? It is immoral to persecute those of your community suffering from the lack of abundance you have. Attacking the victims is easier than finding the solutions. But it is wrong.

Cyndi Johnson


Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network