From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
In Bush's mind
Nothing can shake the conviction of the US president that everything he has done has been right, writes Amin Howeidi*
Do you always have a clue about how the mind of the person you're dealing with works? If you don't, then you're in trouble, especially if the person in question is the president of the United States. In My Life, former US President Bill Clinton describes Bush's early days in office. Bush and his team, says Clinton, gave priority to national security matters, especially to missile defence and the situation in Iraq. Bush had by then toned down his extreme right-wing rhetoric, thanks to the help of Democratic advisers who worked with him during the campaign. But once he won, the new president brought along an all-conservative team. President Bush, in Clinton's opinion, was ready to say anything to get into office.
News agencies have recently quoted Bush as saying that his war in Iraq and Afghanistan was a mission from God. "God told me: 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq.' And I did."
The way Bush uses excessive force reminds me of Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt believed that force is needed to protect peace, and that the US should make the world feel its might. "If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness," he once said. Henry Kissinger, commenting on Roosevelt's policies, concluded that Roosevelt was more interested in muscle flexing than principles. So is George Bush, and you'd better believe it.
International policy makers seek one of three things: consensus, balance of power, or domination. Bush has no use for the first two. He prefers domination. That's the man who developed the theory that "if you're not with us, you're against us." That's the man who had his top aides teach the world about "old Europe". That's the man who promised to build a missile defence system that would make America safe as a castle. And that's the man who divided the world into allies and rogue states.
After 9/11, Bush wasted no time invading Afghanistan and Iraq. His policies were disastrous, and yet he still insists that he's done the right thing. Having failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Bush began claiming that the US task in the Middle East was one of promoting democracy. He recently told a Republican think thank that his administration had allocated $4.6 billion to supporting democratisation programmes around the world. Obviously, he is hoping to redeem himself in the face of mounting domestic opposition.
Read More
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/766/op1.htm
News agencies have recently quoted Bush as saying that his war in Iraq and Afghanistan was a mission from God. "God told me: 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq.' And I did."
The way Bush uses excessive force reminds me of Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt believed that force is needed to protect peace, and that the US should make the world feel its might. "If I must choose between righteousness and peace, I choose righteousness," he once said. Henry Kissinger, commenting on Roosevelt's policies, concluded that Roosevelt was more interested in muscle flexing than principles. So is George Bush, and you'd better believe it.
International policy makers seek one of three things: consensus, balance of power, or domination. Bush has no use for the first two. He prefers domination. That's the man who developed the theory that "if you're not with us, you're against us." That's the man who had his top aides teach the world about "old Europe". That's the man who promised to build a missile defence system that would make America safe as a castle. And that's the man who divided the world into allies and rogue states.
After 9/11, Bush wasted no time invading Afghanistan and Iraq. His policies were disastrous, and yet he still insists that he's done the right thing. Having failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Bush began claiming that the US task in the Middle East was one of promoting democracy. He recently told a Republican think thank that his administration had allocated $4.6 billion to supporting democratisation programmes around the world. Obviously, he is hoping to redeem himself in the face of mounting domestic opposition.
Read More
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2005/766/op1.htm
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network