Who Wants to Dismantle Community Representation at KPFA?

For more information see the flyer for the forum by clicking on "photo" at the head of the right hand Features column in the Indymedia section.

No, that was wrong! -- the flyer can be seen (also) in the features bar
above this item, on both the front page & the Indymedia page.

hearsay and supposed email that could have been generated by Mr. phelps. straight out of Cointelpro, nice one.

So this time he takes off the email addresses for "confidentiality" -- something Phelps and his gang (including KGO business manager Marnie Tattersall) don't give a rat's ass about. At least he spelled Sherry Gendelman's name right this time! So much for authenticity...

You might wonder what's going on here. It's fairly simple: listeners are increasingly thinking of a recall of the wack-jobs who managed to get elected to KPFA's board with a tiny number of votes. What Tiekert is accused of suggesting is nothing that listener subscribers aren't already talking about. So as a means of trying to head that off, Mr. Phelps (a fat cat who lives in Piedmont and sends his kid to private school) is trying to distract everyone. It ain't gonna work.

What does it mean when a person too cowardly to identify themselves is afraid to discuss the facts and politics openly and resorts to personal attacks filled with lies? It means that those he/she supports don't have a factual leg to stand on and are throwing mud to distract from the facts. I don't know how anyone doing this could ever be considered "progressive". Their practice is more like Karl Rove's than Lewis Hill's (KPFA'S founder). Why are all those that do this so afraid to publicly debate the issues? Wouldn't that be more in the spirit of "Free Speech Radio" than firing cheap, dishonest shots from a safe hiding place? I am not a "fat cat" but I do have a fat cat. I drive a 2000 Nissan, not a new Mercedes like some of your "gang", if cars matter. My child has never gone to a private school including college. I grew up in a working class single mother family. My mother was a "rosy the riviter" during WWII. If you want to compare let's hear about you. I will gladly compare my contribution to social change with yours if you want to but you will have to come out from hiding to do that. Most important is to discuss and debate the issues which you refuse to do in a public manner where you will have to be accountable for what you say.

Confidentiality can be used as a cover to hide information and to avoid accountability. "Phelps and his gang" (anyone that supports the Mission and progressive community radio with democratic process, transparency and accountability is welcome to join) support confidentiality with regard to legal and personnel issues that might hurt innocent people or get KPFA sued. However, we don't support the use of confidentiality to prevent our listerners from knowing what is going on politically at KPFA/Pacifica as does the entrenced staff and their few listeners allies. With regard to the election, "Peoples Radio" candidates won 2/3 of the vote. And the vote would have been larger had the entrenched staff encouraged listeners to vote instead of spending so much energy trying to supress the vote along with a few dirty tricks. Remember, Peoples Radio didn't have the assests of the station to use. All we had was our 10 Point Program and our willingness to go out and talk to the voters in person, something the entrenched candidates, (KPFA Forward slate) seldom, if ever, did. But they are community oriented people, aren't they? For the record, despite many opportuinties to do so, Brian Edward-Tiekert, or those that received it, have never said the e-mail is not authentic. That is an admissiom by silence.

So again I offer to debate Brian Edwards-Tiekert, the author of this personal attack, if they are different, or anyone else on these issues. Why aren't these issues being debated on the air? The entrenched staff don't want the listeners to hear anything but the crap they send them to read with their onesided use of listener paid for air time. If they are the rightous defenders of "Free Speech Radio" that they claim to be, why do they hide the facts and issues from open discussion/debate and want to spoon feed the listeners their onesided view? Why don't they want transparency and accountability?
Their practice in information suppression make clear their fear of the truth. But we should just send in our hard earned $$ to them and "Trust them", right?

This email is obviously a scribbling of strategy IDEAS, combed from an email you apparently unscrupulously obtained since it is not addressed to you, and you have gone so far as to organize a forum to discuss this private strategy email, to call to debate something that has never been brought to the table, and has never been mentioned again or acted upon by anyone, quite a Republican tactic. you also have wasted hundreds of pages of paper photocopying this meaningless tidbit, because you see an opportunity to slander someone you consider a political enemy. The urgency with which you spin your wheels trying to make something out of nothing is telling. These are workers who have been slandered and dismissed by their governing board in a blatant and hostile way in the past several months, is it any wonder they discuss alternatives? Are they not free to have these discussions? It is unfortunate that given all the problems KPFA faces at this juncture that you see no better use of your time and position as KPFA board member than to contribute to the workplace hostility by seizing on what is most likely a tongue in cheek remark shared in a private email between a few fellow workers, to turn it into a political trophy to support your ongoing vitriolic rant. Shame on you.

(My comments are in parenthesis. RP)
This email is obviously (pure spin & assumption) a scribbling of strategy IDEAS, combed from an email you apparently unscrupulously (incorrect, attack & assumption) obtained since it is not addressed to you, and you have gone so far as to organize a forum to discuss this private strategy email, to call to debate something that has never been brought to the table, (the activities of the entrenched staff and their LSB allies have made many wonder about their commitment to democratic process and transparency, this was just the printed confirmation) and has never been mentioned again or acted upon by anyone, (it was never mentioned before but demonstrated by anti-democratic anti-transparency conduct) quite a Republican tactic.( for all we know you are a Republican since you are too cowardly to take off your mask) you also have wasted hundreds of pages of paper photocopying this meaningless tidbit, ( you don't want the listeners to know the truth and try to attack its dissemination on the use of paper?) because you see an opportunity to slander ( truth is never slander) someone you consider a political enemy. ( Brian is the one who called people enemies) The urgency with which you spin your wheels trying to make something out of nothing is telling.( the consistency with which Brian and his allies use dirty tricks to impede the development of democracy and then say the LSB is dysfunctional is what is telling. They also attacked the election for low voter turnout and yet they did everything they could to discourage voters. It is like the Menendez Brothers asking the court for mercy since they are orphans.) These are workers who have been slandered and dismissed by their governing board in a blatant and hostile way in the past several months, ( you state no facts to support this "slander" by unnamed LSB members) is it any wonder they discuss alternatives? ( most of the entrenched , if not all, never wanted a democratic process, they wanted to continue to run the station behind closed doors where the only roll for listeners was to send in $$$ and answer phones, none of the entrenced staff that was around in 1995 said boo when over 100 community programers, many people of color, were fired without any justification or recourse) Are they not free to have these discussions? ( of course they are, what is your point? And aren't we free to question their committment to democracy and transparency when we find something like this? Should Ellsberg not have published the "Pentagon Papers"? Surely under your logic the government was free to discuss that immoral war. What about the Palmer letter talking about selling stations, sure the hijackers had a right to discuss selling and we had a right to expose their intentions) It is unfortunate that given all the problems KPFA faces at this juncture ( as I see it the fundamental problem at KPFA is that there is a group of staff and some others that want to continue their power under the prior system of patronage and cronyism and do not want the listeners to have any say in anything, despite the fact that all the $$$ comes from the listeners) that you see no better use of your time and position as KPFA board member ( what better use is there than to expose two-faced Board members and staff who mouth support for democratic process while what they really advocate is to control the station even if it means to "dismantle" the democratic proicess) than to contribute to the workplace hostility (who is really contributing to the hostility? someone that says they want to "prop up staff morale" because their heavy handed power moves have hurt morale? by seizing on what is most likely a tongue in cheek remark (spin, spin, spin, those items were too specific to be tongue in cheek) shared in a private email between a few fellow workers ( that was not sent to just "fellow workers", it was also sent to dissident management person, Lemlem, and a listener elected LSB member, Sherry G. who has in the past made it clear that she is against an elected LSB, and non-union unpaid staff, so much for it being a bunch of union members chatting, it was a political group discussing how to regroup after their 15-5 defeat in trying to control the station by attacking and firing the GM who wouldn't kiss their ring and bow to them as the previous IGM had done. 4 of the 5 votes to fire the GM are on this e-mail), to turn it into a political trophy to support your ongoing vitriolic rant ( damn, you don't like the things I say). Shame on you. (You have so much nerve to talk about SHAME when you don't have the courage of your convictions to stand up and be counted. What kind of progressive politics are practiced by anonymous "hit pieces", what kind of culture does that suggest for KPFA? The answer: behind closed doors patronage and cronysim)

Richard, you are doing wonderful work for the listeners of kpfa and it is much appreciated! THANKS AGAIN!!!

That guy brian is the one that used the term "enemies" and no matter what that liar says he meant it.

I know you would like to think that theses people who are actively working to "dismantle" kpfa are just selfish individuals wanting to secure their position, that is just wishful thinking.

These people are part of a organized attack on kpfa and their goal is to destroy kpfa as a progressive voice that speaks out against the crimes of the fascist capitalists enslaving the people of the world.

Don’t under estimate these criminals they think of you as their “enemy” and will stop at nothing to keep you from interfering with their agenda of destroying kpfa’s progressive programming.

Don’t let your guard down, these people consider you their “enemy” and have said so,

This guy brian edwards-tiekert is a weasel and the other operatives that have wormed there way into kpfa a vicious and ruthless and every word that comes out of their mouth is a lie.

Consider their targets “flash points” “guns and butter” and the “kpfa news”

They have already destroyed the kpfa news content,

How much more damage needs to be done before the threat these agents pose is realized don’t wait till they dismantle the station one show at a time. They must be stopped.


Take great care the threat these agents pose IS dangerous.

Yes the workers and staff of KPFA are the agents of the fascist capitalists. They secretly organized 911 and now wish to take off guns and butter before their plan becomes revealed. Let's all pray that these dangerous young agents of the future don't mess with the entrenched order of the boomer beacon kpfa.
"These people are part of a organized attack on kpfa and their goal is to destroy kpfa as a progressive voice that speaks out against the crimes of the fascist capitalists enslaving the people of the world.
Don’t under estimate these criminals they think of you as their “enemy” and will stop at nothing to keep you from interfering with their agenda of destroying kpfa’s progressive programming.
Take great care the threat these agents pose IS dangerous. "

Richard, you are doing wonderful work for the listeners of kpfa and it is much appreciated! THANKS AGAIN!!!

That guy brian is the one that used the term "enemies" and no matter what that liar says he meant it.

I know you would like to think that theses people who are actively working to "dismantle" kpfa are just selfish individuals wanting to secure their position, that is just wishful thinking.

These people are part of a organized attack on kpfa and their goal is to destroy kpfa as a progressive voice that speaks out against the crimes of the fascist capitalists enslaving the people of the world.

Don’t under estimate these criminals they think of you as their “enemy” and will stop at nothing to keep you from interfering with their agenda of destroying kpfa’s progressive programming.

Don’t let your guard down, these people consider you their “enemy” and have said so,

This guy brian edwards-tiekert is a weasel and the other operatives that have wormed there way into kpfa are vicious and ruthless and every word that comes out of their mouth is a lie.

Consider their targets “flash points” “guns and butter” and the “kpfa news”

They have already destroyed the kpfa news content,

How much more damage needs to be done before the threat these agents pose is realized don’t wait till they dismantle the station one show at a time. They must be stopped.


Take great care the threat these agents pose IS dangerous.