top
North Coast
North Coast
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

PACIFIC LUMBER MOUNTS LAST MINUTE ATTACK ON PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS

by EPIC
Court issues highly unusual order on behalf of Pacific Lumber.
Humboldt County, CA—In a last minute hearing Tuesday afternoon, Maxxam / PL was able to gain a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that short-circuited a public hearing by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) to consider testimony about water quality permits designed to reduce erosion leading to flooding and degradation of salmonid habitat in Freshwater Creek & Elk River.

In a ruling seen as highly unusual, residents and other concerned citizens were shocked when Judge Bruce Watson acceded to the demands of Maxxam attorneys Chris Carr and Frank Bacik. The company lawyers argued that the evidentiary hearings scheduled since June of this year to be held on Sept. 14 and 15, represented an unfair process that limited the “rights” of the company and a minority group of downstream neighbors--many with previous financial relationships with the company—who oppose the proposed rule package. Their contention begs the question of why, after an exhaustive process lasting more than 8 years, Maxxam waited until days before the planned hearings to file their desperate petition.

Deputy Attorney General Nick Stern, joined by Water Board counsel Erik Spiess, rebutted the company’s challenge to the Water Board’s jurisdictional authority regarding impacts of logging. Reading directly from Senate Bill 810, passed in 2004, deputy AG Stern quoted the applicable language of this legislation that provides water quality regulators the authority to fulfill the long-failed function of the California Department of Forestry (CDF) to protect the public trust resource of clean water. The state’s attorney also argued that the Humboldt court lacked jurisdiction in the case until all administrative remedies had been exhausted. Regarding the hearings planned for Ferndale for the next two days, this is particularly pertinent since no decision was scheduled as to whether to adopt the proposed permitting process until the end of the month.

Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC) President Larry Evans said outside the courtroom, “Here is another cynical ploy by Maxxam to obstruct regulatory efforts to reign in the reckless overcutting that has been their standard practice since the hostile takeover of PL in 1985.” Evans pointed out that, “Maxxam has a record of over 800 violations of the Forest Practice Rules documented between 1995 and 2004, and “their irresponsible and lawless practices, have caused significant environmental damage to not just Freshwater and Elk, but also Jordan Creek, Bear River, the Van Duzen River, the Mattole River and many other Humboldt County streams.”

In reply to attorney Carr’s allegation that the state’s case “didn’t hold water”, Evans observed that “neither does Elk River or Freshwater Creek”.

Judge Watson issued his ruling about the long anticipated hearings at 5 pm, but in a final bizarre twist to the proceedings, members of the public were denied access to the ruling. Instead, the court clerk told those waiting for the decision that they should contact the attorneys to discover the results. However, due to the late hour and unknown location of those attorneys, this Kafkaesque paradox challenged citizens to pursue unconventional methods, from calling Water Board members at home to phone canvassing area motels to find out whether the next day’s hearings were on or off.
###
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Bones
Where does Larry Evens of EPIC get this information about how many violations maxxam has been issued by CDF. 800 forest practice rule violations, sure sounds like alot of violations to me. I want to know more about these violations, are they harming the environment or killing endangered species? We all need to know the truth! If a company can stay in business and get away with this many violations of the forest practice rules, in this day and age of over regulation and duplicative permiting including input from mutiple government agencies. We should all hold them accountable for their actions! OR is this just another attempt by environmentlists like EPIC and others to add their twist to the mix to sway public opinion, or just another bald face lie. Come clean Larry what up.
by Justice
EPIC should thank Judge Watson. Had the hearing process gone on as planned, the entire process would have been vulnerable to legal challenges because of procedural errors on the part of the Water Board. The procedural errors are of the same type as committed by CDF that allowed the SYP permits to be invalidated by the EPIC lawsuit. The Water Board cut corners to speed up the review process and finalize the WWDR permits by September 30, which was highly inappropriate in light of the volume and technical complexity of public comments. There was no reason to regard September 30 as carved in stone. It didn't help matters that the responses to public comments were not made available to Board members and the public in a timely manner. The Water Board now has the opportunity to manage the public comment/response review and permit revisions without undue haste and truly prepare themselves for the final steps. Cooler heads will appreciate that Judge Watson saved the Water Board from itself.
by bumble bee
PL's hundreds of violations are a matter of public record. CDF and DFG are the source, as they issued the violations. You can continue to deny PL's record, but it's there, it's available, and was the basis (along with intentionally covering up their violations) for yanking their logging license in 1997.

Here's a SMALL SAMPLE of Maxxam/Pacific Lumber's Violations, from '99 - '03:

By Year
1999: 15
2000: 8
2001: 74
2002: 74
2003: 67

By Category
Harming Marbled Murrelet: 15
Harming Northern Spotted Owls: 12
Destroying rare plants: 8
Logging in "no-cut," riparian zones*: 29
Constructing fuel breaks in riparian zones*: 7
"Misclassifying" streams*: 23
Other illegal cutting*: 10
Other illegal operations along
streams, on landslides, etc: 14
Operating in saturated soil conditions: 19
Untreated erosion sites in riparian zones: 22
Road problems: 23
Stream crossings: 33
Misc. violations: 27

Total: 242

*All or most of these involve illegal cutting of trees that were supposed to be left standing.

http://www.wildcalifornia.org/publications/article-46

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network