From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Why FEMA Failed: The Bush Administration and Disaster Relief
As Republican leaders announced a joint House-Senate inquiry into failures surrounding the response to Hurricane Katrina, we take a look at why FEMA failed with Salon.com staff writer Farhad Manjoo who writes, "Ideologically opposed to a strong federal role in disaster relief and obsessed with terrorism, the Bush administration let a once-admired agency fall apart." In Washington, Republican leaders on Wednesday announced a joint House-Senate inquiry into failures surrounding the response to Hurricane Katrina.
Congressional Democrats were reportedly not involved in putting the joint inquiry together and called instead for an independent probe similar to the 9/11 commission.
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said, "An investigation of the Republican administration by a Republican-controlled Congress is like having a pitcher call his own balls and strikes."
Meanwhile, the Bush administration has requested an additional $51.8 billion in new relief money, with most of the funds directed to FEMA.
This comes as senior House Republican officials said that some lawmakers were pressing the White House to dismiss FEMA director Michael Brown. This according to The New York Times
Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, a senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said he would try to offer an amendment to sever FEMA from the Department of Homeland Security.
* Farhad Manjoo, a staff writer at Salon.com. His latest piece is titled In it he writes, "Ideologically opposed to a strong federal role in disaster relief and obsessed with terrorism, the Bush administration let a once-admired agency fall apart."
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/08/142212
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said, "An investigation of the Republican administration by a Republican-controlled Congress is like having a pitcher call his own balls and strikes."
Meanwhile, the Bush administration has requested an additional $51.8 billion in new relief money, with most of the funds directed to FEMA.
This comes as senior House Republican officials said that some lawmakers were pressing the White House to dismiss FEMA director Michael Brown. This according to The New York Times
Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin, a senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said he would try to offer an amendment to sever FEMA from the Department of Homeland Security.
* Farhad Manjoo, a staff writer at Salon.com. His latest piece is titled In it he writes, "Ideologically opposed to a strong federal role in disaster relief and obsessed with terrorism, the Bush administration let a once-admired agency fall apart."
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/08/142212
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
The widespread corruption within New Orleans Police Dept is already known. The emergency crisis situation of a global warming induced hurricane doesn't suddenly make corrupt cops become angelic rescuers. If anything, the crisis situation would be used by opportunistic police to further weaken and divide the low income community. The NOPD functions as an organized crime unit and what better time to increase their power than a disaster..
Staging a "looting" event where non food electronic items are taken on videotape wouldn't be difficult for a police force already familiar with corruption. The result of the staged looting event could be for Governor Blanco and President Bush to order National Guard to "Shoot to kill the looters". There needs to be evidence of non food items being taken before they could issue such a strong statement. Even if the NOPD did not stage looting, the fact that many police were missing and whereabouts unknown indicates that they were operating illegally in the flooded districts of New Orleans, possibly antagonizing stranded residents with whom they had prior disputes. The gunfights were most likely initiated by police and their allies within the organized gangs. The NOPD continues to be the strongest and most ruthless organized crime gang in the city of New Orleans..
Some may argue that people living in poverty would revel at the chance to take expensive equipment during a time of crisis. Though there may be some individuals who focused their energy on non edible, non-survival items simply for their financial worth, it would be difficult to do this very often while struggling with thirst, hunger and constant standing water chest high. Once again finding proof of either accusation is doubtful, however the results indicate that the scattered reports of "looting" led to an order from both Blanco and Bush to "shoot to kill" the residents, regardless of what they were taking. There was no distinguishing between people taking electronic equipment or people taking food that was needed for their families survival. So now a military or police offical has licensce to shoot at anyone, even if they take a perishable food item that will be a financial loss to the owner regardless. Would the administrators Blanco and Bush prefer that people rather starve than obtain perishable food item? Based on their actions, the answer is yes.
Staging a "looting" event where non food electronic items are taken on videotape wouldn't be difficult for a police force already familiar with corruption. The result of the staged looting event could be for Governor Blanco and President Bush to order National Guard to "Shoot to kill the looters". There needs to be evidence of non food items being taken before they could issue such a strong statement. Even if the NOPD did not stage looting, the fact that many police were missing and whereabouts unknown indicates that they were operating illegally in the flooded districts of New Orleans, possibly antagonizing stranded residents with whom they had prior disputes. The gunfights were most likely initiated by police and their allies within the organized gangs. The NOPD continues to be the strongest and most ruthless organized crime gang in the city of New Orleans..
Some may argue that people living in poverty would revel at the chance to take expensive equipment during a time of crisis. Though there may be some individuals who focused their energy on non edible, non-survival items simply for their financial worth, it would be difficult to do this very often while struggling with thirst, hunger and constant standing water chest high. Once again finding proof of either accusation is doubtful, however the results indicate that the scattered reports of "looting" led to an order from both Blanco and Bush to "shoot to kill" the residents, regardless of what they were taking. There was no distinguishing between people taking electronic equipment or people taking food that was needed for their families survival. So now a military or police offical has licensce to shoot at anyone, even if they take a perishable food item that will be a financial loss to the owner regardless. Would the administrators Blanco and Bush prefer that people rather starve than obtain perishable food item? Based on their actions, the answer is yes.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network