top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Bush Nominates Federal Judge Roberts

by via AP
President Bush chose federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. on Tuesday as his first nominee for the Supreme Court, selecting a rock solid conservative whose nomination could trigger a tumultuous battle over the direction of the nation's highest court, senior administration officials said.
Bush Nominates Federal Judge Roberts

By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer 2 minutes ago

WASHINGTON -
President Bush chose federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. on Tuesday as his first nominee for the Supreme Court, selecting a rock solid conservative whose nomination could trigger a tumultuous battle over the direction of the nation's highest court, senior administration officials said.
ADVERTISEMENT

Bush offered the position to Roberts in a telephone call at 12:35 p.m. after a luncheon with the visiting prime minister of Australia, John Howard. He was to announce it later with a flourish in a nationally broadcast speech to the nation.

Roberts has been on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit since June 2003 after being picked for that seat by Bush.

Advocacy groups on the right say that Roberts, a 50-year-old native of Buffalo, N.Y., who attended Harvard Law School, is a bright judge with strong conservative credentials he burnished in the administrations of former Presidents Bush and Reagan. While he has been a federal judge for just a little more than two years, legal experts say that whatever experience he lacks on the bench is offset by his many years arguing cases before the Supreme Court.

Liberal groups, however, say Roberts has taken positions in cases involving free speech and religious liberty that endanger those rights. Abortion rights groups allege that Roberts is hostile to women's reproductive freedom and cite a brief he co-wrote in 1990 that suggested the Supreme Court overturn
Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 high court decision that legalized abortion.

"The court's conclusion in Roe that there is a fundamental right to an abortion ... finds no support in the text, structure or history of the Constitution," the brief said.

In his defense, Roberts told senators during his 2003 confirmation hearing that he would be guided by legal precedent. "Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land. ... There is nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent."

While he doesn't have national name recognition, Roberts is a Washington insider who has worked over the years at the White House, Justice Department and in private practice.

In the Reagan administration, Roberts was special assistant to the attorney general and associate counsel to the president. Between 1989 and 1993, he was principal deputy solicitor general,the government's second highest lawyer who argues cases before the
U.S. Supreme Court.

In the early 1980s, Roberts was a clerk for Rehnquist before Reagan elevated the retiring jurist to the top chair in 1986.

It was Rehnquist who presided over the swearing-in ceremony when Roberts took his seat on the appeals court for the District of Columbia. It took a while for Roberts to get on the bench. He was nominated for the court in 1992 by the first President Bush and again by the president in 2001. The nominations died in the Senate both times. He was renominated in January 2003 and joined the court in June 2003.

Roberts' nomination to the appellate court attracted support from both sites of the ideological spectrum. Some 126 members of the District of Columbia Bar, including officials of the Clinton administration, signed a letter urging his confirmation. The letter said Roberts was one of the "very best and most highly respected appellate lawyers in the nation" and that his reputation as a "brilliant writer and oral advocate" was well deserved.

"He has been a judge for only two years and authored about 40 opinions, only three of which have drawn any dissent," said Wendy Long, a lawyer representing the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network, adding that his record appears to suit Bush's desire to nominate a judge who will apply the law, as written, and leave policy decisions to the elected branches of government.
by Socialist
As described in an article on the World Socialist Website at Http://www.wsws.org at the time of Justice O'Connor's resignation, the likely new appointment to the US Supreme Court would not be someone who is determined to overturn Roe v. Wade but rather someone who will rule in favor of capital and against labor, as that is what is pending before the court in various cases, and that is what matters most to the capitalist class, whom Bush represents and of which he is a lifelong member.

The anti-abortion position from any member of the ruling class is always just to get votes. It is the class issue that is always primary. And contrary to the rhetoric of Bush upon stealing the election in 2004, for a second time, at which time he claimed he was going to spend his non-existent political capital, his only capital is and has always been the capitalist class itself, the 1/10 of 1% who own the means of production.

As the above article indicates, and as a legal expert stated on KPFA 6 p.m. news, 94.1 FM on July 19, 2005, there is not likely to be any filibuster or any opposition to this appointment. As to referring to any Democrat as "Left," please do not confuse the twin party of capitalism, the Democrats (the same as the Republicans) with the Left, which by definition are socialists, who are always for the right to free abortion on demand with no restrictions.

This hysteria on the part of Democratic Party front groups, such as NOW, is either contrived or out of profound ignorance as to the class nature of this society. The ruling class puts profits first; they are quite comfortable with Roe v. Wade, which is supported not only by the majority of Americans, but by the overwhelming majority of the upper middle class, which constitutes the likely voters. The petty bourgeois lunatic fringe who picket and terrorize the abortion clinics are just used by Bush & Company to be "elected" or more appropriately "selected" as Bush is in office twice via election fraud.

Judge John Roberts will be easily confirmed for the Supreme Court. This Court, as we have seen with the sodomy decision, on which it flip-flopped during the term of Justice O'Connor, with O'Connor participating in that flip-flop, is subject to pressure from mass movements, as is all the rest of the government. Even Bush cannot get through a privatization of Social Security. No matter how great the rhetoric, political reality sets in sooner or later.
by nonya
"The court's conclusion in Roe that there is a fundamental right to an abortion ... finds no support in the text, structure or history of the Constitution," the brief said.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network