top
North Coast
North Coast
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

The Legacy of MAXXAM

by Remedy & Amanita
The Sinking of Pacific Lumber, Old-Growth Redwoods and the Marbled Murrelet.
bonanza_01.jpgaxrh6m.jpg
Humboldt County, CA - In the home state of Maxxam, INC., the slogan is “don’t mess with Texas.” When it comes to their dealings in the Redwood country of Northern California, Maxxam's slogan is “he who has the gold rules.” Maxxam CEO and billionaire Charles Hurwitz is a man of few words, but speaks loudly through his wicked logging plans.

Bad logging and clear-cuts are pretty “run of the mill” for The Pacific Lumber Company (PL), a once friendly local timber operation turned county scourge after Texas financier Hurwitz and his Maxxam Corporation took the reins in 1986. But now and again, the Maxxam controlled PL drafts a logging plan so arrogant and destructive that even the most callous cynic shudders at the thought of it.

By all appearances, Maxxam is attempting to extirpate the Marbled Murrelet, a seabird dependent on old-growth forests, while the company itself threatens to go the way of the dinosaur. Specifically, PL (under control of its multi-billion dollar parent company) is threatening bankruptcy due to a log shortage – the cause of which is a high logging rate imposed by Maxxam. Local residents, who’ve recognized Maxxam’s pattern of taking over other companies (like Kaiser Aluminum) and driving them into the dirt, have predicted the PL bankruptcy for years based on breakneck logging that has turned the coveted Redwood forest into a land sliding, muddy mess.

Much of PL’s 211,000 acres have already been converted from trees into cash. Now at the end game, Maxxam is targeting the most visible and valuable old-growth redwoods left in PL’s holdings, which unfortunately are crucial for the survival of threatened and endangered plants and animals. Maxxam’s latest scheme, called “Bonanza”, is one such plan.

The 250-acre "Bonanza" Timber Harvest Plan, or “THP 05-097,” is located one mile east of the PL-owned town of Scotia. 192 acres (or 77%) of the THP are occupied by the federally listed threatened bird. The old growth redwood groves, which biologists call the Nanning Creek Murrelet Complex, fill a small canyon from one ridge to the next straddling an un-named tributary of Nanning Creek which flows into the Eel River.

In the late ‘90’s, nine unprotected Murrelet complexes were given a rating from lowest to highest quality based on their value to the Murrelets. The Nanning Complex rated the highest. That means the Nanning Creek Complex – Maxxam’s “Bonanza” - is the largest, contiguous, unprotected occupied Murrelet stand left on PL land. And PL owns the largest unprotected Murrelet stands left on Earth.

Oddly, the largest threat to the continuation of the Marbled Murrelet is government agreement to habitat destruction. According to the Evaluation Report of the Five Year Status Review of the Marbled Murrelet in Washington, Oregon and California by the Forest Service, government deals with private parties seeking the “removal of hundreds of acres of suitable Murrelet habitat... encompasses the largest percent of habitat that would be lost or modified over time.” Only 4,598 Murrelets exist in California according to the Review. Murrelet population suffers an annual 4-7% population decline due to low reproductive success, increased predation, oil spills, and habitat loss.

To be sure, the coming PL bankruptcy (if the threats pan out) will be a welcome opportunity for Northern California to be rid of the controlling reign of Maxxam and allow PL to reorganize itself in a sustainable manner. But if Maxxam is allowed to destroy the Nanning Creek Murrelet Complex, the Murrelets will have no such opportunity to regain their numbers following the inevitable financial collision course set by Charles Hurwitz.

The California Department of Forestry is accepting public comment letters on Maxxam’s "Bonanza" through July 8, 2005. Letters can be sent to:

Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection
135 Ridgeway Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
ATT: Forest Practice

Include in your letter: "Re: THP#1-05-097HUM"

Or visit EPIC’s website for a sample letter.

See Past Lawsuits I Maxxam's License to Kill Murrelets I About Murrelets
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Taxpayers should get it straight
Not all the money that the government paid for the deal went to texas, a good portion of it went right to Humboldt county! Before you say someone doesn't have their facts straight, you should get yours straight! This deal was worked out in San Francisco, far away from Humboldt Co.!
by (laugh)
Do you really think that Charlie could be paying individuals to create pressure on the government in order to sell land? I want to know if your sincere or just a bullshit agitator from PL's upper class.
by Humboldt taxpayers
Some of the Headwaters money did go to the County for the loss of tax revenues from the property and yield tax that would have been generated from the forest.If one would look at the recorded documents that were signed and recorded in Humboldt County and not S.F. you would find that The Salmon Cr. company was the seller of the Maxxam interest and that S.P.I. was also a big player in the deal. Just ask Kristy Wriggley who owned the property adjacent to her in Elk River before SCOPAC acquired it in the Headwaters deal. As far as the environmental groups having a hand in pressuring the government to purchase these parcels from Charlie, look who named Headwaters "HEADWATERS". In 1986 the northcoast E.F. group who was somewhat headed by deryl cherney and judi barri named it headwaters. They went on to various tree-sits throughtout PALCO property to bring national attention to the headwaters and Uncle Charlie. No real-estate agent could have done such an outstanding job advertising and pressuring various government agencies to purchase this property. Think about it. Then Julia Hill's tree-set got national attention and she did not leave the tree-sit until the Headwaters deal was sighned. She kept that alive with her tree-sit. We are a group of taxpayers in Humbolt County and have no affiliation with PALCO or E.F. that have done some looking into this and feel the true story on both sides should come out. We don't want to see Jenny Card continue to have the government spend needless tax dollars on a few old redwood trees that are probably not worth that much anyway. Look at the worthless tree she sat in on Greenwood Heights. She caused that tree to become ugly because of her and her friends presence and all the garbage they left behind. I know because I live on Greenwood Heights and have had to watch that operation for the past few years. And byu the way Jenny, where are these massive slide you claimed would happen when they logged along the road? The road and hillside are still intact.
by hmm.....
I not sure what you're trying to get at by saying thatJudi Bari and Darryl Cherney named headwaters forest. I don't beleive that to be the case at all or see how it's relevent. I certainly don't think that it's past Hurwitz to give money to enviro's anonomously but I hardly believe that Julia worked hand in hand with Hurwitz to push through the headwaters deal. I do believe that E.F.er's have unwittingly help Hurwitz pull off some big deals. But I think this is due lately to poor strategy. Also Bari and Cherney were not just about tree-sits, and another thing, what makes you think you think they organized in Humboldt back in the mid-eighties?
That little bit about Remedy and the Jerry tree-sit was a bit of a stretch. Thanks for for the previous answer and I will be awaiting you next response.
by Hah!
Instead of providing info to back up your claims you have basically told me to research it myself. Your claims are unsubstantiated to this point. Keep the speculation coming and I'll continue to challenge you to provide something solid.
by Nova
Everyone seems to be interested in what has happened instead of what is happenning: the destruction of old-growth endangered species habitat in the Nanning Creek watershed. I live in the tree Spooner and have been since September; I have seen what PL has done to that forest. Where there once was a beautiful biodiversity hotspot with ferns taller than me, trees older than Christ, and a whole myriad of forest creatures, there is now a mucky mix of mud, trampled ferns, stunmps that you could set a tent up on, and I haven't seen a forest dweller in a while.
We have about 15 trees we are protecting right now, around the clock, and all these trees are huge, some well over 300ft. We used a handheld GPS unit which uses satellites and barometric pressure to determine elevation above sea level. With one reading at the bottom, one at the top, and some simple math, we determined that the tree Spooner is about 340ft. tall. Some trees have freshly abandoned nests from which some flying creatures have fled after hearing chainsaws for months straight.
When people ask why I am living in a tree, I can never quite explain how I truly feel. All I know is how beautiful and pristine this forest used to be, and how it is now. The acre of habitat we protect is the only thing left to cut, and I don't intend on letting them ruin that as well. Please help us in our quest to save these ancient trees! Visit http://www.wesavetree.org
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$260.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network