From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
SF SPCA Volunteer - PETA threatens animals
PETA sums up its position with doubletalk that exposes an inhumane, unethical agenda: "PETA cannot in good conscience oppose euthanasia as a humane alternative to dealing with cat overpopulation." If the cats could talk (and in many ways, they do), they would passionately protest this death sentence.
PETA threatens animals
Editor -- Re Debra J. Saunders' indictment of PETA ("Better dead than fed, PETA says," June 23): Saunders could have mentioned other more subtle but just as insidious ways that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals threatens animals, specifically feral cats. The San Francisco SPCA has a wonderful network of volunteers who manage feral-cat colonies, but PETA sets such draconian requirements for the areas in which most feral cats live that it would have most such colonies destroyed.
According to its Web site, PETA approves only of feral-cat colonies where, among other things, "the cats are isolated from roads, people, and other animals who could harm them ... and situated in an area where they do not have access to wildlife and where the weather is temperate." There are hardly any spots in San Francisco that conform to this utopian standard.
PETA sums up its position with doubletalk that exposes an inhumane, unethical agenda: "PETA cannot in good conscience oppose euthanasia as a humane alternative to dealing with cat overpopulation." If the cats could talk (and in many ways, they do), they would passionately protest this death sentence.
BILL HAMILTON
SF/SPCA volunteer
San Francisco
Editor -- Re Debra J. Saunders' indictment of PETA ("Better dead than fed, PETA says," June 23): Saunders could have mentioned other more subtle but just as insidious ways that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals threatens animals, specifically feral cats. The San Francisco SPCA has a wonderful network of volunteers who manage feral-cat colonies, but PETA sets such draconian requirements for the areas in which most feral cats live that it would have most such colonies destroyed.
According to its Web site, PETA approves only of feral-cat colonies where, among other things, "the cats are isolated from roads, people, and other animals who could harm them ... and situated in an area where they do not have access to wildlife and where the weather is temperate." There are hardly any spots in San Francisco that conform to this utopian standard.
PETA sums up its position with doubletalk that exposes an inhumane, unethical agenda: "PETA cannot in good conscience oppose euthanasia as a humane alternative to dealing with cat overpopulation." If the cats could talk (and in many ways, they do), they would passionately protest this death sentence.
BILL HAMILTON
SF/SPCA volunteer
San Francisco
For more information:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c...
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network