From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
On Forum Now! - The Role of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Worth listening to and calling in . . . they started off talking about Moyers and his speech . . .
Fri, Jun 10, 2005 -- 10:00 AM
The Role of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Forum discusses the role of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Host: Cynthia Gorney
Guests:
Bob Steele, Nelson Poynter Scholar for Journalism Values with the Poynter Institute
Jeffrey Dvorkin, ombudsman for National Public Radio
John Boland, executive vice president and chief content officer of KQED Public Broadcasting
Jonathan Wilcox, Adjunct professor at USC's Annenburg school for communication, and a former speechwriter for Governor Pete Wilson
The Role of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Forum discusses the role of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Host: Cynthia Gorney
Guests:
Bob Steele, Nelson Poynter Scholar for Journalism Values with the Poynter Institute
Jeffrey Dvorkin, ombudsman for National Public Radio
John Boland, executive vice president and chief content officer of KQED Public Broadcasting
Jonathan Wilcox, Adjunct professor at USC's Annenburg school for communication, and a former speechwriter for Governor Pete Wilson
For more information:
http://www.kqed.org/index.jsp?flash=true
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
If you just look at the lineup of these guests you can see there's no one *really* representing the left. It seems to be about muddying the waters and trying to make NPR / PBS look good.
They were trashing Bolivia the other day in their news segment, saying how people down there didn't know what was going on and making the protestors out to be unsatisfied no matter what efforts the government made, They actually said things like, "What will be good enough for the protestors? Will anything satisfy them?" And then onto "People down here don't seem to know what's going on . . ."
They were trashing Bolivia the other day in their news segment, saying how people down there didn't know what was going on and making the protestors out to be unsatisfied no matter what efforts the government made, They actually said things like, "What will be good enough for the protestors? Will anything satisfy them?" And then onto "People down here don't seem to know what's going on . . ."
AT LEAST THEY DO THEIR BEST TO TRY TO!
"I wished this Forum program had more callers."
YOU HAVE TO WATER DOWN YOUR QUESTION/COMMENT INTO SOMETHING NAMBY-PAMBY OR ASK A SIMPLEMINDED DECOY OR FLUFF QUESTION -- IF YOU'RE A LEFTIST -- TO GET IT PAST THE KNOW-NOTHING OPERATORS (ON NPR'S TOTN THEY WILL EVEN TRY TO ARGUE WITH YOU).
IN FACT, MORE AND MORE, ON REALLY CONTROVERSIAL PROGRAMS, KQED/NPR WILL LOAD UP THE PROGRAM WITH MULITPLE MAINSTREAM GUESTS TO, INDEED, LIMIT CALL-INS -- OR LOAD UP THE PROGRAM WITH 2 OR 3 SEGMENTS TO LIMIT CALL-INS TO JUST A FEW FOR ANY PARTICULAR SEGMENT.
--THAT WAY THEY LIMIT THE POTENTIAL FOR ANY *REAL*, ESPECIALLY PROGRESSIVE, QUESTIONS FROM EVER GETTING THROUGH!
I WOULDN'T GIVE KQED A DAMN CENT. FOR WHAT?:
ENDLESS RIGHT-OF-CENTER OR CONSERVATIVE NEWS, TALK, AND BUSINESS PROGRAMS;
THE WORTHLESS PBS NEWSHOUR, EXCEPT AS A GOVT PRESS AND PROPAGANDA OFFICE;
FINANCIAL GURU GET-RICH SHOWS;
THE HEAVILY BIASED "FRONTLINE" DOCUMENTARIES IN SERVICE TO AMERICAN CAPITALISM, AMERICAN IMPERIALISM, ZIONISM, AND ANTI-ARAB RACISM AND ANTI-MUSLIM BIGOTRY;
SHOWS ABOUT HOW TO BUILD YOUR MILLION-DOLLAR DREAM HOME (WITH POLISHED ITALIAN MARBLE COUNTERTOPS AND CUT STONE DRIVEWAYS) ON 3 ACRES OF COUNTRY LAND;
AND RECYCLED BRITISH DRAMAS / COMEDIES.
(YOU CAN SEE NATURE AND COOKING SHOWS ON CABLE, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'D GIVE KQED MONEY FOR. AND YOU CAN BUY MORE INTELLIGENT CHILDREN'S SHOWS ON VCR/DVD.
OH, AND ENDLESS SHOWS ABOUT FAMOUS WHITE MEN, EXCEPT DURING BLACK HISTORY MONTH -- EVEN THERE KQED HAS CUT BACK SUCH SHOWS IN PRIME TIME -- OR WHEN THEY USING SOUL/DISCO DURING PLEDGE DRIVES.)
PBS OR KQED DON'T EVEN PUT ON THE MANY EXCELLENT INTERNATIONAL FILMS -- WELL, MAYBE ONCE IN A *RARE* WHILE -- FROM OTHER COUNTRIES / CULTURES.
AND YOU'LL NEVER SEE A PALESTINIAN FILM OR DOCUMENTARY THERE, BUT MANY JEWISH (READ, ISRAEL-JUSTIFICATION 'WAR PROPAGANDA') ONES (LIKE SEMI-REGULAR HOLOCAUST DOCUMENTARIES OR DRAMAS).
ALL THE "LIBERALS" ALWAYS RUN AND CRY WHEN THE REPUBS THREATEN TO CUT PBS/NPR FUNDING,
BUT THE REPUBS ARE JUST WOOFIN': PBS/NPR SERVES TOO GREAT A PROPAGANDA TOOL AIMED AT THE SO-CALLED EDUCATED CLASS.
BUT IF PBS/NPR FUNDING IS CUT, AND IF THEY EVEN GO UNDER, THEN NO GREAT LOSS.
"I wished this Forum program had more callers."
YOU HAVE TO WATER DOWN YOUR QUESTION/COMMENT INTO SOMETHING NAMBY-PAMBY OR ASK A SIMPLEMINDED DECOY OR FLUFF QUESTION -- IF YOU'RE A LEFTIST -- TO GET IT PAST THE KNOW-NOTHING OPERATORS (ON NPR'S TOTN THEY WILL EVEN TRY TO ARGUE WITH YOU).
IN FACT, MORE AND MORE, ON REALLY CONTROVERSIAL PROGRAMS, KQED/NPR WILL LOAD UP THE PROGRAM WITH MULITPLE MAINSTREAM GUESTS TO, INDEED, LIMIT CALL-INS -- OR LOAD UP THE PROGRAM WITH 2 OR 3 SEGMENTS TO LIMIT CALL-INS TO JUST A FEW FOR ANY PARTICULAR SEGMENT.
--THAT WAY THEY LIMIT THE POTENTIAL FOR ANY *REAL*, ESPECIALLY PROGRESSIVE, QUESTIONS FROM EVER GETTING THROUGH!
I WOULDN'T GIVE KQED A DAMN CENT. FOR WHAT?:
ENDLESS RIGHT-OF-CENTER OR CONSERVATIVE NEWS, TALK, AND BUSINESS PROGRAMS;
THE WORTHLESS PBS NEWSHOUR, EXCEPT AS A GOVT PRESS AND PROPAGANDA OFFICE;
FINANCIAL GURU GET-RICH SHOWS;
THE HEAVILY BIASED "FRONTLINE" DOCUMENTARIES IN SERVICE TO AMERICAN CAPITALISM, AMERICAN IMPERIALISM, ZIONISM, AND ANTI-ARAB RACISM AND ANTI-MUSLIM BIGOTRY;
SHOWS ABOUT HOW TO BUILD YOUR MILLION-DOLLAR DREAM HOME (WITH POLISHED ITALIAN MARBLE COUNTERTOPS AND CUT STONE DRIVEWAYS) ON 3 ACRES OF COUNTRY LAND;
AND RECYCLED BRITISH DRAMAS / COMEDIES.
(YOU CAN SEE NATURE AND COOKING SHOWS ON CABLE, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'D GIVE KQED MONEY FOR. AND YOU CAN BUY MORE INTELLIGENT CHILDREN'S SHOWS ON VCR/DVD.
OH, AND ENDLESS SHOWS ABOUT FAMOUS WHITE MEN, EXCEPT DURING BLACK HISTORY MONTH -- EVEN THERE KQED HAS CUT BACK SUCH SHOWS IN PRIME TIME -- OR WHEN THEY USING SOUL/DISCO DURING PLEDGE DRIVES.)
PBS OR KQED DON'T EVEN PUT ON THE MANY EXCELLENT INTERNATIONAL FILMS -- WELL, MAYBE ONCE IN A *RARE* WHILE -- FROM OTHER COUNTRIES / CULTURES.
AND YOU'LL NEVER SEE A PALESTINIAN FILM OR DOCUMENTARY THERE, BUT MANY JEWISH (READ, ISRAEL-JUSTIFICATION 'WAR PROPAGANDA') ONES (LIKE SEMI-REGULAR HOLOCAUST DOCUMENTARIES OR DRAMAS).
ALL THE "LIBERALS" ALWAYS RUN AND CRY WHEN THE REPUBS THREATEN TO CUT PBS/NPR FUNDING,
BUT THE REPUBS ARE JUST WOOFIN': PBS/NPR SERVES TOO GREAT A PROPAGANDA TOOL AIMED AT THE SO-CALLED EDUCATED CLASS.
BUT IF PBS/NPR FUNDING IS CUT, AND IF THEY EVEN GO UNDER, THEN NO GREAT LOSS.
"SHOWS ABOUT HOW TO BUILD YOUR MILLION-DOLLAR DREAM HOME (WITH POLISHED ITALIAN MARBLE COUNTERTOPS AND CUT STONE DRIVEWAYS) ON 3 ACRES OF COUNTRY LAND;"
WELL, I.E., YOUR MILLION-DOLLAR DREAM HOME IN THE *NEW JERSEY*, CONNECTICUT OR MASSACHUSETTS COUNTRYSIDE!!
OUT HERE IT WOULD BE A *MULTI*-MILLION-DOLLAR DREAM HOME.
BY THE WAY, BILL MOYER'S SHOW WAS A VERY MIXED BAG TOO -- HAVING THOSE DEMOPUBLICAN CORPORATE NEWS REPORTERS ON FOR COMMENTARY.
WHEN MOYERS ISN'T TALKING ABOUT REPUBLICAN PLANS TO 'GUT' PBS [WHAT IS THERE TO GUT!?], HE'S ONLY GOOD AT REVEALING THE MACHINATION AT THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING -- SOMETHING THAT DIRECTLY AFFECTS HIM PROFESSIONALLY AND PERSONALLY.
MOYERS -- THE LIBERALS' DARLING -- WAS THE "PROGRESSIVE" WHO SAID:
"I *BELIEVE* GEORGE BUSH WHEN HE SAID THAT THE WAR ON TERRORISM IS THE CALLING OF OUR GENERATION"
AND
"WE SHOULD *ALL* BE DRAFTED IN THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM".
HAD ENOUGH?
ACTUALLY *LISTEN* TO MOST OF MOYER'S SPEECHES: ARE THEY REALLY TELLING YOU ANYTHING (EXCEPT ABOUT THE CPB) OR ARE THEY JUST PRIMARILY MAKING YOU 'FEEL GOOD'.
WELL, I.E., YOUR MILLION-DOLLAR DREAM HOME IN THE *NEW JERSEY*, CONNECTICUT OR MASSACHUSETTS COUNTRYSIDE!!
OUT HERE IT WOULD BE A *MULTI*-MILLION-DOLLAR DREAM HOME.
BY THE WAY, BILL MOYER'S SHOW WAS A VERY MIXED BAG TOO -- HAVING THOSE DEMOPUBLICAN CORPORATE NEWS REPORTERS ON FOR COMMENTARY.
WHEN MOYERS ISN'T TALKING ABOUT REPUBLICAN PLANS TO 'GUT' PBS [WHAT IS THERE TO GUT!?], HE'S ONLY GOOD AT REVEALING THE MACHINATION AT THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING -- SOMETHING THAT DIRECTLY AFFECTS HIM PROFESSIONALLY AND PERSONALLY.
MOYERS -- THE LIBERALS' DARLING -- WAS THE "PROGRESSIVE" WHO SAID:
"I *BELIEVE* GEORGE BUSH WHEN HE SAID THAT THE WAR ON TERRORISM IS THE CALLING OF OUR GENERATION"
AND
"WE SHOULD *ALL* BE DRAFTED IN THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM".
HAD ENOUGH?
ACTUALLY *LISTEN* TO MOST OF MOYER'S SPEECHES: ARE THEY REALLY TELLING YOU ANYTHING (EXCEPT ABOUT THE CPB) OR ARE THEY JUST PRIMARILY MAKING YOU 'FEEL GOOD'.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network