top
Central Valley
Central Valley
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Ward Connerly’s Payback

by Seth Sandronsky
Ward Connerly and the Bradley Foundation
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Mar05/Sandronsky0303.htm

Ward Connerly’s Payback
by Seth Sandronsky
http://www.dissidentvoice.org
March 3, 2005

Ward Connerly has tried to end affirmative action programs in California. His Proposition 209 was passed by voters in 1996. Prop. 209 ended state government preferences based on race and gender. On February 16, Connerly received a payback for that and his more recent work: $250,000 from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.

An African American, Connerly is a Sacramento businessman and University of California Regent who founded the American Civil Rights Institute. His second state ballot measure was called the Racial Privacy Initiative, or Proposition 54. It would have banned many California agencies from gathering ethnic and racial data. Connerly’s message to voters this time? The best way to achieve racial justice is to end government documentation of racism. Voters defeated Prop. 54 in October 2003, when they also elected Arnold Schwarzenegger over incumbent Gray Davis in a gubernatorial recall vote.

The Bradley Foundation, a $680 million philanthropy based in Milwaukee, also funds the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). A non-profit educational organization, the PNAC has been shaped by neo-conservatives. Two of these neo-cons are in the Bush administration: Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. They are co-founders of the PNAC. Neo-cons paved the way for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003. Editor of the Weekly Standard, PNAC Chairman William Kristol began clucking for a U.S. invasion of Iraq in 1997.

As the U.S.-led war on terror continues in Afghanistan and Iraq, the racial class conflict surges at home. Consider this. Sour job opportunities for blacks and Latinos connect with the poverty draft of the U.S. military. Wherever America’s armed forces are present, blacks and Latinos are over-represented. They are also the last hired and the first fired in the labor market. Jobless rates for blacks are twice that of whites. Latino unemployment is nearly double the white jobless rate. Abroad, blacks and Latinos, with working-class whites, are the foot soldiers of U.S. imperialism. Connerly’s lust for racial injustice feeds the empire.

He met Bradley’s criteria for “achievements consistent with the mission statement of the foundation.” That mission? “The promotion of liberal democracy, democratic capitalism, and a vigorous defense of American institutions” said Michael W. Grebe, president and CEO of the Bradley Foundation.

Grebe uses the word liberal in the sense of free-market liberalism. That is, countries and peoples freely pursuing their self-interest in the world market. Thus freed, we are supposed to prosper. Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” of the free market will make it so. Do not worry.

By contrast, New Deal liberalism spawned during the Great Depression of the 1930s saw government intervention on behalf of regular people. The Social Security system is one popular example. The GI Bill after World War II is another example. Connerly sidesteps that program of affirmative action. Why? “Theoretically available to all veterans, in practice women and black veterans did not get anywhere near their share of GIbenefits,” author Karen Brodkin Sacks writes.

Connerly got name recognition as California’s military bases closed and unionized jobs declined in the 1990s. That trend helped to spur Proposition 187, an anti-immigrant initiative aimed mainly at Latinos that state voters approved in 1994. Meanwhile, the state’s prison population boomed. Blacks and Latinos who were surplus workers got locked up at rates that far exceed their proportion of California’s population. Jail and prison building boomed. Construction for higher education stalled.

Connerly helped to pave the way for capital’s agenda of profit growth. Prop. 209 fit with commercial pacts like the NAFTA that began to urbanize some rural folks in Mexico. Consequently, some of them have been coming to California to find paid work.

This process has worsened employment opportunities for those on the lowest rungs of the state labor market, blacks and Latinos. They have scant protection from such foreign job competition. Contrast their situation with that of medical doctors who practice in California. They earn high wages largely due to the federal government limiting the number of foreign physicians who can practice in the U.S.

For Connerly, choosing racial injustice is opting for political correctness.

His stance turns the color line upside down. To that end, he has had some success making victims of the racial division of labor into victimizers of California’s general population. Thus Connerly’s payback from the Bradley Foundation.

Seth Sandronsky is a member of Peace Action and co-editor with Because People Matter, Sacramento’s progressive paper. He can be reached at: ssandron [at] hotmail.com.

Other Recent Articles by Seth Sandronsky

* Fed Chief Says Privatize Social Security to Boost Class Equity
* President Bush, Market Opportunity, and Personal Responsibility
* Airline Overcapacity, Profitability and Society
* For Social Security, Stability or Volatility?
* David Stern's Hoop Schemes
* Destroying Social Security To Save It
* Flight Attendants, the Working Day and Labor Solidarity
* US Hiring Increases, But Slow Job Growth Continues
* Future Uncertain: US Workers and Their Retirements
* In US, Her Work, the Vote and Democracy
* Palestine's Voice
* Colored White
* A March of a Million American Workers
* Political Blaxploitation
* Building Bridges with Cubans: An Interview With Kathryn Hall
* In US, Hired Without Health Benefits
* For Bush, Surplus Labor Hidden In Plain Sight
* On Strangers’ Kindness
* How Ray Charles Got Over
* Bill Cosby on Thin Ice

* In America, Can I Get A Whiteness?
* Cruel and Usual Punishment, US-Style
* Accumulate This
* Bob Dylan: Victoria's Dirtiest Secret Yet
* Snow Job
* The Passion of the Donald

HOME



Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Thom
Prop 209 says QUITE CLEARLY that it is illegal to discriminate OR give preference to anyone on account of skin color. That is the law. It has nothing to do with race, religion, ethnic origin, or any other category. Refusing to hire black people because of skin color was wrong. It is just as wrong to give preference to black people because of skin color. Skin color is irrelevant. You are an individual. You should be evaluated as an individual. Giving preference because of pigment is as wrong as excluding because of pigment. We have people from 100 countries in America. Grow up and evolve, please.
by Ruth
What are the chances that Thom is a white male? Always enjoying white priviledge.
by Thom
Ruth, my color is irrelevant, as is your statement. Racial discrimination is against the law. Discrimination means just that, whether it's for or against someone. Racial beancounting is over. 209 is law, and it's spreading to other states. You might as well get used to competing on a level playing field because the days of giving brownie points for pigment are OVER.
by Aaron Aarons
Leaving aside the question of whether we want to live in a society where life is a game with winners and losers, it's clear that the "level playing field" is a myth.

1) People who make decisions that affect one's chances of "success" and even survival in this society are overwhelmingly "white" and have a strong tendency to favor people who are more like them in appearance and mannerisms. This includes educators and educational administrators, employers, union officials, cops, judges and jurors, to name a few categorites that come to mind.

2) The amount of accumulated wealth that one is born into is highly correlated with one's "race" or "ethnicity", and this correlation is largely the product of previous discrimination in favor of "whites". Moreover, the educational level of one's parents is also highly correlated with "race" and "ethnicity", which is again largely the product of previous discrimination in favor of "whites". And there is little doubt that the educational level of one's parents is a significant factor in determining one's own seccess at the dominant game.

3) Ward Connerly and other opponents of affirmative action based on "race" were wont to demagogically say that affirmative action based on economic status would be acceptable. However, I have seen no indication of such economic-based affirmative action being implemented anywhere, at least on a scale that would attract public notice! Since such a policy would, almost by definition, benefit people from groups (including Blacks, Latinos and Native Americans and some white ethnicities) that have the least social power, I would not expect it to be implemented without a major struggle.

When people like Thom are willing to give up the privileges they enjoy as a result of previous, even if not current, racial discrimination, I'll take their call for a "level playing field" seriously. Until then, he's just another one of those folks who were born on second base and grew up believing that he had hit a double.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$40.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network