From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Defense Workers' Unions File Suit Against Rumsfeld
AFGE, Nine Other DOD Unions Challenge New Personnel System Proposed
Regulations Circumvent the Will of Congress, Say Union Presidents
Regulations Circumvent the Will of Congress, Say Union Presidents
AFGE, Nine Other DOD Unions Challenge New Personnel System Proposed
Regulations Circumvent the Will of Congress, Say Union Presidents
WASHINGTON, Feb. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- Ten unions today joined together to
file suit in federal court against Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and
Dan G. Blair, acting director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management
(OPM). The unions claim that Rumsfeld and Blair circumvented the will of
Congress in the design process for the proposed new National Security
Personnel System for the Department of Defense. The defense authorization
legislation that allowed for the creation of a new system to replace the
current civil service structure called for the agencies to engage in active
collaboration with unions and employees' representatives. It also called for
OPM to play an active role in the system's design.
"Instead, DOD has unveiled a plan that it has created unilaterally," said
John Gage, national president of the American Federation of Government
Employees (AFGE). "In the 10 meetings we had with DOD officials, we were
never permitted to go beyond the superficial, resulting in a personnel system
that will compromise national security, and which has grave implications for
safety of America's fighting men and women."
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), together with the
Association of Civilian Technicians (ACT), the International Association of
Firefighters (IAF), the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the
International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers (IFPTE), the
Laborers International Union of North America (LIU), the Metal Trades
Department of the AFL-CIO, the National Association of Government Employees
(NAGE), the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE), and the United
Power Trades Organization (UPTO) filed their suit in the U.S. District Court
of the District of Columbia.
In defiance of the United States Congress, the Defense Department refused
to consult with the unions that represent the department's employees, as
called for in the defense authorization legislation that sanctioned the
creation of the new personnel system. The unions claim that in issuing its
proposed rule changes without their involvement in the system's design, both
DOD and OPM have violated section 9902(m) of the Defense Authorization Act for
fiscal 2004.
"The solidarity displayed in the filing of this law suit by these 10
unions shows that we mean business," said AFGE General Counsel Mark D. Roth.
"No one, not even the secretary of defense, is above the law."
In its new National Security Personnel System (NSPS), also known as the
Rumsfeld plan, the Department of Defense has significantly narrowed employees'
rights to collective bargaining and all but eliminated the due process rights
that enable employees to speak with confidence when they see wrongdoing or
mismanagement.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) is the largest
federal employee union, representing 600,000 workers in the federal government
and the government of the District of Columbia.
SOURCE American Federation of Government Employees
Web Site: http://www.afge.org
Regulations Circumvent the Will of Congress, Say Union Presidents
WASHINGTON, Feb. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- Ten unions today joined together to
file suit in federal court against Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and
Dan G. Blair, acting director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management
(OPM). The unions claim that Rumsfeld and Blair circumvented the will of
Congress in the design process for the proposed new National Security
Personnel System for the Department of Defense. The defense authorization
legislation that allowed for the creation of a new system to replace the
current civil service structure called for the agencies to engage in active
collaboration with unions and employees' representatives. It also called for
OPM to play an active role in the system's design.
"Instead, DOD has unveiled a plan that it has created unilaterally," said
John Gage, national president of the American Federation of Government
Employees (AFGE). "In the 10 meetings we had with DOD officials, we were
never permitted to go beyond the superficial, resulting in a personnel system
that will compromise national security, and which has grave implications for
safety of America's fighting men and women."
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), together with the
Association of Civilian Technicians (ACT), the International Association of
Firefighters (IAF), the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the
International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers (IFPTE), the
Laborers International Union of North America (LIU), the Metal Trades
Department of the AFL-CIO, the National Association of Government Employees
(NAGE), the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE), and the United
Power Trades Organization (UPTO) filed their suit in the U.S. District Court
of the District of Columbia.
In defiance of the United States Congress, the Defense Department refused
to consult with the unions that represent the department's employees, as
called for in the defense authorization legislation that sanctioned the
creation of the new personnel system. The unions claim that in issuing its
proposed rule changes without their involvement in the system's design, both
DOD and OPM have violated section 9902(m) of the Defense Authorization Act for
fiscal 2004.
"The solidarity displayed in the filing of this law suit by these 10
unions shows that we mean business," said AFGE General Counsel Mark D. Roth.
"No one, not even the secretary of defense, is above the law."
In its new National Security Personnel System (NSPS), also known as the
Rumsfeld plan, the Department of Defense has significantly narrowed employees'
rights to collective bargaining and all but eliminated the due process rights
that enable employees to speak with confidence when they see wrongdoing or
mismanagement.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) is the largest
federal employee union, representing 600,000 workers in the federal government
and the government of the District of Columbia.
SOURCE American Federation of Government Employees
Web Site: http://www.afge.org
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Teamsters Challenge DOD Rulemaking
Print This Story Email This Story Save this Link
http://www.teamster.org http://www.uniteddodworkerscoalition.org
WASHINGTON, Feb. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- The International Brotherhood of
Teamsters has joined with several other organizations that represent
Department of Defense (DOD) workers to challenge proposed regulations
published on February 14, 2005. The new rules are part of what has been
called the National Security Personnel System (NSPS), which granted certain
authority to the government to make the personnel system within DOD more
"flexible and contemporary." In doing so, however, officials at DOD and the
Office of Personnel Management failed to involve employee representatives in
designing its revised labor relations system.
"The intent of Congress was crystal clear that the Teamsters and other
organizations should play a meaningful role in any revisions to a labor-
management system that has worked well for the country over the last 25
years," said James Hoffa, General President of the Teamsters. "The Teamsters
will not sit by and allow the government to silence the voice of
democratically-elected employee representatives or to eliminate the collective
bargaining agreements negotiated on behalf of the DOD civilian workforce,"
added Hoffa.
The proposed regulations are open for public comment until March 16, 2005.
The Teamsters represent many public employees, including DOD civilian
workers in the Navy, Army, and Air Force. For more information on the efforts
of various unions to safeguard the rights of all DOD workers, please consult
http://www.uniteddodworkerscoalition.org.
SOURCE International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Web Site: http://www.teamster.org
http://www.uniteddodworkerscoalition.org
Print This Story Email This Story Save this Link
http://www.teamster.org http://www.uniteddodworkerscoalition.org
WASHINGTON, Feb. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- The International Brotherhood of
Teamsters has joined with several other organizations that represent
Department of Defense (DOD) workers to challenge proposed regulations
published on February 14, 2005. The new rules are part of what has been
called the National Security Personnel System (NSPS), which granted certain
authority to the government to make the personnel system within DOD more
"flexible and contemporary." In doing so, however, officials at DOD and the
Office of Personnel Management failed to involve employee representatives in
designing its revised labor relations system.
"The intent of Congress was crystal clear that the Teamsters and other
organizations should play a meaningful role in any revisions to a labor-
management system that has worked well for the country over the last 25
years," said James Hoffa, General President of the Teamsters. "The Teamsters
will not sit by and allow the government to silence the voice of
democratically-elected employee representatives or to eliminate the collective
bargaining agreements negotiated on behalf of the DOD civilian workforce,"
added Hoffa.
The proposed regulations are open for public comment until March 16, 2005.
The Teamsters represent many public employees, including DOD civilian
workers in the Navy, Army, and Air Force. For more information on the efforts
of various unions to safeguard the rights of all DOD workers, please consult
http://www.uniteddodworkerscoalition.org.
SOURCE International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Web Site: http://www.teamster.org
http://www.uniteddodworkerscoalition.org
So, what's the point? These jokers all want to make a good living serving Wall Street and its wars of aggression, but the foul Rumsfeld has their noses out of joint? Come on, gimme a break; working class solidarity doesn't get extended to spies and killer cops.
Dear Max:
Your comment betrays a profound ignorance of the problem. Let me explain:
(1) Not all of the workers mentioned above--in fact almost none of them , if any--are spies or assassins. Most of them are probably office workers.
(2) The issue is not the protection of workers serving an institution that we as activists don't like and honestly agree is fairly useless. The legal system in the United States works on precedent and like it or not, that means that if workers in a bad institution have THEIR union busted, it means that it is easier to bust the unions that represent workers who do some actual good (such as bus drivers, teachers, and/or nurses).
(3) I'm sure that most of the regular contributors / readers of this site will agree that there are certain industrial practices (such as logging, meat packing, suburban home construction) that they'd like to see largely curtailed--often with justification--but it is counterproductive to support the busting of the unions that protect the workers in these industries, if nothing else, because it makes the corporations *more* powerful and *less* accountable!
(4) Did it ever occur to you that AFGE may have some (albeit weak and limited--though that is better than nothing) whistleblower protections?
(5) if the spook-happy Bush Administration thinks so highly of AFGE, then why are they trying to bust it?
(6) You accuse those of us who believe "An Injury to One is an Injury to All" as being blind workerists, and yet you seem bound to your own brand of ideological purity. Not good.
-Steve Ongerth,
IWW
Your comment betrays a profound ignorance of the problem. Let me explain:
(1) Not all of the workers mentioned above--in fact almost none of them , if any--are spies or assassins. Most of them are probably office workers.
(2) The issue is not the protection of workers serving an institution that we as activists don't like and honestly agree is fairly useless. The legal system in the United States works on precedent and like it or not, that means that if workers in a bad institution have THEIR union busted, it means that it is easier to bust the unions that represent workers who do some actual good (such as bus drivers, teachers, and/or nurses).
(3) I'm sure that most of the regular contributors / readers of this site will agree that there are certain industrial practices (such as logging, meat packing, suburban home construction) that they'd like to see largely curtailed--often with justification--but it is counterproductive to support the busting of the unions that protect the workers in these industries, if nothing else, because it makes the corporations *more* powerful and *less* accountable!
(4) Did it ever occur to you that AFGE may have some (albeit weak and limited--though that is better than nothing) whistleblower protections?
(5) if the spook-happy Bush Administration thinks so highly of AFGE, then why are they trying to bust it?
(6) You accuse those of us who believe "An Injury to One is an Injury to All" as being blind workerists, and yet you seem bound to your own brand of ideological purity. Not good.
-Steve Ongerth,
IWW
For more information:
http://www.iww.org
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network