From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Why I am protesting J20 organizing
none
This time, i am protesting large demos organized by authoritarian groups who hide their party affiliations. i am protesting disempowering mass distractions where people actually believe they are doing something to challenge state power and Bush. I am protesting the illusion that those in power give a damn about these mass protests.
Why participate in a spectacle that only gives legitimacy to the process of stealing elections? Do you think you'll actually change something? For those that still believe in the voting process in America, do you think that even if you got your paper trail, that Bush Inc. would not have found another way to steal the election? You are crazy if you believe that.
Unlike Nixon during the Vietnam era, who was privately concerned about the governability of the country due to mass protests given the governments limited legal law enforcement powers, Bush Inc. not only has legitimate COINTELPRO type counter measures in the form of the Patriot Act et al, mass protests tend to 1) help release the steam built up into anger against Bush Inc., and 2) become immediately irrelevant due to the fact that the corporate media will ensure the irrelevance of the message people are tyring to send. This was not the case 30 years ago to the extent it is today.
I recognize the importance of "network" building and developing relationships, but at what expense to a real strategy? I favor getting together, but if that further perpetuates the illusion of impact on a ideologically driven administration, who will stop at nothing to institute their agenda in the coming years, then i must ask what is this top down type mass demo going to accomplish towards our goals. Granted, our goals vary, but one thing we might agree on is that we need to directly challenge and resist the impact of their policies on the most vulnerable. And the key word is "directly."
Further, the "opposition message" is diluted to the point of meaninglessness. The lack of serious political analysis in this country when it comes to organizing those outside of the anti-war movement is a disease. Why aren't we trying to understand why local communities in DC, for example, will not join the throngs of mostly white folks who are coming to their town to protest. Not to mention that these locals are being forced to pay for their "protection" and the enhancement of the local police state already in existence.
No. Something much more profound needs to happen. I do not proclaim to know what it is, but I would start by doing a real assessment of the effects of our actions on this administration. How has ANSWER/NION organizing actually affected policy? What are their goals? What are their successes? How has the rhetoric of anti-war politics worked to reach people?
I for one am sick and tired of ANSWER/NION and their top down style of organizing. I am sick of creating the illusion in peoples minds that walking down the street and throwing dollars into their buckets will actually change anything.
Should we challenge Bush? Of course. Should we keep our mouths shut and stay indoors? Of course not. But we should challenge traditional approaches so that we can expose the deeper flaws in this system. We need to make connections with "normal" people who might be willing to take all forms of non-violent direct action to challenge the legitimacy of this administrations policies if they understood how it directly affects their lives. We need to speak to people's hearts and experiences, not bombard them with sloganeering.
And for the individualistic anarchists, as opposed to the syndicalists and socialist varitey, whom i am very sympathetic, they have become a bizarre fashion cult unto themselves whose rhetoric and style is more consistent with narcissism than with politics. Their "black bloc" is a catwalk of individualism, where if you peeled off the black clothing you would primarily see white.
It is time to move beyond symbolic mass protest and towards community based organizing. It is time to move towards issues that *include* a sound economic analysis that speaks to people's
daily lives, and i am not talking about robot like leninist/stalinist/maoist/marxist "scientific" economic analysis. These people do not know the meaning of the word science or the scientific method, which if they did, they would have known that their various hypotheses of "scientific socialism" failed every experiment put to the test. That others either failed miserably within their ranks, or created totalitarian dungeons, doesn't seem to have sunk in. Or they simply don't care or make excuses as to why history will have Stalin "come down on the people's side" in the future as one RCP hack recently stated on a Pacifica radio station. Well, I suppose that's true if we let the RCP and Bob Avakian write the history books!
Here comes Argentina. We can learn something from these people. We can learn from the solidarity that exists between groups that come from a variety of backgrounds. We can learn that we don't need party bosses to take back factories, or city councils to institute rent control. These people take matters directly into their own hands and, often times, don't even recognize the authority of the state. I fear that many Americans aren't truly prepared for what could happen during an economic collapse, and would be ripe for a frightening form of authoritarianism and fascism to grow here as a result. We need to prepare for that, and we have to have relationships with folks before this happens. Ranting about marxist rhetoric or wearing stylistic black bandanas won't accomplish this. Get over yourselves and start thinking about why those locals in DC aren't participating in your righteous marches.
from the southwest United States in the land of neon and burgers.
Why participate in a spectacle that only gives legitimacy to the process of stealing elections? Do you think you'll actually change something? For those that still believe in the voting process in America, do you think that even if you got your paper trail, that Bush Inc. would not have found another way to steal the election? You are crazy if you believe that.
Unlike Nixon during the Vietnam era, who was privately concerned about the governability of the country due to mass protests given the governments limited legal law enforcement powers, Bush Inc. not only has legitimate COINTELPRO type counter measures in the form of the Patriot Act et al, mass protests tend to 1) help release the steam built up into anger against Bush Inc., and 2) become immediately irrelevant due to the fact that the corporate media will ensure the irrelevance of the message people are tyring to send. This was not the case 30 years ago to the extent it is today.
I recognize the importance of "network" building and developing relationships, but at what expense to a real strategy? I favor getting together, but if that further perpetuates the illusion of impact on a ideologically driven administration, who will stop at nothing to institute their agenda in the coming years, then i must ask what is this top down type mass demo going to accomplish towards our goals. Granted, our goals vary, but one thing we might agree on is that we need to directly challenge and resist the impact of their policies on the most vulnerable. And the key word is "directly."
Further, the "opposition message" is diluted to the point of meaninglessness. The lack of serious political analysis in this country when it comes to organizing those outside of the anti-war movement is a disease. Why aren't we trying to understand why local communities in DC, for example, will not join the throngs of mostly white folks who are coming to their town to protest. Not to mention that these locals are being forced to pay for their "protection" and the enhancement of the local police state already in existence.
No. Something much more profound needs to happen. I do not proclaim to know what it is, but I would start by doing a real assessment of the effects of our actions on this administration. How has ANSWER/NION organizing actually affected policy? What are their goals? What are their successes? How has the rhetoric of anti-war politics worked to reach people?
I for one am sick and tired of ANSWER/NION and their top down style of organizing. I am sick of creating the illusion in peoples minds that walking down the street and throwing dollars into their buckets will actually change anything.
Should we challenge Bush? Of course. Should we keep our mouths shut and stay indoors? Of course not. But we should challenge traditional approaches so that we can expose the deeper flaws in this system. We need to make connections with "normal" people who might be willing to take all forms of non-violent direct action to challenge the legitimacy of this administrations policies if they understood how it directly affects their lives. We need to speak to people's hearts and experiences, not bombard them with sloganeering.
And for the individualistic anarchists, as opposed to the syndicalists and socialist varitey, whom i am very sympathetic, they have become a bizarre fashion cult unto themselves whose rhetoric and style is more consistent with narcissism than with politics. Their "black bloc" is a catwalk of individualism, where if you peeled off the black clothing you would primarily see white.
It is time to move beyond symbolic mass protest and towards community based organizing. It is time to move towards issues that *include* a sound economic analysis that speaks to people's
daily lives, and i am not talking about robot like leninist/stalinist/maoist/marxist "scientific" economic analysis. These people do not know the meaning of the word science or the scientific method, which if they did, they would have known that their various hypotheses of "scientific socialism" failed every experiment put to the test. That others either failed miserably within their ranks, or created totalitarian dungeons, doesn't seem to have sunk in. Or they simply don't care or make excuses as to why history will have Stalin "come down on the people's side" in the future as one RCP hack recently stated on a Pacifica radio station. Well, I suppose that's true if we let the RCP and Bob Avakian write the history books!
Here comes Argentina. We can learn something from these people. We can learn from the solidarity that exists between groups that come from a variety of backgrounds. We can learn that we don't need party bosses to take back factories, or city councils to institute rent control. These people take matters directly into their own hands and, often times, don't even recognize the authority of the state. I fear that many Americans aren't truly prepared for what could happen during an economic collapse, and would be ripe for a frightening form of authoritarianism and fascism to grow here as a result. We need to prepare for that, and we have to have relationships with folks before this happens. Ranting about marxist rhetoric or wearing stylistic black bandanas won't accomplish this. Get over yourselves and start thinking about why those locals in DC aren't participating in your righteous marches.
from the southwest United States in the land of neon and burgers.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
original post here: http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/114825/index.php
I don't think Argentina has Regis and Kathy Lee, or FOX News, or a government that calls its own country the 'Homeland.'
US Sheeple are hypnotized and asleep and some authoritarian measures cover a lot of ground quickly.
Don't cut down others, just build up your own.
US Sheeple are hypnotized and asleep and some authoritarian measures cover a lot of ground quickly.
Don't cut down others, just build up your own.
Believe me Argentina has its own Regis and Kathy Lee types. They have stupid tv shows.
What they do have is a class conscious, socialist and anarchist tradition in its working class and it has a vibrant layer of working class resistance that lies outside the Peronists death grip on the unions. These piqueteros, as they are called, having been blocking road and holding workers assemblies for at least a decade, deciding on a united plan of action and then carrying it out.
That being said, the conditions facing Argentina are very different than in the US. The world capitalist system basically emptied the Argentine banks to pay the gigantic foreign debt. That is when the middle class was hit: its bank accounts frozen--they were in fact starving. After nearly a year of social crisis, they went out onto the streets to stop a state of martial law imposed by the old president de la Rua. Then they followed the examples of the workers held neighborhood assemblies with their working class neighbors and directly challenged the government for basic services, food, medical care and jobs.
So you can see that the level of mass willingness to fight back was at a much higher level than we see now. But when they were ready to fight on a massive scale the discipline of the working class methods of calling an assembly and democratically deciding a plan of action were adopted across the country, seemingly "spontaneously".
As for the tasks of the antiwar movement, I disagree that "new" methods need to be adopted. We need to drive the antiwar movement right into the national spotlight with the slogan "bring the troops home now",. The antiwar movement was split by the election. The right wing leaders of the antiwar movement, those who are tied to the capitalist Democratic Party, insisted that voting for pro-war Kerry would make the antiwar movement a "player". In reality it has led the movement to leaving the streets, getting disoriented and disillusioned.
Now, we have to build it up again, mobilzing powerful, street demonstrations, we have to practially build from nothing again. The antiwar movement must debate the fiasco of the 2004 elections on the mobilizations. But we must also mobilize on the basis of principled opposition to US occupation of Iraq and on the demand "Bring the Troops Home Now". That slogan forces antiwar activists to maintain a mass perspective.
I recommend reading Peter Camejo's pamphlet (written when he was a revolutionary and not a stock broker yuppie): Liberalism, Ultraleftism or Mass Action.
What they do have is a class conscious, socialist and anarchist tradition in its working class and it has a vibrant layer of working class resistance that lies outside the Peronists death grip on the unions. These piqueteros, as they are called, having been blocking road and holding workers assemblies for at least a decade, deciding on a united plan of action and then carrying it out.
That being said, the conditions facing Argentina are very different than in the US. The world capitalist system basically emptied the Argentine banks to pay the gigantic foreign debt. That is when the middle class was hit: its bank accounts frozen--they were in fact starving. After nearly a year of social crisis, they went out onto the streets to stop a state of martial law imposed by the old president de la Rua. Then they followed the examples of the workers held neighborhood assemblies with their working class neighbors and directly challenged the government for basic services, food, medical care and jobs.
So you can see that the level of mass willingness to fight back was at a much higher level than we see now. But when they were ready to fight on a massive scale the discipline of the working class methods of calling an assembly and democratically deciding a plan of action were adopted across the country, seemingly "spontaneously".
As for the tasks of the antiwar movement, I disagree that "new" methods need to be adopted. We need to drive the antiwar movement right into the national spotlight with the slogan "bring the troops home now",. The antiwar movement was split by the election. The right wing leaders of the antiwar movement, those who are tied to the capitalist Democratic Party, insisted that voting for pro-war Kerry would make the antiwar movement a "player". In reality it has led the movement to leaving the streets, getting disoriented and disillusioned.
Now, we have to build it up again, mobilzing powerful, street demonstrations, we have to practially build from nothing again. The antiwar movement must debate the fiasco of the 2004 elections on the mobilizations. But we must also mobilize on the basis of principled opposition to US occupation of Iraq and on the demand "Bring the Troops Home Now". That slogan forces antiwar activists to maintain a mass perspective.
I recommend reading Peter Camejo's pamphlet (written when he was a revolutionary and not a stock broker yuppie): Liberalism, Ultraleftism or Mass Action.
<<The world capitalist system basically emptied the Argentine banks to pay the gigantic foreign debt.>>
Meanwhile, the United States, the premier metropole of world capital, can simply print more money to finance its debts, with Chinese and Japanese central banks, increasingly, picking up the slack.
Preserving this order of things goes along way toward explaining the US' perma-war posture.
Meanwhile, the United States, the premier metropole of world capital, can simply print more money to finance its debts, with Chinese and Japanese central banks, increasingly, picking up the slack.
Preserving this order of things goes along way toward explaining the US' perma-war posture.
get out there and make some trouble, any excuse is a good one. don't be a anti state player hater, go make friends in the streets.
We can infight to death after capitalism falls, I cannot wait, but till then fight like hell for life.
We can infight to death after capitalism falls, I cannot wait, but till then fight like hell for life.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network