From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
McDonald's Ex-CEO Dies From Colorectal Cancer At Age 44
"A charismatic leader who said he ate a McDonald's product most days, Bell was diagnosed with colorectal cancer just weeks after being named to the company's top job in April."
The company's first non-American CEO, Bell had succeeded Jim Cantalupo, who died suddenly of a heart attack after a little more than a year on the job at age 60. He was the company's first CEO to have worked behind the counter since Fred Turner, who retired in 1987.
http://money.cnn.com/2005/01/17/news/newsmakers/mcdonalds_bell.reut/index.htm?cnn=yes
Study Links Red Meat, Colorectal Cancer
In numerous previous studies examining diet and cancer, the relationship between meat consumption and colorectal cancer is the among the strongest, with most finding that eating lots of red meat and processed meats increases the risk.
The new study, led by American Cancer Society researchers and involving 148,610 men and women aged 63 on average, is among the biggest. Participants recorded their meat intake in 1982 and again in 1992-93. Those with a high meat intake were about 30 to 40 percent more likely to develop lower colon or rectal cancer than those with a low intake.
High meat intake for men was at least 3 ounces daily - about the size of a large fast-food hamburger - and 2 ounces daily for women. Low intake was about 2 ounces or less of red meat no more than twice weekly for men and less than an ounce that often for women.
Slightly higher risks were found for a high consumption of processed meats including bacon and bologna.
http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_news_article.jspzQzidzEz338909
http://money.cnn.com/2005/01/17/news/newsmakers/mcdonalds_bell.reut/index.htm?cnn=yes
Study Links Red Meat, Colorectal Cancer
In numerous previous studies examining diet and cancer, the relationship between meat consumption and colorectal cancer is the among the strongest, with most finding that eating lots of red meat and processed meats increases the risk.
The new study, led by American Cancer Society researchers and involving 148,610 men and women aged 63 on average, is among the biggest. Participants recorded their meat intake in 1982 and again in 1992-93. Those with a high meat intake were about 30 to 40 percent more likely to develop lower colon or rectal cancer than those with a low intake.
High meat intake for men was at least 3 ounces daily - about the size of a large fast-food hamburger - and 2 ounces daily for women. Low intake was about 2 ounces or less of red meat no more than twice weekly for men and less than an ounce that often for women.
Slightly higher risks were found for a high consumption of processed meats including bacon and bologna.
http://www.mercksource.com/pp/us/cns/cns_news_article.jspzQzidzEz338909
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4180627.stm
Previous CEO Jim Cantalupo died from a Heart attack last year:
"The company said the 60-year-old had been attending a meeting of restaurant franchise owners in Orlando, Florida, when he fell ill."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3639607.stm
Heart attack
Dietary fat independently affects heart attack risk. The Nurses’ Health Study found that eating foods high in saturated fats (meat and dairy fat) and trans fatty acids (margarine, hydrogenated vegetable oil, and many processed foods containing hydrogenated vegetable oil) was directly associated with nonfatal heart attacks and deaths from coronary heart disease.
http://www.truestarhealth.com/Notes/2011009.html
A common myth among Americans is that many people who suffer heart attacks are in good health and dont have any of these risk factors.
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/news/health/WABC_oncall_081903heart.html
and you deserved it...
pretending to be a supreme mental giant casually dismissing a huge study involving 148,610 people
and you're such the friend of Big Science and all, too -- go figure
now if it was 148,610 dogs, you'd be salivating about it for sure
and sorry for your organic meat solution, regardless of your personal theories on it's ACA-defying properties, there's not enough land in America to keep McDonald's massive meat grinders cranking with organic beef. organic beef will forever remain a niche product for elitists like yourself. it's just not sustainable as an industry any more with the growth in human population in the last 100 years and the amounts of meat consumed.
nessie, part 2: "I didn’t dismiss it. I questioned its methodology."
No, nessie, you pulled an irrelevant distinction out of your butt and then called the study "bogus" if it didn't address it.
That you then turn around and call that process "science" tells me quite a bit about your science education -- that it's just as faith-based as your politics.
@%<