top
Central Valley
Central Valley
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Promising Steelhead Run Follows Behind American River Salmon

by repost Dan Bacher
Early, cold rains this fall have transformed the American River from a potential disaster
area for king salmon into a river full of spawning fish. Early returns of steelhead also
look very promising, as anglers get ready for the traditional steelhead opener in the upper
river on January 1.
nimbus_fish_ladder.jpgx2ymuj.jpg
Promising Steelhead Run Follows Behind American River Salmon

by Dan Bacher

Early, cold rains this fall have transformed the American River from a potential disaster
area for king salmon into a river full of spawning fish. Early returns of steelhead also
look very promising, as anglers get ready for the traditional steelhead opener in the upper
river on January 1.

In August and September, fishery biologists and river activists feared that low, warm
conditions in Folsom Lake, the result of a dry spring and water exports to Southern
California and San Joaquin Valley agribusiness by the Bureau of Reclamation, would result in
a big fish kill.

During the past three falls, 181,709 salmon perished before spawning, according to data from
carcass surveys compiled by Mike Healey, DFG fishery biologist, the pre-spawning mortality
rate was 67 percent in 2001, a water year similar to 2004.

For this year at least, the American River has “dodged the bullet,” due to the intervention
of Mother Nature. “The salmon run was real slow in the beginning,” said Healey. “Then after
the storms moved through the area and the water cooled down, the fish showed up. It is
taking all day for our carcass survey crew just to get down a mile of river.”

Local activists, including Felix Smith of the Save the American River Association, and DFG
fishery biologists also deserve credit for putting pressure on the Bureau of Reclamation
raise flows back to 1500 and then to 1750 cfs after the Bureau temporarily cut flows to 1000
cfs in late September. These flows are helping to maintain good spawning conditions for the
salmon.

Although the data won’t be compiled until the carcass surveys are finished, Healey observed
that there is “much less pre-spawn mortality” than there was last year. Thirty-seven percent
of the run of 2003 - 58,651 fish out of 158,516 salmon - died before spawning.

He also noted that there are a lot of 2 year old salmon ? jacks or grilse. Jack returns are
an indicator that fishery managers use to forecast the health of next year’s salmon runs.

The king salmon returns at Nimbus Fish Hatchery are also very good. Terry West of Nimbus
Fish Hatchery received a total of 10,928 fish, including 6,396 males and 4,532 females, to
date. That compares to 9,231 adults in 2003.
The returns of grilse (jacks) to the hatchery ? 13,066 fish ? are amazing. This compares to
2,705 fish by the same date last year.

Steelhead returns are also looking very good. The hatchery had received 124 adults and 7
half pounders to date this year, compared to 58 adults and 0 half pounders last year.

Meanwhile, steelhead fishing pressure is light on the open stretch of river from the power
lines at the southwest boundary of Ancil Hoffman Park to Discovery Park. Although fishing
has been spotty to date, Dave Mierkey, fishing guide, reported a great day of steelhead
fishing on Saturday, December 11. His two clients caught and released 6 steelhead ranging
from 2 to 6 pounds while fishing roe from the power lines to Watt Avenue.

Rodney Fagundes, fishing guide, was absolutely stoked about the prospects for the opening
day on January 1. “I walked down to the river below the hatchery and it got me excited ?
there’s a ton of steelhead in the river,” said Fagundes.

Not only did the American River “dodge the bullet” on a potential fish kill on the American
River, but the river parkway stayed open in spite of the threat of severe budget cuts by
Sacramento County. Members of the Save the American River Association (SARA), American River
Parkway Foundation, American River Natural Heritage Association, United Anglers and other
groups spent many hours in Sacramento County Board of Supervisors meetings in a successful
lobbying effort to keep the parkway open this season.

In another victory for river activists, the Water Forum recently signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service regarding a schedule and plan for adopting and implementing a new and much needed
lower American River Flow Management Standard.

“It has taken nearly five years of negotiations, studies, modeling, lobbying and tons of
bucks to get where there is at least some light at the end of the tunnel,” wrote Felix Smith
and Jack Sohl, in “River Watch” Fall-Winter 2004, the SARA newsletter. “However, we’re not
home free yet. We will know within a few months into 2005 whether or not the Bureau (and
USFWS) will live up to the purposes and intent of the MOU.”

Also looming behind the fishery restoration efforts on the American River is the “big
picture” of the Bush administration’s plans to reduce habitat and flows for salmon and other
fish. The Bureau of Reclamation and State of California are pushing through the renewal of
long term water contracts and increased diversions of Central Valley water that threaten the
fisheries of the American River and other Central Valley streams.

And on November 30 ? what restoration activists are calling “Extinction Tuesday” ? NOAA
Fisheries released a proposal that slashes “critical habitat” set aside for endangered and
threatened salmon in California and the Pacific Northwest.

Another big task in the coming years is to keep the parkway ? the “crown jewel” of the
Sacramento region ? open with permanent, dedicated funding. SARA board member Warren Truitt.
at a special day honoring Illa Collin of the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors for her
work in preserving the parkway, announced an American River Parkway Summit set for February
26, 2005. The event will run from, 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. at either the Sacramento County BOS
Chambers or the Effie Yaw Nature Center.

“Everybody who cares about the future of the parkway, including fishermen, hikers, rafters,
runners, kayakers, rafters, bird watchers and others, is encouraged to attend this summit,”
said Truitt.

For more information about this summit and other activities, contact the Save the American
River Association, (916) 383-1298, email: riverwatch at comcast.net, http://www.sarariverwatch.org.
====================
photos: j. isreal
====================
article also can be found at:
http://www.fishsniffer.com/dbachere/041217american.html
§Nimbus fish hatcheries on the American River
by repost Dan Bacher
nimbus_fish_hatcheries.jpgejgaso.jpg
The first image is a fish ladder leading into the State of CA run Nimbus Fish Hatchery on the American River. Historically, the American River provided over 150 miles of spawning habitat for chinook (king) salmon and steelhead trout (a sea-run variety of rainbow trout). These fish migrated to the river from the ocean every year, to spawn and die by the hundreds of thousands. Modern humans, however, dammed the river for flood control, municipal water, power, irrigation, and recreation. With the construction of the Folsom and Nimbus dams in 1970, upstream spawning habitat was cut off or destroyed, leaving only the lower river for the fish and threatening the runs of salmon and steelhead with extinction.

The second images are the holding tanks for the fish fry.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Will get deleted
This is way too positive - it's a message of hope for the environment.

Too bad it'll get deleted for not fitting the confirmation bias of the moderators.
by you call it "vivisection"
and accuse them of oppressing those poor fish.... their sex life on wanton display for mere human enjoyment...
by wrong
actually the article is informative. so why make the cheap shot at the people who moderate the articles from misc to local. no it has not been deleted. seems like a lil spam for the article which was well written and informative. yes there might be good signs for the fish migration this year, but you did miss that naturally there is an impediment to hitting the upper streams for spawning. the nimbus fish hatchery is unnnatural and if your truly understood what takes place there, you'd realize it is more like the graveyard for the fish that make it up that far. it does keep some fish species surviving, but surely not in their natural environment.
by unnatural fish love acts
on the taxpayer's dime, no less! an outrage! there ought to be a law!
by luna moth
Folsom dam still blocks the salmon's upstream migration to sheltered tributary spawning grounds. Hatchery fish do not grow under the same conditions as they would in the cool pockets of tributary water. The food source of native insects and other fish is not the same as the feed given to hatchery fish..

Pointing out the downside of fish hatchery rearing as compared to natural unblocked pre-dam tributary spawning isn't pleasant when it just seems like more bad news..

We need to be real about what is happening, the salmon evolve differently when coming from hatchery stock, it was meant as a temporary fix, not a long term solution to blocked rivers..

Human adaptation to less irrigation (diverse permaculture instead of monoculture agribusiness), growing native drought tolerant plants instead of lawns, solar and wind generated electricity can give people a future when the dams can be lowered and salmon can return to their original spawning grounds in the upper reaches of the rivers' tributaries..
I want to emphasize that if you review the numbers in my article, you will find that the vast majority of salmon spawned naturally in the river in recent years. Of the 156,516 salmon recorded by fishery biologists in the fall of 2003, only 9,231 adults actually were spawned in the hatchery. The rest spawned (or unfortunately died before spawning) in the river.

It would be great to open up the habitat above Folsom Dam again to salmon and steelhead again by building some high tech fish ladders, but I doubt if this will happen under the country's current corrupt, corporate-funded political "leadership."

So until we can reopen the habitat above Nimbus and Folsom dams, the hatchery is required, under law, as mitigation for the loss of habitat. But there is still lots of good spawning habitat in the Sacramento metro area on the American River. Before Folsom Dam was built, the fall run salmon spawned in the area that they spawned now, plus the area behind Folsom and Nimbus dams. Unlike spring-run chinook and steelhead, which spawned high in tributaries of the American in the Sierra Nevada, the fall run chinook was a main river, lower river spawner.

Although steelhead are tributary spawners, the natural run of fish has adapted surprisingly well to the spawning gravels on the lower river. You can see lots of wild steelhead spawning in the American from mid January through late April. Both fall-run king salmon and steelhead are highly adaptable fish, unlike the less abundant and nearly extinct Atlantic salmon of Maine and Eastern Canada. You got to really screw up the environment BAD to kill chinook salmon and steelhead of the West (It's been done in lots of rivers, unfortunately). In spite of dams, pollution and water diversions, these fish still return every year to Central Valley rivers.
by why
why pathologize salmon who spawn differently?

why not celebrate the diversity of salmon love?
by me
ADVISARY: North Fork of the American River -- Properties of private families are being purchased or threatened with takeover by PG&E with the "legal" argument of eminent domain. The purpose? To tear down the existing Auburn Dam & replace it with a much larger version in order to supply hydroelectricity to the new developments of the greater Sacramento area. An entire canyon of pristine wilderness -- ancient spider pines & mama bears -- will be flooded out. Supposedly, there are plans to transplant the trees, but to where? And will they survive? And this is even besides the point. Construction on this project due to start in May, 2005. Thank you for reading. And thank you, in advance, for acting.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$330.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network