From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Iraqi Election Boycott
47 Iraqi political parties and related bodies, meeting at the headquarters of the Sunni Association of Muslim Scholars at Baghdad's Umm al-Qura mosque (in Saddam's time, Umm al-Marek, the Mother of Battles), have decided to boycott the alleged elections supposedly scheduled for January (and required under the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1546). In their statement, they have said that the election results are a foregone conclusion, with rewards already lined up for the parties collaborating in the occupation.
The parties include not just Sunni Islamist ones, but others like the National Arab Current, the Iraqi-Turkoman Front, the Democratic Christian Party and the communist People’s Union party, as well as Shi'a parties. They met under the auspices of the Iraqi National Founding Conference, a broad, nonsectarian front that includes Sunni, Shi'a, Arab, Kurd, Islamist, and secular parties within it, with points of unity as follows: opposition to the occupation and freedom of any association with either the crimes of the occupation or those of Saddam's regime.
This initiative was started by Sheikh Jawad al-Khalissi, a Shi'a cleric descended from one of the leaders of the 1920 revolt against the British; its initial conference was held last December. I have written about him and his efforts at greater length before.
I'm not sure an election boycott is wise; historically, they almost always backfire (as the anarchists in Spain found out to their regret). But they are clearly making the point that the destruction of Fallujah, which they termed an act of genocide in their statement, had nothing to do with the elections; in fact, it's decreasing participation, not increasing it.
More (with related links)
http://www.empirenotes.org/november04.html#18nov041
This initiative was started by Sheikh Jawad al-Khalissi, a Shi'a cleric descended from one of the leaders of the 1920 revolt against the British; its initial conference was held last December. I have written about him and his efforts at greater length before.
I'm not sure an election boycott is wise; historically, they almost always backfire (as the anarchists in Spain found out to their regret). But they are clearly making the point that the destruction of Fallujah, which they termed an act of genocide in their statement, had nothing to do with the elections; in fact, it's decreasing participation, not increasing it.
More (with related links)
http://www.empirenotes.org/november04.html#18nov041
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network