From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
How the Left Can Win
How the Left Can Win
by the N3 Coalition
Bush's November 3rd victory has created a crisis of self-examination in the left. There are deep schisms in the progressive community. Schisms in national coalitions like ANSWER and UFPJ. Schisms in the Green Party. A seething battle of resentment between anti-voting and pro-voting progressives. And an abysmal chasm between the ABB'ers and the Naderites.
We must begin to heal if we are to move forward in the cold reality of a Bush second term. But how are we to do this? Those of us who stuck to our core principals and refused to collaborate with the Democratic party have been tarred and feathered. Those of us who put our principals aside to work in common cause with Democrats have been rewarded by a crushing defeat. Never before has the left been so fragmented by sectarianism.
If we are to become a real threat to the Republican's power lock on the government we must become smarter. We must play the game better than Karl Rove himself. In short, we must dissimilate to seize power.
Much was made by the ABB'ers of the marriage of convenience between Ralph Nader and Lenora Fulani and Fred Newman of the Independence Party. True, the Newmanites are somewhat of a cult. But their knowledge of how the electoral game is played put Nader on the ballot in New York state. We on the left would do well to take some lessons from the Newmanites.
We at N3 have spent much time examining the techniques of the New Alliance/Independence Party and we have found them to be the ideal tool for movement building. In particular we find Fred Newman's Short-Term Psychological Therapy a positive way to unite diverse groups while brightening their social outlook and making them fit for the hard work of radical activism. This brilliant form of therapy made it possible for disparate figures such as Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, Lyndon LaRouche, and Ralph Nader to work together in an alliance that pieced together the fragments of sectarian libertarianism into one big tent.
How can the left bridge the chasm between the blue states and the red? How can progressive ideals reach the hearts and minds of the 48% of America that identify itself as Christian fundamentalists?
The answer is right in front of us. Through Dr. Fulani and Fred Newman's social therapy we will be able to penetrate the red states in the form of bible-study classes. The progressive left must reach out to the youth of heartland America in order to educate them to the possibility of revolution change. And we must do so through Jesus.
We must assemble cells of revolutionary youth in the coastal cities of the blue state and send them into the American heartland. Through a deft blend of Newmanite social therapy and bible-study we will nurture the future revolutionaries of the American South and Midwest. This is not vanguardism by another name. A revolutionary program can be found in the teachings of Jesus. It is clearly found in the liberation theology movement and in the Christian anarchism of the Catholic Workers. We must not turn up our noses at ideologies that we consider to be reactionary. If we do so we will lose the race forever.
When the cells have been established in the American heartland and our social therapy and bible study groups have blended into a covert program of revolutionary change we must make our next move into the churches. Through the churches the N3 Coalition plans to re-seize the base of United States government. We do not believe this is a cynical goal. The Republican party is no more concerned with Christian values than the left in its current manifestation. They use the evangelicals as electoral puppets to insure their lock on government positions. But when our program of Karl Marx, Guy Debord, and Jesus takes hold of American religious life then our moment will have arrived.
How will cell members who are LGBT or pro-choice survive the tough work ahead in the red states? They will have to put their identity politics aside while we capture the good will of Christian America. It may take decades but what is sex and the right to an abortion when another world is possible?
Imagine a future when progressives have control again over the machinery of this great country. N3 envisions an America where anti-statist anarchists build bridges with anti-government right libertarians. Instead of a capitalist driven occupation of Iraq, N3 looks forward to an Iraqi Autonomous Zone (IAZ) of worker cooperatives with free social therapy for all. Evangelical Christianity would be the official religion of the IAZ only because the strength of our alliance depends on it. But Islam, homosexuality, freedom of gender expression, and abortion would be tolerated eventually when the IAZ becomes institutionalized in the region.
The left can win only if we pool our resources and our beliefs into one powerful force. Alone we will perish in this new dark age. Together we can make a difference. By healing the schisms between ourselves we can reach out to build bridges with the other America. And by reaching out we will gain a strength in numbers that will forge a new America of progressive values and Christian evangelism that will be a beacon unto the entire world.
In solidarity,
The N3 Coalition (NYC)
by the N3 Coalition
Bush's November 3rd victory has created a crisis of self-examination in the left. There are deep schisms in the progressive community. Schisms in national coalitions like ANSWER and UFPJ. Schisms in the Green Party. A seething battle of resentment between anti-voting and pro-voting progressives. And an abysmal chasm between the ABB'ers and the Naderites.
We must begin to heal if we are to move forward in the cold reality of a Bush second term. But how are we to do this? Those of us who stuck to our core principals and refused to collaborate with the Democratic party have been tarred and feathered. Those of us who put our principals aside to work in common cause with Democrats have been rewarded by a crushing defeat. Never before has the left been so fragmented by sectarianism.
If we are to become a real threat to the Republican's power lock on the government we must become smarter. We must play the game better than Karl Rove himself. In short, we must dissimilate to seize power.
Much was made by the ABB'ers of the marriage of convenience between Ralph Nader and Lenora Fulani and Fred Newman of the Independence Party. True, the Newmanites are somewhat of a cult. But their knowledge of how the electoral game is played put Nader on the ballot in New York state. We on the left would do well to take some lessons from the Newmanites.
We at N3 have spent much time examining the techniques of the New Alliance/Independence Party and we have found them to be the ideal tool for movement building. In particular we find Fred Newman's Short-Term Psychological Therapy a positive way to unite diverse groups while brightening their social outlook and making them fit for the hard work of radical activism. This brilliant form of therapy made it possible for disparate figures such as Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, Lyndon LaRouche, and Ralph Nader to work together in an alliance that pieced together the fragments of sectarian libertarianism into one big tent.
How can the left bridge the chasm between the blue states and the red? How can progressive ideals reach the hearts and minds of the 48% of America that identify itself as Christian fundamentalists?
The answer is right in front of us. Through Dr. Fulani and Fred Newman's social therapy we will be able to penetrate the red states in the form of bible-study classes. The progressive left must reach out to the youth of heartland America in order to educate them to the possibility of revolution change. And we must do so through Jesus.
We must assemble cells of revolutionary youth in the coastal cities of the blue state and send them into the American heartland. Through a deft blend of Newmanite social therapy and bible-study we will nurture the future revolutionaries of the American South and Midwest. This is not vanguardism by another name. A revolutionary program can be found in the teachings of Jesus. It is clearly found in the liberation theology movement and in the Christian anarchism of the Catholic Workers. We must not turn up our noses at ideologies that we consider to be reactionary. If we do so we will lose the race forever.
When the cells have been established in the American heartland and our social therapy and bible study groups have blended into a covert program of revolutionary change we must make our next move into the churches. Through the churches the N3 Coalition plans to re-seize the base of United States government. We do not believe this is a cynical goal. The Republican party is no more concerned with Christian values than the left in its current manifestation. They use the evangelicals as electoral puppets to insure their lock on government positions. But when our program of Karl Marx, Guy Debord, and Jesus takes hold of American religious life then our moment will have arrived.
How will cell members who are LGBT or pro-choice survive the tough work ahead in the red states? They will have to put their identity politics aside while we capture the good will of Christian America. It may take decades but what is sex and the right to an abortion when another world is possible?
Imagine a future when progressives have control again over the machinery of this great country. N3 envisions an America where anti-statist anarchists build bridges with anti-government right libertarians. Instead of a capitalist driven occupation of Iraq, N3 looks forward to an Iraqi Autonomous Zone (IAZ) of worker cooperatives with free social therapy for all. Evangelical Christianity would be the official religion of the IAZ only because the strength of our alliance depends on it. But Islam, homosexuality, freedom of gender expression, and abortion would be tolerated eventually when the IAZ becomes institutionalized in the region.
The left can win only if we pool our resources and our beliefs into one powerful force. Alone we will perish in this new dark age. Together we can make a difference. By healing the schisms between ourselves we can reach out to build bridges with the other America. And by reaching out we will gain a strength in numbers that will forge a new America of progressive values and Christian evangelism that will be a beacon unto the entire world.
In solidarity,
The N3 Coalition (NYC)
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
"How will cell members who are LGBT or pro-choice survive the tough work ahead in the red states? They will have to put their identity politics aside while we capture the good will of Christian America. It may take decades but what is sex and the right to an abortion when another world is possible?"
Hmmm -- pray tell explain to us WHY for a woman whether or not she can get an abortion if she wants or why for a gay person whether they can live openly as they are or have to give up all sex or bury it deep in some closet isn't MORE signigicant than the (in comparison) trivial difference whether they live in a socialist or capitalist society.
Surely your argument could be reversed? The "enemy" in this case won with a coalition of "social conservatives" and "capitalists". Plenty of the "capitalists" would prefer coalition with the social liberals << they aren't social conservatives and find their present coalition palatable ONLY becuase they believe their position of priveledge will keep them safe from being socially restricted >> In other words, it is JUST as reasonable for a gay person (or a woman) to ask YOU why aren't you willing to give up your attachment to socialism for the good of the cause.
Might I ask you something? What's your PERSONAL stake in socialism? See, in choosing political allies one of the things to keep in mind that when push comes to shove, it's only those who have a personal stake you can trust to stick it when the going gets rough. The women can be counted on to fight to the end for their issues, the gays for theirs. But why should I trust YOU? More to the point, why should the women and gays trust you? You are obviously willing to sacrifice THEIR issues "for the good of the cause".
You speak of "identity politics". I take it you mean by that they are idntifying with what ARE their issues rather than some other identification (economic class?) that you claim to be their true interest. Really? Do you REALLY wish to try to make a case that women would be better off in a socialist paradise which they were relegated to the kitchens and breeding babbies? That gays would be better off in a socialist paradise where they had to keep their sexuality hidden or be "re-educated"? They are NOT being reasonable by making inclusion of THEIR issues their proce for beign part of your coalition for this "better world that is possible". It's not better FOR THEM unless their issues are part of it.
Hmmm -- pray tell explain to us WHY for a woman whether or not she can get an abortion if she wants or why for a gay person whether they can live openly as they are or have to give up all sex or bury it deep in some closet isn't MORE signigicant than the (in comparison) trivial difference whether they live in a socialist or capitalist society.
Surely your argument could be reversed? The "enemy" in this case won with a coalition of "social conservatives" and "capitalists". Plenty of the "capitalists" would prefer coalition with the social liberals << they aren't social conservatives and find their present coalition palatable ONLY becuase they believe their position of priveledge will keep them safe from being socially restricted >> In other words, it is JUST as reasonable for a gay person (or a woman) to ask YOU why aren't you willing to give up your attachment to socialism for the good of the cause.
Might I ask you something? What's your PERSONAL stake in socialism? See, in choosing political allies one of the things to keep in mind that when push comes to shove, it's only those who have a personal stake you can trust to stick it when the going gets rough. The women can be counted on to fight to the end for their issues, the gays for theirs. But why should I trust YOU? More to the point, why should the women and gays trust you? You are obviously willing to sacrifice THEIR issues "for the good of the cause".
You speak of "identity politics". I take it you mean by that they are idntifying with what ARE their issues rather than some other identification (economic class?) that you claim to be their true interest. Really? Do you REALLY wish to try to make a case that women would be better off in a socialist paradise which they were relegated to the kitchens and breeding babbies? That gays would be better off in a socialist paradise where they had to keep their sexuality hidden or be "re-educated"? They are NOT being reasonable by making inclusion of THEIR issues their proce for beign part of your coalition for this "better world that is possible". It's not better FOR THEM unless their issues are part of it.
a well known cult in the guise of a political organization
accordingly, it is hard to know how much credence, if any, to attribute to the content of this post, particularly in regard to the alleged organizing successes
--Richard Estes
Davis, CA
[We at N3 have spent much time examining the techniques of the New Alliance/Independence Party and we have found them to be the ideal tool for movement building. In particular we find Fred Newman's Short-Term Psychological Therapy a positive way to unite diverse groups while brightening their social outlook and making them fit for the hard work of radical activism. This brilliant form of therapy made it possible for disparate figures such as Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, Lyndon LaRouche, and Ralph Nader to work together in an alliance that pieced together the fragments of sectarian libertarianism into one big tent.]
accordingly, it is hard to know how much credence, if any, to attribute to the content of this post, particularly in regard to the alleged organizing successes
--Richard Estes
Davis, CA
[We at N3 have spent much time examining the techniques of the New Alliance/Independence Party and we have found them to be the ideal tool for movement building. In particular we find Fred Newman's Short-Term Psychological Therapy a positive way to unite diverse groups while brightening their social outlook and making them fit for the hard work of radical activism. This brilliant form of therapy made it possible for disparate figures such as Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot, Lyndon LaRouche, and Ralph Nader to work together in an alliance that pieced together the fragments of sectarian libertarianism into one big tent.]
Karl Marx, Guy Debord, and Jesus walk into a bar. The bartender says, "What'll you have?"
I forget how the rest of it goes. Could someone please refresh my memory?
I forget how the rest of it goes. Could someone please refresh my memory?
"Through ... Fred Newman's social therapy we will be able to penetrate the red states in the form of bible-study classes." —N3 Coalition/NYC
Yo! These guys should be writing for the Ali G show.
So who is/are the N3 Coalition/NYC? Obviously the writer/writers have more than a passing interest in and knowledge of Fred Newman's "somewhat of a cult" modus operandi. I'm thinking this may have been written by a bunch of Larouchies on acid?
This is indeed an ingenious little spoof -- so uncannily effective, in fact, that I know ABBies who at this very moment are dusting off their Motel 6 copies of the King James Bible and inviting friends over for Moveon-style scripture study groups.
Even more interesting than the identity of the mystery writer(s) is the question of why the piece was written in the first place — what the author(s) seek to achieve. Provocative it is. Humorous, yes perhaps — though the humor is effectively undercut by blunt irony, much as a sliver of shrapnel can tickle and at the same time cut ever more deeply into the flesh. Reassuring it definitely is NOT!
Then again reassurance is in short supply these days.
James Retherford
Yo! These guys should be writing for the Ali G show.
So who is/are the N3 Coalition/NYC? Obviously the writer/writers have more than a passing interest in and knowledge of Fred Newman's "somewhat of a cult" modus operandi. I'm thinking this may have been written by a bunch of Larouchies on acid?
This is indeed an ingenious little spoof -- so uncannily effective, in fact, that I know ABBies who at this very moment are dusting off their Motel 6 copies of the King James Bible and inviting friends over for Moveon-style scripture study groups.
Even more interesting than the identity of the mystery writer(s) is the question of why the piece was written in the first place — what the author(s) seek to achieve. Provocative it is. Humorous, yes perhaps — though the humor is effectively undercut by blunt irony, much as a sliver of shrapnel can tickle and at the same time cut ever more deeply into the flesh. Reassuring it definitely is NOT!
Then again reassurance is in short supply these days.
James Retherford
I for one find it horribly offensive to imply that the nation should unite over a common religion. Wouldn't separation of church and state imply doing simply the opposite of that?
And there is currently no pro-life party, if Christian leaders decide to stick to there guns about supporting life: Democrats say abortion rights are needed, but Republicans have employed the death penalty worse in Texas, the President's state, more than any other state in the union.
This is not to mention the millions of Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, and Native Americans who practice their own religions and may not feel resonance at all with the Christian majority.
What we are losing sight of here is that democracy, imperfect as it is, is only closer to perfect if it is the will of the majority WITH PROTECTION FOR MINORITY RIGHTS.
And there is currently no pro-life party, if Christian leaders decide to stick to there guns about supporting life: Democrats say abortion rights are needed, but Republicans have employed the death penalty worse in Texas, the President's state, more than any other state in the union.
This is not to mention the millions of Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, and Native Americans who practice their own religions and may not feel resonance at all with the Christian majority.
What we are losing sight of here is that democracy, imperfect as it is, is only closer to perfect if it is the will of the majority WITH PROTECTION FOR MINORITY RIGHTS.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network