Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Carter warns of repeat election 'fraud' in Florida
Jimmy Carter, who has made a second career monitoring elections in world trouble spots, yesterday accused Florida Republicans of "brazenly" resisting efforts to clean up "fraudulent and biased electoral practices" that so marred the 2000 election in their state.
The former Democrat president offered a harsh verdict on Florida's prospects for a free and fair election this November, writing in the Washington Post that: "A repetition of the problems of 2000 seems likely."
The former Democrat president offered a harsh verdict on Florida's prospects for a free and fair election this November, writing in the Washington Post that: "A repetition of the problems of 2000 seems likely."
Mr Carter pinned much of the blame on the state's Republican governor, Jeb Bush, younger brother of President George W Bush. He wrote that Jeb Bush, "naturally a strong supporter of his brother, has taken no steps to correct these departures from principles of fair and equal treatment or to prevent them in the future".
In 2000, Jeb Bush presided over an election system controlled by fiercely partisan Republican officials, Mr Carter wrote.
History was now repeating itself, he charged. In particular, Mr Carter denounced Mr Bush and aides for attempting, once again, to throw tens of thousands of black voters off the state's electoral roll, on the grounds that they were believed to be convicted criminals who had not yet regained their right to vote in clemency hearings.
In the 2000 election thousands of non-white voters were refused the right to vote because they were incorrectly included on a list of alleged felons, provided to election officials by the Republican state government.
This summer, Mr Bush's aides sent a similar list of alleged felons to local election officials. The list was once again found to contain thousands of incorrect names. It focused almost exclusively on black felons and ignored criminals from the Hispanic community, seen as more likely to vote Republican. The list was retracted.
Mr Carter described the latest row as "a fumbling attempt . . . to disqualify 22,000 African-American [likely Democrats], but only 61 Hispanics [likely Republicans], as alleged felons".
Mr Carter's words may anger as many Americans as they comfort, notably his incendiary comment that "basic international requirements for a fair election are missing in Florida".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/09/28/wus28.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/09/28/ixportal.html
In 2000, Jeb Bush presided over an election system controlled by fiercely partisan Republican officials, Mr Carter wrote.
History was now repeating itself, he charged. In particular, Mr Carter denounced Mr Bush and aides for attempting, once again, to throw tens of thousands of black voters off the state's electoral roll, on the grounds that they were believed to be convicted criminals who had not yet regained their right to vote in clemency hearings.
In the 2000 election thousands of non-white voters were refused the right to vote because they were incorrectly included on a list of alleged felons, provided to election officials by the Republican state government.
This summer, Mr Bush's aides sent a similar list of alleged felons to local election officials. The list was once again found to contain thousands of incorrect names. It focused almost exclusively on black felons and ignored criminals from the Hispanic community, seen as more likely to vote Republican. The list was retracted.
Mr Carter described the latest row as "a fumbling attempt . . . to disqualify 22,000 African-American [likely Democrats], but only 61 Hispanics [likely Republicans], as alleged felons".
Mr Carter's words may anger as many Americans as they comfort, notably his incendiary comment that "basic international requirements for a fair election are missing in Florida".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/09/28/wus28.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/09/28/ixportal.html
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Jimmy Carter, the former US president, has said Florida lacks "some basic international requirements for a fair election" and a repeat of the 2000 election fiasco "seems likely".
Mr Carter said reforms recommended after the recount in Florida had still not been implemented "because of inadequate funding or political disputes".
Mr Carter, who runs an election and human rights centre in Atlanta, accused election officials working for Florida's governor, Jeb Bush, the president's brother, of being "highly partisan".
They were "brazenly violating a basic need for an unbiased and universally trusted authority to manage all elements of the electoral process".
"The disturbing fact is that a repetition of the problems of 2000 now seems likely, even as many other nations are conducting elections that are internationally certified to be transparent, honest and fair," Mr Carter writes in a commentary reprinted in today's Guardian.
Busy with the fourth hurricane to hit Florida in six weeks, the governor's office did not return calls seeking comment yesterday. But Mark Foley, a Republican congressman from Florida, rejected Democratic criticism of the state's election preparations.
"They're alleging somehow we're a third world nation in our ability to handle ballots," he told CNN. "There is no way the supervisors of elections in 67 counties can't handle the proper job of tabulating ballots."
During the 2000 recount, the Florida state government was accused of trying to orchestrate George Bush's victory by certifying doubtful results and by disenfranchising thousands of mainly black voters with the use of flawed criminal lists.
Under Florida's laws, former convicts who have completed their sentence remain ineligible to vote for life, unless they receive a specific act of clemency. It is a racially charged issue as 58% of Florida's 600,000 former felons are African-Americans, most convicted of drug offences for which they are more frequently charged than whites.
In May this year, Florida's secretary of state, Glenda Hood (a Bush family partisan), distributed a secret list of 48,000 alleged former felons and instructed county election supervisors to remove them from the voter rolls. When a court ordered the list published, it was found that more than 20,000 people on the list were black (black Floridians vote Democratic by more than nine to one) and only 61 were Hispanics (who are much more likely to vote Republican). The Miami Herald newspaper found at least 2,000 people should not have been on the list, having regained their voting rights.
In his commentary, Mr Carter called the distribution of the list a "fumbling attempt" to disenfranchise black people. It was dropped after it became public, but by then 14 counties had sent letters to the residents named, informing them they would be ineligible to vote.
It is not easy for the state's former felons to regain the right to vote. According to the Florida Justice Institute, a civil rights organisation, it requires a hearing by the state's clemency board, chaired by Governor Bush, which meets only four times a year and reviews only 50 cases each time. The all-Republican board can turn down requests without giving reasons and does so in about half the cases they review.
Randall Berg, the head of the institute, said the number of former convicts who win back their right to vote each year was "a drop in the bucket".
Another source of controversy in the 2000 election was the use, in some counties, of punch-card ballot papers which sometimes could not be read by machines because of loose fragments of cardboard (chads) that stuck to them.
Mr Carter was a member of a commission that recommended modernising the state's voting equipment, but he says today those reforms have been patchy. The new computer voting machines have raised questions over the possibility of tampering, but there are no statewide regulations on the use of a paper backup record of the vote in the event of another recount.
Mr Carter argues the right to uniform, reliable voting procedures is a requirements for a fair election by international standards. However, he writes: "There are disturbing signs that once again ... some of the state's leading officials hold strong political biases that prevent necessary reforms."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1314205,00.html
Mr Carter said reforms recommended after the recount in Florida had still not been implemented "because of inadequate funding or political disputes".
Mr Carter, who runs an election and human rights centre in Atlanta, accused election officials working for Florida's governor, Jeb Bush, the president's brother, of being "highly partisan".
They were "brazenly violating a basic need for an unbiased and universally trusted authority to manage all elements of the electoral process".
"The disturbing fact is that a repetition of the problems of 2000 now seems likely, even as many other nations are conducting elections that are internationally certified to be transparent, honest and fair," Mr Carter writes in a commentary reprinted in today's Guardian.
Busy with the fourth hurricane to hit Florida in six weeks, the governor's office did not return calls seeking comment yesterday. But Mark Foley, a Republican congressman from Florida, rejected Democratic criticism of the state's election preparations.
"They're alleging somehow we're a third world nation in our ability to handle ballots," he told CNN. "There is no way the supervisors of elections in 67 counties can't handle the proper job of tabulating ballots."
During the 2000 recount, the Florida state government was accused of trying to orchestrate George Bush's victory by certifying doubtful results and by disenfranchising thousands of mainly black voters with the use of flawed criminal lists.
Under Florida's laws, former convicts who have completed their sentence remain ineligible to vote for life, unless they receive a specific act of clemency. It is a racially charged issue as 58% of Florida's 600,000 former felons are African-Americans, most convicted of drug offences for which they are more frequently charged than whites.
In May this year, Florida's secretary of state, Glenda Hood (a Bush family partisan), distributed a secret list of 48,000 alleged former felons and instructed county election supervisors to remove them from the voter rolls. When a court ordered the list published, it was found that more than 20,000 people on the list were black (black Floridians vote Democratic by more than nine to one) and only 61 were Hispanics (who are much more likely to vote Republican). The Miami Herald newspaper found at least 2,000 people should not have been on the list, having regained their voting rights.
In his commentary, Mr Carter called the distribution of the list a "fumbling attempt" to disenfranchise black people. It was dropped after it became public, but by then 14 counties had sent letters to the residents named, informing them they would be ineligible to vote.
It is not easy for the state's former felons to regain the right to vote. According to the Florida Justice Institute, a civil rights organisation, it requires a hearing by the state's clemency board, chaired by Governor Bush, which meets only four times a year and reviews only 50 cases each time. The all-Republican board can turn down requests without giving reasons and does so in about half the cases they review.
Randall Berg, the head of the institute, said the number of former convicts who win back their right to vote each year was "a drop in the bucket".
Another source of controversy in the 2000 election was the use, in some counties, of punch-card ballot papers which sometimes could not be read by machines because of loose fragments of cardboard (chads) that stuck to them.
Mr Carter was a member of a commission that recommended modernising the state's voting equipment, but he says today those reforms have been patchy. The new computer voting machines have raised questions over the possibility of tampering, but there are no statewide regulations on the use of a paper backup record of the vote in the event of another recount.
Mr Carter argues the right to uniform, reliable voting procedures is a requirements for a fair election by international standards. However, he writes: "There are disturbing signs that once again ... some of the state's leading officials hold strong political biases that prevent necessary reforms."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1314205,00.html
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$110.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network