From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Greens take off Nader training wheels
California's Greens reject Nader's bid for state ballot. What does it mean that the San Francisco Chronicle, mouthpiece for corporate rule tells a story much closer to the truth than Counterpunch, which is the FoxNews of the left?
California's Greens reject Nader's bid for state ballot
- Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer
Wednesday, August 11, 2004
Ralph Nader, who failed to secure enough signatures to get on the Nov. 2 ballot in California, suffered another political setback Tuesday when state Green Party leaders rebuffed a move intended to make him the state party's presidential nominee.
The California Green Party's executive committee rejected the idea of holding a special general assembly -- a state nominating convention -- that could have put Nader and his vice presidential running mate, Peter Camejo, on the state ballot.
Cres Vellucci, spokesman for the California Green Party, said the state party had reaffirmed the national party's nomination of presidential candidate David Cobb and running mate Patricia LaMarche in California, the state with the largest Green Party membership.
The effort by Nader supporters to get a ballot foothold in California, the nation's most populous state, has been considered strategically significant to the former consumer advocate. While California is not a battleground state -- polls show Democrat John Kerry leading President Bush by double digits -- insiders said the free media in a state with 18 major media markets would give Nader the best shot at gaining traction, and perhaps enough votes to gain future public funding and a role in presidential debates.
Nader's campaign spokesman Kevin Zeese downplayed the matter, saying the campaign was still examining its legal and political options. "There's a number of things we have in the fire,'' he said.
Still, the push for Green Party access created bitter divisions -- and a public debate among Greens over Nader's campaign for president, which a variety of polls show could take votes from Kerry and give the edge to Bush in closely contested states.
Supporters passionately argued that Nader deserved a shot at the California ballot, because the Green Party's complex nominating process was undemocratic and Cobb was chosen as the nominee despite widespread support for Nader.
"What you're seeing is a lot of angry California Greens, that they're having David Cobb shoved down their throat,'' Zeese said. "It's become an issue of basic democracy for the Green Party.''
Cobb maintained he had become the party's candidate in a fair process -- after Nader publicly insisted he did not want its nomination.
"I am disappointed that Ralph is willing to disrupt and damage the Green Party in an effort to get on the Greens' ballots,'' Cobb said.
"Ralph chose to run as an independent, and it looks like a mistake,'' he said. "It looks like Ralph Nader needed the Green Party in terms of volunteer energy and organization.''
With three months until the election, Zeese said Nader had received word from secretaries of state in New Jersey, South Dakota and Nevada that he had qualified for their ballots.
Page A - 10
URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/08/11/MNGDF861NA1.DTL
- Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer
Wednesday, August 11, 2004
Ralph Nader, who failed to secure enough signatures to get on the Nov. 2 ballot in California, suffered another political setback Tuesday when state Green Party leaders rebuffed a move intended to make him the state party's presidential nominee.
The California Green Party's executive committee rejected the idea of holding a special general assembly -- a state nominating convention -- that could have put Nader and his vice presidential running mate, Peter Camejo, on the state ballot.
Cres Vellucci, spokesman for the California Green Party, said the state party had reaffirmed the national party's nomination of presidential candidate David Cobb and running mate Patricia LaMarche in California, the state with the largest Green Party membership.
The effort by Nader supporters to get a ballot foothold in California, the nation's most populous state, has been considered strategically significant to the former consumer advocate. While California is not a battleground state -- polls show Democrat John Kerry leading President Bush by double digits -- insiders said the free media in a state with 18 major media markets would give Nader the best shot at gaining traction, and perhaps enough votes to gain future public funding and a role in presidential debates.
Nader's campaign spokesman Kevin Zeese downplayed the matter, saying the campaign was still examining its legal and political options. "There's a number of things we have in the fire,'' he said.
Still, the push for Green Party access created bitter divisions -- and a public debate among Greens over Nader's campaign for president, which a variety of polls show could take votes from Kerry and give the edge to Bush in closely contested states.
Supporters passionately argued that Nader deserved a shot at the California ballot, because the Green Party's complex nominating process was undemocratic and Cobb was chosen as the nominee despite widespread support for Nader.
"What you're seeing is a lot of angry California Greens, that they're having David Cobb shoved down their throat,'' Zeese said. "It's become an issue of basic democracy for the Green Party.''
Cobb maintained he had become the party's candidate in a fair process -- after Nader publicly insisted he did not want its nomination.
"I am disappointed that Ralph is willing to disrupt and damage the Green Party in an effort to get on the Greens' ballots,'' Cobb said.
"Ralph chose to run as an independent, and it looks like a mistake,'' he said. "It looks like Ralph Nader needed the Green Party in terms of volunteer energy and organization.''
With three months until the election, Zeese said Nader had received word from secretaries of state in New Jersey, South Dakota and Nevada that he had qualified for their ballots.
Page A - 10
URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/08/11/MNGDF861NA1.DTL
For more information:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c...
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
on principle
Thu, Aug 12, 2004 1:24PM
colores
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 11:36PM
where was during the war
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 11:24PM
Colors
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 11:01PM
by the way
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 9:32PM
Interesting to see
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 8:54PM
Eh
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 5:41PM
Decline to State
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 5:36PM
Burn, baby, burn
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 5:35PM
distracted
Wed, Aug 11, 2004 3:28PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network