From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
AIDS Activist adds another voice to the SHAC Campaign
Peter Tatchell is a leading gay and human rights campaigner (in England). Peter Tatchell says that animal experiments have undermined HIV research and hindered new treatments. Here is an article he wrote for SHAC:
The development of life-saving protease inhibitor treatments for HIV was delayed for four years by the pharmaceutical company Merck, after the first trials of protease drugs killed laboratory dogs and rats. During those four years, tens of thousands of people with AIDS died, perhaps needlessly. Many might have benefited from the new drugs, including my dear friend, the filmmaker Derek Jarman. He and many others could now be alive if Merck had not submitted its protease research programme to the "Russian roulette" of animal testing.
Merck made the false, unscientific assumption that animal experiments provide an accurate model of how anti-HIV drugs interact with humans. The result? Research on a promising protease inhibitor was halted by Merck in 1989 and clinical trials of a new protease drug (crixivan) did not start until 1993. This disastrous setback in protease research is one of the greatest scandals of the AIDS epidemic, possibly contributing to the premature deaths of up to 50,000 people worldwide.
The way animal research stalled the availability of protease inhibitor treatments was exposed several years ago in Washington Post magazine, and has since been conceded - in part - by the Vice-President of Merck, Bennett M.Shapiro. He acknowledges that trials of a promising protease drug were halted in 1989, after it was tested on lab rats and dogs and they all died. Merck assumed this treatment would have the same deadly effect on humans.
It is, however, questionable whether the abandoned protease inhibitor would have caused similar damaging consequences to people. This is because there are huge physiological differences between humans and animals. Research findings in other species cannot, therefore, be generalized to people. Indeed, protease drugs - which may be lethal to dogs and rats - have nevertheless dramatically saved the lives of those with HIV.
Merck admits that animal studies were not used in the primary research that led to the invention of protease inhibitors as a treatment for HIV. An animal-free breakthrough, the inhibitor drugs were designed on computers and safety-tested using human cell cultures and biochemical assays. It was only when Merck decided to further test the new drugs on laboratory animals that they ran into trouble, with the dogs and rats dying of liver failure. Protease inhibitors do not, of course, have these same fatal consequences for people. On the contrary, they are lifesavers.
This demonstrates the scientific flaws of animal-based medical research. Animal tests can produce inaccurate data that is totally inapplicable too humans. The results are often tragic: as evidenced by all the people with HIV who died during the lost four years. 1989 to 1993.
Further info on Peter Tatchell's campaigns: http://www.petertatchell.net
50 Deadly Consequences of Lab Animal Experiments : http://www.curedisease.com/Harms.html
Merck made the false, unscientific assumption that animal experiments provide an accurate model of how anti-HIV drugs interact with humans. The result? Research on a promising protease inhibitor was halted by Merck in 1989 and clinical trials of a new protease drug (crixivan) did not start until 1993. This disastrous setback in protease research is one of the greatest scandals of the AIDS epidemic, possibly contributing to the premature deaths of up to 50,000 people worldwide.
The way animal research stalled the availability of protease inhibitor treatments was exposed several years ago in Washington Post magazine, and has since been conceded - in part - by the Vice-President of Merck, Bennett M.Shapiro. He acknowledges that trials of a promising protease drug were halted in 1989, after it was tested on lab rats and dogs and they all died. Merck assumed this treatment would have the same deadly effect on humans.
It is, however, questionable whether the abandoned protease inhibitor would have caused similar damaging consequences to people. This is because there are huge physiological differences between humans and animals. Research findings in other species cannot, therefore, be generalized to people. Indeed, protease drugs - which may be lethal to dogs and rats - have nevertheless dramatically saved the lives of those with HIV.
Merck admits that animal studies were not used in the primary research that led to the invention of protease inhibitors as a treatment for HIV. An animal-free breakthrough, the inhibitor drugs were designed on computers and safety-tested using human cell cultures and biochemical assays. It was only when Merck decided to further test the new drugs on laboratory animals that they ran into trouble, with the dogs and rats dying of liver failure. Protease inhibitors do not, of course, have these same fatal consequences for people. On the contrary, they are lifesavers.
This demonstrates the scientific flaws of animal-based medical research. Animal tests can produce inaccurate data that is totally inapplicable too humans. The results are often tragic: as evidenced by all the people with HIV who died during the lost four years. 1989 to 1993.
Further info on Peter Tatchell's campaigns: http://www.petertatchell.net
50 Deadly Consequences of Lab Animal Experiments : http://www.curedisease.com/Harms.html
For more information:
http://www.shac.net
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
look at the picture
Sat, Dec 4, 2004 12:53AM
isolation/connectivity
Sat, Aug 21, 2004 1:49PM
Calender posting for HLS home demo
Sat, Aug 21, 2004 9:31AM
8/21 event
Sat, Aug 21, 2004 7:33AM
hierarchy
Wed, Aug 18, 2004 9:08PM
more from dumbfock holmes
Wed, Aug 18, 2004 5:00PM
Yes, I'm against cats
Tue, Aug 17, 2004 4:44PM
show me
Tue, Aug 17, 2004 4:17PM
"I'm not a speciesist"
Tue, Aug 17, 2004 4:06PM
no sympathy for mass murderers
Tue, Aug 17, 2004 3:25PM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network