Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Recall Press Release
The Civil Grand Jury, in a report last month, traced District 10’s dire problems to 60 years of neglect by City Hall. Will City Hall fail us again?
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact Willie Ratcliff, (415) 671-0789
Why won’t Elections director put District 10 recall on Nov. 2 ballot?
Special election would cost hundreds of thousands and disenfranchise voters
“The recall of Supervisor Sophie Maxwell has really gotten people in the District 10 communities involved in politics,” wrote Apollonia Jordan in the June 16 Bay View, alongside a picture of some of the hard-working signature gatherers, tired but smiling at the end of a long day.
This recall is the essence of democracy: citizens determining their own destiny. The thousands who eagerly signed the recall petition – far more than the 3,900 registered voters required – were exercising their right to choose as their district supervisor someone strong and effective enough to solve some of the City’s worst problems, urgent problems, problems of life and death.
They expected to vote on the recall and a new District 10 supervisor in the general election Nov. 2. That’s a presidential election, giving voters a chance to beat Bush, to elect lawmakers at every level, from Congress to the Board of Supervisors, and to decide the fate of a host of ballot measures. The turnout is predicted to be the highest in decades.
But Director of Elections John Arntz says no, an amendment to the City Charter requires a special election in December for the recall. We say that amendment puts the recall on the general election ballot.
The difference hinges on what the voters meant by the word “it” when they approved this Charter amendment in 1996. Arntz admits in a letter we received Thursday that our interpretation is “one possibility”; his is another. A member of the Elections Commission I spoke with says Arntz is dragging his feet.
More than two weeks after we submitted the signatures, on July 19, Arntz admits the Elections Department has not yet checked a single one. State law allows the sufficiency of the signatures to be decided simply by random sampling if a high enough percentage is found to be valid – that is, if the name and address of the petition signer appears on the City’s “master voter file” of registered voters.
But in over two weeks, the Elections Department has not found the time even to perform the random sampling. Clearly, the recall is not a high priority.
What difference does it make if we vote on the recall in November or December? A difference of “hundreds of thousands of dollars” that a special election would cost, according to Arntz’ letter – hundreds of thousands desperately needed in this budget crisis, especially in District 10, to save lives stalked by poverty and pollution.
And a difference that would further disenfranchise San Francisco’s most disenfranchised voters. “For the last several elections,” says well known activist Marie Harrison, a candidate for supervisor in District 10 in 2000, “District 10 has been another Florida. Voters, especially low-income Black voters and other voters of color, were intimidated and treated like criminals, just for wanting to vote.
“Many voters who live in public and subsidized housing were told that if they didn’t vote right, they’d lose their homes – and they did,” Harrison says. City statistics show that 67 percent of San Francisco’s homeless people come from Bay View Hunters Point.
In a special election, with only the recall on the ballot, people going to the polls could come under suspicion for intending to vote the “wrong” way. The level of fear could rise; turnout, always low for a special election, could fall further. Is this democracy?
Recall proponents will attend the meeting of the Elections Commission Wednesday at 7 p.m. in Room 408 of City Hall. We will ask the commissioners to find a way to put the recall on the Nov. 2 general election ballot.
We will tell them how hard we tried to gather sufficient signatures sooner than the little over two months it took. And we will tell how little cooperation we got from the Elections Department – their 10-day delay in approving the petition at the beginning of the process and their refusal to give us an up-to-date “master voter file” until the last two and a half weeks.
We urge all San Franciscans who believe in democracy – and the press dedicated to keeping them an informed electorate – to join us at the Elections Commission meeting Wednesday.
The Civil Grand Jury, in a report last month, traced District 10’s dire problems to 60 years of neglect by City Hall. Will City Hall fail us again?
Thousands of District 10 voters want desperately to determine our own destiny at the polls on Nov. 2. Let’s see if San Francisco really is the city that knows how.
Why won’t Elections director put District 10 recall on Nov. 2 ballot?
Special election would cost hundreds of thousands and disenfranchise voters
“The recall of Supervisor Sophie Maxwell has really gotten people in the District 10 communities involved in politics,” wrote Apollonia Jordan in the June 16 Bay View, alongside a picture of some of the hard-working signature gatherers, tired but smiling at the end of a long day.
This recall is the essence of democracy: citizens determining their own destiny. The thousands who eagerly signed the recall petition – far more than the 3,900 registered voters required – were exercising their right to choose as their district supervisor someone strong and effective enough to solve some of the City’s worst problems, urgent problems, problems of life and death.
They expected to vote on the recall and a new District 10 supervisor in the general election Nov. 2. That’s a presidential election, giving voters a chance to beat Bush, to elect lawmakers at every level, from Congress to the Board of Supervisors, and to decide the fate of a host of ballot measures. The turnout is predicted to be the highest in decades.
But Director of Elections John Arntz says no, an amendment to the City Charter requires a special election in December for the recall. We say that amendment puts the recall on the general election ballot.
The difference hinges on what the voters meant by the word “it” when they approved this Charter amendment in 1996. Arntz admits in a letter we received Thursday that our interpretation is “one possibility”; his is another. A member of the Elections Commission I spoke with says Arntz is dragging his feet.
More than two weeks after we submitted the signatures, on July 19, Arntz admits the Elections Department has not yet checked a single one. State law allows the sufficiency of the signatures to be decided simply by random sampling if a high enough percentage is found to be valid – that is, if the name and address of the petition signer appears on the City’s “master voter file” of registered voters.
But in over two weeks, the Elections Department has not found the time even to perform the random sampling. Clearly, the recall is not a high priority.
What difference does it make if we vote on the recall in November or December? A difference of “hundreds of thousands of dollars” that a special election would cost, according to Arntz’ letter – hundreds of thousands desperately needed in this budget crisis, especially in District 10, to save lives stalked by poverty and pollution.
And a difference that would further disenfranchise San Francisco’s most disenfranchised voters. “For the last several elections,” says well known activist Marie Harrison, a candidate for supervisor in District 10 in 2000, “District 10 has been another Florida. Voters, especially low-income Black voters and other voters of color, were intimidated and treated like criminals, just for wanting to vote.
“Many voters who live in public and subsidized housing were told that if they didn’t vote right, they’d lose their homes – and they did,” Harrison says. City statistics show that 67 percent of San Francisco’s homeless people come from Bay View Hunters Point.
In a special election, with only the recall on the ballot, people going to the polls could come under suspicion for intending to vote the “wrong” way. The level of fear could rise; turnout, always low for a special election, could fall further. Is this democracy?
Recall proponents will attend the meeting of the Elections Commission Wednesday at 7 p.m. in Room 408 of City Hall. We will ask the commissioners to find a way to put the recall on the Nov. 2 general election ballot.
We will tell them how hard we tried to gather sufficient signatures sooner than the little over two months it took. And we will tell how little cooperation we got from the Elections Department – their 10-day delay in approving the petition at the beginning of the process and their refusal to give us an up-to-date “master voter file” until the last two and a half weeks.
We urge all San Franciscans who believe in democracy – and the press dedicated to keeping them an informed electorate – to join us at the Elections Commission meeting Wednesday.
The Civil Grand Jury, in a report last month, traced District 10’s dire problems to 60 years of neglect by City Hall. Will City Hall fail us again?
Thousands of District 10 voters want desperately to determine our own destiny at the polls on Nov. 2. Let’s see if San Francisco really is the city that knows how.
For more information:
http://www.sfbayview.com
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
This is a continuning saga of disenfranchisement, not Florida just San Francisco.
For more information:
http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/uploadedfiles/...
A report of the 2003-2004 Civil Grand Jury For the City and County of San Francisco.
A Liberal Democratic City?
A Liberal Democratic City?
For more information:
http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/uploadedfiles/...
If you can not administrate the Elections Department in a fair and open manner that makes San Francisco City and County proud, it is time to step down. It has been apparent for years that the management of the Elections Department leaves a lot to be desired. When your Elections Department Heads cause embarrassment to the City and County of San Francisco in the media repeatedly, it is time for a change, if you can’t administer that department then it is time for you to relinquish your duties as City Administrator and let someone who won’t play politics with people vote step into your position. We San Franciscans are tired of the bad press, we are not Florida and we would prefer to see a positive report coming out of the Grand Jury on a department which you administer. Remember one man (person) one vote, it is not to be manipulated or played with for political reasons.
The Community
The Community
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact Willie Ratcliff, (415) 671-0789
PRESS CONFERENCE: District 10 recall proponents will hold a press conference at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 4, in the hallway outside Room 408, City Hall, just prior to the Elections Commission meeting.
Why won’t Elections director put District 10 recall on Nov. 2 ballot?
Special election would cost hundreds of thousands and disenfranchise voters
“The recall of Supervisor Sophie Maxwell has really gotten people in the District 10 communities involved in politics,” wrote Apollonia Jordan in the June 16 Bay View, alongside a picture of some of the hard-working signature gatherers, tired but smiling at the end of a long day.
This recall is the essence of democracy: citizens determining their own destiny. The thousands who eagerly signed the recall petition – far more than the 3,900 registered voters required – were exercising their right to choose as their district supervisor someone strong and effective enough to solve some of the City’s worst problems, urgent problems, problems of life and death.
They expected to vote on the recall and a new District 10 supervisor in the general election Nov. 2. That’s a presidential election, giving voters a chance to beat Bush, to elect lawmakers at every level, from Congress to the Board of Supervisors, and to decide the fate of a host of ballot measures. The turnout is predicted to be the highest in decades.
But Director of Elections John Arntz says no, an amendment to the City Charter requires a special election in December for the recall. We say that amendment puts the recall on the general election ballot.
The difference hinges on what the voters meant by the word “it” when they approved this Charter amendment in 1996. Arntz admits in a letter we received Thursday that our interpretation is “one possibility”; his is another. A member of the Elections Commission I spoke with says Arntz is dragging his feet.
More than two weeks after we submitted the signatures, on July 19, Arntz admits the Elections Department has not yet checked a single one. State law allows the sufficiency of the signatures to be decided simply by random sampling if a high enough percentage is found to be valid – that is, if the name and address of the petition signer appears on the City’s “master voter file” of registered voters.
But in over two weeks, the Elections Department has not found the time even to perform the random sampling. Clearly, the recall is not a high priority.
What difference does it make if we vote on the recall in November or December? A difference of “hundreds of thousands of dollars” that a special election would cost, according to Arntz’ letter – hundreds of thousands desperately needed in this budget crisis, especially in District 10, to save lives stalked by poverty, prejudice and pollution.
And a difference that would further disenfranchise San Francisco’s most disenfranchised voters. “For the last several elections,” says well known activist Marie Harrison, a candidate for supervisor in District 10 in 2000, “District 10 has been another Florida. Voters, especially low-income Black voters and other voters of color, were intimidated and treated like criminals, just for wanting to vote.
“Many voters who live in public and subsidized housing were told that if they didn’t vote right, they’d lose their homes – and they did,” Harrison says. City statistics show that 67 percent of San Francisco’s homeless people come from Bay View Hunters Point.
In a special election, with only the recall on the ballot, people going to the polls could come under suspicion for intending to vote the “wrong” way. The level of fear could rise; turnout, always low for a special election, could fall further. Is this democracy?
Elections Director John Arntz knows that the recall is the will of the people. The number of people who signed the recall petition he holds is greater than the votes cast for incumbent Sophie Maxwell in either 2000 or 2002. Why is he not doing all he can to support the people of District 10 who want to exercise their democratic rights?
Recall proponents will hold a press conference at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday in the hallway outside Room 408 of City Hall just prior to the meeting of the Elections Commission and then attend the meeting at 7 p.m. in Room 408. We will ask the commissioners to find a way to put the recall on the Nov. 2 general election ballot.
We will tell them how hard we tried to gather sufficient signatures sooner than the little over two months it took. And we will tell how little cooperation we got from the Elections Department – their 10-day delay in approving the petition at the beginning of the process and their refusal to give us an up-to-date “master voter file” until the last two and a half weeks.
We urge all San Franciscans who believe in democracy – and the press dedicated to keeping them an informed electorate – to join us at the press conference and the Elections Commission meeting Wednesday.
The Civil Grand Jury, in a report last month, traced District 10’s dire problems to 60 years of neglect by City Hall. Will City Hall fail us again?
Thousands of District 10 voters want desperately to determine our own destiny at the polls on Nov. 2. Let’s see if San Francisco really is the city that knows how.
Background Info Links http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/08/1691015.php
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/08/1700778.php
PRESS CONFERENCE: District 10 recall proponents will hold a press conference at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 4, in the hallway outside Room 408, City Hall, just prior to the Elections Commission meeting.
Why won’t Elections director put District 10 recall on Nov. 2 ballot?
Special election would cost hundreds of thousands and disenfranchise voters
“The recall of Supervisor Sophie Maxwell has really gotten people in the District 10 communities involved in politics,” wrote Apollonia Jordan in the June 16 Bay View, alongside a picture of some of the hard-working signature gatherers, tired but smiling at the end of a long day.
This recall is the essence of democracy: citizens determining their own destiny. The thousands who eagerly signed the recall petition – far more than the 3,900 registered voters required – were exercising their right to choose as their district supervisor someone strong and effective enough to solve some of the City’s worst problems, urgent problems, problems of life and death.
They expected to vote on the recall and a new District 10 supervisor in the general election Nov. 2. That’s a presidential election, giving voters a chance to beat Bush, to elect lawmakers at every level, from Congress to the Board of Supervisors, and to decide the fate of a host of ballot measures. The turnout is predicted to be the highest in decades.
But Director of Elections John Arntz says no, an amendment to the City Charter requires a special election in December for the recall. We say that amendment puts the recall on the general election ballot.
The difference hinges on what the voters meant by the word “it” when they approved this Charter amendment in 1996. Arntz admits in a letter we received Thursday that our interpretation is “one possibility”; his is another. A member of the Elections Commission I spoke with says Arntz is dragging his feet.
More than two weeks after we submitted the signatures, on July 19, Arntz admits the Elections Department has not yet checked a single one. State law allows the sufficiency of the signatures to be decided simply by random sampling if a high enough percentage is found to be valid – that is, if the name and address of the petition signer appears on the City’s “master voter file” of registered voters.
But in over two weeks, the Elections Department has not found the time even to perform the random sampling. Clearly, the recall is not a high priority.
What difference does it make if we vote on the recall in November or December? A difference of “hundreds of thousands of dollars” that a special election would cost, according to Arntz’ letter – hundreds of thousands desperately needed in this budget crisis, especially in District 10, to save lives stalked by poverty, prejudice and pollution.
And a difference that would further disenfranchise San Francisco’s most disenfranchised voters. “For the last several elections,” says well known activist Marie Harrison, a candidate for supervisor in District 10 in 2000, “District 10 has been another Florida. Voters, especially low-income Black voters and other voters of color, were intimidated and treated like criminals, just for wanting to vote.
“Many voters who live in public and subsidized housing were told that if they didn’t vote right, they’d lose their homes – and they did,” Harrison says. City statistics show that 67 percent of San Francisco’s homeless people come from Bay View Hunters Point.
In a special election, with only the recall on the ballot, people going to the polls could come under suspicion for intending to vote the “wrong” way. The level of fear could rise; turnout, always low for a special election, could fall further. Is this democracy?
Elections Director John Arntz knows that the recall is the will of the people. The number of people who signed the recall petition he holds is greater than the votes cast for incumbent Sophie Maxwell in either 2000 or 2002. Why is he not doing all he can to support the people of District 10 who want to exercise their democratic rights?
Recall proponents will hold a press conference at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday in the hallway outside Room 408 of City Hall just prior to the meeting of the Elections Commission and then attend the meeting at 7 p.m. in Room 408. We will ask the commissioners to find a way to put the recall on the Nov. 2 general election ballot.
We will tell them how hard we tried to gather sufficient signatures sooner than the little over two months it took. And we will tell how little cooperation we got from the Elections Department – their 10-day delay in approving the petition at the beginning of the process and their refusal to give us an up-to-date “master voter file” until the last two and a half weeks.
We urge all San Franciscans who believe in democracy – and the press dedicated to keeping them an informed electorate – to join us at the press conference and the Elections Commission meeting Wednesday.
The Civil Grand Jury, in a report last month, traced District 10’s dire problems to 60 years of neglect by City Hall. Will City Hall fail us again?
Thousands of District 10 voters want desperately to determine our own destiny at the polls on Nov. 2. Let’s see if San Francisco really is the city that knows how.
Background Info Links http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/08/1691015.php
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/08/1700778.php
For more information:
http://www.sfbayview.com
Maxwell has not seemed to notice that there is an out of control murder rate in her district. The prevalence of drug dealers because there are no other jobs available, (30% unemployment rate) despite all the millions being spent by a whole raft of public agencies not to mention private operations. Developers are getting away with murder, no enforcement of Federal MBE, WBE goals. Lack of accessibility except to former Willie Brown connected people and special interest. A total lack of taking a direct stand for her district, look at Maxwell’s voting record. All of the candidates that ran against her before rolled their votes over her to fight the machine, once she got in a change took place she became part of the machine she swore to fight, ask the supervisoral candidates if they had the opportunity to release their votes to Maxwell if they would do it again? She always seems to be a day late and a dollar short unless it is taking a stance for special interest. The small group of people she labels as wanting her out of office is comprised of 15,000 signatures that didn’t qualify and over 5,000 that their signatures should qualify for her recall taking both numbers together is over 20,000 showing people in her District want her OUT. They gave her a chance when they let her run unopposed hoping for change but it was to no avail. She by no means is even close to walking in her mother’s footsteps (Enola), she fought for her community Sophie seems to like turning her back on people in Public Housing and low income anybody who is not financially connected. That is why we want a new Supervisor who will fight for the Community’s Rights (Civil, Environmental and Economic Rights)
Newsom respect the voter rights of District 10 read the Grand Jury Report.
Peskin confine yourself to your district, remember you saw something when you challenged her for BOS President.
Newsom respect the voter rights of District 10 read the Grand Jury Report.
Peskin confine yourself to your district, remember you saw something when you challenged her for BOS President.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$120.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network