Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
SF Janitor’s Decert Battle Threatens SEIU Stern’s Game Plan
Thousands of San Francisco janitors met in San Francisco to discuss the possible decertification of SEIU 1877. Hundreds of janitors are angry at the failure to represent them and a forced merger.
SF Janitor’s Decert Battle Threatens SEIU Stern’s Game Plan
7/31/04
By Steve Zeltzer
Hundreds of San Francisco janitors rallied at two separate meetings in San Francisco today to discuss the possible decertification from SEIU Local 1877. On August 5, 2004 over 2,000 janitors will be voting on whether they want to leave the SEIU and join the United Service Worker For Democracy Local 87. If they vote to decertify and remove the SEIU as the bargaining agent, this would be a major embarrassment to President Stern as he attempts to "reform the AFL-CIO".
Fearing a loss in this important election, SEIU president Andy Stern rushed to San Francisco to personally lobby janitors to vote to continue to be represented by the SEIU. He and his supporters warned San Francisco janitors that if they voted to decertify SEIU Local 1877 no other AFL-CIO unions would support them and also they could lose their pension and healthcare benefits.
Behind the move to decertify is a long time battle between the SEIU international and the membership of the San Francisco janitor’s local which was one of the most important locals of the SEIU. It was founded by George Hardy, one of the most important leaders of the SEIU and it has had a strong independent role in the SEIU. The drive by the International to merge various janitor’s locals did not begin in San Francisco. Janitors Local 399 in Los Angeles was also put in trusteeship despite massive resistance by the membership and after a sit-in at their union offices by the rank and file.
At the time. then SEIU President John Sweeney sent Bill Fletcher, his personal assistant to Los Angeles and he persuaded the janitors to call off their sit-in in return for local control by the membership of the local. Instead, after the sit-in and hunger strike was called off, Sweeney put the local in trusteeship and then split the local into two with 399 becoming the hospital section of the union and 1877 becoming the janitor section of the union. Rank and file janitors had won the majority of positions on the SEIU 399 executive board and wanted to end the business unionism of the local. Once contracts are signed in the Local the International pushes collaboration with the employers and in many cases refuses to back up militant action to defend workers’ rights. Presently, the International is supporting the merger of all healthcare locals in California into SEIU Local 250. SEIU 250 with the encouragement of former President John Sweeney had supported the labor-management "partnerships" at Kaiser and other healthcare facilities. This led at Kaiser to contracts that provided bonuses to phone call workers who turned away patients from Doctors. http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/3285986.htm It also recently led to SEIU 250 uniting with convalescent home bosses to support legislation that would limit elderly and disabled patients suing from being neglected, sexually abused or killed. http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2004-06-30/smith.html
The battle in San Francisco over local autonomy was not limited to Local 87 and Local 1877. Local 14 representing apartment building doormen and others was also merged with many members in opposition to their loss of autonomy and local control.
Janitors at the meeting of the United Service Workers For Democracy meeting reported that their wage increases had declined while janitors in Oakland and other areas received larger increases. Many argued that janitors in San Francisco under the leadership of President Mike Garcia, Vice President Tom Csekey and International Vice President Eliseo Medina had allowed wages and benefits to decline as they increased wages and benefits outside San Francisco. In 2002 Medina under the direction of Andy Stern put the local in trusteeship and promised "We will absolutely not cut benefits," Medina said after taking the over, "We will not cut pay."
They also were angry that building managers had been allowed to replace long-term workers with new workers and thereby violated their seniority rights. The meeting was attended by hundreds of janitors.
Janitors also complained that the union hiring hall had been eliminated by the previous administration led by President Richard Leung. Leung who now works for the California Nurses Association (CNA) had resisted the trusteeship according to many union members only when he discovered that he would not be running the Northern California region of the janitors. He then helped initiate the formation of United Service Workers For Democracy but did not attend the convention held by the local this weekend.
The meeting was also attended by members of the independent union Public Workers Local 1 who represent 15,000 workers in Northern California. They congratulated the janitors for their fight for independence and declared that they would help them in their efforts. The newly organized union is represented by Dan Siegle who was formerly the president of the Oakland Board of Education. He and his associates spoke at the meeting about the what would happen to the worker’s pensions if they voted to decertify.
Historically, ethnic divisions have also dominated Local 87. Feuding between Latino, Arabs and Chinese within the local had brought literally hundreds of picket lines over the last 5 years. One result however of the forced merger of Local 87 into SEIU Local 1877 is that for the first time in many years janitors from every nationality have united to bring back local autonomy from the International.
The recent national convention of the SEIU also held in San Francisco was leafleted by these same San Francisco janitors. At the convention, the Stern administration pushed through a further centralization of their apparatus. Arguing that the administration needs more control of the locals in order to bargain with multi-national corporations. They prevented a debate at the convention on regional bargaining bodies representing tens of thousands of janitors and healthcare workers that would be handpicked by the management of the union. Many delegates at the national convention were concerned that the railroading of these structural changes were preventing the voice of the rank and file from being heard.
In fact when SEIU Local 415 delegates from Santa Cruz sought to allow a debate on the this resolution, they were prevented from having a voice on the issue and a number felt like walking out of the convention.
The convention for many seemed like a virtual "coronation" of the Stern presidency. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent on corporate video PR and entertainment lauding the achievements of the international officers in increasing the membership of the International.
San Francisco janitors and other SEIU members around the country were also enraged by the massive increase in the dues without vote of the local membership by $6 to $7 a month. Janitors outside San Francisco earn close to minimum wages yet their dues have had major increases. Stern plans to spend $65 million dollars in supporting Kerry in this election cycle.
Janitors however seemed to have very little interest in the election. They do not see Kerry or any of the politicians solving or even addressing their struggle for survival as their cost of living increases while their real wages and healthcare benefits decline.
Steven Lerner, an appointee of President Andy Stern who is the SEIU Director of Building Services has argued that labor’s "structure" stands in the way of organizing and that the centralized "restructuring" of labor is necessary to organize the mass of unorganized workers. Rather than gaining power on the shop floor through struggle with the employers and a more democratic structure in the union, Lerner argues that unions must stop organizing the same industries, trade members and get even bigger so that they can be competitive with the power of the corporations. The growing anger and frustration among the rank and file however of many SEIU Locals and their feeling that they have been disenfanchized from any control in these forced "corporate" mergers is a growing danger for many AFL-CIO unions. Workers in many "statewide" locals of tens and hundreds of thousands of workers have no control of their business agents since they are all appointed by the President and since they have no local autonomy they have been excised out of any serious imput in the union policies. This corporatization of the unions and labor-management "partnerships" has led to decertifications in many other unions as well. 17,000 University of California clerical workers left AFSCME and formed an independent union called the Coalition Of University Employees (CUE) and most recently, thousands of mechanics left the IAM at United Airlines and Northwest Airlines for a craft union called AMFA. This growing threat has led to the AFL-CIO establishing a special committee to stop these decertifications but the failure to defend their members against take-backs and concessions combined with the total lack of democratic control is only adding fuel to fire within the membership.
The recent attack on the ILUW Local 10 initiated Million Worker March in Washington D.C. http://www.millionworkermarch.org by the President John Sweeney and the AFL-CIO for being a "diversion" and a threat to the "grassroots" campaign for Kerry has also angered many unionists throughout the country. The fear by top AFL-CIO officials of a mass independent workers mobilization could only further their growing crisis and paralysis in the face of the economic and political attack working people face in the US.
A vote on August 5 in San Francisco for the decertification of the SEIU and the victory of United Service Workers For Democracy would not only be a critical defeat for the plans for statewide janitor’s Local 1877 but would represent a threat to the continued centralization and forced mergers within the SEIU.
lvpsf [at] labornet.org
http://www.laboractioncoalition.org
7/31/04
By Steve Zeltzer
Hundreds of San Francisco janitors rallied at two separate meetings in San Francisco today to discuss the possible decertification from SEIU Local 1877. On August 5, 2004 over 2,000 janitors will be voting on whether they want to leave the SEIU and join the United Service Worker For Democracy Local 87. If they vote to decertify and remove the SEIU as the bargaining agent, this would be a major embarrassment to President Stern as he attempts to "reform the AFL-CIO".
Fearing a loss in this important election, SEIU president Andy Stern rushed to San Francisco to personally lobby janitors to vote to continue to be represented by the SEIU. He and his supporters warned San Francisco janitors that if they voted to decertify SEIU Local 1877 no other AFL-CIO unions would support them and also they could lose their pension and healthcare benefits.
Behind the move to decertify is a long time battle between the SEIU international and the membership of the San Francisco janitor’s local which was one of the most important locals of the SEIU. It was founded by George Hardy, one of the most important leaders of the SEIU and it has had a strong independent role in the SEIU. The drive by the International to merge various janitor’s locals did not begin in San Francisco. Janitors Local 399 in Los Angeles was also put in trusteeship despite massive resistance by the membership and after a sit-in at their union offices by the rank and file.
At the time. then SEIU President John Sweeney sent Bill Fletcher, his personal assistant to Los Angeles and he persuaded the janitors to call off their sit-in in return for local control by the membership of the local. Instead, after the sit-in and hunger strike was called off, Sweeney put the local in trusteeship and then split the local into two with 399 becoming the hospital section of the union and 1877 becoming the janitor section of the union. Rank and file janitors had won the majority of positions on the SEIU 399 executive board and wanted to end the business unionism of the local. Once contracts are signed in the Local the International pushes collaboration with the employers and in many cases refuses to back up militant action to defend workers’ rights. Presently, the International is supporting the merger of all healthcare locals in California into SEIU Local 250. SEIU 250 with the encouragement of former President John Sweeney had supported the labor-management "partnerships" at Kaiser and other healthcare facilities. This led at Kaiser to contracts that provided bonuses to phone call workers who turned away patients from Doctors. http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/3285986.htm It also recently led to SEIU 250 uniting with convalescent home bosses to support legislation that would limit elderly and disabled patients suing from being neglected, sexually abused or killed. http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2004-06-30/smith.html
The battle in San Francisco over local autonomy was not limited to Local 87 and Local 1877. Local 14 representing apartment building doormen and others was also merged with many members in opposition to their loss of autonomy and local control.
Janitors at the meeting of the United Service Workers For Democracy meeting reported that their wage increases had declined while janitors in Oakland and other areas received larger increases. Many argued that janitors in San Francisco under the leadership of President Mike Garcia, Vice President Tom Csekey and International Vice President Eliseo Medina had allowed wages and benefits to decline as they increased wages and benefits outside San Francisco. In 2002 Medina under the direction of Andy Stern put the local in trusteeship and promised "We will absolutely not cut benefits," Medina said after taking the over, "We will not cut pay."
They also were angry that building managers had been allowed to replace long-term workers with new workers and thereby violated their seniority rights. The meeting was attended by hundreds of janitors.
Janitors also complained that the union hiring hall had been eliminated by the previous administration led by President Richard Leung. Leung who now works for the California Nurses Association (CNA) had resisted the trusteeship according to many union members only when he discovered that he would not be running the Northern California region of the janitors. He then helped initiate the formation of United Service Workers For Democracy but did not attend the convention held by the local this weekend.
The meeting was also attended by members of the independent union Public Workers Local 1 who represent 15,000 workers in Northern California. They congratulated the janitors for their fight for independence and declared that they would help them in their efforts. The newly organized union is represented by Dan Siegle who was formerly the president of the Oakland Board of Education. He and his associates spoke at the meeting about the what would happen to the worker’s pensions if they voted to decertify.
Historically, ethnic divisions have also dominated Local 87. Feuding between Latino, Arabs and Chinese within the local had brought literally hundreds of picket lines over the last 5 years. One result however of the forced merger of Local 87 into SEIU Local 1877 is that for the first time in many years janitors from every nationality have united to bring back local autonomy from the International.
The recent national convention of the SEIU also held in San Francisco was leafleted by these same San Francisco janitors. At the convention, the Stern administration pushed through a further centralization of their apparatus. Arguing that the administration needs more control of the locals in order to bargain with multi-national corporations. They prevented a debate at the convention on regional bargaining bodies representing tens of thousands of janitors and healthcare workers that would be handpicked by the management of the union. Many delegates at the national convention were concerned that the railroading of these structural changes were preventing the voice of the rank and file from being heard.
In fact when SEIU Local 415 delegates from Santa Cruz sought to allow a debate on the this resolution, they were prevented from having a voice on the issue and a number felt like walking out of the convention.
The convention for many seemed like a virtual "coronation" of the Stern presidency. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent on corporate video PR and entertainment lauding the achievements of the international officers in increasing the membership of the International.
San Francisco janitors and other SEIU members around the country were also enraged by the massive increase in the dues without vote of the local membership by $6 to $7 a month. Janitors outside San Francisco earn close to minimum wages yet their dues have had major increases. Stern plans to spend $65 million dollars in supporting Kerry in this election cycle.
Janitors however seemed to have very little interest in the election. They do not see Kerry or any of the politicians solving or even addressing their struggle for survival as their cost of living increases while their real wages and healthcare benefits decline.
Steven Lerner, an appointee of President Andy Stern who is the SEIU Director of Building Services has argued that labor’s "structure" stands in the way of organizing and that the centralized "restructuring" of labor is necessary to organize the mass of unorganized workers. Rather than gaining power on the shop floor through struggle with the employers and a more democratic structure in the union, Lerner argues that unions must stop organizing the same industries, trade members and get even bigger so that they can be competitive with the power of the corporations. The growing anger and frustration among the rank and file however of many SEIU Locals and their feeling that they have been disenfanchized from any control in these forced "corporate" mergers is a growing danger for many AFL-CIO unions. Workers in many "statewide" locals of tens and hundreds of thousands of workers have no control of their business agents since they are all appointed by the President and since they have no local autonomy they have been excised out of any serious imput in the union policies. This corporatization of the unions and labor-management "partnerships" has led to decertifications in many other unions as well. 17,000 University of California clerical workers left AFSCME and formed an independent union called the Coalition Of University Employees (CUE) and most recently, thousands of mechanics left the IAM at United Airlines and Northwest Airlines for a craft union called AMFA. This growing threat has led to the AFL-CIO establishing a special committee to stop these decertifications but the failure to defend their members against take-backs and concessions combined with the total lack of democratic control is only adding fuel to fire within the membership.
The recent attack on the ILUW Local 10 initiated Million Worker March in Washington D.C. http://www.millionworkermarch.org by the President John Sweeney and the AFL-CIO for being a "diversion" and a threat to the "grassroots" campaign for Kerry has also angered many unionists throughout the country. The fear by top AFL-CIO officials of a mass independent workers mobilization could only further their growing crisis and paralysis in the face of the economic and political attack working people face in the US.
A vote on August 5 in San Francisco for the decertification of the SEIU and the victory of United Service Workers For Democracy would not only be a critical defeat for the plans for statewide janitor’s Local 1877 but would represent a threat to the continued centralization and forced mergers within the SEIU.
lvpsf [at] labornet.org
http://www.laboractioncoalition.org
For more information:
http://www.laboractioncoalition.org
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
I was once a member of SEIU Local 87, before it was taken over by the international, and merged with Local 1877. I left the union in 1999, as I had to stop working due to work related injuries. A major cause of this was the lack or representation that I received from the former Local 87 officials. When I was in the union, I heard many simular complaints from other janitors. When I heard of the merger, I was very happy and hoped that there would be an improvement. Unfortunately, this was not so. The janitors workloads only increased, and the Local 1877 officials did not provide any better representation than the former Local 87 ones. Last week, I was informed that the San Francisco janitors voted to decertify from SEIU, and form a separate union, the United Service Workers For Democracy. In a piece of campaign literature from the USWD that was sent to me, I read that a janitor dropped dead on her job at San Francisco's TransAmerica building. While it WAS campaign literature, I don't think that it was too far off the mark. Apparently the death was caused by a terrible heavy workload, which was so heavy that she didn't have time to take her lunch and breaks. The article stated that for the immediate 45 minutes before her passing, that she was subjected to prolonged verbal and psychological abuse, by her One Source Building Maintenance managers. When the janitor appealed to Local 1877 for help with her problems, apparently she was told by the business agents that "you are being paid very well to perform your assigned duties. If you don't like it, look for another job, because there are several members at the union who are able and waiting for an opportunity to take your job." I can relate to this, because I worked in some buildings, where the workload was unreasonably heavy, and I received simular responses from the Local 87 Business Agents.
With all that I wrote here, chances are that I would have voted against decertifying from the SEIU, were I still a janitor. Considering the fact that most of the janitors in the local are not American citizens and that so many don't speak English fluently, I don't see how they can run a union. The janitors need to have some affiliation with the AFL-CIO. However, I understand that the United Service Workers have an excellent attorney representing them, so hopefully my skepticism will prove false, and that their new union will be successful. What good does a union contract do, if the union members work in sweatshops, and if they can be suspended and fired anytime, without decent representation? If the AFL-CIO and the SEIU are not a part of the solution, then they are part of the problem. If organized labor is to grow, it must do a much better job in representing its members. It must stop simply blaming the Taft-Hartley Act, Reagan, Bush, and the Republicans, because many, NOT ALL, labor leaders are also to blame for labor's decline.
With all that I wrote here, chances are that I would have voted against decertifying from the SEIU, were I still a janitor. Considering the fact that most of the janitors in the local are not American citizens and that so many don't speak English fluently, I don't see how they can run a union. The janitors need to have some affiliation with the AFL-CIO. However, I understand that the United Service Workers have an excellent attorney representing them, so hopefully my skepticism will prove false, and that their new union will be successful. What good does a union contract do, if the union members work in sweatshops, and if they can be suspended and fired anytime, without decent representation? If the AFL-CIO and the SEIU are not a part of the solution, then they are part of the problem. If organized labor is to grow, it must do a much better job in representing its members. It must stop simply blaming the Taft-Hartley Act, Reagan, Bush, and the Republicans, because many, NOT ALL, labor leaders are also to blame for labor's decline.
I wrote this letter to Walter Johnson, President of the San Francisco Labor Council and to the labor council. Walter Ballin
Dear Mr. Johnson & San Francisco Labor Council:
I read your June 28th letter to the San Francisco janitors, calling upon them not to decertify from the SEIU. I am a former member of what was Local 87. I left the janitorial industry and the union in 1999, due to work related injuries, and received workers' compensation benefits. A major cause of my injuries was a lack of representation by SEIU Local 87. I am now retired and live in Chico. When I heard that the SEIU international took over Local 87 and merged it with Local 1877 in 2002, I was very pleased. Unfortunately, I was informed that Local 1877 didn't do any better than the former Local 87, in representing the janitors. Obviously, this was true. Otherwise two-thirds of the janitors would not have voted SEIU out. I was informed that the already very heavy workloads of the San Franicsco office building janitors continued to increase. I received some information about a janitor, who dropped dead on the job at the Trans-America building. Apparently the janitor's death was caused by a terrible heavy workload, which was so heavy that she didn't have time to take her lunch and breaks. The article stated that for the immediate 45 minutes before her passing, the janitor was subjected to prolonged verbal and psychological abuse, by her One Source Building Maintenance managers. I heard that often when janitors appealed to the Local 1877 business representatives, they were told "You are being paid very well to perform your assigned duties. If you don't like it, look for another job, because there are several members at the union who are able and waiting for an opportunity to take your job." I can relate to this, because I worked in some buildings, where the workload was unreasonably heavy, and I received simular responses from the Local 87 Business Agents.
If I were still a San Francisco janitor, I might have also voted to decertify from SEIU, and have the United Service Workers For Democracy represent me. When a labor union ceases to represent the members, it is the right of those workers to throw out that union, and seek representation elsewhere. What good does an SEIU contract that provides wages and benefits on paper do, if the janitors work in sweatshops? What good does such a contract do if the janitors can be downsized, suspended, and fired, and receive no union representation? This is pretty much what I went through, before I had to leave my position. If organized labor is to grow, it must do a much better job in representing its members. It must stop simply blaming the Taft-Hartley Act, Reagan, Bush, and the Republicans, because many labor leaders are also to blame for labor's dwindling membership. What is needed is a mass movement against oppression, all across the country. If the San Francisco Labor Council won't support workers who form new unions in their campaigns and strikes, as stated in your letter, then workers and other people from the grass roots will band together to fight the greedy employers. Below the underline, is a narrative of the last couple of years of my experience in SEIU Local 87 for your reference.
Sincerely Yours,
Walter Ballin
_______________________________________________________________________
In November 1997, the office building that I was working in became vacant. It was a Blue Shield building where I enjoyed an excellent work enviornment. After the building was vacated, the contractor (I was employed by) cut my hours from full-time to 27 hours and then to 12(one of the buildings that the contractor sent me to afterwards had gone non-union). This particular contractor had just taken over my building(the Blue Shield building that became vacant) one year prior. Under the union contract, that contractor took over my seniority of which I had 18 years. It was a small contractor and supposedly the contractor didn't have another building to place me in. I was forced to go back to the hiring hall and get dispatches to buildings that the prior contractor (whom I was employed by), cleaned. I lost all of my seniority. My pay went down from $13.75 per hour to something like $9.69 per hour. On several occasions, I made requests to the local to properly represent me, by arranging with the contractor to place me into a permanent position and restore my seniority and pay. I was repeatedly rebuffed in my attempts. During this time, I heard of many instances from reliable sources that there were new janitors obtaining jobs in buildings without ever having to follow the union's rules, by going to the hiring hall to obtain a dispatch. On one occasion, while working in a building where I had to obtain a dispatch, I found out that a 16-year-old fellow was working there without a dispatch. It was for one night. He happened to be the son of another janitor, whom the contractor allowed to come in and work. This was just one of many cases, where the Local 87 officials simply turned their heads. There was also a situation where a contractor, fired a foreman for sexual harassment. The local arranged for him to be hired on as a foreman for another contractor with full seniority. I heard that he even received $1.00 per hour more with the new contractor. There were many cases where janitors faced disciplinary action, including loss of income, for not being able to handle the heavy workloads. They did not receive proper representation from the local. In fact, one business agent actually told members that the problem was their fault. During this period, several Local 87 members of various ethnicities concurred with me about the wrongdoing on the part of the local's leadership. Many office buildings were going non-union. While a good part of that was because of greed on the part of building owners, part of that was because of the mismanagement of the local.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$210.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network