top
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Israeli conscientious objectors receive reduced sentences

by Electronic Intifada (repost)
GENEVA, PARIS -– The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, a joint program of FIDH and OMCT, welcomes the decision by the Military Parole Committee on July 14, 2004 to reduce the sentences of Haggai Matar, Matan Kaminer, Shimri Zameret, Adam Naor and Noam Bahat, conscientious objectors to the occupation of the Palestinian territories. Initially scheduled to be released in January 2005, they will now be released September 15, 2004.
On March 11, 2003 Ben Artzi was the first Israeli conscientious objector to be court martialled since the 1970’s. Jonathan Ben Artzi, despite once being noted as a “pacifist” by the Military Court, has served more than 8 sentences for the same offense of refusing to serve in the Israeli army. Jonathan Ben Artzi’s most recent sentencing was for two months, issued on April 21, 2004. He is currently serving an additional two month period for refusing to pay the fine associated with that sentence.

On April 15, 2003 Matar, Kaminer, Zameret, Naor and Bahat were court martialled as well for refusing to enlist in the army due to their selective conscientious objection to the occupation of the Palestinian territories. They were charged by the Israel Defense Forces disciplinary courts without the assistance of a lawyer or the hearing of any testimony concerning the crime of refusing to obey orders. On January 5, 2004 they were sentenced to a year in prison, after having spent a year in detention.

The Observatory recalls that the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention determined in is Final Opinion No. 24/2003 that although, at present, the rejection by a state of the right to conscientious objection cannot be considered incompatible with international law, the repeated penalties imposed on Jonathan Ben Artzi, Matan Kaminer, Adam Naor and Noam Bahat violate the principle on non bis in idem and therefore their detention is considered arbitrary. In addition, the UN Human Rights Committee, the interpretive body for the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), has stated that, “the [ICCPR] does not explicitly refer to a right to conscientious objection, but the [Human Rights] Committee believes that such a right can be derived from article 18 [of the ICCPR] inasmuch as the obligation to use lethal force my seriously conflict with the freedom of conscience and the right to manifest one’s religion or belief.” Israel ratified the ICCPR on December 19, 1966.

While the Observatory welcomes the decision of early release for these five selective conscientious objectors, they concurrently denounce the Israeli Military’s general disregard of due process in dealing with conscientious objectors. The Observatory urges the Israeli authorities to recognize the right to conscientious objection under the provisions of the ICCPR and to institute an alternative civil service option. Most urgently, the Observatory urges the Israeli authorities to comply with all international human rights norms and call for the immediate and unconditional release of Jonathan Ben Artzi and all prisoners whose sentences violate the principle of non bis in idem.

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article2934.shtml
§more
by maarivintl
It is now official: the five conscientious objectors, Noam Bahat, Shimri Tzameret, Haggai Matar, Adam Naor and Matan Kaminer, who are serving time in a civilian prison will be released early.

Against the recommendation of the military advocate general, a military committee of three officers, reviewed their case and decided that they would be released on Erev Rosh Hashanah (15 September).

It also recommended that the cases be reviewed by a military fitness board, which has the authority to release them from military service. The committee is parallel to the committee that considers the requests of civilian prisoners to have the sentences reduced by one-third for good behavior.

The committee praised the five’s desire to serve Israeli society, “This a group of young people who have expressed their desire to contribute to society in the future. Their behavior before their violation indicates that they are very likely to the to actually do so”. The committee received letter from other prisoners, thanking the five for their contributions to others in prison.

The committee rejected the military advocate’s request to delay the decision to a date closer to its implementation and did not require them to express regret because “a lack of regret does not indicate that these prisoners might endanger society”.

The decision further notes that repetition of the violation in the future is dependent on the IDF’s decision about how to relate to them after their release.

Doron Matar, the father of Haggai, to NRG Maariv, “The military advocate received a blow and that is consolation. Throughout the entire process, the army has behaved inappropriately. The fact that the committee did not require the five to apologize show that they finally understand that this is the Inquisition’.

The conscientious objectors received additional good news this afternoon when Attorney General Meni Mazuz’s office announced that the policy of not pressing charges against people who encourage conscientious refusal will be continued.

http://www.maarivintl.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=9785
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Critical Thinker
Sat, Jul 24, 2004 3:45AM
gehrig
Thu, Jul 22, 2004 10:48AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$150.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network