From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
It’s the Occupation, Stupid!
One can say the same to both Israel and the U.S. when they complain of terrorism and a lack of security. It’s the occupation, stupid!
The Israeli reaction to the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion regarding the legality of the Wall (or “Separation Barrier”) was as predictable as the verdict: absolute denial of both the saliency of the judgment itself and of the ICJ’s fundamental authority to even pronounce an opinion at all. The verdict was so damaging to Israel not because it fears UN sanctions—the U.S., for one, would never permit that—but because it directly challenges Israel’s PR line: that the problem is Palestinian terrorism and not its own increasingly brutal 37-year military occupation of Palestinian lands. For years Israel has presented itself as “the only democracy in the Middle East,” a small peaceful country fallen victim to an intractable Palestinian aggressor, a normal place, like Manhattan, smitten for no fathomable reason by terrorism.
In one fell swoop the ICJ, and through it the international community, destroyed that carefully cultivated image. No, it declared in a loud and clear voice, you are not an innocent victim. You are a powerful country with overwhelming military force that is holding almost four million Palestinians in bondage with no regard whatsoever for their fundamental human rights. The wall you are building deep in the occupied West Bank constitutes a grave violation of international law, and you must be held accountable. It is not a security barrier as you would have us believe, but a political border concealing a massive land grab, effectively alienating thousands of farmers from their fields, imprisoning tens of thousands of Palestinians in walled enclaves. True, you have a right to security, but you also have a solemn obligation under the Fourth Geneva Convention to ensure the well-being of the civilian population under your control. The route of the wall is so invasive of Palestinian territory, so far from the 1967 border that constitutes your security line, so disproportionate in the balance between security for your people and repression of an entire Palestinian population that it simply cannot be justified in either security or legal terms.
In particular, the ICJ ruling challenged Israel’s presentation of itself as innocent victim merely protecting itself. This has always been Israel’s most disingenuous way of avoiding accountability for its actions. For a victim has no responsibility, cannot be held accountable. Thus Israel is the world’s fourth largest nuclear power, yet still retains the image of the poor little kid in what former Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu used to call a “neighborhood of bullies.” Israel produces 10 percent of the world’s arms and is a main conduit for the arms its strategic ally, the United States, disseminates to malevolent regimes around the globe, yet it is the weak party, the victim, in its conflict with the Palestinians. Israel is an occupying power that has demolished 11,000 Palestinian homes since 1967, that has expropriated hundreds of thousands of acres of Palestinian land for its own settlements, has attacked densely populated civilian centers in cities such as Rafah, Ramallah, Jenin, Bethlehem, Nablus and Hebron with tanks, bombs, artillery, laser-guided missiles and snipers, yet evades accountability for state terrorism. Israel has an economy three times larger than Egypt, Palestine, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon put together, but has created a situation where some 70 percent of the Palestinians live on less than two dollars a day, yet avoids its responsibility towards the innocent population it rules.
One word characterizes the Israeli response to both Palestinian suffering and to attempts, such as those of the UN and the ICJ, to hold Israel accountable under international law: impunity. This is easy to understand. Almost coincident with the ICJ ruling, the United States Congress voted almost unanimously (407-12) to endorse the radical change in U.S. policy induced by Bush at Sharon’s behest. Henceforth Israel will not be required to withdraw from all the territories it conquered in 1967 nor from its major settlement blocs. Against the entire corpus of international law and with absolute impunity towards Palestinian human rights, the U.S. Congress effectively recognized a new apartheid situation of Israel over Palestine.
One can say the same to both Israel and the U.S. when they complain of terrorism and a lack of security. It’s the occupation, stupid! Our only chance of bringing peace, justice, prosperity and progress to this battered world of ours is through a truly New World Order based on international law and human rights. Occupation and repression are the infrastructure of terror. This is the message of the ICJ, and we ignore it at our peril.
In one fell swoop the ICJ, and through it the international community, destroyed that carefully cultivated image. No, it declared in a loud and clear voice, you are not an innocent victim. You are a powerful country with overwhelming military force that is holding almost four million Palestinians in bondage with no regard whatsoever for their fundamental human rights. The wall you are building deep in the occupied West Bank constitutes a grave violation of international law, and you must be held accountable. It is not a security barrier as you would have us believe, but a political border concealing a massive land grab, effectively alienating thousands of farmers from their fields, imprisoning tens of thousands of Palestinians in walled enclaves. True, you have a right to security, but you also have a solemn obligation under the Fourth Geneva Convention to ensure the well-being of the civilian population under your control. The route of the wall is so invasive of Palestinian territory, so far from the 1967 border that constitutes your security line, so disproportionate in the balance between security for your people and repression of an entire Palestinian population that it simply cannot be justified in either security or legal terms.
In particular, the ICJ ruling challenged Israel’s presentation of itself as innocent victim merely protecting itself. This has always been Israel’s most disingenuous way of avoiding accountability for its actions. For a victim has no responsibility, cannot be held accountable. Thus Israel is the world’s fourth largest nuclear power, yet still retains the image of the poor little kid in what former Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu used to call a “neighborhood of bullies.” Israel produces 10 percent of the world’s arms and is a main conduit for the arms its strategic ally, the United States, disseminates to malevolent regimes around the globe, yet it is the weak party, the victim, in its conflict with the Palestinians. Israel is an occupying power that has demolished 11,000 Palestinian homes since 1967, that has expropriated hundreds of thousands of acres of Palestinian land for its own settlements, has attacked densely populated civilian centers in cities such as Rafah, Ramallah, Jenin, Bethlehem, Nablus and Hebron with tanks, bombs, artillery, laser-guided missiles and snipers, yet evades accountability for state terrorism. Israel has an economy three times larger than Egypt, Palestine, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon put together, but has created a situation where some 70 percent of the Palestinians live on less than two dollars a day, yet avoids its responsibility towards the innocent population it rules.
One word characterizes the Israeli response to both Palestinian suffering and to attempts, such as those of the UN and the ICJ, to hold Israel accountable under international law: impunity. This is easy to understand. Almost coincident with the ICJ ruling, the United States Congress voted almost unanimously (407-12) to endorse the radical change in U.S. policy induced by Bush at Sharon’s behest. Henceforth Israel will not be required to withdraw from all the territories it conquered in 1967 nor from its major settlement blocs. Against the entire corpus of international law and with absolute impunity towards Palestinian human rights, the U.S. Congress effectively recognized a new apartheid situation of Israel over Palestine.
One can say the same to both Israel and the U.S. when they complain of terrorism and a lack of security. It’s the occupation, stupid! Our only chance of bringing peace, justice, prosperity and progress to this battered world of ours is through a truly New World Order based on international law and human rights. Occupation and repression are the infrastructure of terror. This is the message of the ICJ, and we ignore it at our peril.
For more information:
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/article...
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
>>>In one fell swoop the ICJ, and through it the international community, destroyed that carefully cultivated image. No, it declared in a loud and clear voice, you are not an innocent victim. You are a powerful country with overwhelming military force that is holding almost four million Palestinians in bondage with no regard whatsoever for their fundamental human rights. The wall you are building deep in the occupied West Bank constitutes a grave violation of international law, and you must be held accountable. It is not a security barrier as you would have us believe, but a political border concealing a massive land grab, effectively alienating thousands of farmers from their fields, imprisoning tens of thousands of Palestinians in walled enclaves.<<<The above article>>>
<<One can say the same to both Israel and the U.S. when they complain of terrorism and a lack of security. It’s the occupation, stupid!>>
I cannot understand why there are people determined to justify everything terrorists do. Terrorists have murdered thousands of people both in Israel and in the US. However, you put the blame on the victims.
How are you doing so? One could imagine you have something to do with terrorism. However, I prefer to think the rreason why you are justifying acts of terror is ignorance.
You mistake causes for consequences and viceversa. What was first, Israel attacking the Arabs or the Arabs attacking the Israelis?
<< The Israeli reaction to the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion regarding the legality of the Wall (or “Separation Barrier”) was as predictable as the verdict: absolute denial of both the saliency of the judgment itself and of the ICJ’s fundamental authority to even pronounce an opinion at all. >>
Why is the Israeli security barrier “illegal” and the many barriers and walls in other countries are legal? Why is Israel so special? As far as the UN is concerned, is it legitimate that somebody explodes on a bus loaded with people? Is it a legitimate action to launch missiles at Israel?
< The verdict was so damaging to Israel not because it fears UN sanctions—the U.S., for one, would never permit that—but because it directly challenges Israel’s PR line: that the problem is Palestinian terrorism and not its own increasingly brutal 37-year military occupation of Palestinian lands. For years Israel has presented itself as “the only democracy in the Middle East,” a small peaceful country fallen victim to an intractable Palestinian aggressor, a normal place, like Manhattan, smitten for no fathomable reason by terrorism. >>
What do you call “occupation”? What is Israel “occupaying”? Do you mean that Israel is “Palestinian occupied territory”?
I cannot understand why there are people determined to justify everything terrorists do. Terrorists have murdered thousands of people both in Israel and in the US. However, you put the blame on the victims.
How are you doing so? One could imagine you have something to do with terrorism. However, I prefer to think the rreason why you are justifying acts of terror is ignorance.
You mistake causes for consequences and viceversa. What was first, Israel attacking the Arabs or the Arabs attacking the Israelis?
<< The Israeli reaction to the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion regarding the legality of the Wall (or “Separation Barrier”) was as predictable as the verdict: absolute denial of both the saliency of the judgment itself and of the ICJ’s fundamental authority to even pronounce an opinion at all. >>
Why is the Israeli security barrier “illegal” and the many barriers and walls in other countries are legal? Why is Israel so special? As far as the UN is concerned, is it legitimate that somebody explodes on a bus loaded with people? Is it a legitimate action to launch missiles at Israel?
< The verdict was so damaging to Israel not because it fears UN sanctions—the U.S., for one, would never permit that—but because it directly challenges Israel’s PR line: that the problem is Palestinian terrorism and not its own increasingly brutal 37-year military occupation of Palestinian lands. For years Israel has presented itself as “the only democracy in the Middle East,” a small peaceful country fallen victim to an intractable Palestinian aggressor, a normal place, like Manhattan, smitten for no fathomable reason by terrorism. >>
What do you call “occupation”? What is Israel “occupaying”? Do you mean that Israel is “Palestinian occupied territory”?
Why is the location of the fence the problem? The Palestinians were killing Israelis long before the fence. In fact, terrorism is the reason why Israel is installing the barrier.
The occupation is the real root cause of Palestinian freedom fighters being blamed for any "terrorism."
There is nothing wrong with Israel wanting to build a wall/fence/barrier, the problem is where they build it. They could easily have built it just inches inside the pre 1967 border, they could easily put guard towers along that border/barrier and have their military in those towers to guard the border from any type of harm. But no they have to build the barrier inside the West Bank even though we are trying to work on the Road Map to Peace which calls for a Viable Palestinian State, so that the freedom fighting (suicide bombings, the desperate act of a people without an army to fight for their freedom) can end and you can have two Peaceful nations living side by side just like any other nation with Borders.
France has Borders with Spain....The U.S. has Borders with Canada.
Does France build a barrier inside the borders of Spain?
Does the U.S. build a barrier inside the borders of Canada?
Why does Israel build its barrier inside the West Bank.
If you have an acre of land and your neighbor has an acre next to you, and you decide you do not like your neighbor and you want a wall, do you put your fence on your property line or do you put your fence ten feet inside the property that belongs to your neighbor you do not like? Won't putting the wall inside your neighbors land make him angry at you and just cause more conflict and hate?
The solution is so simple build the barrier on the pre 1967 border not on land that is under Occupation or as you like to say land that is under dispute is it not better to build the barrier on land that is not under dispute? on land that is NOT needed for the Viable Palestinian State called for in the Road Map to Peace.
France has Borders with Spain....The U.S. has Borders with Canada.
Does France build a barrier inside the borders of Spain?
Does the U.S. build a barrier inside the borders of Canada?
Why does Israel build its barrier inside the West Bank.
If you have an acre of land and your neighbor has an acre next to you, and you decide you do not like your neighbor and you want a wall, do you put your fence on your property line or do you put your fence ten feet inside the property that belongs to your neighbor you do not like? Won't putting the wall inside your neighbors land make him angry at you and just cause more conflict and hate?
The solution is so simple build the barrier on the pre 1967 border not on land that is under Occupation or as you like to say land that is under dispute is it not better to build the barrier on land that is not under dispute? on land that is NOT needed for the Viable Palestinian State called for in the Road Map to Peace.
The barrier is not the problem or where it is being installed. The Palestinians have been attacking Israel long time before the fence was installed.
France doesn't build a fence inside Spain, but Spain isn't attacking France. And Spain has its borders since at least Roman times, while the Palestinians have no borders because they have no country.
Besides there are countries which have built walls inside other countries. Morocco has built a wall inside Western Sahara, which they are occupying. Why the UN say nothing about it?
France doesn't build a fence inside Spain, but Spain isn't attacking France. And Spain has its borders since at least Roman times, while the Palestinians have no borders because they have no country.
Besides there are countries which have built walls inside other countries. Morocco has built a wall inside Western Sahara, which they are occupying. Why the UN say nothing about it?
What do you call "occupation", if I may ask?
The occupation is the existence of any Jews in historical Palestine. Their very presence there subjugates Palestinians almost by definition. That's the real root cause of Palestinian freedom fighters being blamed for any "terrorism."
At least you are being clear. However, permit me express my disagreement. "Palestine" is the name the Romans gave to the Jews' land, and there have always been Jews living there.
Besides the modern state of Israel is as legitimate as any other .
What has never existed is an Arab Palestine. And the now so-called Palestinians have always refused to have their own state. They refused when it was offered to them in 1947, and later on they have signed accords they have always breached.
The Palestinians are not oppressed by Israel but by their own authorities, which want to have them in permanent war and use the international aid to pay terrorists and to become rich themselves, instead of using this aid to improve the living conditions of the people.
Besides the modern state of Israel is as legitimate as any other .
What has never existed is an Arab Palestine. And the now so-called Palestinians have always refused to have their own state. They refused when it was offered to them in 1947, and later on they have signed accords they have always breached.
The Palestinians are not oppressed by Israel but by their own authorities, which want to have them in permanent war and use the international aid to pay terrorists and to become rich themselves, instead of using this aid to improve the living conditions of the people.
Those people you call "freedom fighters" are terrorists. They are not fighting for freedom but aiming to exterminate others. And then they will attack non-Jews, which, in fact, they have already started to do.
Being myself a potential victim, I stand for my brothers in victimhood, that is to say, the Jews.
I also said (I think a couple of days ago) that the Palestinians had more freedoms under Israeli rule, which were supressed as soon as power was handed over to the PA.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network