From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Kerry position paper outlines support for Israel, promises not to negotiate with Arafat
WASHINGTON - In a position paper outlining his stance on Israel, Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry promises not to negotiate with Yasser Arafat and expresses support for Israel's right to defend itself by attacking terrorist organizations.
The paper, entitled "John Kerry: Strengthening Israel's Security and Bolstering the U.S.-Israel Special Relationship," was sent in mid-June to a group of people in the Jewish community as part of the Kerry attempt to maintain contact with Jewish supporters in the United States and to clarify his positions on Israel.
Kerry, who previously spoke against the separation fence at a gathering of the Arab-American Institute, is now seeking to correct that impression: "The security fence is a legitimate act of self-defense erected in response to the wave of terror attacks against Israeli citizens."
The presumptive Democratic nominee also declares his opposition to transferring debate on the fence to international forums. The paper shows consistent support for Israel on all the issues at hand: Kerry backs Israel's disengagement plan and also the two central points in President Bush's letter to Prime Minister Sharon - the resettlement of Palestinian refugees in the Palestinian state, not within Israel, and recognition of Jewish population concentrations in the West Bank when establishing the permanent borders. "In light of demographic realities, a number of settlement blocs will likely become a part of Israel," Kerry wrote his supporters.
He further declared support for Israel's actions against Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terror organizations and recalled that he was a signatory to the motion of support for Israel passed by the Senate during Operation Defensive Shield.
On the issue of Palestinian leadership, Kerry declared that "Yasser Arafat is a failed leader and unfit partner for peace" and called for "his total isolation." He thereby aligned himself with Bush administration policy, and in contrast to former president Bill Clinton, who recently stated that despite his disappointment with Arafat, negotiations should be conducted with him.
Kerry lists additional issues on which he supports Israel: the battle against cutting foreign aid to Israel; calling upon the United Nations to evince a more balanced approach to the conflict; support for moving the American embassy to Jerusalem; international action against regimes that support terror; and maintaining Israel's military supremacy.
Seeking to set himself apart from Bush on several issues, Kerry blasts Saudi Arabia and promises to act against anti-Semitic statements by senior Saudi government officials. "As president, he will never permit these kinds of attacks to go unanswered," the paper promises.
Sources in his campaign said that the paper and other letters sent in recent weeks to supporters in the Jewish community are intended "to educate and inform on his views, so there will be no doubt about his support for the state of Israel."
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/446429.html
Kerry, who previously spoke against the separation fence at a gathering of the Arab-American Institute, is now seeking to correct that impression: "The security fence is a legitimate act of self-defense erected in response to the wave of terror attacks against Israeli citizens."
The presumptive Democratic nominee also declares his opposition to transferring debate on the fence to international forums. The paper shows consistent support for Israel on all the issues at hand: Kerry backs Israel's disengagement plan and also the two central points in President Bush's letter to Prime Minister Sharon - the resettlement of Palestinian refugees in the Palestinian state, not within Israel, and recognition of Jewish population concentrations in the West Bank when establishing the permanent borders. "In light of demographic realities, a number of settlement blocs will likely become a part of Israel," Kerry wrote his supporters.
He further declared support for Israel's actions against Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terror organizations and recalled that he was a signatory to the motion of support for Israel passed by the Senate during Operation Defensive Shield.
On the issue of Palestinian leadership, Kerry declared that "Yasser Arafat is a failed leader and unfit partner for peace" and called for "his total isolation." He thereby aligned himself with Bush administration policy, and in contrast to former president Bill Clinton, who recently stated that despite his disappointment with Arafat, negotiations should be conducted with him.
Kerry lists additional issues on which he supports Israel: the battle against cutting foreign aid to Israel; calling upon the United Nations to evince a more balanced approach to the conflict; support for moving the American embassy to Jerusalem; international action against regimes that support terror; and maintaining Israel's military supremacy.
Seeking to set himself apart from Bush on several issues, Kerry blasts Saudi Arabia and promises to act against anti-Semitic statements by senior Saudi government officials. "As president, he will never permit these kinds of attacks to go unanswered," the paper promises.
Sources in his campaign said that the paper and other letters sent in recent weeks to supporters in the Jewish community are intended "to educate and inform on his views, so there will be no doubt about his support for the state of Israel."
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/446429.html
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
is this guy 'presuming' he has the nomination. Let's throw his ass out! He's not even a democrat.
WE WANT DENNIS KUCINICH!!
WE WANT DENNIS KUCINICH!!
Definition of APARTHEID: "An official policy of racial segregation formerly practiced in the Republic of South Africa, involving political, legal, and economic discrimination against non-whites."
Israel's policy toward the Palestinians is also being called "a new kind of apartheid, a crime against humanity, a form of genocide." Now let's take a look at this so-called" apartheid" within Israel. Within Israel today, Jews are a majority, but the large Arab minority (23% of total) are full citizens with voting rights and representation in the government. Under the former South African apartheid system, black South Africans could not vote and were not citizens of the country in which they were the overwhelming majority of the population. There is still some degree of discrimination within Israel, but Israeli Arabs have more political rights than any other Arabs in the Middle East... including their compatriots in the Palestinian Authority. And, whatever their grievances, they are still economically better off than the majority of their fellows in virtually every other Arab country. If they still face inequality it is because of the mutual hostility and mistrust between both communities, not because of race.
The situation for Arab Palestinians in the [West Bank and Gaza] territories, won by Israel in the 1967 defensive war begun by three surrounding Arab armies, is different. Israel's very real security requirements, brought about by two violent insurrections [Intifadas] in these "occupied" territories, have forced Israel to impose restrictions on their Arab residents which are not [yet!] necessary INSIDE Israel’s pre-'67 borders. This is because the Arab Palestinians in the territories dispute Israel’s right to exist whereas South Africa's blacks did not seek the destruction of South Africa... only the removal of the White apartheid regime.
Up until September 2000, when the Arab Palestinians from the [West Bank and Gaza] territories began their second violent "Intifada" and unleashed their non-stop Jew-killing, suicide bombing spree, they had been allowed to work inside Israel Proper and receive similar pay and benefits as did their Jewish counterparts. They were also allowed to attend schools and universities (which Israel built for them!). Palestinians were also given opportunities to run many of their own affairs. None of this was true for South African blacks.
Israeli Muslims, Christians, Druse and many other minority ethnic groups enjoy exactly the same civil and political rights as Jews. They can sit in the Knesset, say what they like, go where they like, pray where they like, go into business, be elected to office and serve in the Cabinet. The first Middle East country to grant Arab women the right to vote was Israel! And nowhere else in the Middle East is there a democracy where the word "vote" has any real meaning! The only exception is that Israeli Arabs do not serve in the army. There is nothing more hypercritical than a single one of the 64 Arab/Islamic/Muslim theocracies and brutal dictatorships pronouncing judgment on issues relating to "discrimination" since not a single one among them treats their minorities in the same tolerant way as does Israel.
As for Israel's "racially based" Law of Return," this policy has nothing to do with race and is based solely on religious affiliation. If it were racist, why did Israel airlift 42,000 BLACK Ethiopian Jews between 1984 and 1991? In anything, that airlift marked the only time in history when blacks were systematically moved from one country to another while NOT in chains! When Jordan (the FIRST Arab "Palestinian" state) introduced its own law of return in 1954 for all former non-Jewish residents of Palestine. Yet when Israel did precisely the same thing for Jews, it suddenly becomes "racism!" We call it a "double standard!"
Anti-Zionists (modern day disguise of anti-Semites) have leveled other discriminatory charges against Israel toward the Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza. Among them are that (1) Israel enforces different color license plates and computerized passes that restrict where West Bank and Gaza Arabs can go and (2) Israel builds "by-pass" roads for "Jews only."
In response to these charges... (1) All Israelis, whether they be Jewish, Christian or Arab, have the same color license plate. Only ["Palestinian"] Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza have a different colored license plate. This is for security reasons, especially at border crossings and other security checkpoints. This is similar to American and Canadian plates... the only real difference being that hardly any Canadians cross the border with the primary intent of killing Americans!!! (2) By-pass roads were built AROUND Arab areas because too many Jews were being slaughtered by Arabs on roads that went THROUGH Arab areas! They were not built to discriminate against Arabs. Nor were they built to give Jews a smoother ride. They were built to save Jewish lives!
Accusations such as the above are baseless. And who could ever believe that Israel's willingness to even DISCUSS handing over land (won in a war the Arabs started) to form a second independent Arab Palestinian state. Most "normal" people would have long ago concluded that the Arafat and his fellow Arab Palestinian psychopaths were never really interested in peace. Yet Israel's decades-long quest for peace, compromise and accommodation with these very same "Palestinians" is called a "crime against humanity" or a desire to commit "genocide" upon the Palestinians! If anything, it is the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizbollah and all the other Arab Palestinian terrorist groups themselves that brought about the Israeli crackdown in the "occupied territories" which led to the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians... in addition to different colored license plates and by-pass roads just for Jews!
Contrary to myth and propaganda, Israel is not an apartheid state. The largest practitioner of apartheid in the world is Islam, which practices both gender and religious apartheid. Those who accuse Israel of Apartheid are the true practitioners of Apartheid!
Israel's policy toward the Palestinians is also being called "a new kind of apartheid, a crime against humanity, a form of genocide." Now let's take a look at this so-called" apartheid" within Israel. Within Israel today, Jews are a majority, but the large Arab minority (23% of total) are full citizens with voting rights and representation in the government. Under the former South African apartheid system, black South Africans could not vote and were not citizens of the country in which they were the overwhelming majority of the population. There is still some degree of discrimination within Israel, but Israeli Arabs have more political rights than any other Arabs in the Middle East... including their compatriots in the Palestinian Authority. And, whatever their grievances, they are still economically better off than the majority of their fellows in virtually every other Arab country. If they still face inequality it is because of the mutual hostility and mistrust between both communities, not because of race.
The situation for Arab Palestinians in the [West Bank and Gaza] territories, won by Israel in the 1967 defensive war begun by three surrounding Arab armies, is different. Israel's very real security requirements, brought about by two violent insurrections [Intifadas] in these "occupied" territories, have forced Israel to impose restrictions on their Arab residents which are not [yet!] necessary INSIDE Israel’s pre-'67 borders. This is because the Arab Palestinians in the territories dispute Israel’s right to exist whereas South Africa's blacks did not seek the destruction of South Africa... only the removal of the White apartheid regime.
Up until September 2000, when the Arab Palestinians from the [West Bank and Gaza] territories began their second violent "Intifada" and unleashed their non-stop Jew-killing, suicide bombing spree, they had been allowed to work inside Israel Proper and receive similar pay and benefits as did their Jewish counterparts. They were also allowed to attend schools and universities (which Israel built for them!). Palestinians were also given opportunities to run many of their own affairs. None of this was true for South African blacks.
Israeli Muslims, Christians, Druse and many other minority ethnic groups enjoy exactly the same civil and political rights as Jews. They can sit in the Knesset, say what they like, go where they like, pray where they like, go into business, be elected to office and serve in the Cabinet. The first Middle East country to grant Arab women the right to vote was Israel! And nowhere else in the Middle East is there a democracy where the word "vote" has any real meaning! The only exception is that Israeli Arabs do not serve in the army. There is nothing more hypercritical than a single one of the 64 Arab/Islamic/Muslim theocracies and brutal dictatorships pronouncing judgment on issues relating to "discrimination" since not a single one among them treats their minorities in the same tolerant way as does Israel.
As for Israel's "racially based" Law of Return," this policy has nothing to do with race and is based solely on religious affiliation. If it were racist, why did Israel airlift 42,000 BLACK Ethiopian Jews between 1984 and 1991? In anything, that airlift marked the only time in history when blacks were systematically moved from one country to another while NOT in chains! When Jordan (the FIRST Arab "Palestinian" state) introduced its own law of return in 1954 for all former non-Jewish residents of Palestine. Yet when Israel did precisely the same thing for Jews, it suddenly becomes "racism!" We call it a "double standard!"
Anti-Zionists (modern day disguise of anti-Semites) have leveled other discriminatory charges against Israel toward the Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza. Among them are that (1) Israel enforces different color license plates and computerized passes that restrict where West Bank and Gaza Arabs can go and (2) Israel builds "by-pass" roads for "Jews only."
In response to these charges... (1) All Israelis, whether they be Jewish, Christian or Arab, have the same color license plate. Only ["Palestinian"] Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza have a different colored license plate. This is for security reasons, especially at border crossings and other security checkpoints. This is similar to American and Canadian plates... the only real difference being that hardly any Canadians cross the border with the primary intent of killing Americans!!! (2) By-pass roads were built AROUND Arab areas because too many Jews were being slaughtered by Arabs on roads that went THROUGH Arab areas! They were not built to discriminate against Arabs. Nor were they built to give Jews a smoother ride. They were built to save Jewish lives!
Accusations such as the above are baseless. And who could ever believe that Israel's willingness to even DISCUSS handing over land (won in a war the Arabs started) to form a second independent Arab Palestinian state. Most "normal" people would have long ago concluded that the Arafat and his fellow Arab Palestinian psychopaths were never really interested in peace. Yet Israel's decades-long quest for peace, compromise and accommodation with these very same "Palestinians" is called a "crime against humanity" or a desire to commit "genocide" upon the Palestinians! If anything, it is the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizbollah and all the other Arab Palestinian terrorist groups themselves that brought about the Israeli crackdown in the "occupied territories" which led to the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians... in addition to different colored license plates and by-pass roads just for Jews!
Contrary to myth and propaganda, Israel is not an apartheid state. The largest practitioner of apartheid in the world is Islam, which practices both gender and religious apartheid. Those who accuse Israel of Apartheid are the true practitioners of Apartheid!
First, let’s look at the apartheid within the area *controlled* by Israel, which includes all of the Land of Palestine, not just Israel “proper.” Even in Israel “proper” Jews have more rights than non Jews. And Israel “proper” is nothing but one zone of Occupied Palestine. In the other two zones of Occupied Palestine, non Jews have *no* rights whatsoever. More than half the people who live there were born under Israeli occupation. They have *never* had any rights, not once in their lives.
That’s apartheid.
That’s apartheid.
First, let’s look at the apartheid within the *entire* area controlled by Musliim Arabs, which includes part of the Land of Israel, not just Arab states. Even in PA areas, Muslim Arabs have more rights than non Muslims. And PA ares are nothing but Occupied Palestine. In the other zones of Palestine, non Jews have *much more* rights thatnks to the Zionists. All the people who live in PA areas now have much less rights and freedoms than they had had under Zionist Occupation.
That’s apartheid.
That’s apartheid.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network