Will SF MARRY-IN run till 11AM Tuesday?

Judges Warren and Quidachay are the 2 law and motion judges, Warren being in Dept. 301 and Quidachay in 302, both at 400 McAllister, across the street from City Hall. Calling the courts is an endless loop of phone numbers, all of which can be found at:
http://sfgov.org/site/courts_page.asp?id=3673
In Law and Motion, tentative rulings are given on the court day before. If you know the action number, you could get the tentative ruling. My guess on these two cases is that the ruling is simply that all parties must appear.

The judges do not have to issue the requested injunctions. This is a civil rights issue and I am sure the judges can come up with a civil rights law, if not the US Constitution itself, to justify same sex marriage licenses. More likely, they could toss both suits saying that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing or they did not meet some technical requirement. The fascists would then have to appeal, thus making these 2 cases test cases, which is obviously what is wanted, perhaps more by the pro-same sex marriage license people, because Prop 22 is the law that is being challenged. Conversely, they could both issue the injunctions, which the pro-gay marraige people could appeal, also making these 2 cases test cases.

With gay marriage being allowed in some European countries and 2 Canadian provinces, and with a very large and strong gay rights movement in this country, these anti-gay marriage laws like Prop 22, supported by Democrats Clinton, Gray Davis and others, as well as Republicans, are sure to fall sooner or later.

One thing we all know is that by the end of this decade, the 39% of us who voted No on 22 will become 51% as the gay rights issue is a generational issue, with the younger generations more supportive of gay rights than older generations, overall, with due respect to those older people who voted No on 22 and support gay marriage. After all, we have had 34 years of gay rights parades in this country, so the people under age 44 have no memory of the terrible era before the current gay liberation movement, when all of this would simply have been unthinkable.

This is certainly an historic moment, but much more needs to be done to address the needs of the workingclass, namely eliminating poverty, to make possible any advances in civil rights. Court cases are not enough; a civil rights movement needs a broad base of support, rooted in the community that has the least vested interest in maintaining the rotten status quo, namely the workingclass. To advance, the gay liberation movement must build more alliances with the workingclass. That was the lesson of the great gay liberation freedom fighter, Harvey Milk, who organized labor, tenants, non-whites and gays (overlapping groups, of course) to make possible his election to the Board of Supervisors as the first openly gay supervisor in San Francisco in 1977. Milk's weakness was that he was a registered Democrat. There can be no advances with the Democratic Party. He succeded in spite of the Democratic Party. There is certainly no advancing with election-frauder, anti-tenant Gavin Newsom.

Has anyone heard if the courts rule against us if there is a demonstration planned? I'm looking everywhere and can't find any information.

Thanks.