top
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Chron's Attempt to Manipulate Voters with Homeless Series Exposed

by repost
The Chron must have taken a beating in letters to the ed - they filled the whole section today with letters around the 'shame' series on the homeless trying to offset to ones that were negative. It seems those who write in support of the series have no actual experiences with homless people. One person even says - "A one- way Greyhound bus ticket back to their home county should be included in any benefits given by the city."
Editor -- As a former social worker who assisted homeless individuals, I was extremely disappointed in the first part of Kevin Fagan's series on homelessness. Instead of helping people understand the history of homelessness and how this country has systematically turned its back on the poor and mentally ill, we are treated to the same old sensationalized headlines, such as "Shame of the City'' and "Homeless Island,'' with pseudo-dramatic interviews of people with substance-abuse problems and most likely mental illness.
But don't get me wrong -- it is a shame, a shame on our nation, our society and our culture that while we can spend billions of dollars on foreign wars and homeland security, we cannot take care of the most vulnerable in our community. This is the true shame and it sits not only with the government, but with each and every one of us for letting it happen.

QUINTIN MECKE
San Francisco


'Exploitive' series
Edior -- Disgusting and despicable! The cynical and manipulative timing of your "series of articles'' just a week before the runoff election is one of the most callous and venal examples of the distortion and corruption of the press for partisan political purposes that I can imagine. To exploit the misery of your fellow human beings in such a transparent attempt to garner support for a political candidate is truly loathsome. It is to be hoped that it will backfire in much the same way as Angela Alioto's endorsement has.

PATRICK MONK
San Francisco


Editor -- Kevin Fagan should be commended for his excellent reportage. Monday's piece ("We're together'') on the Silver family was engaging and insightful.
I reserve less charitable sentiments however for The Chronicle. The decision to run a five-day series on homelessness just before the mayoral election is a blatant give-away to Gavin Newsom. It is unfortunate that such an interesting, in-depth series is shadowed by the noisome, dark cloud of political favoritism.

ARIC BRIGHT
San Francisco


Editor -- I've already become accustomed to The Chronicle's vilification of our city's indigents, the latest example being the Kevin Fagan/Brant Ward series, which focused on the "hardcore homeless'' on the front page.
What strikes me is your sense of timing. In the second section, you run your annual plea to give to people who just saw a reversal of fortune. Do you realize you're making a distinction of "worthy'' and "unworthy'' poor people by running both series concurrently? Apparently, the first thing the "hardcores'' need to escape their plight is a competent publicist.

T. J. JOHNSTON
San Francisco

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by hmm
While the papers did time this story to help Newsom they will have issues bringing up Newsom's policies on the homeless today since his agreement with Allioto was that she would determine the city's policies on this issue.

Thursday their coverage is about:
"San Francisco knows how to solve its problem with homelessness, but it needs decisionmakers to agree on a plan.
"
http://www.sfgate.com/gate/special/pages/2003/homeless/
So Im guessing before the Angela announcement they intended this series to end with an open Newsom endorsement.

While this is a "major" issue in the election, its rather a strange one to be the main issue. Homelessness is a serious problem for those who are homeless but the Chronicle has tried to turn it into an issue for the middle class with stories titled "Stench Town" (http://sfgate.com/) and other similar names. As with Newsom's campaign against the poor, the Chronicle walks a thin line, talking about the horrors of being homeless one second and then jumping to a form of dehumanizing demonization the next. Frequenly the articles will stress the humanity of the homeless while the headlines linking to them will stress that the homeless are a problem for the middle class and are less than human.

Its also sick how the Chronicle can carry pleas for the less fortunate on one page (http://www.seasonofsharing.org/) and then accuse people who help the poor of being "enablers" on another (http://www.sfgate.com/gate/special/pages/2003/homeless/). Helping the needy indirectly is a deep rooted part of most people's morality, but newspapers like the Chronilce try to seperate the giving from the getting. Giving to the poor indirectly is Christian (especially if the money and donated goods go to organizations with high overheads), whereas giving directly to the poor is "enabling".To the Chronicle and Newsom, poor people are merely pawns who can be condemned, humiliated and dragged through the dirt if it benefits their political interests.
by louise (weezlynch10 [at] yahoo.com)
the article "SHAME " is a bit overdue - it should be at least weekly news so that the ones who don't witness it on a daily basis wil act with those who do.

But it is the timing of this article that really fries me- talk about campaigning for gavin-how objectivedo you claim to be?
by Anti-Chronicle guy
For years, I've been wanting to slag off and/or other wise embarass the SF Chronicle's Christmastime "Season Of Sharing" shit. Truth be told, this should be known as the "Save the Landlords" fund. The shit-bags at the Chron raise money (and their own humanitarian profile) by hustling money from readers, through the Chron, to be provided to "service providers" -- i.e, landlords! This is like coming up with charity bread for pimps!

Any creative ideas on how to embarrass these fuckers over this? And in doing so, draw attention to the fact that homelessness is caused by the market, by commodity relations, by the fact that housing, like all else under the dictatorship of capital, exists to be sold for a profit, and not for the satisfaction of human needs...
by G Mauberret
The Silver Family should return to Vermont. A van is not a home and their children should be their primary concern in life--not turning down public housing or making excuses. If they are unable to do so then they should consider placing the children in temporary foster care while the mother receives vocational training. High blood pressure and osteoarthritis are not excuses for not working. If she is genuinely disabled, then she should apply for disability.
by 'ya
I've always thought that it isn't quite fair that wealthy people are in a position to itemize their taxes and so they can deduct charitable contributions, but most people who get wages can't get an accountant and take the standard deduction, so they can't deduct for charity. You know those car commercials on radio where they advise you to give your old car to them as a gift and deduct it from taxes - usually they have an overestimated value for the car - and in the end, everyone else has to pay more taxes to make up for these deductions, yet poorer people couldn't take such a deduction. I make $14,000/year and I just gave $250 to a wingnut in Berkeley who bags newspapers for a living and lives in some sort of office space and was about to become homeless, which the community doesn't need, and I can't deduct that charity.
by Tax Payer
Anyone can itemize their taxes whether you make $100K or $14K a year. If you need an accountant – try HR block to prepare your taxes or buying software like Turbo Tax. My guess is that at $14K a year you are better off taking just the standard deductions vs. itemizing.

And I thought the SHAME article in the SF Chronicle was very accurate of the homeless situation in SF from what I observed in the 10 years I lived in the city and one of the reasons why I moved from SF to the East Bay.
by An Observer
The Silver family parents are mentally disturbed. That is the reason the children are not allowed to live either with the grandparents or a temporary foster home until the parents get "back on their feet." Living in a van by choice has nothing to do with family values.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network